Thesis (D.W.S.)--Institute for Worship Studies, Florida, 2004. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 292-297).

Thesis (D.W.S.)--Institute for Worship Studies, Florida, 2004. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 292-297).

Thesis (D.W.S.)--Institute for Worship Studies, Florida, 2004. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 292-297).

The National Gallery in Prague conserves an important masterpiece of the Fle- mish mannerist Jan Gossaert. The panel painting Saint Luke painting the Virgin was originally determined for the cathedral of Saint Roumboult in Mechelen in Belgium. The artwork represents one of the first applications of Renaissance style behind the Alps. Gossaert was educated in this new style during a visit to Italy several years earlier and combined it with traditional Flemish art. The artist worked for the court of Margaret of Austria in Mechelen around the year 1513, the year the painting originates. His traditional style became influenced by the techniques used in Mechelen by foreign artists. The theme is painted the tradi- tional manner of work on an oak panel. Renaissance and Gothic architecture is decorated by " en grisaille" sculptures. A seemingly simple theme is given deeper meaning thanks to these objects containing hidden meanings. There are also some prints from the time the panel was in the Saint Vitus Cathedral in Prague due to which we can contemplate the progress in presentation of the painting during centuries. 1

Dans l’Espagne des XVIe et XVIIe siècles, le peintre est un personnage en construction. Souvent défini par l’idéologie qui le commande et les œuvres qui lui survivent, son geste semble perdu à jamais, ou figé sous la forme d’archétypes et d’allégories. L’autoportrait, genre naissant, témoigne de cette main, mais il reste loin de toute objectivité : « Le peintre, peintre de lui-même, dans la dépendance de ce que l’histoire charrie et porte, n’aurait-il été qu’un singe savant et dressé qui rabâche ? », se demande Pascal Bonafoux en conclusion de son étude sur Les peintres et l’autoportrait. Même dans le reflet direct que l’artiste offre de lui-même, les topiques s’immiscent : ils aident à son identification, au déchiffrage des chefs-d’œuvre et au balisage des chemins de la gloire. Cependant, ces figures ont une vie, et elles échappent parfois à l’évidence qu’on leur prête. À commencer par saint Luc, personnalité a priori idéale pour conduire les peintres vers la reconnaissance attendue dans l’élan contre-réformiste, mais qui doit compter avec Apelle, le maître grec dont l’excellence retentit depuis un sommet convoité. Ces légendes se diversifient et se ramifient dans le jeu métaphorique des mots, elles évoluent au gré de la revendication théorique et dévoilent leurs limites au moment de prendre corps. Leur fréquence, leur intensité et leurs croisements témoignent des voies empruntées afin de saisir le personnage du peintre, non pas sa psychologie, mais sa stature, libérale et noble. La focalisation sur la patte du peintre mythique, qui pousse dans l’ombre celle du singe imitateur, éclaire l’avancée de l’artiste dans le Siècle d’Or de la peinture espagnole. / In 16th and 17th century Spain, the figure of the painter is a work in progress. His gesture – often defined by the underlying ideology and by the pieces which will outlive it – seems lost forever or frozen into archetypes and allegories. The new genre of the self-portrait states the existence of the painter’s hand but without any objectivity: “Has the painter, painting himself, been nobody but a performing trained monkey rambling on?”, Pascal Bonafoux wonders in the conclusion of his study Les peintres et l’autoportrait. Topics creep in even in the direct reflection the painter offers when painting himself: they help identify him, decipher the masterpieces and mark out the way to glory. However, those topics live and sometimes escape the obviousness one tends to see in them. Starting with St Luke, who should be the ideal one to lead the painters towards the recognition expected in the wake of the anti-reformation movement, but who has to reckon with Apelles, the Greek master whose excellence resounds from a much-envied summit of fame. Those legends become diverse and ramified through the metaphoric game of language, evolve according to theoretical claims and show their limits when given substance. Their frequency, intensity and conjunctions bear witness to the ways one follows to grasp the figure of the painter – not his psychology but his stature, liberal and noble. The focus on the painter’s touch – which relegates the gesture of the copying monkey to the shadows – sheds a light on the artist’s progression in the Golden Age of Spanish Painting