• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 77
  • 25
  • 9
  • 7
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 145
  • 145
  • 34
  • 28
  • 25
  • 22
  • 20
  • 20
  • 19
  • 19
  • 15
  • 15
  • 14
  • 14
  • 14
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
141

Locação social em São Paulo entre 2001 e 2016: definição da agenda governamental

Moraes, Ivy Mayumi de 24 April 2018 (has links)
Submitted by Ivy Mayumi de Moraes (ivydemoraes@gmail.com) on 2018-07-03T14:46:34Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MORAES, I. 2018.pdf: 2054461 bytes, checksum: 6d7a8cb00488215262b94aa92f0aefdf (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Pamela Beltran Tonsa (pamela.tonsa@fgv.br) on 2018-07-03T14:49:35Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MORAES, I. 2018.pdf: 2054461 bytes, checksum: 6d7a8cb00488215262b94aa92f0aefdf (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Suzane Guimarães (suzane.guimaraes@fgv.br) on 2018-07-03T16:13:20Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MORAES, I. 2018.pdf: 2054461 bytes, checksum: 6d7a8cb00488215262b94aa92f0aefdf (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-03T16:13:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MORAES, I. 2018.pdf: 2054461 bytes, checksum: 6d7a8cb00488215262b94aa92f0aefdf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-04-24 / O objetivo desta dissertação de mestrado é analisar o tema de locação social na agenda governamental da cidade de São Paulo nas gestões municipais de 2001 a 2016. Entende-se locação social, nesta pesquisa, como ação de Estado que destina estoque de imóveis, público ou privado, para atender as demandas de moradia da população de baixa renda, sem que haja transferência de propriedade do imóvel ao beneficiário, mas, em contrapartida, o pagamento de taxas de aluguel, que podem ou não ser subsidiadas. Baseado em entrevistas e análise documental, e mobilizando o referencial teórico de definição de agenda, argumenta-se que há três períodos distintos da locação social na agenda habitacional do governo municipal, quais sejam, inclusão (entre 2001 e 2004), inércia (entre 2005 e 2015), e centralidade (entre 2015 e 2016). No período de inclusão, a locação social entrou na agenda governamental paulistana como misto de iniciativa interna e externa, em resposta ao problema de moradia acessível no centro de São Paulo, resultando na criação do Programa de Locação Social (PLS) em 2002. No período de inércia, que se iniciou em 2005 com a mudança de governo, o PLS foi revisto, fazendo com que a locação social se mantivesse na agenda nos anos seguintes apenas em virtude de desdobramentos de ações tomadas anteriormente. Isto incluiu a entrega de empreendimentos previstos ou iniciados e a realocação de unidades habitacionais para locação social em empreendimentos realizados no escopo de outros programas. Finalmente, no período de centralidade, a partir da mudança da equipe da Secretaria Municipal de Habitação em 2015, a locação social adquiriu notoriedade no planejamento da política habitacional do município. Isto incluiu a ênfase dada ao tema no projeto de lei do Plano Municipal de Habitação de 2016, seu papel no Plano Municipal de Políticas para a População em Situação de Rua de 2016, a criação de um órgão de competência única voltada à locação social, a Gerência de Locação Social, e os planos para retomada e ampliação do PLS. Em um momento de intensificação do debate sobre locação social como alternativa de habitação de interesse social, esta dissertação de mestrado contribui para preencher as lacunas na produção acadêmica brasileira sobre locação social e, na área de Administração Pública, sobre habitação de interesse social. / This thesis analyzes the social rental housing in the agenda of the Municipality of São Paulo from 2001 to 2016. Social rental housing is defined as a government policy that i) allocates public and private housing stock, ii) meets the demands of a low-income population, iii) upon payment of rents that may or may not be subsidized by the government, and iv) functions without transferring property from the owner to the beneficiary. Based on interviews and archival research, and drawing from the agenda-setting framework, I argue that social rental housing in the Municipality's housing agenda can be classified into three periods: inclusion (2001-2004), inertia (2005-2015), and centrality (2015-2016). During the period of inclusion, the social rental housing policy Programa de Locação Social (PLS, Social Rental Housing Program) was established in 2002 as an initiative, simultaneously internal and external to the Municipality, to respond to demands for housing affordability in downtown São Paulo. The inertia period started in 2005 when the new administration revised the PLS. In the subsequent years, social rental housing only persisted in the policy agenda as a consequence of past decisions. This included the delivery of previously planned PLS projects, and the reallocation of units from different policies to social rental housing. Finally, the centrality period began in 2015 with the team change at the Housing Department. Social rental housing became a prominent aspect in housing plans put forth by the Municipality in this period. In 2016, it was incorporated into the Plano Municipal de Habitação (Housing Plan) and the Plano Municipal de Políticas para a População em Situação de Rua (Homeless Policies Plan); additionally, the Gerência de Locação Social (Social Rental Housing Management Office) was created, and the Municipality made plans to resume and expand the PLS. At a time when debates over social rental housing as a housing alternative are intensifying, this study contributes to filling in the gaps of the Brazilian social rental housing literature in general and the Brazilian social housing literature in the field of Public Administration.
142

Hushållens vattenanvändning i Göteborg : Statistisk studie utifrån utomhustemperatur, byggår och socioekonomisk påverkan / Household water use in Gothenburg : Statistical study analyzing impacts of outdoor temperature, building year and socio-economicfactors

Mahmoudi, Nazanin January 2017 (has links)
Enligt Världshälsoorganisationen, WHO, behöver människan använda minst 20 liter vatten per dag (Reed & Reed, 2013). I Sverige är vattenanvändningen ca 160 liter per person och dygn i hushållet (Svenskt vatten, 2016) och ungefär 87 % av Sveriges befolkning är anslutna till det kommunala vatten- och avloppsledningsnätet (SCB, 2016a). Dricksvattnet i Sveriges används bl.a. till mat, tvätt och toalettspolning. Svenskt Vattens riktlinjer för den dimensionerande vattenanvändningen baseras på bl.a. publikationen P83:s dimensionering av svenska vatten- och spillvattensystem. Dimensioneringen ger specifik vattenanvändning samt maxdygn- och maxtimfaktorer för sambanden mellan medelvattenanvändningen per dygn och vattenanvändningen maximalt under ett dygn respektive en timme vid dimensioneringen. I denna studie har påverkan av utomhustemperatur, byggår och socioekonomiska aspekter på vattenanvändningen undersökts. Områden i Göteborg som har undersökts är Hisingen, Centrum samt Östra delen av Göteborg. Dessa grupper och områden har även bl.a. statistiskt undersökts med hjälp av korrelations- och signifikansanalys. På grund av personuppgiftslagen har främst personer över 15 år inkluderats i studien, men även vissa underåriga. Med hjälp av data från Göteborgs Energi AB har dimensioneringsparametrar för områden och grupper kunnat beräknas. Bl.a. visades att medelinkomst oftast var den variabel med signifikant korrelation med dimensioneringsparametrarna. Ett annat resultat var att låginkomsttagare var gruppen med störst specifik vattenanvändning och maxdygnsfaktor. Centrum och Östras vattenanvändning visade signifikant korrelation med utomhustemperaturen år 2013 och 2014. Maxdygnsfaktor och maxtimfaktor (dygn) och maxtimfaktor (år) förefaller vara lämpliga parametrar som kan användas i framtida dimensioneringsberäkningar. / According to the World Health Organization, a human being has to use at least 1-3 liters of water a day (Reed & Reed, 2013). In Sweden, water use in households is about 160 liters per person and day in the household (Svenskt vatten, 2016) and around 87 % of the Swedish population are connected to the municipal water and sewage networks (SCB, 2016a). The drinking water in Sweden is used for many purposes, for example cooking, laundry and toilet flushing. Swedish guidelines for the dimensioning of the water networks is based on the publication P83 dimensions of Swedish water- and wastewater systems. The dimensioning guidelines give maximum day factor and maximum hour factor in relation to mean water usage per day and also one day and one day hour usage maximums. The effects of outdoor temperature, building year and socio-economic characteristics on water usage were investigated in this study. Areas of Gothenburg such as Hisingen, Centrum and Östra were studied. These areas and also specific groups in these areas have also been statistically studied through correlation, significance tests and confidence interval investigation. Due to the Swedish personal record law, children under the age of 16 were included in the study but with a modification. The water use for addresses were obtained from Göteborgs Energi AB. Data quality was ensured before statistical analysis thorough data review and analysis. The study’s result showed that the mean income was usually the only variable with significant correlation with the dimensioning parameters. The low-income group was shown to have the highest specific water usage and maximum day factor. Centrum and Östra’s had significant correlation between water use outdoor temperature during 2013 and 2014. Maximum day factor and maximum hour factor (day) and maximum hour factor (year) were suitable parameter to be used for future water usage calculations.
143

The role of intergovernmental relations in the implementation of social housing in Gauteng Province

Madisha, Makota 18 January 2021 (has links)
South Africa has a social housing delivery problem, where, despite all mechanisms, efforts and resources (including policies, enabling legislation and social housing production inputs such as planning regimes, guidelines and strategies, funding, land, buildings and human resources put in place by the government), the pace of social housing delivery is not at a point where it is measurably satisfactory across all spheres of government. There exists between the three spheres of government an intergovernmental relations framework for implementing social housing policy. The performance of government shows a lack of institutionalized arrangements, coordination, and alignment in the day to-day operations of the three spheres of government in implementing social housing policy. It is for this reason that this study assessed the current intergovernmental relations operational system in the delivery of social housing units in Gauteng Province. A mixed-methods research approach was implemented for this study based in methodological pragmatism, phenomenology, and positivism. The researcher conducted interviews with senior managers and administered research questionnaires with operational staff within the National, Provincial and Local spheres of government which included City of Tshwane, City of Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni Metropolitan municipalities in Human Settlements Departments, state agencies involved in the delivery of social housing units such as the Social Housing Regulatory Authority and municipal entities such as the Housing Company Tshwane, the Johannesburg Social Housing Company and the Ekurhuleni Social Housing Company. Private and non-governmental social housing institutions, such as the Yeast City Housing and Mannapendlo Social Housing Organisation were also included. The data were complemented by documentary content analysis, including review of annual reports, strategic human settlements plans, policies and legislation pertaining to the provision of housing, human settlements, and social housing. This study assessed the functioning of the three spheres of government in relation to the implementation of social housing policy in Gauteng Province. The three spheres of government are regarded as equally important institutions for the development of sustainable human settlements, and a sound relation between the three spheres of government must be maintained in order to achieve successful development and management of social housing. The research found evidence of poor coordination and alignment, and no integration of social housing related activities and functions between the three spheres of government. There are major risks, such as financial risk, financial planning, and project implementation risks experienced at local government level. The study identified challenges faced by the three spheres of government and state agencies in the implementation of social housing policy in Gauteng Province. The challenges included slow release of land for social housing development, uncoordinated and unplanned social housing delivery in the province. In addition, the study identified other input factors that impact negatively on the supply of social housing units which cut across all spheres of government such as political mandates, legislation, policies, strategies, plans, targets, priorities, information technology and administrative and financial constraints. The study presented and recommended social housing delivery model for Gauteng Province. The proposed model has the probability of providing an understanding of the relations between government departments, state agencies, social housing institutions, intergovernmental relations structures at national, provincial and local government level, non-governmental organizations, and community based organizations, so as to ensure there is vertical and horizontal alignment to improve and fast track the delivery of social housing in Gauteng Province. / Public Administration and Management / D. Phil (Public Administration)
144

Hodnocení systému prevence a pomoci osobám ohrožených ztrátou bydlení v České republice / Evaluation system of prevention and assistance to persons at risk of losing their homes in the Czech Republic

Kšandová, Pavlína January 2015 (has links)
This thesis covers the main problems related to loss of housing in the context of the institutional setting in the Czech Republic. The aim of this thesis is explaining the institutional setup of the system of prevention and help people / households that are at risk of losing housing and evaluate the system in terms of the possibility of prevention of social exclusion.The introductory part describes the characteristics of the key concepts in housing policy in relation to social housing and various approaches to social housing in selected countries (Sweden, Germany, Great Britain). The thesis focuses on the institutional analysis of the existing legal framework and possible solutions to the current housing shortage (welfare, social work, social services). In the research part of this thesis a case study of Louny municipality has been chosen as a model sample of resolving the current shortage of housing. Results of the analysis had been confronted and evaluated by perspective of people solving housing problems and relevant social workers working with poor people. In the end of the thesis, a SWOT analysis is delivered identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the system.
145

Montréal et son marché immobilier locatif de 1731 à 1831 : stratification sociale, ségrégation spatiale et transition vers le capitalisme

Massicotte, Daniel January 1994 (has links)
Thèse numérisée par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

Page generated in 0.0835 seconds