This work provides a basic orientation in matters of taxation of non-residents - natural persons in the Czech Republic. At the beginning are explained the concepts, methods to avoid double taxation, and examines the various categories of income taxation of individuals and also affects the social and health insurance. In the practical part are a questions addressed to the specific practical examples, including file and completing tax return, social security and health insurance reports and other related forms. In conclusion are mentioned the news regarding the taxation of non-natural persons and author´s proposals. The work shows the possibility to limit tax evasion carry out the transition from the system of automatic oneself declaration to the tax international refund system. There are added also useful attachments.

This diploma thesis deals with the deferred tax issue in the context of changing the US GAAP accounting system to IFRS. First of all, it summarizes the theoretical approaches to recognition, measurement and reporting of deferred tax and examines the factors, which could affect its appearance in the individual and consolidated financial statements. Then this diploma thesis focuses on the comparison between the US GAAP and IFRS rules regarding deferred tax accounting. The output of this comparison is demonstrated in a form of analysis table pointing to the fundamental conceptual differences. Next part of the thesis presents the first IFRS adoption issue in relation to IFRS 1, where the effect of the first adoption on the presented deferred tax is accentuated. After all, the findings from the theoretical part of the diploma thesis are applied in the practical example of PJSC LUKOIL, which had to change US GAAP to IFRS in 2014 due to the new legislation requirement. This last part examines the differential attitudes of both accounting systems to deferred tax and presentation and significance of deferred tax at the first IFRS adoption.

Le mécanisme de solidarité traverse le droit fiscal. D’essence civile, la solidarité est intimement liée aux moyens de recouvrement dont dispose l’administration. S’agissant du dirigeant de société, sa « responsabilité pécuniaire » ou « solidarité patrimoniale » est actuellement suspendue à la décision du juge. Or, deux textes prévoient la solidarité du dirigeant selon qu’il s’agisse du juge de la responsabilité (LPF, art. L. 267) ou du juge répressif (CGI, art. 1745). Si ces deux dispositions sont indépendantes l’une de l’autre au motif qu’elles n’ont ni la même cause, ni le même objet, ni le même demandeur, il y a lieu de s’interroger sur leur portée respective, souligner leurs écueils et présenter les voies d’une réforme de la solidarité du dirigeant au passif fiscal. Il s’agit à la fois à rendre davantage efficace l’action en recouvrement de l’administration et garantir les droits dont dispose le dirigeant. La prégnance de la situation actuelle impose le pragmatisme : recouvrer le passif fiscal formé essentiellement par la TVA et suspendre la solidarité à l’intentionnalité des manquements à l’origine du passif fiscal dès la procédure d’assiette. / Joint liability is a recurrent feature of tax law. It is essentially a civil law mechanism which is closely bound to the means of recovery available to the revenue authorities. With respect to the company director, his “financial liability” or “joint pecuniary liability” currently depends on a court ruling. Two items of legislation provide for the director’s liability according to whether the matter is being heard before the civil courts (Article L. 267 of the LPF tax code) or the criminal courts (Article 1745 of the CGI tax code).Although those two provisions are independent from one another since they have neither the same legal basis, nor the same purpose and the person bringing the action is different, it is appropriate to question their respective scope, underline their pitfalls and present avenues for reform of the corporate manager’s joint liability for tax liabilities.The aim is both to make the revenue authority’s action for recovery more effective and to secure the corporate manager’s rights. The current situation requires pragmatism, for recovering tax liabilities resulting primarily from VAT and for suspending joint liability for intentionally causing tax liabilities from the time of the procedure of the determination of the tax base.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-15T19:33:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Carlos Willians Osorio.pdf: 1082658 bytes, checksum: 73921d0f02d430dfae4fa6fce3d3d35c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-08-08 / The small business is one of the main pillars of the economy, both the number of establishments and geographical desconcentration, as its ability to generate jobs statistically proven facts. For this reason, they become deserving of public policies to support and encourage the growth, profitability and business sustainability. From this evidence, the limitation of the study includes understanding the importance of this segment to the country, combined with the effectiveness of public policies intended for, in the context of differential treatment guaranteed by the fundamental rule. / A empresa de pequeno porte constitui um dos principais pilares de sustentação da economia, tanto pelo número de estabelecimentos e desconcentração geográfica, quanto pela sua capacidade de gerar empregos fatos comprovados estatisticamente. Por essa razão, tornam-se merecedoras de políticas públicas de apoio e incentivo ao seu crescimento, rentabilidade e sustentabilidade empresarial. A partir dessa constatação, a limitação do estudo abarca a compreensão da relevância desse segmento para o país, articulada com a efetividade das políticas públicas a ele destinadas, no contexto do tratamento diferenciado garantido pelo Texto Fundamental.