No description available.

Glauber Rocha (1939-1981), conhecido principalmente pelo seu trabalho de cineasta e como um dos expoentes do Cinema Novo, atuou em diversos cenários da nossa intelectualidade e da cultura nacional. Este trabalho examina a prática ensaística deste intelectual manifestada em sua produção escrita que circulou na grande imprensa, nos veículos alternativos, em revistas literárias e culturais e em livros, entre o final dos anos 1950 e início dos anos 1980. Como método, privilegia-se a análise do seu trajeto intelectual em convivência com a análise de sua prática do ensaio de ideias sob a forma de divulgação seriada. Por esta intersecção, foi possível apreender: os movimentos de Glauber pelo campo cultural brasileiro em distintos períodos; sua visão, cheia de mobilidades, sobre os temas nacionais e culturais mais variados; e as estratégias disseminadas em seus escritos de ensaio que revelam o seu processo de consagração e rejeição diante de seus pares contemporâneos, no contexto cultural e intelectual de suas experiências de artista e crítico. / Glauber Rocha (19391981), Brazilian filmmaker and exponent of Cinema Novo, has acted in several contexts of the intelligentsia and culture of Brazil. This thesis examines his essay\'s practice manifested in their written production that circulated in the mainstream press, in the alternative media, in the literary and cultural magazines and books, between the late 1950s and early 1980s. The method which is used is interdisciplinary and includes two analytical perspectives: the intellectual trajectory of Glauber in harmony with the analysis of his essay\'s practice. In this thesis, we will discuss: the positions of the Glauber inscribed in the Brazilian cultural field at different times; his viewpoint of cultural and political practices in Brazil; and the strategies developed by Glauber, in his essay, that reveal his process of consecration and rejection in the cultural and intellectual context of his experiences as a Brazilian artist.

The subject of this thesis is the contemporary literature written by the sons and daughters of North African immigrant families in France. Its main area of investigation is the place of this literature in the French literary field, in the Bourdieusian sense of the term, and the discursive features which motivate the ethnic based label of “Beur literature”. The study has a double approach in investigating both the argument for the socio-ethnic categorisation, and the reception of this literature in the French press. The literary corpus consists of twenty works from 2005 and 2006 by eighteen Beur writers. Thirteen of these works are subject to literary analysis. These are novels by Akli Tadjer, Zahia Rahmani, Faïza Guène, Mabrouck Rachedi, El Driss, Mohamed Razane, Houda Rouane, Nora Hamdi, Nor Eddine Boudjedia and Touhami Moualek, and three autobiographical narratives written by Razika Zitouni, Abel El Quandili and Aziz Senni. The press corpus from the corresponding period covers 14 titles of French national and regional daily papers, 8 titles of weekly general press and 6 titles of periodicals of literary and social debate. According to my hypothesis, the Beur fiction and the autobiographical narratives of my corpus are based on a common discourse that is expressed through certain literary means. A frequent strategy found in the novels is the subversion of French classics. Another feature is the constant referral to the French republican values. The novels share the latter of these two strategies with the autobiographical stories. This can be interpreted as resulting from a communication between a literary discourse and a social discourse which points toward a common ideological foundation. It also reveals the specific “Frenchness” of a literature that is often classified as “francophone” rather than “French” literature. The study of the journalistic reception confirms this aspect by the frequent referral of its authors to their ethnic and social origins.

OLIVEIRA, Lucia Maria Alves Maia. O leitor Gerardo Mello Mourão. 2008. 164f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Literatura, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras, Fortaleza-CE, 2008. / Submitted by Liliane oliveira (morena.liliane@hotmail.com) on 2012-07-02T13:33:12Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2008_DIS_LMAMOLIVEIRA.pdf: 1069924 bytes, checksum: a6ad963f49fbdd7ada39a91583765aef (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Maria Josineide Góis(josineide@ufc.br) on 2012-07-23T11:31:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2008_DIS_LMAMOLIVEIRA.pdf: 1069924 bytes, checksum: a6ad963f49fbdd7ada39a91583765aef (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2012-07-23T11:31:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2008_DIS_LMAMOLIVEIRA.pdf: 1069924 bytes, checksum: a6ad963f49fbdd7ada39a91583765aef (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 / The writer’s imaginary and aesthetical inclinations are inserted in the historical and cultural context which involves them. However, besides experiencing the social tensions of his time, the writer searches for his autonomy as a literary creator, absorbing and reinterpreting the tradition. Thus, in the analysis of literary project of Gerardo Mello Mourão from (Jan., 8th, 1917 to March, 9th 2007), we outline firstly, a historical and cultural panel of the period his work was created with O Valete de Espadas (1960). Such investigation receives the theoretical critical orientation of Antronio Candido’s, Literature and Society (2000), Wilson Martins’, História da Intelectualidade Brasileira (1996), Gilberto de Mello Kujawski’s, A Crise do Século XX (1991), Vitor Manuel de Aguiar e Silva’s, Teoria da Literatura (1973) Pierre Bourdieu’s discussive pressuposition, The Rules of Art (2005) and Dominique Maingueneau with The context of the Literary work (2001). Moreover, we investigated the philosophical and aesthetical tendency of the period which interrelates with the writer’s critical positioning regarding the world around him as well as with his notion about literary writing. At the light of theoretical categories such as “Misreading” (Harold Bloom) and intertextuality (Julia Kristeva), we inquired into the 2nd chapter, the literary and critical work, Gerardo Melo Mourão’s interviews and speeches with the purpose of learning about a dialogue which is creative and traditional. In such analysis, the critical writings which were base for our reflexions were: A Angústia da Influência (1991) and Um Mapa da Desleitura (1995) by Harold Bloom as well as Palavras da Crítica (1992), organized by José Luis Jobim. In the final part of the research we observed the discursive intercourse that Gerardo Mourão keeps with other writers searching for a space of autonomous emancipation. / O imaginário e as inclinações estéticas dos escritores estão inseridos no contexto histórico e cultural que os envolve. Mas, além de vivenciar as tensões sociais de seu tempo, o escritor busca sua autonomia como criador literário absorvendo e reinterpretando a tradição. Assim, na análise do projeto literário de Gerardo Mello Mourão (8.1.1917 - 9.3.2007) esboçamos, inicialmente, um painel histórico e cultural do período de criação de sua obra O Valete de Espadas (1960). Essa investigação recebe a orientação teórico-crítica de: Antônio Cândido, Literatura e Sociedade (2000), Wilson Martins, História da Intelectualidade Brasileira (1996), Gilberto de Mello Kujawski, A Crise do Século XX (1991), Vitor Manuel de Aguiar e Silva, Teoria da Literatura (1973) e os pressupostos discursivos de Pierre Bourdieu, As Regras da Arte (2005) e Dominique Maingueneau, O Contexto da Obra Literária (2001). Além disso, investigamos as correntes filosóficas e estéticas do período, que se inter-relacionam com o posicionamento crítico do escritor acerca do mundo que o rodeia e com sua concepção de escrita literária. À luz de categorias teóricas como “Desleitura” (Harold Bloom) e “Intertextualidade” (Julia Kristeva), examinamos, no 2º capítulo, a obra literária e crítica, as entrevistas e os discursos de Gerardo Mello Mourão, com o intuito de apreendermos um diálogo criativo com a tradição. Nessa análise, as obras críticas que embasaram nossa reflexão foram: A Angústia da Influência (1991) e Um Mapa da Desleitura (1995) de Harold Bloom e Palavras da Crítica (1992), organizada por José Luis Jobim. Na etapa final da pesquisa, observamos os encontros discursivos que Gerardo Mello Mourão mantém com outros escritores, na busca por um espaço de enunciação autônoma.

Glauber Rocha (1939-1981), conhecido principalmente pelo seu trabalho de cineasta e como um dos expoentes do Cinema Novo, atuou em diversos cenários da nossa intelectualidade e da cultura nacional. Este trabalho examina a prática ensaística deste intelectual manifestada em sua produção escrita que circulou na grande imprensa, nos veículos alternativos, em revistas literárias e culturais e em livros, entre o final dos anos 1950 e início dos anos 1980. Como método, privilegia-se a análise do seu trajeto intelectual em convivência com a análise de sua prática do ensaio de ideias sob a forma de divulgação seriada. Por esta intersecção, foi possível apreender: os movimentos de Glauber pelo campo cultural brasileiro em distintos períodos; sua visão, cheia de mobilidades, sobre os temas nacionais e culturais mais variados; e as estratégias disseminadas em seus escritos de ensaio que revelam o seu processo de consagração e rejeição diante de seus pares contemporâneos, no contexto cultural e intelectual de suas experiências de artista e crítico. / Glauber Rocha (19391981), Brazilian filmmaker and exponent of Cinema Novo, has acted in several contexts of the intelligentsia and culture of Brazil. This thesis examines his essay\'s practice manifested in their written production that circulated in the mainstream press, in the alternative media, in the literary and cultural magazines and books, between the late 1950s and early 1980s. The method which is used is interdisciplinary and includes two analytical perspectives: the intellectual trajectory of Glauber in harmony with the analysis of his essay\'s practice. In this thesis, we will discuss: the positions of the Glauber inscribed in the Brazilian cultural field at different times; his viewpoint of cultural and political practices in Brazil; and the strategies developed by Glauber, in his essay, that reveal his process of consecration and rejection in the cultural and intellectual context of his experiences as a Brazilian artist.

Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2017-01-11T17:25:15Z No. of bitstreams: 1 rodrigodasilvacerqueira.pdf: 1861404 bytes, checksum: d367962dff6dd66c47914f4a9ad0e74e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Diamantino Mayra (mayra.diamantino@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-01-31T11:18:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 rodrigodasilvacerqueira.pdf: 1861404 bytes, checksum: d367962dff6dd66c47914f4a9ad0e74e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-31T11:18:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 rodrigodasilvacerqueira.pdf: 1861404 bytes, checksum: d367962dff6dd66c47914f4a9ad0e74e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-09-30 / O presente trabalho objetiva analisar as movimentações de Luiz Ruffato no campo literário brasileiro, norteando-se pela maneira como o escritor situa nesse espaço o Inferno provisório, conjunto de livros por ele publicado entre 2005 e 2011. O que se pretende aqui é um estudo de trajetória, a fim de que se possa esmiuçar as tomadas de posição do escritor no campo literário em que ele se insere e no qual tenta instituir uma posição particular. O trabalho dividir-se-á em cinco capítulos. No primeiro, buscamos averiguar o processo de formação do escritor, investigando como se dá a incorporação de certos habitus e a possível transformação desses em prática artística. Para isso, analisamos relatos em tons autobiográficos com que Ruffato se insere no campo, textos públicos (entrevistas e depoimentos) através dos quais o autor se posiciona, construindo para si uma autoimagem sobre cujas características básicas refletiremos. Pesam também nesse estudo sobre a formação de Luiz Ruffato como escritor as primeiras incursões literárias profissionais, tímidos passos no campo literário, mas que já revelam procedimentos e posicionamentos a serem potencializadas em momentos futuros de sua trajetória. No segundo capítulo, buscaremos compreender como se dá o início da trajetória profissional do autor, analisando seus três primeiros livros. Neste capítulo em especial, interessar-nos-á as estratégias adotadas pelo autor para inserir suas obras, as relações e aproximações com séries literárias várias que ele vai facultando a fim de criar para si uma posição particular, a maneira como o produtor movimenta-se no campo. O terceiro capítulo já estabelece o estudo em diálogo com o Inferno provisório. Nele, o mesmo tipo de análise desenvolvido no segundo capítulo é agora articulado à pentalogia desenvolvida pelo autor entre 2005 e 2011. Analisamos, sobretudo, a presença desse projeto literário em textos públicos que datam do fim da década de 1990, sopesando seus traços mais marcantes, seus desvios de rota e a relação entre tais movimentos e os lugares que o escritor vai ocupando no campo de produção. Já os dois últimos capítulos desta tese objetivam analisar os movimentos de Luiz Ruffato na própria escrita do Inferno provisório. Lendo os cinco volumes da pentalogia, buscamos averiguar se há possibilidade de a escrita conservar traços de outras tomadas de posição do escritor, o trânsito que ele estabelece no campo literário, a autoimagem que vai construindo para si e o lugar específico que tenta criar para seu nome. / The current task aims to analyze how Luiz Ruffato moves himself at Brazilian’s literary field studying how the writer situates Inferno provisório, books set released by the author between 2005 and 2011, in this space. What is intended here is an study about a writer’s trajectory, in order to read his stances and a particular position that he tries to institute. The task is divided in five chapters. In the first one, we seek to ascertain the writer’s formation process, investigating his incorporation of habitus and its possible formulation on artistic practices. For doing this, we analyze autobiographical reports with which Ruffato inserts himself on the literary field, public texts (interviews and statements) through which the author establishes a position; building a self image on whose basic characteristics we shall reflect. It’s also important for the study about Ruffato’s formation process, his first literary experiments, first steps on the literary field that, however, reveals procedures and position that will be potentiated in future moments. On the second chapter, we’ll try to understand the beginning of Ruffato’s professional trajectory analyzing his first three books. On this chapter, the strategies that the author adopts do insert his work on the literary field interest us, the relations and approximations with literary series that he provides in order to create a singular position, how the author build movementes. The third chapter establishes a relation with Inferno provisório. In this point, our goal is to maintain the type of analysis present in the second chapter, but now with the set of books published between 2005 and 2011. About everything, we analyze the presence of the project in public texts in the late 1990’s, positioning its remarkable features, detours and the places that the author occupies in the production field. The last two chapters search to reveal Ruffato´s movements in Inferno provisório’s writing. Reading the five volumes of the set we try to ascertain if there is a possibility for the literary writing to be considered as a carrier of author’s positioning, the place that he tries to occupy on literary field, the self image that he builds to conclude this objective.

Articulant littérature et sociologie, cette thèse étudie le processus de construction de la valeur littéraire à travers les pratiques de sélection des intermédiaires de la chaîne du livre, en l’occurrence des bibliothécaires de lecture publique en section adulte, quand ils constituent les collections ou les mettent en valeur. Elle s’appuie sur une enquête menée entre 2004 et 2010 dans le réseau des bibliothèques de la Ville de Paris à partir d’observations (séances de travail et réunions), d’entretiens approfondis avec des bibliothécaires, d’analyses quantitatives multiples menées à partir des catalogues et d’analyses textuelles. Une première partie analyse le cadre institutionnel de la lecture publique, ses professionnels et ses destinataires, en interrogeant les modèles de lecture promus et la réalité de la démocratisation culturelle. Une deuxième partie envisage les politiques d’acquisitions et les reconfigurations de la hiérarchie des genres qu’elles esquissent. Une dernière partie étudie trois dispositifs de mise en valeur qui, dans leur complémentarité, articulent réponse à la demande et politique d’offre. La thèse montre que les choix des bibliothécaires sont liés à la fois au rapport qu’ils entretiennent avec leur profession, à leur conception de la lecture publique et à leur position d’agents des politiques de la lecture et d’acteurs du champ littéraire : dans une double exigence de qualité et d’accessibilité au plus grand nombre, ils promeuvent des valeurs moyennes, devant procurer plaisir et savoir ; ce faisant, ils prennent part au processus d’auctorialisation dans ses différentes phases, de la découverte à la perpétuation. / Crossing literature and sociology, this dissertation studies the process of production of literary values through the work of books’ intermediaries, here librarians of public libraries, when they choose literary books to build collections or to point out a part of the collections. It is based on a survey conducted between 2004 and 2010 in Paris’ libraries network through observation (working sessions and meetings), interviews with librarians, quantitative analysis of parts of libraries catalog and textual analysis. The first part of the dissertation analyzes the institutional frame of public policies regarding readership development, examining the models of reading they promote and the reality of cultural democratization. The second part considers the policies of acquisition and the way they may reconfigure the scale of genres. The last part studies three promotion devices, that try to reconcile answer to demand and supply policies. The dissertation stresses the link between librarians’ choices, their relation to their profession, their conception of public reading and their position within literary field : having a double requirement for quality and accessibility, they promote middlebrow values, and books that have to provide both pleasure and knowledge. In doing so they take part to the process of “auctorialization”, pretending to discover authors and contributing to the perpetuation of their consecration.

L’image institutionnelle du Romantisme portugais, souvent calquée sur la vision nationaliste des chefs de file de ce mouvement et tournée vers les textes innovateurs, est une image tronquée, partiale et figée. Combinant l’analyse socio-littéraire de quatre œuvres de fiction, représentatives des principales lignes d’affrontement de l’époque en termes de valeurs esthétiques et idéologiques, avec l’analyse historique des traductions, cette étude fait émerger les différents pôles constitutifs du champ littéraire portugais entre 1840 et 1860 et démontre sa complexité polyphonique. On y décèle ainsi, au niveau de “la littérature civique” (symboliquement dominante), incarnée par A Virgem da Polónia, de J.J.R. Bastos, et Eurico, O Presbítero, d’Alexandre Herculano, un conflit entre modèles sociaux et littéraires conservateurs et progressistes. Quant à A Mão do Finado, d’Alfredo Possolo Hogan, elle permet d’éclairer l’émergence de l’”industrialisme littéraire”. Enfin, Maria! Não me mates, que sou tua mãe!, de Camilo Castelo Branco, représente la pérennité de la littérature de colportage et pour son auteur le début d’une carrière de “professionnel des lettres”. La partie finale est consacrée à l’examen de la littérature traduite (raisons du succès ou de l’absence de certains auteurs) et de la méthode de nationalisation que Castilho lui appliqua afin de perpétuer l’ordre institué. / Modeled on the vision of the nationalist movement’s leaders and oriented towards the literary innovative texts, the institutional image of the Portugese Romanticism is a distorted, partial and a static one. Combining the socio-literary analysis of four works of fiction, representative of the main lines of confrontation both for their aesthetic and ideological values, and the historical analysis of book translations, this study brings to the foreground the various constituent poles of the Portuguese literary field between 1840 and 1860 and shows its polyphonic complexity. A conflict between social models and literary conservatives and progressives is therefore depicted through the « civic literature » (symbolically dominant) and incarnated by A Virgem da Polónia, by J.J.R.Bastos, and Eurico, O Presbitero, by Alexandre Herculano. As for A Mão do Finado, by Alfredo Possolo Hogan, it sheds light on the emergence of the “literary industrialism”. Finally, Maria! Não me mates, que sou tua mãe!, by Camilo Castelo Branco, represents the sustainability of the chapbooks and for its author the beginning of a career of «professional of letters». The last section is devoted to the consideration of translated literature (reasons for success or absence of some authors) and the method of nationalization that Castilho applied to it in order to perpetuate the established order.

(English) The aim of this master thesis is to analyse the fiction of Tommy Wieringa, specifically in relation to the concept of the posture developed by Jérôme Meizoz. The distinction between the internal posture and the external posture is essential in this theory. Therefore, there can arise a tension between both images of the author (i.e., in the terminology of Daniël Rovers, between auteursfiguur and figuurauteur). This thesis is based on the question if this statement is valid in case of the work of Wieringa. Keywords: Wieringa, author's posture, author's image, literary identity, self-fashioning, authorship, the literary field

À travers l’expérience de Verlaine, cette thèse s’interroge sur la critique littéraire d’un écrivain. Les raisons d’être et les particularités formelles d’une production quotidienne d’un poète accédant graduellement à la notoriété sont étudiées en partant d’un panorama des définitions du phénomène (introduction). La triple analyse biographique, esthétique et discursive expose le lien étroit entre le contexte de production de la critique, les constructions théoriques qu’elle véhicule et les formes discursives qu’elle prend. La position marginale de Verlaine dans le champ littéraire prédétermine sa méfiance envers les mécanismes del’institutionnalisation, autant qu’envers les théories qui la justifient. D’où la faible conceptualisation théorique et le maniement contradictoire et décourageant des notions existantes. Les particularités de l’autoreprésentation (provocation, ethos faible) découlent également de sa position dans le champ littéraire et accompagnent l’abandon des théories prescriptives au profit d’une tolérance accrue. L’accent se déplace du domaine conceptuel vers le domaine discursif où se cultivent l’affectivité, l’expressivité, l’ironie qui rapprochent la critique de la création poétique, sans toutefois l’apparenter à la poésie en prose. Cette critique garde le caractère pragmatique d’élément de communication littéraire, son efficacité renforcée par certains traits de l’idiolecte (jeux de sonorités, métaphores, segmentation des phrases), dégagés de leur valeur poétique dans le nouveau contexte. / Verlaine’s experience allows to question the phenomenon of writer criticism. The rationale and the formal qualities of the daily critical output of a poet acceding to celebrity are studied after an overview of the phenomenon’s definitions (introduction). The triple biographical, esthetic and discourse analysis reveals the tight bond between critical production context, theories used and form given to critical texts. Verlaine’s marginal position in the literary field predetermines his distrust of institutionalization mechanisms and oftheories justifying them resulting in low conceptualization as well as in contradictory and discouraging handling of existing notions. The particularities of self-representation (provocation, weak ethos) equally result from his position in the literary field and go along with abandoning prescriptive theories in the name of tolerance. The emphasis moves from the conceptual sphere to the discourse accentuating affectivity, expressivity and irony which bring it closer to poetical creativity but not so as to become prose poetry. This criticism does not loose its pragmatic turn inherent to literary communication, its efficiency being reinforcedby certain features of idiolect (play upon sounds, metaphors, segmentation of phrases), freed of their poetical value in the new context.