退撫基金成立之目的主要為解決經費來源以減輕政府財政負擔，而退撫基金運作迄今已逾十年，退撫基金管理運用機構因受組織屬性、功能及人力之限，經營績效無法大幅提昇，因基金規模不斷成長，參加基金人數及支領定期給與之退休人數亦快速增加，面對日增之業務量，似有必要針對基金管理機構組織屬性、功能及人力配置等重新審視檢討。 鑑於基金運作之良窳，對於退撫基金支付能力具有關鍵性的影響，且涉及全國軍公教人員及各級政府退撫經費之負擔，因此，基金管理機構是否有適當之組織結構，能否採行企業化經營以靈活妥善運用基金，以及如何因應現有制度與管理上之缺失，創造高收益率以穩固退撫財源，均為本研究之重點。時值政府為提升國家整體競爭力，積極推動更具彈性與企業精神之「行政法人」，本研究乃分別就德國、英國、日本公法人制度，以及世界主要國家退休基金管理現況進行文獻探討，再針對我國退撫基金管理及運用現況進行檢視分析，復對基金管理會現職員工以問卷調查其對機關改制為行政法人之態度，並輔以深度訪談及SWOT分析等方法，以探究我國退撫基金管理機構行政法人化之可行性。 茲據研究結果發現，基金管理機構因受組織屬性、功能及人力之限，退撫基金管理無法獨立運作，致影響經營績效之提昇，其業務性質確具專業性，應頗適合行政法人化，惟因尚有潛藏負債、最後支付責任、行政法人法草案尚未建置完成以及現實上之政治生態等諸多考量，故建議其如擬行政法人化，應先明確區分政府及行政法人之潛藏負債及最後支付責任，並宜配合退休制度一同考量。 / The purpose of establishing Public Service Pension Fund （PSPF）mainly focuses on reducing the financial burden of the government. However, after more than ten years of operation, the performance of the pension fund still cannot significantly improve due to the limitation of attributes, functions and human resources of organization. This, together with the adjustment of contribution rates to reflect the normal costs, has received universal condemnation and worries about how to improve the operation of the fund in order to relieve the pressure of raising contribution rates. Due to the gradual increase of workloads caused by the continued growth of fund scale, fund participants and the number of retirees receiving regularly payments, it seems to be necessary to inspect and review the attributes, functions and human resources of the fund management agency. As the quality of the fund operation has crucial effects to the payment ability of the PSPF, and the expenditure burden of all fund participants and different levels of local governments, whether the fund management agency has proper organization structure, whether it is suitable to adopt the craft industry, and how to cope with the drawbacks of present system and management are the main points of this research. While the government is actively boosting “administrative corporation”, which is more flexible and possesses business spirit, with the aim of promoting integral competitiveness of the government, this research first literarily discusses public corporation system of Germany, Britain and Japan, and the current management state of main countries in the world. This is followed by an analysis of current management and operation state of the PSPF, and questionnaires filled by the employees of the Management Board of PSPF to understand their opinions on changing to administrative corporation. The analysis is reinforced by a deep interview, SWOT analysis and so on to investigate the feasibility of administrative corporation system for the management agency of PSPF.. This research finds out that being unable to operate independently, due to the limitations of organization attributes, functions and human resources, the PSPF’s management performance has been negatively influenced. Judging from agency functions, “administrative corporation” can be a suitable system for the organization. However, with considerations like inclined liabilities, final disbursement duty, and the Administrative Corporation Act still pending for legislative approval, it is suggested that a clear distinction between the inclined liabilities and final disbursement duty of the government and the administrative corporation has to be made, together with a consideration of the retirement system, before the “administrative corporation” system is put into real practice.

公務人員退撫基金雖非一般企業，但這並不表示公務人員退撫基金可以不必對「資金提供者」負責或懈怠獲致「應有報酬」之責任；公務人員退撫基金為執行特定公共任務之組織，其能否發揮制度設計所預期的功能，將直接影響公務人員退撫基金的營運績效。本研究之主要目的為探討治理變數對基金績效的影響效果。實證結果發現監理委員會的組成結構中，唯有軍公教、學者專家的係數估計值顯著異於零，其他的治理變數對基金績效的影響皆不具有顯著影響效果，另外，股價指數與資產配置對於基金績效存在顯著的作用，股價指數以及資產配置在銀行存款與短期票券，具有正的影響效果，至於配置在有價證券，可能由於受到政治的干預護盤以及對於股票市場的投資監督不佳，所以造成其負向影響效果。 由於治理變數大多對基金績效無顯著影響效果，可能肇因於退撫基金無健全的課責制度，可以考慮減少政府機關代表的數量與其角色，考量委員的代表性與專業性。此外，股市投資為影響報酬與風險最為顯著的投資工具，股價指數與有價證券的資產配置皆對基金績效有顯著的影響效果，對於股票市場的投資需要更加的小心。由於退撫基金由政府管理，欠缺彈性，其投資運用易受到官僚體系與政治因素的影響，未來退撫基金也可以朝行政法人組織來做改革。隨著基金累積金額的日漸龐大，監理委員會功能的發揮與否，與投資運用績效息息相關，將攸關未來退休者的給付與參與者的費率，如何有效發揮監理委員會的功能，是值得關注的議題。

隨著退休人口不斷的增加，加以政府的財政困難，各國無不加速年金改革的腳步，希望能建立一個財務永續、世代公平，且滿足社會保障需求的年金制度。臺灣的退休金制度長期以來處於提撥率遠低於精算平衡費率的狀態，加上不斷增長的潛藏負債，使得退休金制度將面臨破產的考驗。本研究針對公教人員退撫基金進行財務分析探討，發現對目前正在繳納的年輕世代，若不積極採取適當的年金改革方案，終將成為了繳多卻領少，或甚至領不到的一群人，未來可能缺乏老年經濟安全的保障，造成世代不均，形成嚴重的社會問題。 理想的退休金制度應該同時兼顧老有所養的目的與世代的公平，倘若不斷降低給付支出以達到財務平衡，對於民眾的老年經濟卻造成嚴重的威脅，也不是恰當的方案。研究結果顯示，改革的幅度若是太小，年輕世代(30歲)退休金的金錢價值比約為1；而年長世代(60歲)則約為2.5。而若是將改革的幅度提高，則年輕世代金錢價值比為1.05；而年長世代則約為2.4，均得出確實存在世代公平性的問題。因此，將年輕世代的退休金制度漸進地轉換成確定提撥制(DC)或許是更為理想的改革方式；而採用確定給付制的人，透過政府挹注、減少相當的給付或持續提撥保費，讓世代間透過包容、互助的精神，使得年金改革的路程能夠更正確更為有效，促成社會祥和，才能讓臺灣的年金制度永久的走下去。 / Because of the increased retirement population and the government's financial difficulties, all countries will accelerate the pace of annuity reform. Hoping to establish a financial sustainability, fair pension system and meet the social security needs of the annuity system. In this study, we discuss the financial analysis of the public Service Pension Fund and find that the young generation will become a group of people who receive less pensions. If we do not take the appropriate annuity reform plan, the pension fund will not provide economic security in the old age. The ideal pension plan should have the function of taking care the elderly and the intergenerational equity. If we continue to reduce the pension payment in order to achieve financial balance, the elderly economy will be threated seriously. It’s not a good and appropriate reform. The research results show that if the magnitude of the reform is too small, the money’s worth ratio of the young generation (30 years) pension is about 1; and the older generation (60 years) is about 2.5. And if the magnitude of reform is increased, the money’s worth ratio of the young generation is 1.05; and the older generation is about 2.4. All have the problem of the intergenerational equity. Thus, the pension plan of young generation changes into the defined contribution plan slowly. It may be a more ideal reform. And the people who use defined benefit plan have to reduce the payments, continue to pay premium into pension fund and the government provides the subsidies. So that the generations through the spirit of mutual assistance, it will make the journey of annuity reform can be more effective.