No description available.

Die Alkoholsucht ist ein global verbreitetes Phänomen und kennzeichnet sich durch eine Transition von kontrolliertem zu zwanghaftem Alkoholkonsum.Die Tendenz, einem neutralen Reiz eine Anreizwirkung zuzuschreiben, ist individuell unterschiedlich und stellt einen Risikofaktor für die Entwicklung einer Abhängigkeit dar.Zur Entwicklung spezifischer Präventionsstrategien ist ein besseres Verständnis der Zusammenhänge zwischen der Anreizsalienz und Alkoholabhängigkeit erforderlich.Der Übergang von mäßigem zu zwanghaftem Alkoholkonsum wurde durch das Modell des Alkoholentzugseffekts simuliert, das den menschlichen Alkoholrückfall nachahmt.Die Ratten erhielten freiwilligen Zugang zu verschieden Alkohollösungen mit wiederholten Deprivations- und Alkoholphasen.Die Ratten durchliefen zusätzlich den Pavlovian Conditioned Approach getestet, welcher die individuellen Tendenzen auf einen bedingten Reiz/Belohnung quantifiziert.Während des letzten ADE-Zyklus wurde mit Geschmacksverfälschung zwanghaftes Trinken ermittelt.Nach der Identifizierung zuverlässiger Prädiktoren für Suchtverhalten wurde präventive Neurostimulation durchgeführt, um die Tendenz der Tiere alkoholbezogenen Reizen eine motivationale Bedeutung beizumessen, zu beeinflussen, und die Manifestation eines Abhängigkeitsverhaltens zu verhindern. Weibchen tranken mehr Alkohol als Männchen und zeigten ST Verhalten im PavCA, während Männchen GT aufwiesen.Die Anwendung von transkranieller Gleichstromstimulation während PavCA führte zu mehr GT-Verhalten bei stimulierten Ratten.Frühe tDCS während des Trinkens hatte keinen Einfluss auf das akute und das Langzeit-Trinken. Die Ergebnisse zeigen eine komplexere Beziehung zwischen Anreizsalienz und Alkoholsucht und unterstreichen,individuelle Unterschiede und beide Geschlechter in der präklinischen Forschung zu berücksichtigen. / The consequences of alcohol dependence cause the global deaths of million people yearly.The ability of the environment can trigger dependent behavior and promote drinking.The tendency to attribute incentive salience to cues differs between subjects.By forming a cue-alcohol association, neutral cues receive motivational value,thereby predicting the likelihood of alcohol reward occurrence,known as Pavlovian learning.Understanding the relationship between incentive salience and alcohol addiction help inform treatment strategies.We study the relationship between incentive salience and alcohol addiction.The transition from moderate to compulsive alcohol intake can be captured by the alcohol deprivation effect rat model (mimics alcohol relapse in humans).Rats were given voluntary access to alcohol solutions with repeated abstinence/reintroduction phases.Further,rats were tested in the PavCA,which quantifies individual tendency toward a conditional cue and the reward, thus allowing to trace the process of attributing incentive salience to rewardcues.During the final ADE cycle,rats underwent a bitter taste adulteration test to assess for compulsive-like behavior.After identifying reliable predictors of addictive behavior,preventive tDCS was performed to influence the tendency of animals to attach motivational importance to alcohol-related stimuli,and to prevent the manifestation of alcohol addictive behavior.Females drank more alcohol than males and exhibited more ST behavior in the PavCA, whereas males showed GT behavior.PavCA phenotypes emerged early and remained stable.The application of tDCS during PavCA results in high GT numbers in stimulated rats.Early tDCS on drinking does not affect acute or long-term drinking.Our findings indicate a complex relationship between incentive salience and alcohol addiction and emphasize the importance of considering individual differences and both sexes in preclinical research.

Damage to the nervous system may cause sensorimotor impairment, often resulting in chronic neuropathic pain. Phantom limb pain affects multiple amputees and the treatment options are limited. A promising treatment option to reduce chronic pain is by training sensory discrimination. At the Center for Bionics and Pain Research, a sensory training device has been developed. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique to stimulate different regions of the cerebral cortex. In studies, anodal tDCS of the sensorimotor cortex has shown to improve tactile acuity. Until now, the effect of the sensory discrimination training, performed with the sensory training device, in combination with tDCS has not been tested. The purpose of this master’s thesis was to determine the effect of tDCS applied on the sensorimotor cortex on the outcomes of sensory discrimination training. The purpose was also to compare the effect of two different methods of stimulation, namely conventional and High Definition tDCS. 16 able-bodied participants underwent three single sessions with 40 minutes of sensory discrimination training: one session combined with conventional tDCS, one session combined with High Definition tDCS and one session without tDCS. The tactile acuity was determined by the two-point discrimination test and the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, prior to and one hour after each session. This study showed that 40 minutes of sensory discrimination training was sufficient to improve the two-point discrimination in the sensory trained areas, compared to the sensory untrained areas (p=0.02). However, the improvement in two-point discrimination was not statistically significant between the interventions, i.e. the improvement in two-point discrimination for the sessions with brain modulation was not statistically significant compared to the session without brain modulation. The monofilament assessments showed an improvement in monofilament score for the sensory untrained skin patches (p=0.053). This study concluded that single sessions of training was enough to improve two-point discrimination but not monofilament score at the site of stimulation. This study lays a foundation for what parameters to include in future studies.

No description available.

Le traitement visuel répété d’un visage inconnu entraîne une suppression de l’activité neuronale dans les régions préférentielles aux visages du cortex occipito-temporal. Cette «suppression neuronale» (SN) est un mécanisme primitif hautement impliqué dans l’apprentissage de visages, pouvant être détecté par une réduction de l’amplitude de la composante N170, un potentiel relié à l’événement (PRE), au-dessus du cortex occipito-temporal. Le cortex préfrontal dorsolatéral (CPDL) influence le traitement et l’encodage visuel, mais sa contribution à la SN de la N170 demeure inconnue. Nous avons utilisé la stimulation électrique transcrânienne à courant direct (SETCD) pour moduler l’excitabilité corticale du CPDL de 14 adultes sains lors de l’apprentissage de visages inconnus. Trois conditions de stimulation étaient utilisées: inhibition à droite, excitation à droite et placebo. Pendant l’apprentissage, l’EEG était enregistré afin d’évaluer la SN de la P100, la N170 et la P300. Trois jours suivant l’apprentissage, une tâche de reconnaissance était administrée où les performances en pourcentage de bonnes réponses et temps de réaction (TR) étaient enregistrées. Les résultats indiquent que la condition d’excitation à droite a facilité la SN de la N170 et a augmentée l’amplitude de la P300, entraînant une reconnaissance des visages plus rapide à long-terme. À l’inverse, la condition d’inhibition à droite a causé une augmentation de l’amplitude de la N170 et des TR plus lents, sans affecter la P300. Ces résultats sont les premiers à démontrer que la modulation d’excitabilité du CPDL puisse influencer l’encodage visuel de visages inconnus, soulignant l’importance du CPDL dans les mécanismes d’apprentissage de base. / Repeated visual processing of an unfamiliar face suppresses neural activity in face-specific areas of the occipito-temporal cortex. This "repetition suppression" (RS) is a primitive mechanism involved in learning of unfamiliar faces, which can be detected through amplitude reduction of the N170 event-related potential (ERP). The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) exerts top-down influence on early visual processing. However, its contribution to N170 RS and learning of unfamiliar faces remains unclear. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently increases or decreases cortical excitability, as a function of polarity. We hypothesized that DLPFC excitability modulation by tDCS would cause polarity-dependent modulations of N170 RS during encoding of unfamiliar faces. tDCS-induced N170 RS enhancement would improve long-term recognition reaction time (RT) and/or accuracy rates, whereas N170 RS impairment would compromise recognition ability. Participants underwent three tDCS conditions in random order at ~72 hour intervals: right anodal/left cathodal, right cathodal/left anodal and sham. Immediately following tDCS conditions, an EEG was recorded during encoding of unfamiliar faces for assessment of P100 and N170 visual ERPs. P300 was analyzed to detect prefrontal function modulation. Recognition tasks were administered ~72 hours following encoding. Results indicate the right anodal/left cathodal condition facilitated N170 RS and induced larger P300 amplitudes, leading to faster recognition RT. Conversely, the right cathodal/left anodal condition caused increases in N170 amplitudes and RT, but did not affect P300. These data are the first to demonstrate that DLPFC excitability modulation can influence early visual encoding of unfamiliar faces, highlighting the importance of DLPFC in basic learning mechanisms.

La stimulation électrique transcrânienne à courant direct (tDCS) est une technique non invasive de neuromodulation qui modifie l’excitabilité corticale via deux grosses électrodes de surface. Les effets dépendent de la polarité du courant, anodique = augmentation de l’excitabilité corticale et cathodique = diminution. Chez l’humain, il n’existe pas de consensus sur des effets de la tDCS appliquée au cortex somatosensoriel primaire (S1) sur la perception somesthésique. Nous avons étudié la perception vibrotactile (20 Hz, amplitudes variées) sur le majeur avant, pendant et après la tDCS appliquée au S1 controlatéral (anodale, a; cathodale, c; sham, s). Notre hypothèse « shift-gain » a prédit une diminution des seuils de détection et de discrimination pour la tDCS-a (déplacement vers la gauche de la courbe stimulus-réponse et une augmentation de sa pente). On attendait les effets opposés avec la tDCS-c, soit une augmentation des seuils (déplacement à droite et diminution de la pente). Chez la majorité des participants, des diminutions des seuils ont été observées pendant et immédiatement suivant la tDCS-a (1 mA, 20 min) en comparaison à la stimulation sham. Les effets n’étaient plus présents 30 min plus tard. Une diminution du seuil de discrimination a également été observée pendant, mais non après la tDCS-c (aucun effet pour détection). Nos résultats supportent notre hypothèse, uniquement pour la tDCS-a. Une suite logique serait d’étudier si des séances répétées de tDCS-a mènent à des améliorations durables sur la perception tactile. Ceci serait bénéfique pour la réadaptation sensorielle (ex. suite à un accident vasculaire cérébral). / Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique which aims to modify cortical excitability using large surface-area electrodes. tDCS is thought to increase (anodal, a-tDCS) or decrease (cathodal, c-tDCS) cortical excitability. At present, there is no consensus as to whether tDCS to primary somatosensory cortex (S1) modifies somatosensory perception. This study examined vibrotactile perception (frequency, 20 Hz, various amplitude) on the middle finger before, during and after contralateral S1 tDCS (a-, c- and sham, s-). The experiments tested our shift-gain hypothesis which predicted that a-tDCS would decrease vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds (leftward shift of the stimulus-response function with increased gain/slope), while c-tDCS would increase thresholds (shift to right; decreased gain). The results showed that weak, a-tDCS (1 mA, 20 min), compared to sham, led to a reduction in both thresholds during the application of the stimulation in a majority of subjects. These effects persisted after the end of a-tDCS, but were absent 30 min later. Cathodal tDCS, vs sham, had no effect on detection thresholds; in contrast, there was a decrease in discrimination threshold during but not after c-tDCS. The results thus supported our hypothesis, but only for anodal stimulation. Our observation that enhanced vibrotactile perception outlasts, albeit briefly, the period of a-tDCS is encouraging. Future experiments should determine whether repeated sessions of a-tDCS can produce longer lasting improvements. If yes, clinical applications could be envisaged, e.g. to apply a-tDCS to S1 in conjunction with retraining of sensory function post-stroke.

A depressão pós Acidente Vascular Cerebral (AVC) é uma condição desabilitante que ocorre em um terço dos casos. Há uma dificuldade no tratamento farmacológico devido a efeitos adversos e eficácia limitada. Recentemente, a estimulação trasncraniana por corrente contínua (ETCC) tem demonstrado eficácia no tratamento da depressão unipolar, apesar dos seus efeitos em depressões secundárias serem desconhecidos. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a eficácia e segurança da ETCC, uma intervenção não farmacológica, para depressão pós AVC (DPA), através de um ensaio clínico, randomizado, duplo-cego, sham-controlado. Foram incluídos quarenta e oito pacientes sem uso de antidepressivos com DPA foram igualmente divididos em 2 grupos que não diferiram em gênero, idade, gravidade do AVC ou da depressão e nem em outras variáveis clínicas. Foram realiadas 12 sessões de 30 minutos de ETCC com 2mA de corrente com ânodo à esquerda e cátodo à direita em córtex pré-frontal dorsolateral. Para a ETCC sham foi feita um minuto de estimulação somente, seguida por desligamento da máquina até um total de 30 minutos. Foi feita uma análise por intenção de tratamento, na qual o desfecho primário foi mudança na Hamilton Depression Rating Scale na sexta-semana (final). Resposta clínica e remissão foram desfechos secundários. Segurança foi avaliada usando um questionário de efeitos adversos, avaliação da cognição e a escala de mania de Young. A ETCC ativa foi significantemente superior a sham no desfecho final (diferença de médias de 4.7 pontos, IC95% de 2.1 a 7.3, P < 0.001). Taxas de resposta e remissão também foram estatisticamente maior no grupo ativo (37.5% e 20.8%, respectivamente) em relação ao grupo sham (4.1% e 0). O número necessário para tratar para resposta e remissão foi, respectivamente, 3 e 5. A região ou lado do AVC não predisse resposta. Nenhum efeito adverso grave foi relatado e a frequência dos efeitos adversos foi semelhante em ambos grupos. Pacientes e avaliadores foram cegados de forma efetiva. Este é o primeiro estudo controlado que mostra a eficácia da ETCC na DPA. Dessa forma, a ETCC pode ser uma opção terapêutica para esses pacientes / Depression after a stroke is a disabling condition that occurs in up to one-third of cases. Pharmacological treatment is challenging due to adverse effects and presents limited efficacy. Recently, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown efficacy in the treatment of unipolar depression, although its antidepressant effects in secondary depressions are unknown. The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tDCS, a nonpharmacological intervention, for post-stroke depression (PSD) in a prospective, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled trial. Forty-eight antidepressant-free patients with PSD were equally divided in two groups that did not differ in gender, age, stroke and depression severity and other clinical variables. Twelve 30-minute sessions of 2-mA anodal left/cathodal right dorsolateral prefrontal tDCS applied over 6 weeks. For sham tDCS we performed 1-min of stimulation only, followed by no stimulation during the remaining period. Intention-to-treat analysis, in which the primary outcome measure was the change in Hamilton Depression Rating scale score at 6 weeks (endpoint). Clinical response and remission were secondary outcomes. Safety was assessed using an adverse effects questionnaire, cognitive assessment and the Young mania rating scale. Active tDCS was significantly superior to sham at endpoint (mean difference, 4.7 points; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.3; P <.001). Response and remission rates were also statistically higher in active (37.5% and 20.8%, respectively) vs. sham (4.1% and 0) groups. The number needed to treat for response and remission was, respectively, 3 and 5. Stroke region or side did not predict response. No serious adverse effects were reported and the frequency of common adverse effects was similar in both groups. Patients and raters were effectively blinded. This is the first controlled study that demonstrates the safety and clinically meaningful efficacy of tDCS in patients with PSD. Therefore, tDCS could be an option for the treatment of these patients

Recentes evidências sugerem que a dor lombar crônica está associada a alterações plásticas no cérebro, que podem ser modificadas por estratégias de neuromodulação. Neste ensaio clínico investigamos a eficácia analgésica de 12 sessões não consecutivas de estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínua (ETCC), estimulação elétrica periférica (EEP), ETCC+EEP e estimulação simulada (sham) em 92 pacientes com dor lombar crônica inespecífica. A intensidade, aspecto sensorial e afetivo da dor, incapacidade e percepção global de recuperação foram avaliadas antes do tratamento e quatro semanas, três e seis meses pós-randomização. Efeitos adversos, satisfação do paciente com o tratamento e fatores de confusão como ansiedade e depressão também foram avaliados. Os resultados demonstraram efeitos analgésicos clinicamente importantes da ETCC+EEP (MD = -2,6 IC95% = -4,4 a -0,9) e EEP isolada (MD = -2,2 IC95% = -3,9 a -0,4) comparada ao grupo sham, mas não da ETCC isolada (MD = -1,7 IC95% = -3,4 a -0,0). Além da manutenção do efeito analgésico por até três meses a ETCC+EEP obteve maior proporção de respondedores em diferentes pontos de corte. Os resultados sugerem que tanto a ETCC+EEP quanto EEP isolada são eficazes em curto prazo para o alívio da dor lombar crônica inespecífica. No entanto o efeito analgésico mais duradouro aliado a maior proporção de respondedores indicam um possível efeito aditivo e sinérgico da ETCC+EEP no alívio da dor em pacientes com dor lombar crônica não específica. Os nossos resultados não apoiam o uso da ETCC no regime de tratamento utilizado / Recent evidence suggests that chronic low back pain is associated with plastic changes in the brain that can be modified by neuromodulation strategies. In this clinical trial we have investigated the analgesic efficacy of 12 non-consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), peripheral electrical stimulation (PES), tDCS+PES and sham stimulation in 92 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Intensity, the sensory and affective aspect of pain, disability, and overall perception of recovery were assessed before treatment and four weeks, three and six months post-randomization. Adverse effects, patient satisfaction with treatment and confounding factors such as anxiety and depression were also evaluated. The results showed clinically significant analgesic effects of tDCS+PES (Mean Reduction (MR) = -2.6; CI95% = -4.4 to - 0.9) and PES alone (MD = -2.2, CI95% = -3.9 to -0.4) compared to sham group, but not tDCS alone (MD = -1.7, CI95% = -3.4 to -0.0). In addition to maintaining the analgesic effect for up to three months, tDCS+PES treatment had a higher proportion of responders in different cutoff points. The results suggest that both tDCS+PES and PES alone are effective in relieving chronic nonspecific low back pain in the short term. However the most lasting analgesic effect, combined with a higher proportion of responders, indicates a possible additive and synergistic effect of tDCS+PES in relieving low back pain. Our findings do not support the use of tDCS alone in this condition

Introdução: A Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua (ETCC) é uma intervenção não farmacológica com resultados discordantes quanto à sua eficácia para o tratamento do Episódio Depressivo Maior (EDM). Possivelmente devido a heterogeneidade dos estudos, as três meta-análises publicadas até agora sobre o assunto apontam para uma pequena vantagem a favor da técnica, dependendo da variável de desfecho analisada (melhora de depressão ou resposta). Todas essas meta-análises utilizaram dados agregados. Focamo-nos, no presente estudo, na realização de uma revisão sistemática da literatura e de uma meta-análise baseada em dados individuais de pacientes (MA-DIP) com Depressão Maior (DM) submetidos à ETCC na fase aguda. Este tipo de análise é mais preciso na avaliação da eficácia de uma intervenção e na obtenção dos preditores de respostas de tratamento, já que as características individuais de cada sujeito são consideradas ao invés das médias e frequências, como nas meta-análises de dados agregados. Objetivos: (1) avaliar a eficácia da ETCC na fase aguda da DM, (2) identificar preditores de resposta, remissão e melhora da depressão específicos e (3) avaliar a aceitabilidade da intervenção. Resultados: Os dados foram colecionados de 6 ensaios clínicos randomizados placebo controlados, totalizando 289 sujeitos. A ETCC ativa foi estatisticamente superior à estimulação simulada em relação à resposta (34% vs. 19%, respectivamente; RC=2,44, IC 95% = 1,38-4,32, NNT=7), remissão (23,1% vs. 12,7%, respectivamente; RC= 2,38, IC 95% = 1,22 - 4,64, NNT=9) e melhora da depressão (coeficiente = 0,35, IC 95% =0,12 0,57). Demonstrou-se que após ajustes para outros preditores e confundidores, depressão resistente a tratamento e doses mais altas de ETCC foram, respectivamente, inversa e diretamente associadas com a eficácia da ETCC. Conclusões: O tamanho de efeito do tratamento com ETCC foi comparável àqueles reportados, em outros estudos, para a Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana repetitiva (EMTr) e para o tratamento farmacológico (com antidepressivos tricíclicos e inibidores seletivos de recaptação de serotonina) na atenção primária para depressão. Os parâmetros mais importantes para otimização em ensaios clínicos futuros são a refratariedade da depressão e a dose da ETCC / Introduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a nonpharmacological intervention for depression. Randomised, sham-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) conducted hitherto have presented mixed results regarding its efficacy. Although recent meta-analyses suggest some efficacy when measuring depression symptoms using a continuous outcome, these meta-analyses were limited in their results as they used an aggregate data approach. We aimed therefore to perform an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. In contrast to an aggregate data meta-analysis, an IPD approach uses the raw data of each participant within a study. IPD is more accurate in estimating the efficacy of an intervention since aggregate data meta-analyses present only summary estimates of efficacy. IPD meta-analysis is also superior to the aggregate data approach for obtaining predictors of treatment outcome, as the characteristics of each patient are assessed instead of the mean and frequency values obtained in the traditional aggregate data meta-analysis. Objectives (a) To provide precise estimates of tDCS efficacy based on continuous (depression improvement) and categorical (response and remission rates) outcomes, (b) to identify variables associated with tDCS efficacy and (c) to estimate the treatment acceptability. Results: Data were gathered from six randomised sham-controlled trials, enrolling 289 patients. Active tDCS was significantly superior to sham for response (34% v. 19%, respectively, odds ratio (OR) = 2.44, 95% CI 1.384.32, number needed to treat (NNT) = 7), remission (23.1% v. 12.7%, respectively, OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.224.64, NNT = 9) and depression improvement ( coefficient 0.35, 95% CI 0.120.57). Mixed effects models showed that, after adjustment for other predictors and confounders, treatment-resistant depression and higher tDCS doses were, respectively, negatively and positively associated with tDCS efficacy. Conclusions: The effect size of tDCS treatment was comparable with those reported for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and antidepressant drug treatment in primary care. The most important parameters for optimisation in future trials are depression refractoriness and tDCS dose

Introdução: A osteoartrite de joelhos (KOA) apresenta alta prevalência, principalmente em mulheres. Com o envelhecimento da população esta prevalência irá aumentar. Os tratamentos conservadores apresentam limitada eficácia em expressivo número de pacientes no curso do tratamento . A cirurgia de protetização apresenta altos custos, possibilidade de complicações pós-operatórias graves e ainda que a correção anatômica seja perfeita, em torno de 20% dos pacientes persistem com dor crônica pós-operatória. Portanto, é preciso avançar no conhecimento dos mecanismos fisiopatológicos e estudar novas abordagens terapêuticas para agregar às existentes, visando melhor manejo da dor e para restabelecer a função de maneira mais efetiva. Estas questões motivaram três questões centrais que origiram os três estudos que compõem esta tese. Estudo I: No primeiro estudo avaliamos os mecanismos pelos quais há perpetuação da dor na KOA. Para responder a esta questão buscou respostas aos seguintes objetivos: I) Comparar se a função da via da dor inibitório descendente está associada com o estado de inibição no sistema corticospinal, indexado pelo potencial evocado motor (MEP) e o período de silêncio cortical (CSP) em pacientes com KOA e controles saudáveis. II) Determinar se há correlação entre as medidas de inibição intracortical (CSP, MEP) com alterações na escala de dor numérica (NPS 0-10) na KOA durante a tarefa de modulação condicionada de dor (CPM-task) considerando o efeito da capacidade funcional auto-relatada avaliada pelo Western Ontário and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) e uso de analgésicos. Métodos: Estudo transversal, foram incluídas 21 pacientes femininas com KOA e 10 controles saudáveis com idade entre 19 a 75 anos. Os parâmetros de excitabilidade do córtex motor (MEP e CSP) foram avaliados utilizando a estimulação magnética trasncraniana (EMT). Avaliação de dor e a incapacidade pelo WOMAC e a NPS (0-10) durante a CPM-task. Resultados: A média ajustada (DP) do CSP observada em pacientes com OA foi 23,43% menor do que em indivíduos saudáveis [54,54 (16,10) vs. 70,94 (22,87)], respectivamente (P = 0,01). A função do sistema modulador descendente de dor avaliado pela alteração do NPS (0-10) durante o CPM-task foi negativamente correlacionada com o parâmetro de excitabilidade cortical indexado pelo CSP (P = 0,001). O CSP foi negativamente correlacionado com a dor e incapacidade avaliada pelo índice WOMAC. Conclusão: Foi observado um sistema inibitório descendente de dor enfraquecido, corroborando com os achados em outras patologias de dor crônica. Estudo II O segundo estudo buscou determinar se na KOA, uma sessão de IMS (eletroestimulação intramuscular) ativa comparada com sham promove um efeito nos parâmetros de excitabilidade do córtex motor [MEP, inibição intracortical curta - SICI, facilitação intracortical (ICF) e CSP] e nas medidas de dor [limiar de dor a pressão (PPT); escala visual analógica de dor (VAS) e mudança na escala de dor numérica (NPS0-10) durante a CPM-task]. Esse estudo também se propôs a determinar se o fator neurotrófico derivado do cérebro (BDNF) sérico medeia o efeito desta estimulação no sistema cortico-espinhal, tal como avaliado pelo MEP e pelo PPT. Métodos: Foram incluídas 26 mulheres com KOA, com idade entre 50 a 75 anos. Elas foram divididas randomicamente para receber uma sessão de 30 minutos de IMS ativa (n = 13) ou IMS sham (n = 13) por meio de eletroestimulação com frequência de 2 Hz. As agulhas foram inseridas paravertebrais em nível da saída das raízes lombares de L1 a S2 e nos músculos cuja inervação corresponde a essas raízes e que sustentam a articulação do joelho (vasto medial, reto anterior, vasto lateral, tibial anterior e inserção da pata anserina). Os desfechos foram as medidas de dor (VAS, PPT, NPS durante CPM-task) e parâmetros de excitabilidade (MEP, CSP, SICI, ICF) realizados antes e imediatamente após a intervenção. Resultados: a IMS ativa comparado com sham diminuiu o MEP em 31,61% [intervalo de confiança (IC) 95%, 2,34-60,98]. Para os resultados secundários, IMS reduziu o ICF e aumentou o CSP. A IMS melhorou a dor relatada no VAS, o PPT e a pontuação do NPS (0-10) durante a CPM-task. O BDNF foi negativamente correlacionado com o PPT (r = 20,56). Conclusão: Obtivemos resultados demonstrando melhora da dor e reforço do sistema cortico-espinhal inibitório comparado ao tratamento sham com IMS. Estudo III O terceiro estudo buscou: 1) Avaliar se a utilização da ETCC (estimulação transcraniana de corrente contínua) combinada a IMS pode promover um resultado melhor de modulação da via cortico-espinhal de dor através da potenciação dos efeitos dos dois tratamentos; comparado a cada um deles isoladamente e ao tratamento sham. 2) Avaliar a capacidade da ETCC em reforçar o sistema inibitório descendente de dor e modular a excitabilidade neuronal através da VAS, PPT e NPS durante CPM-task. Além disso, avaliamos se o BDNF sérico poderia prever o efeito da terapia no final do tratamento. Métodos: 60 mulheres de 50 a 75 anos. Randomizadas em um de quatro grupos: ETCC+IMS, ETCC+IMS sham, ETCC sham+IMS, ETCC sham+IMS sham. Receberam 5 sessões de tratamento: ETCC anodal, lado contrário ao joelho acometido, 2mA, 30 min. IMS: estimulação com freqüência de 2Hz, 30 min; agulhas colocadas a 2cm de L1 á S2, nos músculos vasto medial, vasto lateral, reto anterior, tibial anterior e na inserção da pata anserina. Resultados: O a-tDCS + a-IMS mostrou os melhores resultados com diferença significativa na dor (VAS) [média (DP) relacionadas ao tratamento (pós e pré): 0.46 (0.04) vs. 6.32 (1.97); 95%CI -5.42 (-8.24 to -4.36), p=.003] e funcionalidade. Esse resultado iniciou na primeira sessão e manteve-se ao longo do estudo. A-tDCS+a-IMS foi o único capaz de modificar o sistema inibitório descendente de dor. Conclusão: Obtivemos melhora da dor e capacidade funcional com IMS, ETCC e ETCC+IMS. Mas somente o grupo de tratamento ETCC+IMS demonstrou capacidade de modificação do sistema inibitório descendente de dor. / Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has a high prevalence, especially in women. With the aging of the population this prevalence will increase. Conservative treatments have limited efficacy in expressive number of patients in the course of the treatment. The total knee replacement surgery presents high costs, possibility of serious postoperative complications and although the anatomical correction is perfect, around 20% persist with chronic postoperative pain. Therefore, it’s necessary to advance in the knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms and to study new therapeutic approaches to add to the existing ones, aiming to better manage pain and to restore function more effectively. These questions motivated three central questions that originated the three studies that compose this thesis. Study I In the first study we evaluated the mechanisms by which there is perpetuation of pain in knee osteoarthritis and to answer this question sought to answer the following objectives: I) To compare if the function of the descending inhibitory pain pathway is associated with the state of inhibition in the corticospinal system, indexed by the motor evoked potential (MEP) and the cortical silent period (CSP) in patients with KOA and healthy controls. II) To determine if there is a correlation between the intracortical inhibition measures (CSP, MEP) with changes in the numerical pain scale (NPS 0-10) in the KOA during the task of conditioned pain modulation (CPM-task) considering the effect of the self-reported function evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) and the use of analgesics. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 21 female patients with KOA and 10 healthy controls aged 19-75 years old. Motor cortex excitability parameters (MEP and CSP) were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Pain assessment and disability by WOMAC and NPS (0-10) during the CPM-task. Results: The adjusted mean (SD) of CSP observed in patients with OA was 23.43% lower than in healthy subjects [54,54 (16,10) vs 70.94 (22.87)], respectively (P = 0.01). The function of the descending pain modulatory system evaluated by the NPS (0-10) change during the CPM-task was negatively correlated with the cortical excitability parameter indexed by CSP (P = 0.001). CSP was negatively correlated with pain and disability assessed by the WOMAC index. Conclusion: It was observed a descending pain inhibitory system weakened, corroborating the findings of other chronic pain conditions. Study II The second study sought to determine if one active IMS session compared to sham promoted an effect on motor cortex excitability (MEP, short intracortical inhibition - SICI, intracortical facilitation (ICF) and CSP and in the pain measures [pressure pain threshold (PPT); Visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and numerical pain scale change (NPS0-10) during the CPM-task]. This study also aimed to determine whether serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mediates the effect of this stimulation on the cortico-spinal system, as assessed by MEP and PPT. Methods: Twenty-six women with KOA, aged 50-75 years old, were included. They were randomly divided to receive a 30-minute session of active IMS (n = 13) or IMS sham (n = 13) by electrostimulation with a frequency of 2 Hz. The needles were inserted paravertebral at the level of the lumbar roots exit from L1 to S2 and in the muscles whose innervation corresponds to these roots and which support the knee joint (vastus medialis, rectus anterior, vastus lateral, tibialis anterior and insertion of the anserine paw). The outcomes were pain measures (VAS, PPT, NPS during CPM-task) and excitability parameters (MEP, CSP, SICI, ICF) performed before and immediately after the intervention. Results: the active IMS compared with sham decreased the MEP by 31.61% [confidence interval (CI) 95%, 2.34-60.98]. For the secondary outcomes, IMS reduced ICF and increased CSP. IMS improved pain reported in VAS, PPT, and NPS score (0-10) during the CPM-task. BDNF was negatively correlated with PPT (r = 20.56). Conclusion: We obtained results demonstrating improvement of pain and enhancement of the inhibitory corticospinal system compared to sham treatment with IMS. Study III The third study aimed to: 1) Evaluate if the use of the combined tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) to IMS can promote a better result of modulation of the corticospinal pain pathway through the potentiation of the effects of the two treatments; compared to each of them alone, and with the sham treatment. 2) To evaluate the ability of the tDCS to strengthen the descending inhibitory pain system and to modulate neuronal excitability through VAS, PPT and NPS during CPM-task. In addition, we evaluated whether serum BDNF could predict the effect of therapy at the end of treatment. Methods: 60 women aged 50 to 75 years old. Randomized in one of four groups: tDCS + IMS, tDCS + IMS sham, tDCS sham + IMS, tDCS sham + IMS sham. They received 5 sessions of treatment: anodal tDCS, opposite side to affected knee, 2mA, 30 min. IMS: stimulation with frequency of 2Hz, 30 min; needles placed at 2 cm from L1 to S2, in the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus anterior, tibialis anterior and insertion of the anserine paw. Results: a-tDCS + a-IMS showed the best results with significant difference in pain (VAS) [mean (SD) related to treatment (post and pre): 0.46 (0.04) vs. 6.32 (1.97); 95% CI -5.42 (-8.24 to -4.36), p = .003] and functionality. This result started in the first session and was maintained throughout the study. A-tDCS + a-IMS was the only one able to modify the descending inhibitory pain system. Conclusion: We achieved improved pain and functional capacity with IMS, tDCS and tDCS + IMS. But only the tDCS + IMS treatment group demonstrated ability to modify the descending inhibitory pain system.