• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 41
  • 41
  • 12
  • 10
  • 8
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 6
  • 6
  • 5
  • 5
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
11

TECNOLOGIE DI GRUPPO / Group's Tecnologies

PARMIGIANI, DAVIDE 23 March 2009 (has links)
L’obiettivo della ricerca denominata “Tecnologie di Gruppo” è fondato su tre idee basilari: 1. a scuola è importante perseguire due tipologie di apprendimento: l’apprendimento individuale e quello di gruppo. Al momento, gli insegnanti organizzano le loro azioni didattiche maggiormente verso il primo tipo mentre il secondo è considerato un supporto per il primo; 2. a scuola, le situazioni più comuni di lavoro con le tecnologie non sono inline bensì principalmente offline, nella classe oppure nel laboratorio multimediale. Durante queste situazioni didattiche, è piuttosto usuale far lavorare in gruppo gli studenti. Quando un gruppo di studenti lavora con alcune strumentazioni tecnologiche, le interazioni fra i partecipanti tendono a modificarsi; 3. le nuove interazioni aumentano le possibilità per sviluppare apprendimenti collaborativi se gli insegnanti organizzano e progettano l’ambiente di apprendimento finalizzato a supportare la costruzione collaborativa della conoscenza e lo sviluppo delle competenze. L’espressione “Tecnologie di Gruppo” significa che le tecnologie (il computer, la tv, la videocamera e altri) può aumentare le possibilità di impostare lavori di gruppo dove gli studenti scambiano opinioni o idee, discutono un argomento oppure cercano di risolvere una situazione-problema, decidono come organizzare il lavoro del gruppo stesso. Nel gruppo con le tecnologie ci sono maggiori possibilità di feed-back cognitivi e relazionali fra gli studenti. La questione principale è gestire le differenti interazioni e permettere al gruppo di crescere e affrontare le situazioni-problema in cui il gruppo viene coinvolto. Quindi è fondamentale il ruolo dell’insegnante come conduttore della classe. All’inizio di un’esperienza didattica, il lavoro di gruppo è maggiormente “cooperativo”. Il compito, i ruoli e i passi sono stabiliti dall’insegnante. Successivamente, quando il gruppo è consapevole delle proprie abilità e potenzialità, l’insegnante può ampliare le possibilità gestionali e affidarle agli studenti. Essi possono scegliere i percorsi ritenuti più adatti per affrontare i problemi, distribuire i ruoli, condividere informazioni e altro. Il lavoro di gruppo diventa “collaborativo”. È necessario costruire un ambiente di apprendimento che integrato fra online e offline per allenare gli studenti al lavoro di gruppo. Tale ambiente si costituisce in tre situazioni principali: 1. lavoro di gruppo senza tecnologie; 2. lavoro di gruppo con tecnologie in classe (offline); 3. lavoro di gruppo online. La ricerca ha individuato interessanti progetti in atto in Italia ed in altri paesi. Le caratteristiche comuni sono le seguenti: c’è una piattaforma di apprendimento online (come Knowledge Forum o Moodle) dove gli studenti interagiscono, comunicano e lavorano insieme; gli insegnanti propongono attività su un argomento o una tematica disciplinare o trasversale; i lavori (individuali o di gruppo) procedono parallelamente in classe con o senza le tecnologie e continuano online, in modo che la rete sia percepita come un medium collaborativo; la progettazione delle attività è condivisa fra studenti e insegnanti. / The aim of research called “Group’s Technologies” is based on trhee basic ideas: 1. At school it’s important to pursue two kinds of learning: individual learning and team learning. At the moment, the teachers direct their acts above all to the first kind and the second one is relegate as a support for the first. 2. At school the situations more common for the work with ICT are not online but mainly offline in the classroom or in the room of computers. During these situations, it’s usual that the students work in groups. When a team of students works with some technologies, the interactions among the participants will change. 3. New interactions improve possibilities for collaborative learning if the teachers organize and plan the learning environment to foster and support the collaborative building of knowledge and the growth of competencies. The expression “Group’s Technology” means that technologies (computers or others) can increase the possibilities to build work’s groups where the students can exchange opinions or ideas, discuss a matter or on resolve a situation-problem, decide as to handle the job. In group with technologies there are more possibilities of feed-back by schoolfriends or by the computers. The main question is to manage the different interactions and to allow to the team to grow and to tackle the problems that the group’s situations involve. Therefore, it’s important the role of teacher as leader of the classroom. At the beginning, the work’s group will be more “cooperative”. The task, the roles in the groups and the steps of job are assigned by the teacher. Then, when the groups are aware of their abilities, the teacher can open the possibilities. The students can select the ways to solve the problems, share the rules, information and other. The work is getting “collaborative”. It’s necessary build a learning environment integrated between online and offline to train for group’s work. This environment is built by three situations: 1. group’s work without technologies 2. group’s work with technology in the classroom (offline) 3. group’s work online At the moment, I found some interesting projects in Italy and in other countries. The common peculiarities are: there is a learning platform online (like Knowledge Forum or Moodle) where the students can interact, communicate and work together; the teachers suggest some activities about a subject; the jobs (individual or team) proceed in the classroom with or without technologies and continue online, so the network is felt like a collaborative medium; the design of instruction is shared by students and teachers.
12

Conversational uses of the repertory grid for personal learning and the management of change in special educational needs

Cowne, Elizabeth Ann January 1994 (has links)
An action research design, incorporating the repertory grid as a framework for Learning Conversations, is used to examine the management of change for a group of teachers and their schools. The study sets out to analyse how individual, teachers, from twelve primary and middle schools, in three outer London boroughs, learnt about managing change in their schools, in relation to children with Special Educational Needs. To study how the school supported these individuals, Headteachers and Deputy Heads were also included in the research. The sample of teachers was chosen from those who had attended either of two sets of in-service courses on Special Educational Needs in Ordinary Schools. The first set of teachers had recently completed their course; the second had completed courses between five and eight years previously. This gave an opportunity to compare short-term and long-term learning outcomes from these courses. As the study progressed, so did the development of the use of the conversational techniques. Flexible Learning Conversations, which went beyond the repertory grid techniques, were developed, and the evidence showed that this improved individuals' ability to reflect on their work, thus gaining confidence for future action in their schools. It was, also possible to develop a procedure for small groups of participants to share their own constructs, elicited from personal grid conversations. This led, into a Group Learning Conversation, which also included future action planning. The research also examines the interaction of action research and the Learning Conversation using the repertory grid, in helping to develop reflective practitioners and effective schools. As co-ordinating tutor for both sets of in-service courses, as a co-ordinator of LEA support services in two of the LEAs, and in the role as action researcher, my personal learning has formed part of the research outcomes.
13

Educational value of group learning activities in MBA education : student perceptions and instructor intentions

Annandale, C.H. (Cornelius Henry) 10 June 2012 (has links)
The objectives of this study were to assess the perceptions of educational value of group learning held by students and compare it with the intentions of lecturers involved in the MBA programme. Eighty-two MBA students enrolled at the Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) of the University of Pretoria completed an online questionnaire, the results of which reflected an overall positive perception of educational value of group learning. However, negative perceptions of group dynamics, fairness and administrative processes also surfaced. There appears to be some evidence of racial undertones to the negative perceptions. These perceptions were significantly different between junior and senior students. Semi-structured interviews with lecturers and administrative staff revealed markedly different intentions and approaches to group learning. An awareness of the difficulties faced by students in group activities could be demonstrated, but different opinions were held on appropriate interventions. The study concludes with suggestions to improve identified weaknesses through a more focused educational approach. Such an approach would place greater emphasis on personal reflection and addressing of dysfunctional behaviour in groups, as part of a posited central skill in management.Copyright / Dissertation (MBA)--University of Pretoria, 2012. / Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) / unrestricted
14

Collaborative Group Learning and Knowledge Building to Address Information Systems Project Failure

Angelo, Raymond Fontana 01 January 2011 (has links)
Approximately half of the information systems (IS) projects implemented each year are considered failures. These failed projects cost billions of dollars annually. Failures can be due to projects being delivered late, over-budget, abandoned after significant time and resource investment, or failing to achieve desired results. More often than not, the failure of a project is not due to technical issues, but due to social and business-related problems. These issues can include a communication breakdown and lack of participation by project stakeholders; lack of a business case and success criteria for a project; failure to review project status, delays and revisions; and unrealistic schedules. While educators cannot address the issue of project failure in information systems directly, they can target the need to build collaboration skills and sensitivity to project business and social issues in students. The building of these skills and sensitivities can lead to more effective project team members and managers. Conversely, there is little evidence that higher education prepares students to be collaborators. One goal of this research was to determine to what extent students demonstrated group knowledge construction through online discussion of project issues presented in a real-world business scenarios. The Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing (IAM) was chosen to measure group knowledge construction through discussions in a series of project problem scenarios. A second goal was to determine to what extent the knowledge construction through group discussion increases students' perceived level of awareness of information systems projects' social and business issues. Both goals of this research were realized to some extent. This study demonstrated that by the use of scenarios to expose students to typical social and business causes of failure in information systems projects, awareness of these issues could be enhanced between the pre-test and post-test groups. This study also demonstrated that through participation in discussion groups, individuals can demonstrate significant growth in collaboration skills. Further research should examine a population that has more balance with regard to gender of the participants, and should consider the influence of "guided reflection" provided by instructors.
15

Instructional Design and Technology Student and Instructor Perceptions Regarding Collaborative Learning Groups

Jeffrey, Thomas Read 15 April 2010 (has links)
Collaborative group learning is a popular method of instruction that is used in a variety of academic disciplines but little is known about how it is perceived as an instructional approach. The purpose of this study was to discover how college-level learners and instructors perceive collaborative group learning in regard to value and benefit, role of the instructor, and factors that contribute to positive and negative collaborative experiences. A non-experimental study provided information about participants in the form of descriptive data, correlational statistics, and qualitative analysis. Findings indicated that collaborative group learning was valued because it supported the achievement of learning goals, was an effective method of learning, and held professional benefit. However, value and benefit were reported to be affected by a variety of factors, such as work and reward inequities, the social context of collaboration, and the appropriateness of the activity to the learning situation and objectives. Findings related to the instructor's role showed that students acknowledged and accepted ownership of group processes; however, they also indicated that they would like the instructor to play an active role in the collaborative activity to support the learning process. This and other instructor role findings indicate the complexity of balancing instructor functions, as highlighted in results that showed some learners and instructors preferred a hands-off approach on the part of the instructor, while other learners and instructors felt that instructor involvement was a necessity. Suggestions provided by learners and instructors regarding instructor functions that supported effective collaboration included such activities as mentoring collaborative behavior, monitoring group and individual progress, and providing clear expectations and guidance. Findings from this study may be useful for informing the design, development, and implementation of collaborative group learning activities by providing insight into the factors that contribute to effective collaborative experiences, as well as perceptual differences and similarities between the learners and instructors. / Ph. D.
16

GLOBE: Data-Driven Support for Group Learning / GLOBE: データ駆動型グループ学習支援システム

Liang, Changhao 25 September 2023 (has links)
京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(情報学) / 甲第24934号 / 情博第845号 / 新制||情||141(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院情報学研究科社会情報学専攻 / (主査)教授 緒方 広明, 教授 伊藤 孝行, 教授 田島 敬史 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Informatics / Kyoto University / DFAM
17

Sozial vermittelte Lernprozesse bei quantitativen Schätzaufgaben / Social learning processes in quantitative estimation tasks

Stern, Alexander 11 April 2017 (has links)
No description available.
18

Gymnasieelevers kommunikativa strategier i matematikklassrummet : En fallstudie av ett smågruppsarbete om derivata

Bergholm, Marie January 2014 (has links)
Denna fallstudie belyser gymnasieelevers arbete i små grupper med ett problem kopplat till derivata och syftar till att belysa faktorer som gynnar eller hindrar individernas deltagande i och utveckling av den matematiska kommunikationen i klassrummet. Studien har sin teoretiska förankring i Anna Sfards kommognitiva ramverk, där lärande i matematik ses som deltagande i en matematisk diskurs. Under mer än ett årtionde har larmrapporter om svenska elevers bristande kunskaper i matematik avlöst varandra. Forskningsrapporter pekar på olika faktorer bakom denna sjunkande kunskapsutveckling. Den rådande undervisningskulturen, där eleverna i hög grad arbetar individuellt med uppgifter ur läroboken, ses som en förklaring till de försämrade resultaten, och att undervisningen inte ger eleverna möjlighet att utveckla samtliga föreskrivna förmågor i ämnet. För att uppnå detta betonar både forskningsfältet och den nya läroplanen från 2011 vikten av att eleverna kommunicerar i matematik. I detta perspektiv finns ett behov av att belysa skillnader i elevernas deltagande i kommunikationen om matematik, inte minst i samband med lärande i smågrupper, och hur detta antas påverka elevernas förutsättningar till lärande. Studiens fokus är riktat mot deltagarnas olika bidrag till gruppens matematiska diskurs, det vill säga då eleverna kommunicerar om matematiska objekt eller processer, och hur dessa påverkar elevernas förutsättningar och deltagande i kommunikationen. Fokus är också riktat mot den kommunikation som handlar om deltagarna i gruppen, vad eleverna gör och hur de värderar varandras sätt att delta i den matematiska diskursen i klassrummet. Denna kommunikation, benämns i ramverket för subjektifiering och antas vara sammankopplad med individens lärande i matematik. Datainsamlingsmetoder som använts är intervjuer, audio- och videoinspelningar och användning av audiovisuella pennor för att sammanföra verbal och skriftlig kommunikation. Diskursen ses som den naturliga analysenheten. I analysens första steg studerades den matematiska diskursen avseende skillnader i innehållet i deltagarnas yttranden. I ett andra analyssteg fokuserades på interaktionsflödet i gruppen för att förstå mer av skillnader i varje elevs deltagande och bidrag till kommunikation. Studiens resultat visar på stora skillnader avseende deltagande och innehåll i elevernas kommunikation, både på grupp- och individnivå. Elevernas utveckling av den matematiska diskursen gynnas av användningen av flera olika mediatorer för att representera de matematiska objekten. När eleverna erbjuds kopplingar till en tidigare erövrad diskurs, leder det till diskursiva framflyttningar. Eleverna visar sig vidare ha stora svårigheter att tolka och använda det formella matematiska symbolspråket som stöd för matematiserandet. Elevernas tolkning av likhetstecknet, olikhetstecknet och symbolen f´(x) på en processnivå skapar hinder för att utveckla den matematiska diskursen i önskvärd riktning. Den diskurs som handlar om deltagarna och deras egenskaper (identifiering) utgör ca 10 % av samtliga yttranden och är i stort sett samtliga negativa omdömen, ofta använda i syfte att utesluta eller införliva sig själva eller andra från deltagande i matematiserandet. Forskningsstudien visar på ett behov av ytterligare kunskap om hur matematiklärare på bästa sätt kan organisera arbete i smågrupper för att öka elevernas engagemang och kvaliteten på elevernas matematiserande. Studien pekar vidare på vikten av att matematiklärare belyser och varierar användningen av olika mediatorer för att representera de matematiska objekt som är föremål för lärandet. Fallstudien belyser även vikten av att bygga upp det tillåtande arbetsklimat där eleverna inte bedömer sig själva och andra, utan istället vågar ställa de frågor som innebär att de blir alltmer delaktiga i den matematiska diskursen. Ett behov framträder av ytterligare forskning riktad mot inte bara mot den bedömning som sker mellan lärare och elev, utan också mot den bedömning som pågår i klassrummet mellan eleverna, vilket kan påverka vilka roller de väljer eller tilldelas i klassrummet. Detta kan antas vara av stor vikt för hur eleverna kommunicerar om matematik med andra deltagare i klassrummet, vilket också kan antas påverka lärandet. / This case study takes its focus on upper secondary school students’ work in small groups with a problem related to the derivative. The analysis aims to identify factors that promote or hinder an individual’s participation in and development of the mathematical communication in the classroom. The theoretical basis of the study is Anna Sfard’s commognitive framework, where learning mathematics is seen as participating in a mathematical discourse. For more than a decade, reports about Swedish students’ decreasing levels of school mathematical knowledge have been put forward. Research points to various factors behind this development. The prevailing educational culture, where students largely work individually from the textbook, is seen as one explanation for the deterioration in the results, and that teaching does not give students the opportunity to develop all the required competencies in the curriculum. To achieve this, both research and the new Swedish curriculum from 2011 emphasize the importance of student communication in mathematics. In this perspective, there is a need to highlight the differences in student participation in the communication of mathematics in the classroom, particularly in the context of small group learning, and how this is assumed to influence students’ opportunities for learning. The focus of the research is directed towards the participants’ contributions to the group’s mathematical discourse, i.e. when they communicate about mathematical objects or processes, and how these affect students’ opportunities and participation in the communication. Focus is also directed to the communication that involves participants in the group, what the students are doing and how they evaluate each other’s way to participate in the mathematical discourse in the classroom. This type of communication is in the framework referred to as subjectifying, and is assumed to affect the individual’s mathematical learning. Data collection methods used are interviews, audio and video recordings, as well as “smart pens” to combine verbal and written communication. In the first step of the analysis, the mathematical discourse was studied regarding differences in the content of the participants’ utterances. The second step of analysis focused on the interaction flow of the group to understand more of the differences in each student’s participation and contribution to the communication. The results point to big differences regarding participation and content in student communication, both at group level and individual level. The development of students’ mathematical discourse benefits from the use of multiple mediators to represent the mathematical objects. When connections to a previously acquired discourse are offered, this leads to discursive advancements. Students were observed to have difficulties to interpret and use the formal mathematical symbolic language that would support their mathematizing. Students’ interpretation of the equality sign, the sign for inequality, and the symbol f´(x) on a process level, create obstacles to developing the mathematical discourse in the desired direction. The discourse about the participants and their own traits  (identification) constitutes about 10% of all utterances and are almost all negative reviews, frequently used in order to exclude or incorporate themselves or others from participating in the mathematizing activity. This research study points to a need for more knowledge about how mathematics teachers can best organize work in small groups to increase student engagement and the quality of their mathematizing. The study also indicates the importance of mathematics teachers highlighting and varying the use of different mediators to represent the mathematical objects to learn. The case study also highlights the importance of building up a permissive environment in which students do not evaluate themselves and others, but instead dare to ask questions that will make them increasingly involved in the mathematical discourse. A need emerges for further research not only on the assessment between teacher and student, but also on the assessment that goes on in the classroom between the students, which can affect what roles they take or are assigned to in the classroom. This can be assumed to be of great importance to the way students communicate about mathematics with other students in the classroom, which is also likely to influence learning.
19

A study of the impact of cooperative small group facilitated case studies on student learning outcomes

Malin, Gregory Ryan 06 December 2007
A cooperative small group facilitated case-based learning method has been used in the medical college at the researchers educational institution since the 2003-2004 academic year. They were designed to be a supplement to a primarily lecture-based curriculum where it was believed that these cooperative cases helped students to develop a better understanding of the material taught in the lectures, although no rigorous investigations had been completed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of these cooperative facilitated small group cases on five specific outcomes which included: 1) achievement, 2) knowledge confidence, 3) student satisfaction, 4) students perceived time on task, and 5) the students perceptions of the degree to which they believed a facilitator helped them to learn the material. These outcomes for cooperative learning (CL) were compared with individual learning (IL) outcomes. Quantitative data on student achievement and knowledge confidence were collected using a pre-test post-test 10 multiple choice question quiz. A brief questionnaire was also distributed to students to collect data regarding student satisfaction, time on task and perceived helpfulness of the facilitator.<p>Fifty-nine medical students were randomly assigned to either the CL or IL cohort (cooperative cohort, n = 32; individual cohort, n = 27). All students were blinded to the purpose of the study until all data were collected at the end of the investigation. Students completed the 10 multiple choice question pre-test. After each question they rated their level of confidence (on a scale from 1 to 10) that they had chosen the correct answer. Immediately after completion of the pre-test, they worked on the case, either cooperatively or individually. One week after the pre-test and case, the students completed the post-test quiz with the same questions, as well as the questionnaire.<p>A repeated-measures MANOVA was used to compare achievement and confidence in the CL (n =19) and IL (n =13) cohorts. An alpha level of .05 was used for all statistical tests. Effect sizes (d) were calculated for within-group and between-groups comparisons for achievement and confidence. Descriptive data on student satisfaction, time on task and facilitator helpfulness were gathered from the questionnaire and compared between groups.<p> Within-group results from the study showed that CL had a greater impact on student achievement and confidence than IL (achievement, d = 0.57 vs. 0.16; confidence, d = 0.52 vs. 0.14). The results for the statistical analysis did not reach significance for achievement or confidence. Between-groups effect sizes were calculated for average pre- to post-test change for achievement and confidence (achievement, d = 0.35; confidence, 0.40). Students in the CL cohort reported spending more time on task before and during the case session and less after the session. They also reported greater levels of satisfaction with the learning experience than IL group. The majority of students (90.5%) in the CL cohort felt that the facilitator helped them to learn.<p>The findings from this study showed that this CL method had a greater impact on the five outcomes outlined above compared to the IL method. Students made greater gains in achievement and confidence. They also spent more time on task, and had higher levels of satisfaction with the learning experience. Students in the CL cohort also believed that the facilitator helped them to learn. Implications of the study include possible expanded use of the cases within the curriculum of this medical college although the demands of resources and curriculum content would have to be carefully considered.
20

A study of the impact of cooperative small group facilitated case studies on student learning outcomes

Malin, Gregory Ryan 06 December 2007 (has links)
A cooperative small group facilitated case-based learning method has been used in the medical college at the researchers educational institution since the 2003-2004 academic year. They were designed to be a supplement to a primarily lecture-based curriculum where it was believed that these cooperative cases helped students to develop a better understanding of the material taught in the lectures, although no rigorous investigations had been completed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of these cooperative facilitated small group cases on five specific outcomes which included: 1) achievement, 2) knowledge confidence, 3) student satisfaction, 4) students perceived time on task, and 5) the students perceptions of the degree to which they believed a facilitator helped them to learn the material. These outcomes for cooperative learning (CL) were compared with individual learning (IL) outcomes. Quantitative data on student achievement and knowledge confidence were collected using a pre-test post-test 10 multiple choice question quiz. A brief questionnaire was also distributed to students to collect data regarding student satisfaction, time on task and perceived helpfulness of the facilitator.<p>Fifty-nine medical students were randomly assigned to either the CL or IL cohort (cooperative cohort, n = 32; individual cohort, n = 27). All students were blinded to the purpose of the study until all data were collected at the end of the investigation. Students completed the 10 multiple choice question pre-test. After each question they rated their level of confidence (on a scale from 1 to 10) that they had chosen the correct answer. Immediately after completion of the pre-test, they worked on the case, either cooperatively or individually. One week after the pre-test and case, the students completed the post-test quiz with the same questions, as well as the questionnaire.<p>A repeated-measures MANOVA was used to compare achievement and confidence in the CL (n =19) and IL (n =13) cohorts. An alpha level of .05 was used for all statistical tests. Effect sizes (d) were calculated for within-group and between-groups comparisons for achievement and confidence. Descriptive data on student satisfaction, time on task and facilitator helpfulness were gathered from the questionnaire and compared between groups.<p> Within-group results from the study showed that CL had a greater impact on student achievement and confidence than IL (achievement, d = 0.57 vs. 0.16; confidence, d = 0.52 vs. 0.14). The results for the statistical analysis did not reach significance for achievement or confidence. Between-groups effect sizes were calculated for average pre- to post-test change for achievement and confidence (achievement, d = 0.35; confidence, 0.40). Students in the CL cohort reported spending more time on task before and during the case session and less after the session. They also reported greater levels of satisfaction with the learning experience than IL group. The majority of students (90.5%) in the CL cohort felt that the facilitator helped them to learn.<p>The findings from this study showed that this CL method had a greater impact on the five outcomes outlined above compared to the IL method. Students made greater gains in achievement and confidence. They also spent more time on task, and had higher levels of satisfaction with the learning experience. Students in the CL cohort also believed that the facilitator helped them to learn. Implications of the study include possible expanded use of the cases within the curriculum of this medical college although the demands of resources and curriculum content would have to be carefully considered.

Page generated in 0.1362 seconds