Thesis (MTech (Mechanical Engineering))--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2018. / A membrane distillation crystallization (MDC) experimental setup was designed, constructed and commissioned with rectangular mixing crystallizer tanks. The advantages and disadvantages of a rectangular mixing tank are compared to the traditional cylindrical mixing tank with baffling by means of a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis in Ansys Fluent. The effect of tank configuration and geometry on the hydrodynamic and mixing characteristics for efficient momentum, solid suspension, heat and mass transfer were investigated. The hydrodynamic conditions in a crystallizer-mixing tank determine the quality of fluid mixing essential for optimal crystallization. Forty-five degree pitched blade turbines (PBT) were used to provide the agitation in the stainless steel rectangular jacketed tanks. Clear polycarbonate replicas of the rectangular tanks were manufactured to visually observe the mixing process in the tanks. Silica particles were used to represent the calcium carbonate crystals in the experiment. The data gathered from these experiments showed that the tanks should be operated between 600 to 750 rpm in the CFD simulations to simulate partial to complete suspension. In the numerical simulations a rectangular tank was compared to a cylindrical tank with baffling of the same volume. The partial differential equations solved in the numerical simulation were the conservation of mass (continuity), conservation of momentum and additional turbulence equations. In order to solve the turbulent fluid flow characteristics, the industry standard two-equation model, namely the K-epsilon model was used. This model was refined by the addition of the Wen-Yu drag model, the Simonin turbulent dissipation and the Simonin et al. turbulence interaction models. The RANS based RNG (k-ε), derived from the instantaneous Navier-Stokes equation was selected as the preferred model to analyse the hydrodynamic flow fields in the tanks. The 3D sliding mesh method was used to compute a time accurate solution. The Eulerian-granular multiphase model was used to predict the degree of solids suspension in the tanks. The efficiency of mixing within the tank was measured by the tank’s ability to keep the crystals in suspension and preventing any particle from settling at the bottom for more than 1-2 second(s). The mixing tanks were initially loaded with 5% v/v, which equates to a loaded height of approximately 10 mm. The simulations were done with the use of the volume fraction function to visually observe the cloud height and gauge the homogeneity and distribution of the particulates within the fluid flow fields. The results from the experimental setup were compared to the CFD simulations to qualify the use of CFD simulations for the comparison of the geometrically different tanks. Lastly, the findings from the CFD simulations were used to compare the tanks and determine if the rectangular tank built for the MDC experiment perform satisfactorily to replace a standard cylindrical tank with baffling for this application.

In this thesis, we consider four different problems in membrane filtration, using a different mathematical approach in each instance. We account for the fluid-driven deformation of a filtercake using nonlinear poroelasticity in Chapter 2. By considering feeds with very high and very low particle concentrations, we introduce a quasi-static caking model that provides a suitable approximation to the full model for the physically realistic concentration regimes. We illustrate the agreements and differences between our model and the existing conventional cake-filtration law. In Chapter 3, we introduce a stochastic model for membrane filtration based on the quantised nature of the particles and show how it can be applied for feeds with different particle types and membranes with an interconnected pore structure. This allows us to understand the relation between the effects of clogging on the level of an individual pore and on the macroscopic level of the entire membrane. We conclude by explaining the transition between the discrete and continuous model based on the Fokker--Planck equation. In Chapter 4, we consider the inverse problem of determining the underlying filtration law from the spreading speed of a particle-laden gravity current. We first couple the theory of gravity currents with the stochastic model developed in Chapter~3 to determine a filtration law from a given set of experiments. We then generalise this idea for the porous medium equation, where we show that the position of the front follows a power law for the conventional filtration laws, which allows us to infer the clogging law in certain instances. We conclude the thesis by showing in Chapter 5 how we can combine experimental measurements for the clogging of a depth filter and simple fluid dynamics to accurately predict the pressure distribution in a multi-capsule depth filter during a filtration run.

O cultivo de microalgas é uma matéria prima para produção de biocombustível e de captura de carbono devido a vantagens como alta produção de biomassa e rápido crescimento quando comparado com outras fontes de energia e não necessitar de terra fértil. O presente trabalho teve como objetivo estudar métodos de concentração da biomassa. A microalga utilizada foi a Isochrysis galbana. Os cultivos tiveram duração de 20 dias e concentração inicial de 7.104 cel/mL no meio de cultivo F2/Guillard. e foram realizados em fotobioreatores de 500 mL, 3 L e 12 L. Os experimentos foram conduzidos em foto-período de 12 h claro/escuro, com temperatura de 27 a 29 C. Ao final dos cultivos, as amostras foram levadas para a sequência de processos de separação. Inicialmente, foram realizados ensaios de microfiltração em membrana com porosidade de 0,45 m em procedimento do tipo dead-end e constatou-se a rápida e intensa formação de camada de fouling. Acrescentou-se uma etapa de separação por floculação preliminar à microfiltração, utilizando-se Al2(SO4)3 como agente floculante. O meio coagulado foi então filtrado e microfiltrado. O estudo combinado das 3 etapas de separação possibilitou 99% de remoção de biomassa.O teor de óleo obtido foi de 22,4%. Portanto, o trabalho apresenta uma configuração de concentração da biomassa Isochrysis galbana visando o processo de produção de biocombustíveis / The cultivation of microalgae is a feedstock for biofuel production and carbon sequestration due to advantages such as high-biomass production and, fast growth when compared to other energy sources and does not require fertile land. This work aimed to study methods for biomass concentration. The microalgae used was Isochrysis galbana. The cultivation lasted 20 days and initial concentration of 70,000 cells / mL F2/Guillard culture medium and were performed in. Photobioreactors of 500 mL, 3 L and 12 L. The experiments were conducted in photoperiod of 12 h light / dark, temperature of 27-29 C. At the end of cultivation, samples were taken for the sequence of separation processes Initially, tests were performed on microfiltration membrane with 0.45 μm pore diameter in a dead-end procedure, and the rapid and intense formation of fouling layer was noted. One step of preliminary separation by flocculation previous to microfiltration was added to the process, using Al2(SO4)3 as flocculant agent. The coagulated medium was then filtered and microfiltered. The combined study of three separation steps allowed 99% removal of biomassa.O oil content obtained was 22.4%. Therefore, the work presents a configuration in biomass concentration of Isochrysis galbana aiming at the process of production of biofules

Thesis (Master of Engineering in Chemical Engineering)--Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2018. / Globally, water is considered an essential resource as it sustains human, animal and plant life. Water is not only essential for all forms of life but imperative for economic growth. The world’s population is increasing at a disquieting rate, which will result in an increased demand for fresh water and food security. The agricultural industry is the main consumer of global freshwater and utilises fertilisers in order to meet food demands. The demand for water in South Africa (SA) has increased considerably due to the rapid expansion of the agricultural industry, and of the municipal and industrial sectors. Agricultural developments in SA are affected greatly as the country is facing a current drought crisis as a result of low rainfall and large water demands. With an abundance of saline water globally, desalinisation will be a major contributor to solving the global freshwater crisis. With limited fresh water resources accompanied by the agricultural industry as a major consumer, alternative measures are required to desalinate water specifically for agricultural use. Forward osmosis (FO) is a membrane technology that gained interest over the past decade because it has several advantages over pressure-driven membrane processes such as reverse osmosis (RO). FO technology is based on the natural osmotic process which is driven by a concentration gradient between two solutions separated by a semi-permeable membrane. Naturally, water will permeate through the membrane from a solution of low solute concentration or low osmotic pressure (OP) known as a feed solution (FS) to a solution of a higher concentration or higher OP also known as a draw solution (DS). Whilst various research studies have contributed to several advances in FO, several process limitations such as reverse solute flux (RSF), concentration polarisation (CP) and membrane fouling remain problematic, hindering FO for large-scale applications. Further investigation is therefore warranted and crucial in order to understand how to mitigate these limitations to develop/improve future processes. The aim of this study was to evaluate a fertiliser-drawn forward osmosis (FDFO) system by investigating the effects of membrane orientation, system flow rate, DS concentration, and membrane fouling on an FDFO systems performance and energy consumption. The FS used was synthetic brackish water with a sodium chloride (NaCl) content of 5 g/L whereas a potassium chloride (KCl) synthetic fertiliser was used as a DS. The membrane utilised was a cellulose triacetate (CTA) membrane and was tested in forward osmosis mode (FO mode) and pressure retarded osmosis mode (PRO mode) whilst the system flow rate was adjusted between 100, 200 and 400 mL/min. Additionally, the DS concentration was altered from 0.5, 1 and 2 M KCl, respectively. Experiments were performed using a bench scale FO setup which comprised of an i) FO membrane cell, ii) a double head variable peristaltic pump for transporting FS and DS’s respectively, iii) a digital scale to measure the mass of the DS, iv) a magnetic stirrer to agitate the FS, v) two reservoirs for the FS and DS, respectively, vi) a digital multiparameter meter to determine FS electrical conductivity (EC) and vii) a digital electrical multimeter to measure system energy consumption. Each experiment comprised of seven steps i) pre-FDFO membrane control, ii) membrane cleaning, iii) FDFO experiment, iv) post-FDFO membrane control, v) membrane cleaning, vi) membrane damage dye identification and vii) membrane cleaning. Pre- and post-FDFO membrane control experiments operated for 5 h whilst each membrane cleaning procedure operated for 30 min. The FDFO experiment operated for 24 h whilst the membrane damage dye identification operated until a minimum of 10 mL water was recovered. The process parameter which largely contributed to a beneficial system performance and specific energy consumption (SEC) was the increase in DS concentration. Water fluxes increased approximately threefold from a DS concentration increase from 0.5 to 1 M, followed by an additional 30 to 50 % rise in water flux at a DS concentration increase 1 to 2 M. SEC decreased by 58 and 53 % for FO and PRO modes, respectively, with a DS concentration increase from 0.5 to 1 M. An additional 35 and 37 % SEC reduction for FO and PRO modes was obtained for a DS concentration increase from 1 to 2 M. Altering the membrane from FO to PRO did not contribute to a beneficial system performance nor did it improve SEC. However, at a DS concentration of 0,5 M, the PRO mode obtained a 5.3 % greater water recovery compared to the FO mode. Conversely, at a DS concentration of 1 and 2 M, the FO mode achieved 5.4 and 7.0 % greater water recoveries compared to the PRO mode. The increase in flow rate also did not increase system performance significantly, however, a fluctuation in system SEC was observed. Throughout the study, no membrane fouling was observed, however, possible minute traces of membrane fouling could be observed from the membrane surface electron microscope (SEM) images. Additionally, minor changes in post- FDFO membrane control water recovery results were noticed which support the possible occurrence of membrane fouling during the FDFO experiment.

Neste trabalho avaliou-se a eficácia de dois sistemas sequenciais de tratamento de esgoto sanitário envolvendo processo biológico anaeróbio (em escala piloto) com processos físico-químicos de flotação (escala de laboratório), microfiltração tangencial (escala industrial) e osmose reversa (escala industrial). Foram realizadas cinco baterias de ensaios (primeira etapa de estudos) utilizando um sistema seqüencial composto por: reator anaeróbio biológico, flotação por ar dissolvido, filtração em areia, filtração em cartucho de 5 &#956m, filtração em papel de filtro de 1,2 &#956m/filtração em cerâmica microporosa e filtração em membrana de nanofiltração. Numa segunda etapa de estudos foi realizada uma bateria de ensaios utilizando um sistema seqüencial composto por: reator anaeróbio biológico, flotação por ar dissolvido, microfiltração tangencial e osmose reversa. Todos os efluentes gerados pelos dois sistemas de tratamento foram avaliados, e a possibilidade de reuso (agrícola e industrial) dos mesmos foi investigada, os efluentes da filtração em areia, filtração em cartucho, filtração de papel de filtro/filtração em cerâmica e nanofiltração (primeira etapa de estudos) apresentaram características compatíveis com a água necessária para a maioria dos processos industriais. Por outro lado, os efluentes da microfiltração tangencial e da osmose reversa (segunda etapa de estudos) se mostraram como uma boa alternativa para reuso agrícola e também para reuso industrial(principalmente o efluente da osmose reversa). / This work evaluates the efficiency of two sequence systems of treatment of sewage involving anaerobic biologycal and physical-chemical processes. Five sets of experiments were done in the first stage of the study, using a sequence system formed with: anaerobic biologycal reactor, dissolved - air flotation, sand filtration, cartridge filtration (5 &#956m), filter paper filtration (1,2 &#956m)/ceramic filtration and nanofiltration. Another set of experiments was carried out using a different sequence system formed with: anaerobic biologycal reactor, dissolvid-air flotation, crossflow microfiltration and reverse osmosis. Every effluent resulted from the two treatment systems was evaluated and the reuse possibility (agricultural and industrial) was invetigated. The sand filtration, cartridge filtration, filter paper filtration/ceramic filtration and nanofiltration effluents (of the first step of studies) showed compatible characteristics with irrigation water but they were not compatible with water used in the majority industrial processes. On the other hand the crossflow microfiltration and reverse osmosis effluents (of the second step of studies) can be said as a good alternative to agricultural reuse and industrial reuse as well (mainly the reverse osmosis effluent).

<p>Water is the most consumed foodstuff around the world. Therefore it is very important to analyze possible faecal contamination of water, and Enterococci are an indicator for that. They are also used as an indicator for possible faecal contamination in food. Normally you find Enterococci in the intestines of humans and animals, but Enterococci can also give infections like urinary tract infection.</p><p>In this study, varying number of colonies and colours of Enterococci on different media were evaluated. The purpose was to investigate if three different methods would give the same numbers of colonies. Another interesting perspective was to investigate if one medium could be used for two methods. Membrane filter techniques and surface spreading techniques were used to detect Enterococci. These methods were compared with a most probable number method.</p><p>None of the strains showed an optimal result on all media, however one medium, ChromoCult, showed good results for all investigated strains.</p>

Water is the most consumed foodstuff around the world. Therefore it is very important to analyze possible faecal contamination of water, and Enterococci are an indicator for that. They are also used as an indicator for possible faecal contamination in food. Normally you find Enterococci in the intestines of humans and animals, but Enterococci can also give infections like urinary tract infection. In this study, varying number of colonies and colours of Enterococci on different media were evaluated. The purpose was to investigate if three different methods would give the same numbers of colonies. Another interesting perspective was to investigate if one medium could be used for two methods. Membrane filter techniques and surface spreading techniques were used to detect Enterococci. These methods were compared with a most probable number method. None of the strains showed an optimal result on all media, however one medium, ChromoCult, showed good results for all investigated strains.

Arsenic is a known carcinogen, causing cancers of the skin, lungs, bladder and kidney. Current research suggests that drinking water is the most common pathway for long-term low dose exposure. Arsenic contaminated drinking water has caused serious health problems in many countries including: India, Bangladesh, Argentina, Chile, Taiwan, the United States and Canada. Nanofiltration (NF) is a promising technology for arsenic removal since it requires less energy than traditional reverse osmosis membranes. Several studies have shown that nanofiltration is capable of removing the oxidized form of arsenic [As(V)] while the reduced form of arsenic [As(III)] is poorly removed. To exploit this difference it has been suggested that a pretreatment step which oxidizes the As(III) to As(V) would improve the performance of membrane filtration, but this has never been demonstrated. The research had three objectives: The first was to investigate the ability of NF membranes to treat arsenic contaminated groundwater and evaluate the influence of the membrane type and operating conditions. Secondly, the effectiveness of a solid phase oxidizing media (MnO2) to oxidize arsenite to arsenate was investigated. Lastly, the MnO2 was combined with NF membrane filtration to determine the benefit, if any, of oxidizing the arsenic prior to membrane filtration. A pilot membrane system was installed to treat a naturally contaminated groundwater in Virden, Manitoba, Canada. The groundwater in Virden contains between 38 and 44 µg/L of arsenic, primarily made up of As(III), with little particulate arsenic. In the first experiment three Filmtec® membranes were investigated: NF270, NF90 and XLE. Under all conditions tested the NF90 and NF270 membranes provided insufficient treatment of Virden's groundwater to meet Canada's recommended Interim Maximum Acceptable Concentration (IMAC) of 25 µg/L. The XLE membrane provided better arsenic removal and under the conditions of 25 Lmh flux and 70% recovery produced treated water with a total arsenic concentration of 21 µg/L. The XLE membrane is therefore able to sufficiently treat Virden's ground water. However treatment with the XLE membrane alone is insufficient to meet the USEPA's regulation of 10 µg/L or Canada's proposed Maximum Allowable Concentration (MAC) of 5 µg/L. The effects of recovery and flux on total arsenic passage are consistent with accepted membrane theory. Increasing the flux increases the flow of pure water through the membrane; decreasing the overall passage of arsenic. Increasing the recovery increases the bulk concentration of arsenic, which leads to higher arsenic passage. The second experiment investigated the arsenic oxidation capabilities of manganese dioxide (MnO2) and the rate at which the oxidation occurs. The feed water contained primarily As(III), however, when filtered by MnO2 at an Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT) of only 1 minute, the dominant form of arsenic was the oxidized form [As(V)]. At an EBCT of 2 minutes the oxidation was nearly complete with the majority of the arsenic in the As(V) form. Little arsenic was removed by the MnO2 filter. The third and final experiment investigated the benefit, if any, to combining the membrane filtration and MnO2 treatment investigated in the first and second experiments. The effect of MnO2 pretreatment was dramatic. In Experiment I, the NF270 and NF90 membranes were unable to remove any arsenic while the XLE removed, at best, approximately 50% of the arsenic. Once pretreated with MnO2 the passage of arsenic through all of the membranes dropped to less than 4 µg/L, corresponding to approximately 91% to 98% removal. The dramatic improvement in arsenic removal can be attributed to charge. All three membranes are negatively charged. Through a charge exclusion effect the rejection of negatively charged ions is enhanced. During the first experiment, As(III) (which is neutrally charged) was the dominant form of arsenic, and was uninfluenced by the negative charge of the membrane. Once oxidized to As(V), the arsenic had a charge of -2, and was electrostatically repelled by the membrane. This greatly improved the arsenic rejection characteristics of the membrane. Nanofiltration alone is not a suitable technology to remove arsenic contaminated waters where As(III) is the dominant species. When combined with MnO2 pre-oxidation, the arsenic rejection performance of nanofiltration is dramatically improved.

The goal of drinking water treatment is to produce and deliver safe water to the consumers. To achieve these objectives water treatment plants are designed based on the concept of the multibarrier approach which combines several drinking water treatment processes in order to increase the reliability of the system. The presence of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs), personal care products (PCPs) and endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in drinking water sources is becoming a concern, because of chronic and indirect human exposure to contaminant mixtures at sub-therapeutic levels via drinking water consumption. Membrane filtration can be an efficient treatment process to remove microorganisms and/or trace organic contaminants from drinking water sources. However, membranes are confronted by a major limitation: membrane fouling. Fouled membranes suffer from a loss in performance either leading to a reduction in flux or a higher pressure requirement. Generally, membrane fouling increases the need for membrane maintenance measures such as backwashing and chemical cleaning which has a negative impact on the operating costs and membrane life time. Severe membrane fouling may even impact permeate quality and/or compromise membrane integrity. The aim of this study was to establish if biofiltration pretreatment without prior coagulation would be able to control membrane fouling in natural waters. The second objective investigated the removal of trace organic contaminants by individual treatment processes (i.e. biofiltration and membrane filtration). Parallel to this work, the presence and concentration of selected trace organic contaminants in Grand River (Ontario, Canada) were determined. The trace organic contaminants investigated included atrazine, carbamazepine, DEET, ibuprofen, naproxen, and nonylphenol. Direct biofiltration pretreatment (no coagulation) significantly reduced both reversible and irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. Results showed that the different degree of reduction of hydraulically reversible fouling was primarily attributed to the absolute concentration of a specific fraction of the dissolved organic matter (i.e. biopolymers) in the biofilter effluent (i.e. membrane feed). The study also suggests that the composition of biopolymers rather than their absolute concentration is important for the control of irreversible fouling. High pressure membranes such as nanofiltration membranes are also subjected to fouling. Results showed that biofiltration pretreatment was able to achieve fouling control but membrane characteristics (i.e. molecular weight cut off) influence the efficiency of the pretreatment. This study also showed that not only biopolymers but also humic substances and low molecular weight acids are being rejected by nanofiltration membranes. Selected trace organic contaminants were detected in Grand River water in the low ng/L range with detection frequencies between 48 to 100%. Seasonal occurrence patterns could be explained by compound use and possible degradation mechanisms. These results confirm the impact of human activities on the Grand River. This study showed that under the right conditions rapid biofiltration is capable of completely removing biodegradable emerging contaminants at ng/L concentrations. DEET, ibuprofen, and naproxen were biodegradable and therefore amenable to removal while carbamazepine and atrazine were recalcitrant. Factors such as empty bed contact time, influent concentration, and temperature influenced the biodegradation kinetics. Finally, both membrane and contaminant properties influenced the degree of rejection achieved by nanofiltration membranes. Results showed that steric hindrance and electrostatic repulsion were the major rejection mechanisms. Several benefits are associated with the use of direct biofiltration for drinking water treatment. These benefits include: the removal of easily biodegradable organic matter leading to biologically stable effluents; the removal of biodegradable trace organic contaminants contributing to the multibarrier approach; the absence of chemicals coagulation which is of advantage for operations in isolated areas; the simple operation and maintenance which is an advantage for locations with limited trained operators; and finally if used prior to membrane filtration biofiltration pretreatment can control membrane fouling.

Arsenic is a known carcinogen, causing cancers of the skin, lungs, bladder and kidney. Current research suggests that drinking water is the most common pathway for long-term low dose exposure. Arsenic contaminated drinking water has caused serious health problems in many countries including: India, Bangladesh, Argentina, Chile, Taiwan, the United States and Canada. Nanofiltration (NF) is a promising technology for arsenic removal since it requires less energy than traditional reverse osmosis membranes. Several studies have shown that nanofiltration is capable of removing the oxidized form of arsenic [As(V)] while the reduced form of arsenic [As(III)] is poorly removed. To exploit this difference it has been suggested that a pretreatment step which oxidizes the As(III) to As(V) would improve the performance of membrane filtration, but this has never been demonstrated. The research had three objectives: The first was to investigate the ability of NF membranes to treat arsenic contaminated groundwater and evaluate the influence of the membrane type and operating conditions. Secondly, the effectiveness of a solid phase oxidizing media (MnO2) to oxidize arsenite to arsenate was investigated. Lastly, the MnO2 was combined with NF membrane filtration to determine the benefit, if any, of oxidizing the arsenic prior to membrane filtration. A pilot membrane system was installed to treat a naturally contaminated groundwater in Virden, Manitoba, Canada. The groundwater in Virden contains between 38 and 44 µg/L of arsenic, primarily made up of As(III), with little particulate arsenic. In the first experiment three Filmtec® membranes were investigated: NF270, NF90 and XLE. Under all conditions tested the NF90 and NF270 membranes provided insufficient treatment of Virden's groundwater to meet Canada's recommended Interim Maximum Acceptable Concentration (IMAC) of 25 µg/L. The XLE membrane provided better arsenic removal and under the conditions of 25 Lmh flux and 70% recovery produced treated water with a total arsenic concentration of 21 µg/L. The XLE membrane is therefore able to sufficiently treat Virden's ground water. However treatment with the XLE membrane alone is insufficient to meet the USEPA's regulation of 10 µg/L or Canada's proposed Maximum Allowable Concentration (MAC) of 5 µg/L. The effects of recovery and flux on total arsenic passage are consistent with accepted membrane theory. Increasing the flux increases the flow of pure water through the membrane; decreasing the overall passage of arsenic. Increasing the recovery increases the bulk concentration of arsenic, which leads to higher arsenic passage. The second experiment investigated the arsenic oxidation capabilities of manganese dioxide (MnO2) and the rate at which the oxidation occurs. The feed water contained primarily As(III), however, when filtered by MnO2 at an Empty Bed Contact Time (EBCT) of only 1 minute, the dominant form of arsenic was the oxidized form [As(V)]. At an EBCT of 2 minutes the oxidation was nearly complete with the majority of the arsenic in the As(V) form. Little arsenic was removed by the MnO2 filter. The third and final experiment investigated the benefit, if any, to combining the membrane filtration and MnO2 treatment investigated in the first and second experiments. The effect of MnO2 pretreatment was dramatic. In Experiment I, the NF270 and NF90 membranes were unable to remove any arsenic while the XLE removed, at best, approximately 50% of the arsenic. Once pretreated with MnO2 the passage of arsenic through all of the membranes dropped to less than 4 µg/L, corresponding to approximately 91% to 98% removal. The dramatic improvement in arsenic removal can be attributed to charge. All three membranes are negatively charged. Through a charge exclusion effect the rejection of negatively charged ions is enhanced. During the first experiment, As(III) (which is neutrally charged) was the dominant form of arsenic, and was uninfluenced by the negative charge of the membrane. Once oxidized to As(V), the arsenic had a charge of -2, and was electrostatically repelled by the membrane. This greatly improved the arsenic rejection characteristics of the membrane. Nanofiltration alone is not a suitable technology to remove arsenic contaminated waters where As(III) is the dominant species. When combined with MnO2 pre-oxidation, the arsenic rejection performance of nanofiltration is dramatically improved.