Submitted by Rosangela Silva (rosangela.silva3@unioeste.br) on 2018-05-10T12:13:45Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Allyne Thaís da Silva.pdf: 6260638 bytes, checksum: ce20b24a11c5f33082857c431a6c6f3a (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-10T12:13:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Allyne Thaís da Silva.pdf: 6260638 bytes, checksum: ce20b24a11c5f33082857c431a6c6f3a (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-07-29 / This dissertation investigated the Socio Educational Measure of Probation performed by the Center for Social Assistance Specialized Reference II, Cascavel - PR, in the period 2001-2011. The overall objective was to investigate the actions developed by the Center for Social Assistance Specialized Reference II to ensure compliance with the Socio Educational Measure of Probation to adolescents in conflict with the law and specific objectives were: a) to understand the relationship between the State and Policy socioeducation and b) clarify how it is and what are the purposes of the Socio-Educational measures, considering what determines the Statute of the Child and Adolescent. The study of Measure Socio particularly of Probation , has as parameter the following documents : Statute of the Child and Adolescent (2010 ); SINASE - National System of Socio (2006) Theoretical and Practical Guide Socio-Educational measures (2006) and Educational Policy Project (2010) CREAS II. As a result of the investigations, it was found that the actions taken to ensure compliance with youth in conflict with the law and in compliance with Measure Socio LA, the Technical Team Center for Social Assistance Specialized Reference II, Cascavel, were: a) referral of adolescents conflict and family to obtain civil documents, b) referral of adolescents in conflict with the law for school education network c) transport aid to attend the Center for Social Assistance Specialized Reference II, the school and the courses d) referral of adolescents in conflict with the law for the municipal health e) conducting workshops Socioeducational. / Nesta dissertação investigou-se a Medida Socioeducativa de Liberdade Assistida (LA) executada pelo Centro de Referência Especializado de Assistência Social – CREAS II, de Cascavel – PR, no período de 2001-2011. O objetivo geral foi o de investigar as ações desenvolvidas pelo CREAS II para assegurar o cumprimento da Medida Socioeducativa de Liberdade Assistida (LA) aos adolescentes em conflito com a lei e os objetivos específicos foram: a) compreender a relação entre o Estado e a Política de Socioeducação; e b) esclarecer como se constitui e quais são os propósitos das Medidas Socioeducativas, considerando o que determina o Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente (ECA). O estudo da Medida Socioeducativa, particularmente, da Liberdade Assistida (LA), teve como parâmetro os seguintes documentos: Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente – ECA (2010); SINASE – Sistema Nacional de Atendimento Socioeducativo (2006); Guia Teórico e Prático de Medidas Socioeducativas (2006) e Projeto Político Pedagógico (2010) do CREAS II. Como resultado das investigações, constatou-se que as ações realizadas para assegurar o atendimento aos adolescentes em conflito com a lei e em cumprimento de Medida Socioeducativa de LA, pela Equipe Técnica do CREAS II, de Cascavel, foram: a) encaminhamento dos adolescentes em conflito e da família para obtenção de documentação civil; b) encaminhamento dos adolescentes em conflito com a lei para rede de ensino escolar; c) auxílio ao transporte para freqüentar o CREAS II, a escola e os cursos; d) encaminhamento dos adolescentes em conflito com a lei para a rede municipal de saúde; e) realização de Oficinas Socioeducativas.

La présente recherche porte sur les rapports entre droit pénal des mineurs et justice restaurative dans le cadre d’une approche comparative entre la France et la Belgique. Au-delà de la révélation de similitudes et de différences entre les deux pays dans ces domaines, la recherche aborde également les difficultés présentées par la France et la Belgique dans l’acceptation de la justice restaurative en droit pénal des mineurs et de son développement au sein des institutions judiciaires. Par l’étude des raisons qui ont conduit la France à manquer le tournant restauratif et de celles ayant permis, en Belgique, l’implantation de la justice restaurative dans le droit pénal des mineurs, des points d’ancrage sont relevés de nature à permettre son épanouissement dans l’ordonnance du 2 février 1945. Une expérimentation dans un service éducatif de réparation pénale a été menée avec le souci de prendre en compte des problématiques intéressant le service lui-même (logiques actuarielles, prudentielles, financières, idéologies professionnelles, craintes diverses). L’analyse des pratiques souligne que les services de réparation pénale, inscrits dans une rationalité managériale du traitement du phénomène criminel juvénile, sont limités dans la mise en œuvre des démarches de justice restaurative. Il s’avère également que quelques prises en compte du mineur et des modalités de l’exécution de la mesure envisagée par les éducateurs facilitent (approche psycho-criminologique du passage à l’acte inscrit dans une dimension psycho-socio-éducative de la réparation) ou bien inhibent (approche criminologique de l’acte inscrit dans une dimension rétributive de la réparation) des programmes de justice restaurative. Pour autant, quand bien même la pratique facilite une telle expérimentation, lorsque les éducateurs disposent de mission de « réparation-directe » notamment, des obstacles d’ordre idéologique s’observent au niveau de l’accueil, du démarchage et de la participation de la victime. Il demeure cependant essentiel de souligner que, par la présentation des principes et des promesses de la Justice restaurative aux éducateurs rencontrés, les écueils identifiés tombent, principalement quant à la présence de la victime lors de la mise en œuvre de la réparation pénale directe. Une telle évolution des postures professionnelles augure d’une intégration harmonieuse prochaine des démarches de justice restaurative en droit pénal des mineurs. / This research focuses on the juvenile criminal law and restorative justice in a comparative approach between France and Belgium. Beyond revealing the similarities and differences of these countries in these fields, the research also carters to the difficulties encountered by France and Belgium in the acceptance of restorative justice in juvenile criminal law and its development in the judicial institutions. By studying the reasons that led France to miss the “turning” of restorative justice and those enabled, in Belgium enabled, the implementation of restorative justice in the criminal law for minors, anchor points have been identified for its development in the order of 2 February 1945. Subsequently, an experiment in youth justice service on the reparation measures was led considering difficulties which concern the service itself (actuarial logic, supervisory, financial, professional ideologies and fears). Our analysis of practices in the youth justice services on the reparation measures, reveals that the experimentation of restorative justice is limited by a managerial rationality treatment of juvenile criminal phenomenon. Also, some of the minor approaches and their implementation in the measure facilitate (psycho-criminological approach to acting out part and a psycho-socio-educational dimension in reparation) or inhibit (criminological approach to act itself and a retributive dimension in reparation) restorative justice programs. However, even if the practice facilitates experimentation and that educators apply “direct reparation”, ideological barriers remain in dealing with victims. However, it remains essential to underline that, thanks to the presentation of the principles and promises of restorative justice educators met, the identified pitfalls fall, mainly with the presence of the victim during the implementation of “direct reparation”. Such a development professional postures omen a harmonious integration of next restorative justice approaches in juvenile criminal law.