The methods of fixation of the facial prostheses, it has been developing for larger comfort and safety, improving the quality and the patients' life. Consulting the information informs on the theme, there was the coincidence of subjects studied in some of these goods, having, also the disagreement possibility in their conclusions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fixation methods (implants extra orals and stickers) of facial prosthesis in patient of cancer, through a systematic review (Meta analysis). Searches were accomplished by rehearsals controlled randomized of studies about fixation of facial prosthesis in patient of cancer through stickers and implants facial in bases of bibliographical data. It was located 259 summaries that were read and selected by two examiners, according to eligibility criteria and quality. The clinical endings of fixation mechanic's methods and anatomical, it was not possible to accomplish methanalysis. For the studies whose fixation method was adhesive and facial implants, it took place methanalysis eleven goods, selected were considered eligible and presenting quality for the study, involving 787 patient that do use of facial prosthesis. The methanalysis shows evidences of the beneficial effects of the use of implants extra orals for retention of the facial prostheses. The good effectiveness of the fixation methods is evidenced by implants extra orals, but for cases where no there is a good selection of the bone type and all is not possible the placement of implants the stickers is an alternative to keep the prostheses facial. / Os métodos de fixação das próteses faciais têm evoluído para maior conforto e segurança, melhorando a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. Consultando as informações cientificas sobre o tema, houve a coincidência de assuntos estudados em alguns destes artigos, havendo, também a possibilidade de discordância nas suas conclusões. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os métodos de fixação (implantes extra-orais e adesivos) de próteses faciais em pacientes oncológicos, por intermédio de uma revisão sistemática (meta análise). Foram realizados buscas por ensaios aleatorizados controlados de estudos sobre fixação de prótese facial em pacientes oncológicos por meio de adesivos e implantes extra orais em bases de dados bibliográficos. Localizouse 259 resumos que foram lidos e selecionados por examinadores, segundo critérios de elegibilidade e qualidade. Para os desfechos clínicos dos métodos de fixação por adesivos, não foi possível realizar metanálise. Para os estudos cujo método de fixação eram adesivos e implantes faciais, realizou-se metanálise. Dez artigos, selecionados foram considerados elegíveis e apresentando qualidade para o estudo, envolvendo 787 pacientes que fazem uso de prótese facial. A metanálise mostra evidencia dos efeitos benéficos do uso de implantes extra orais para retenção das próteses faciais. Para casos onde não há quantidade e qualidade óssea e onde foi submetido a tratamento radioterápico, quando não for possível a colocação de implantes, os adesivos são uma alternativa para reter próteses faciais, mas pode trazer irritação a pele quando usado por um longo período. / Mestre em Odontologia

Bakgrund: Överrapportering vid skiftbyte är en essentiell del av sjuksköterskans kliniska arbete, trots detta råder inte konsensus om vilken rapporteringsmetod som är bästa praxis. I takt med en större personcentrering av vården står patientens rätt till delaktighet och medbestämmande i större fokus, och bedsiderapportering har vuxit fram som ett alternativ till den traditionella rapporten. Syfte: Att belysa hur sjuksköterskor och vuxna patienter i den somatiska slutenvården beskriver sin upplevelse av bedsiderapportering. Metod: Denna litteraturöversikt genomfördes som en förenklad metasyntes där dataanalysen baserades på kvalitativ innehållsanalytisk teknik. Resultat: Tre huvudteman framkom gällande patienters upplevelse av bedsiderapportering: patientmedverkan, bättre vårdupplevelse samt möjliga hinder. Ytterligare tre huvudteman framkom för sjuksköterskors upplevelser: upplevda fördelar, möjliga hinder och förutsättningar för bedsiderapportering. Både patienter och sjuksköterskor beskrev positiva upplevelser av bedsiderapportering med den främsta fördelen att patienten blev mer delaktig i vården. Patienter beskrev en ökad trygghetskänsla och ett tillgodosett informationsbehov. Sjuksköterskor beskrev hur patientsäkerheten förbättrades och prioriteringar underlättades av bedsiderapportering. Oro kring sekretess och känslig information lyftes av både sjuksköterskor och patienter. Slutsats: Bedsiderapportering kan utgöra ett värdefullt verktyg i en mer personcentrerad vård, men att ytterligare kunskap behövs kring hantering av sekretessen. / Background: Shift reporting is an essential part of the nurse’s clinical work, despite this there is no consensus about what constitutes best practice. As personcentredness is becoming more important, more focus is on the patients’ right to participation and shared decision-making, and bedside reporting has become an alternative to the traditional shift report. Aim: To illustrate how nurses and adult inpatients within the somatic care describe their experience of bedside handover. Method: This literature review was conducted through a simplified meta-synthesis approach based on qualitative content analysis as a tool for the analysis of data. Results: Three main themes regarding patients’ experiences of bedside handover emerged: patient participation, improved care experience and possible barriers. Three additional main themes regarding nurses’ experiences emerged: perceived advantages, possible barriers and enabling factors for bedside handover. Both patients and nurses reported positive experiences of bedside handover, with the foremost advantage being the patients’ involvement in their care. Patients described an increased feeling of safety and that their needs of information were met. Nurses described how patient safety was improved and how prioritization was facilitated. Both nurses and patients had concerns about confidentiality and sensitive information. Conclusion: Bedside handover can be used as a valuable tool in the work towards a more person centred care, but there is a need for further knowledge about how confidentiality can be managed.