The purpose of this bachelor’s thesis is to examine how problematic school absenteeism is produced, depicted and negotiated as a social problem. It aims to do so by studying texts produced by three different parties with a shared responsibility for children and youths experiencing problematic school absenteeism in Sweden: the families, the school system and affiliated authorities, as well as therapy providers commissioned by the social services. The research questions asked are how these different parties describe problematic school absenteeism as a social problem in texts, and what the consequences for the discourse are based on these problem descriptions. The analyzed texts are an article for debate published in the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet, written by a parent of a child with problematic school absenteeism, a report written by the Swedish Schools Inspectorate, Skolinspektionen, and a handbook about working with problematic school absenteeism, written by a research team employed by a company specialized in therapies for children and youths with varying social issues.  Theoretically this study mainly departs from Bronfenbrenners (1979) ecological systems theory, the theoretical framework of Foucault (1982), mainly concerning discourse, and the methodological approach of Bacchi (2009) What’s the problem represented to be. The analysis uses Bacchis methodology, by posing specific questions aimed at the three different texts.  The results of this study show that problematic school absenteeism as a social problem is depicted differently throughout the different texts – often using different strategies and perspectives in describing and defining the issue. The study also finds a commonality among the texts regarding their perspective on parental strategies and influence in relation to problematic school absenteeism, where this factor is generally not scrutinized.  One of the major conclusions drawn from this study is that the discourse generally tends to subjectify the child or youth into being somewhat interchangeable with the social problem at hand, especially in the cases where the term hemmasittare (Swedish for home sitter) is used.  The conclusions made from this study are mainly applicable on the instance of these three texts but are thought to also be of use in further investigations concerning critical discourse analysis applied to problematic school absenteeism as a social problem. / Syftet med denna kandidatuppsats är att undersöka hur problematisk skolfrånvaro framställs och omförhandlas som ett socialt problem. Studien ämnar göra så genom att studera och analysera texter producerade av tre olika aktörer som besitter ett delat ansvar för barn och unga med problematisk skolfrånvaro. Dessa tre aktörer är familjen, skolan med angränsande myndigheter och behandlare/utförare på uppdrag av socialtjänsten. Studiens frågeställningar ämnar närmre undersöka hur dessa olika aktörer beskriver problematisk skolfrånvaro som ett socialt problem samt vilka diskursiva effekter detta genererar. De texter som valts ut för analys är en debattartikel publicerad i Aftonbladet skriven av en förälder till ett barn med problematisk skolfrånvaro, en rapport skriven av Skolinspektionen, samt en handbok som beskriver insatser vid långvarig skolfrånvaro skriven av en grupp forskare på uppdrag av ett företag som även erbjuder behandlingstjänster inom området. Studien grundar sig teoretiskt huvudsakligen på Bronfenbrenners (1979) utvecklingsekologiska systemteori, Foucaults (1982) teoretiska ramverk gällande diskurs samt Bacchis (2009) metodologiska analysverktyg What’s the problem represented to be. Bacchis verktyg används explicit i analysen genom att ställa specifika frågor gentemot det utvalda empiriska materialet. Analysens resultat visar att problematisk skolfrånvaro som ett socialt problem framställs på olika sätt beroende av vem avsändaren är – och att de olika aktörerna ofta använder olika strategier och perspektiv i beskrivningen och definitionen av problemet. Studien finner även en gemensam nämnare mellan samtliga texter gällande det faktum att föräldraförmågan inte lyfts eller problematiseras i förhållande till problematisk skolfrånvaro. En av studiens huvudsakliga slutsatser är att diskursen gällande problematisk skolfrånvaro generellt tenderar att förena barnet eller ungdomen som subjekt med det sociala problemet, särskilt vad gäller användningen av termen hemmasittare. Slutsatser gjorda i denna studie är framför allt applicerbara i kontexten för de tre texter som har analyserats, men kan också hävdas vara användbara i framtida undersökningar gällande kritisk diskursanalys av problematisk skolfrånvaro som socialt problem.

As the statistics for maternal mortality have declined all over the world, it has also been rising in the US for the past two decades. The data clearly shows that the group with the highest risk for maternal mortality are black women, whilst white women are the group with the lowest risk. This study aims to investigate three policys related to maternal care: Affordable Care Act, Preventing Maternal Deaths Act and Improving Access to Maternal Care Act. By using Carol Bacchi's What’s the Problem Represented to Be-method of analysis, the study looks deeper into what underlying presumptions and assumptions the policys carry, and what consequences these have. Together with intersectionality as a theoretical framework, the study was able to uncover issues between the policies that are currently in place, and the categories and power positions within the people involved in the policy process and the people affected by the policies. The results show that the underlying assumptions and presumptions is that women work as a homogenous group and that the policies are focused on low-income individuals within that group. This results in continuous disparities in maternal mortality for black women, with concerning consequences. There is a great need for research, not only for accurate data surrounding maternal mortality (on deeper levels, not for women as a homogenous group), but also for development of policies and health care.