<p>En sudie i gonzojournalistiken, dess innebörd och vad den förmedlar. Studien beskriver och kopplar gonzojournalistiken till romantikens teori och kunskapssyn och är uppdelad i två huvuddelar vilka beskriver perspektivismen samt den romantika ironi som rymms inom gonzojournalistikens teknik.</p>

En sudie i gonzojournalistiken, dess innebörd och vad den förmedlar. Studien beskriver och kopplar gonzojournalistiken till romantikens teori och kunskapssyn och är uppdelad i två huvuddelar vilka beskriver perspektivismen samt den romantika ironi som rymms inom gonzojournalistikens teknik.

Zugl.: Salamanca, Universidad, Diss., 2002.

This book is being edited at the suggestion of colleagues who feel a great need for a Spanish reader with the the following qualifications: A good connected story from Spanish Literature Subject matter suitable for adolescents Sufficiently simple for use in Beginning Spanish This is an edited version of Part One, and consequently is simplified and cut. Many authorities prefer to wait until students get to college so that they may be introduced to the great masterpiece in its original. In as much as the average high school student does not take more than two years of Spanish, this system removes the greatest Spanish classic from the education of the masses of American people. Furthermore the study of Don Quixote offers excellent character training and basic education for the adolescent. To the student: This book is arranged to help English-speaking students of thirteen years of age or over to learn to read their second language. You must remember that unless you can make use of your English vocabulary and ability, you will learn to read Spanish at somewhat the same rate of speed with which you learned English. In other words, at the end of one year, you will know about as much as you did in English at the end of the First Grade, and at the end of ten years, you may expect to have somewhat the same ability that is usual for a Junior in High School, furthermore, you must remember that it is impossible to Iearn all the common or useful words in a foreign language, and it is not always possible to consult a dictionary at every turn when traveling around Mexico or South America.

This study explores the intersection of the philosophy of Martin Heidegger and Spanish literature. The study examines the Heideggerian authenticity and inauthenticity of two characters in the literature: Melibea in La Celestina by Fernando de Rojas and Grisóstomo in Don Quijote de la Mancha by Miguel de Cervantes. Heidegger’s concept of authenticity is the ability of the individual to live in the world according to her own desires, outside of the influence of others. Both die by suicide, but Melibea is an authentic character in Heideggerian terms and Grisóstomo is inauthentic. At the end of her life, Melibea has resolved all anxiety into resoluteness and is determined to live life in her own terms. Grisóstomo, however, dies inauthentically, full of anxiety and subject to the will of Others. He never leaves the influence of others to live a life of his own determination.

No description available.

No description available.

Der Artikel stellt eine der allerersten Beiträge von Alfonso de Toro zu Postmoderne und zum Postkolonialismus in den romanischen Studien sowie den ersten Beitrag zum Postkolonialismus und zu Postmoderne in Beziehung zum Werk von Jorge Luis Borges dar. Hier wird eine grundlegende und wegweisende Auseinandersetzung mit der postmodernen und postkolonialen Theorie und Praxis, die die Sprache, Terminologie, die zeitlich-historische Entwicklung, die Eingrenzung der Theorien sowie die Verschränkung beider Gebiete erfasst und in die Einführung der Konzepte ‚Postmodernität‘ und ‚Postkolonialität‘ einmündet. Als Basis für ein neues Verständnis von ‚Postkolonialität‘ dient das Essay von Borges, „Der argentinische Schriftsteller und die Tradition“ (1955) und für die neue Auffassung von ‚Postmodernität‘ greift de Toro v.a. auf die französische postmoderne bzw. poststrukturale Philosophen wie Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze/Guattari, Lyotard, Baudrillard, aber auch auf Vattimo und auf Borges Erzählungen, u.a. wie „El Aleph“, „Tlön, Uqbar, Tertius Orbis', Pierre Menard Autor von Don Quichotte'. / This article represents one of the very first contributions by Alfonso de Toro to Postmodernism and Postcolonialism in Romance studies, as well as the first contribution to postcolonialism and postmodernism in relation to the work of Jorge Luis Borges. Here is a fundamental and pioneering examination of postmodern and postcolonial theory and practice, covering language, terminology, temporal-historical development, the delimitation of theories, and the intertwining of the two fields, culminating in the introduction of the concepts of ‘Postmodernity’ and ‘Postcoloniality’. Borges’ essay “The Argentinian Writer and the Tradition” (1955) serves as the basis for a new understanding of ‘Postcoloniality’. For a new conception of ‘Postmodernity’, de Toro draws primarily on French post-modern or post-structural philosophers such as Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze/Guattari, Lyotard, Baudrillard, but also on Vattimo and on Borges’ narrations, such as “El Aleph”, “Tlön, Uqbar, Tertius Orbis”, “Pierre Menard author of Don Quixote”. / Este artículo representa una de las primeras aportaciones de Alfonso de Toro al postmodernismo y al poscolonialismo en los Estudios Romances, así como la primera contribución al poscolonialismo y al posmodernismo en relación con la obra de Jorge Luis Borges. Aquí, un examen fundamental y pionero de la teoría y la práctica posmodernas y poscoloniales que recoge el lenguaje, la terminología, el desarrollo temporal-histórico, la delimitación de las teorías, así como el entrelazamiento de ambos campos, culmina con la introducción de los conceptos de ‘posmodernidad’ y ‘poscolonialidad’. El ensayo de Borges “El escritor argentino y la tradición” (1955) sirve de base para una nueva comprensión de la “poscolonialidad”. Para una nueva concepción de la ‘posmodernidad’, de Toro se basa principalmente en filósofos franceses posmodernos o posestructurales como Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze/Guattari, Lyotard, Baudrillard, pero también en Vattimo y en los cuentos de Borges, como “El Aleph”, “Tlön, Uqbar, Tertius Orbis”, “Pierre Menard autor del Quijote”.

Der Artikel stellt eine der aller ersten Beiträge von Alfonso de Toro zu Postmoderne und zum Postkolonialismus in den romanischen Studien sowie den ersten Beitrag zum Postkolonialismus und zu Postmoderne in Beziehung zum Werk von Jorge Luis Borges dar. Hier wird eine grundlegende und wegweisende Auseinandersetzung mit der postmodernen und postkolonialen Theorie und Praxis, die die Sprache, Terminologie, die zeitlich-historische Entwicklung, die Eingrenzung der Theorien sowie die Verschränkung beider Gebiete erfasst und in die Einführung der Konzepte ‚Postmodernität‘ und ‚Postkolonialität‘ einmündet. Als Basis für ein neues Verständnis von ‚Postkolonialität‘ dient das Essay von Borges, „Der argentinische Schriftsteller und die Tradition“ (1955) und für die neue Auffassung von ‚Postmodernität‘ greift de Toro v.a. auf die französische postmoderne bzw. poststrukturale Philosophen wie Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze/Guattari, Lyotard, Baudrillard, aber auch auf Vattimo und auf Borges Erzählungen, u.a. wie „El Aleph“, „Tlön, Uqbar, Tertius Orbis', 'Pierre Menard Autor von Don Quichotte' / This article represents one of the very first contributions by Alfonso de Toro to Postmodernism and Postcolonialism in Romance studies, as well as the first contribution to postcolonialism and postmodernism in relation to the work of Jorge Luis Borges. Here is a fundamental and pioneering examination of postmodern and postcolonial theory and practice, covering language, terminology, temporal-historical development, the delimitation of theories, and the intertwining of the two fields, culminating in the introduction of the concepts of ‘Postmodernity’ and ‘Postcoloniality’. Borges’ essay “The Argentinian Writer and the Tradition” (1955) serves as the basis for a new understanding of ‘Postcoloniality’. For a new conception of ‘Postmodernity’, de Toro draws primarily on French post-modern or post-structural philosophers such as Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze/Guattari, Lyotard, Baudrillard, but also on Vattimo and on Borges’ narrations, such as “El Aleph”, “Tlön, Uqbar, Tertius Orbis”, “Pierre Menard author of Don Quixote” / Este artículo representa una de las primeras aportaciones de Alfonso de Toro al postmodernismo y al poscolonialismo en los Estudios Romances, así como la primera contribución al poscolonialismo y al posmodernismo en relación con la obra de Jorge Luis Borges. Aquí, un examen fundamental y pionero de la teoría y la práctica posmodernas y poscoloniales que recoge el lenguaje, la terminología, el desarrollo temporal-histórico, la delimitación de las teorías, así como el entrelazamiento de ambos campos, culmina con la introducción de los conceptos de ‘posmodernidad’ y ‘poscolonialidad’. El ensayo de Borges “El escritor argentino y la tradición” (1955) sirve de base para una nueva comprensión de la “poscolonialidad”. Para una nueva concepción de la ‘posmodernidad’, de Toro se basa principalmente en filósofos franceses posmodernos o posestructurales como Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze/Guattari, Lyotard, Baudrillard, pero también en Vattimo y en los cuentos de Borges, como “El Aleph”, “Tlön, Uqbar, Tertius Orbis”, “Pierre Menard autor del Quijote”

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2017-11-30T11:32:23Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Vanessa Alves Maximo dos Santos.pdf: 1791281 bytes, checksum: f0b2b15003ebd0802aafa8a1bd325c81 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-30T11:32:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Vanessa Alves Maximo dos Santos.pdf: 1791281 bytes, checksum: f0b2b15003ebd0802aafa8a1bd325c81 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-11-07 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / Quixote, by Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, whose first part came to light in 1605, is one of the best known works in world literature and has received several interpretations. A controversial subject concerns the proposal of Salvador de Madariaga y Rojo, who proposed a slow and persistent process of symbiosis between the characters Don Quixote and Sancho Panza, from the work Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, resulting in the sanchificación of dom Quixote and in Sancho's quixotization. The proposal, made in the first half of the twentieth century, caused great repercussion in the scope of the Cervantine studies. The present work seeks to analyze the speech and the behavior of the characters throughout the narrative, in order to confirm or not Madariaga's proposal and, for that, concentrates on the analysis of two chapters "Moinhos de Vento" (Chapter VIII) and "Cravilenho" (cap.XLI) that make up the first and second part of Quixote, respectively. The research, which is a critical one, has the basic support in the theoretical-methodological proposal of Systemic-Functional Linguistics (LSF), in which the interpersonal metafunction encompasses the notion of modality as welll as the notion of appraisal – subdivided in affection (emotions), judgement (ethic) and appreciation (aesthetics). SFL allows the relation of the lexical-grammatical choices of the microstructure of the text with the macrostructure of the power relations and discourse ideology. The research should answer the following questions: (a) What grammatical choices confirm the sanchification of Don Quixote and the quixotization of Sancho? (b) What role does appraisal play in this process? (c) How is social critique made in this context? The analysis proves that there is in fact a change in the character of both characters, in terms of a mutual influence that happens throughout the narrative, in which a more careful examination discloses the implicit social critique woven by Cervantes / O livro Quixote, de Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, cuja primeira parte veio a lume em 1605, é uma das obras mais conhecidas da literatura mundial e tem recebido várias interpretações. Um assunto controvertido, diz respeito à proposta de Salvador de Madariaga y Rojo, que propôs um processo de simbiose, lento e persistente, entre os personagens dom Quixote e Sancho Pança, da obra Quixote, de Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, resultando na sanchificação de dom Quixote e na quixotização de Sancho. A proposta, feita na primeira metade do século XX, provocou grande repercussão no âmbito dos estudos cervantinos. O presente trabalho tem o objetivo de analisar a fala e o comportamento das personagens ao longo da narrativa, a fim de confirmar, ou não, a proposta de Madariaga e, para tanto, concentra-se na análise de dois capítulos “Moinhos de Vento” (cap. VIII) e “Cravilenho” (cap.XLI) que compõem a primeira e a segunda parte de Quixote, respectivamente. A pesquisa, de cunho crítico, tem o apoio básico na proposta teórico-metodológica, da Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional (LSF), cuja metafunção interpessoal acolhe a noção de modalidade acrescida da avaliatividade – avaliação de afeto (emoções), julgamento (ética) e apreciação (estética), que inclui a avaliação social (avaliação de fenômenos sociais). A LSF permite relacionar as escolhas léxico-gramaticais da microestrutura do texto com a macroestrutura das relações de poder e de ideologia do discurso. Nesse contexto, incluímos questões referentes ao footing, à ameaça de face e de ironia. A pesquisa deve responder às seguintes perguntas: (a) Que escolhas gramaticais confirmam a sanchificação de dom Quixote e a quixotização de Sancho? (b) Que papel exerce a avaliatividade nesse processo? (c) Como é feita a crítica social nesse contexto? A análise comprova que há de fato uma mudança no caráter das duas personagens, em termos de uma mútua influência que acontece ao longo da narrativa, em que um exame detido capta a crítica social implícita tecida por Cervantes