Changes to healthcare delivery models such as the promotion of an interdisciplinary team approach to patient care and increased hiring of unlicensed care providers have resulted in the need for knowledge about effective interdisciplinary teams. The purpose of this study was to describe student experiences in the development of team during an “interdisciplinary” clinical practicum. Participants were in first and third year of the Dalhousie baccalaureate nursing program, first year of the Nova Scotia Community College practical nursing diploma and at the end of the Nova Scotia Community College Continuing Care Assistant certificate program. Using a qualitative descriptive methodology, in-depth interviews were conducted with the eight participants to understand their experience of what made the team during an “Interdisciplinary” Collaborative Clinical Education Project (ICCEP) practicum. Thematic analysis revealed three themes; clinical instructor mentoring, peer attitudes of respect and acceptance, and mutual sharing of knowledge and skill.

Unlicensed driving remains a serious problem for road safety, despite ongoing improvements in traffic law enforcement practices and technology. While it does not play a direct causative role in road crashes, unlicensed driving undermines the integrity of the driver licensing system and is associated with a range of high-risk behaviours. This thesis documents three studies that were undertaken to explore the scope and nature of unlicensed driving, in order to develop more effective countermeasures to the behaviour.----- Study One utilised official road crash data from the Australian state of Queensland to compare the crash involvement patterns of unlicensed drivers with those of licensed drivers. The results confirmed that unlicensed driving is a relatively small, but significant road safety problem. Unlicensed drivers represent over 6% of the drivers involved in fatal crashes and 5% of those in serious injury crashes. Based on a quasi-induced exposure method, unlicensed drivers were found to be almost three times as likely to be involved in a crash than licensed drivers. In the event of a crash, those involving unlicensed drivers were twice as likely to result in a fatality or serious injury. Consistent with these results, the serious crashes involving unlicensed drivers were more likely to feature risky driving behaviours, such as drink driving, speeding and motorcycle use, than those involving licensed drivers.----- Study Two involved a cross-sectional survey of 309 unlicensed driving offenders who were recruited at the Brisbane Central Magistrates Court. The survey involved a face-to-face interview that took approximately 25 minutes to complete and achieved a response rate of 62.4%. A wide range of offenders participated in the study, including: disqualified and suspended drivers; expired licence holders; drivers without a current or appropriate licence; and those who had never been licensed. The results reinforced concerns about the on-road behaviour of unlicensed drivers. Almost one quarter of all the offenders reported driving unlicensed when they thought they might have been over the alcohol limit. Similarly, 25% reported exceeding the speed limit by 10 km/h or more on most or all occasions, while 15% admitted that they didn't always wear their seat belt. In addition, the results indicated that unlicensed drivers should not be viewed as a homogeneous group. Significant differences were found between the offender types in terms of their socio-demographic characteristics (age, education level, prior criminal convictions); driving history (prior convictions for unlicensed driving and other traffic offences); whether they were aware of being unlicensed; the degree to which they limited their driving while unlicensed; and their drink driving behaviour. In particular, a more deviant sub-group of offenders was identified, that included the disqualified, not currently licensed and never licensed drivers, who reported higher levels of prior criminal offending, alcohol misuse and self-reported drink driving. The results of Study Two also highlight the shortcomings of existing police enforcement practices. Almost one-third of the sample reported that they continued to drive unlicensed after being detected by the police (up until the time of the court hearing), while many offenders reported experiences of punishment avoidance. For example, over one third of the participants reported being pulled over by the police while driving unlicensed and not having their licence checked.----- Study Three involved the further analysis of the cross-sectional survey data to explore the factors contributing to unlicensed driving. It examined the influence of various personal, social and environmental factors on three aspects of the offenders' behaviour: the frequency of their driving while unlicensed; whether they continued to drive unlicensed after being detected; and their intentions to drive unlicensed in the future. This study was also designed to assess the capacity of a number of different theoretical perspectives to explain unlicensed driving behaviour, including deterrence theory and Akers' (1977) social learning theory. At an applied level, the results of Study Three indicated that personal and social factors exert the strongest influence over unlicensed driving behaviour. The main personal influences on unlicensed driving were: the need to drive for work purposes; exposure to punishment avoidance; personal attitudes to unlicensed driving; and anticipated punishments for the behaviour. The main social influences reflected the social learning construct of differential association, namely being exposed to significant others who both engage in unlicensed driving (behavioural dimension) and hold positive attitudes to the behaviour (normative dimension). At a theoretical level, the results of Study Three have two important implications for traffic psychology and criminology. Firstly, they provided partial support for Stafford and Warr's (1993) reconceptualisation of deterrence theory by demonstrating that the inclusion of punishment avoidance can improve the overall predictive utility of the perspective. Secondly, they suggested that social learning theory represents a more comprehensive framework for predicting illegal driving behaviours, such as unlicensed driving. This is consistent with Akers' (1977; 1990) assertion that formal deterrence processes can be subsumed within social learning theory.----- Together, the results of the three studies have important implications for road safety. Most importantly, they question the common assumption that unlicensed drivers drive in a more cautious manner to avoid detection. While the findings indicate that many offenders reduce their overall driving exposure in order to avoid detection, this does not appear to result in safer driving. While it remains possible that unlicensed drivers tend to act more cautiously than they would otherwise, it appears that their driving behaviour is primarily designed to reduce their chances of detection. In terms of countermeasures, the research indicates that a multi-strategy approach is required to address the problem of unlicensed driving. Unlicensed drivers do not represent a homogeneous group who are likely to be influenced by the threat of punishment alone. Rather, innovative strategies are required to address the wide range of factors that appear to encourage or facilitate the behaviour. Foremost among these are punishment avoidance and the need to drive for work purposes.

nÃo hà / Neonatos internados em unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal (UTIN) sÃo expostos a uma grande variedade de medicamentos, a maioria sem dados de seguranÃa e eficÃcia. Descrever o perfil de uso de medicamentos em neonatos em UTIN de um hospital pÃblico no Brasil de acordo com dados de registro do medicamento e potencial nocivo destes, foi o objetivo do trabalho. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo retrospectivo sobre uso de medicamentos em UTIN, envolvendo neonatos internados por mais de 24 horas e dados de prescriÃÃo coletados em prontuÃrio eletrÃnico durante o perÃodo de janeiro a junho do ano de 2012. InformaÃÃes sobre os medicamentos, com base nas bulas, foram comparadas com o British National Formulary for Children 2012-2013 e a base de dados Thomson Micromedex. O potencial nocivo de medicamentos e excipientes foi avaliado conforme a literatura. Neonatos foram categorizados em grupos de idade gestacional (IG). Os dados foram submetidos à anÃlise descritiva e testes de distribuiÃÃo (ANOVA, Teste U de Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, qui-quadrado de Pearson) por IG com o nÃvel de significÃncia de p < 0,05. IncluÃram-se 192 neonatos, a maioria prÃ-termo, com mediana de 33 semanas de IG, totalizando 3.617 neonatos-dia. Registraram-se 3.290 prescriÃÃes, mÃdia 17,1 prescriÃÃes/neonato (DP  17,9) e 8,8 medicamentos/neonato (DP  5,9), maiores em neonatos mais imaturos (p < 0,05). Anti-infecciosos de uso sistÃmico, medicamentos para o sangue e ÃrgÃos formadores do sangue, trato alimentar e metabolismo apresentaram maior utilizaÃÃo, variando conforme a IG. Neonatos apresentaram maior exposiÃÃo a gentamicina seguido por ampicilina, heparina e fitomenadiona. A maioria dos neonatos (99,5%) foi exposta a medicamentos nÃo licenciados (NL) e de uso nÃo padronizado (NP), mais frequentes em neonatos com IG < 28 semanas (p < 0,05). Mais de 70% dos RN estiveram expostos a algum medicamento potencialmente perigoso (MPP), com maior frequÃncia em neonatos com IG < 31 semanas (p < 0,05). Praticamente todos os neonatos estiveram expostos a excipientes nocivos (EN) e potencialmente nocivos, sendo maior o nÃmero de formulaÃÃes prescritas a neonatos mais imaturos. Metilparabeno, propilparabeno e polissorbato 80 foram os EN aos quais os neonatos estiveram mais expostos, principalmente nas formulaÃÃes de domperidona soluÃÃo oral, polivitamÃnicos soluÃÃo oral e fentanila soluÃÃo injetÃvel. Neonatos em UTIN no Brasil, tal como em outras realidades, estÃo expostos a uma variedade de medicamentos NL, NP e com potencial nocivo, uma situaÃÃo preocupante. Alternativas seguras e estudos sÃo necessÃrios sobre esse tema. / Neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are exposed to a wide variety of drugs most without data on safety and efficacy. To describe the drug use profile of neonates in NICU of a public hospital in Brazil according to the drugs records and harmful potential of drugs and pharmaceutical excipients. Descriptive and retrospective study of drug use in NICU, with neonate inpatients for over 24 hours and prescription data from electronic medical records over the period from January to June, 2012. Drug information found in the package leaflets were compared with information in the British National Formulary for Children 2012-2013 and in the Thomson Micromedex database. The drug and excipients harmful potential was evaluated according to the literature. Neonates were categorized into groups of gestational age (GA). The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and Distribution tests tests (ANOVA Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson's chi-squared) by GA, with a significance level of p <0.05. Were included 192 neonates, most preterm with median 33 weeks of GA and a total of 3.617 neonates-day. Were registered 3,290 prescriptions, average 17.1 prescriptions/neonate (SD  17.9) and 8.8 drugs/neonate (SD  5.9), higher in most immature neonates (p < 0.05). The anti-infectives for systemic use, blood and blood forming organs, alimentary tract and metabolism drugs groups showed increased use among the neonates, varying according to the GA. Neonates had higher exposure to gentamicin followed by ampicillin, heparin and phytomenadione. Most neonates (99.5%) were exposed to unlicensed drugs (UL) and off label use (OL), more frequently those with GA < 28 weeks (p < 0.05). More than 70% of the neonates were exposed to any high-alert medications, with higher frequency among neonates with GA < 31 weeks (p < 0.05). Almost all neonates were exposed to harmful and potentially harmful excipients, being greater the number of formulations prescribed to more immature neonates. Gentamicin (sulfate) injectable Solution 10 mg/mL (1 mL), fentanyl solution injectable 0.05 mg/mL (10 mL) and sodium heparin injectable solution were the containing harmful excipients formulations to which neonates were most exposed. Neonates in Brazilian NICU, as in other settings, are exposed to a variety of OL, UL and potentially harmful drugs and harmful excipients, an alarming situation. Safety alternatives and more studies are needed on this topic.

Aproximadamente apenas um terço dos medicamentos utilizados em crianças tem sido estudado de forma adequada e apresentam informações sobre eficácia e segurança do produto. Este fato se deve a dificuldade de realização de ensaios clínicos na população pediátrica tornando-a mais propensa a erros de medicação, predominantemente devido à necessidade de prescrições de apresentações farmacêuticas não aprovadas e não indicadas para uso pela indústria e agência de fiscalização sanitária. Dessa forma, uma ferramenta importante que pode ser utilizada para análise do uso de medicamentos nesta população compreende os estudos da utilização de medicamentos. O presente estudo analisou as prescrições medicamentosas realizadas para crianças hospitalizadas no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo, com a finalidade de estabelecer o perfil de utilização de medicamentos de acordo com os critérios de aprovação e indicação da Agencia Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) e da Food and Drugs Administration (FDA). O estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa do respectivo hospital, e classificado como transversal, retrospectivo e observacional. Através do banco de dados informatizado, foram analisadas todas as prescrições medicamentosas a crianças menores de 12 anos no período compreendido entre 01/08/2008 a 31/07/2009. A população pediátrica foi dividida em subgrupos de acordo com os parâmetros fisiológicos do desenvolvimento estabelecidos pela Organização Mundial de Saúde. As apresentações farmacêuticas foram classificadas de acordo com o primeiro nível do sistema Anatomical Therapeutic Chemistry e, por conseguinte, foi realizada a classificação de uso das mesmas em: licenciado, não licenciado - registro, indicado, não indicado, não licenciado - dispersão e licenciado/indicado de acordo com a ANVISA e FDA. Durante o período analisado, foram identificados 6948 pacientes, 56,7% do sexo masculino, média de idade 3,1 (±3,5) anos, média de internação 17,5 (±29,8) dias, 1120 causas de internação e 79 unidades de atendimento. A causa de internação mais frequente esteve relacionada ao nascimento no hospital, sendo dessa forma, o centro obstétrico a unidade mais requisitada para hospitalização. Das 617 apresentações farmacêuticas identificadas, 17,6% foram referentes aos agentes infecciosos de uso sistêmico. A média de apresentações farmacêuticas por paciente foi de 6,1. Em relação ao uso não licenciado - registro 1,1% e 14,9% das apresentações farmacêuticas assim foram classificadas de acordo com a análise da ANVISA e FDA, respectivamente. O uso não indicado esteve presente em 36,5% e 37,3% de acordo com a ANVISA e FDA, respectivamente. Dessa forma, este trabalho ressalta a necessidade em se estabelecer um consenso sobre a classificação de uso dos medicamentos na população pediátrica entre os países, além de enfatizar a necessidade de aumentar a realização ensaios clínicos nesta população, uma vez que houve um elevado número de apresentações farmacêuticas com informações de uso apenas na população adulta sendo utilizadas em crianças / Approximately only one-third of the drugs used in children has been studied adequately and presents information about its effectiveness and safety. This fact is due to the difficulty of conducting clinical trials in the pediatric population making them more prone to medication errors, mainly due to the need for pharmaceutical dosage forms unapproved and off-label for use by industry and regulatory agency. Thus, an important tool that can be used to analyze the use of drugs in this population comprises studies of drug utilization. This study analyzed drug prescriptions for children hospitalized at the Clinical Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo, in order to establish the profile of drug utilization in accordance to the criteria for approval and indication of the Brazilian Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) and the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA). The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the respective hospital, being classified as cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study. Through the computerized database, all drug prescriptions to children under the age of 12 were analyzed in the period of August 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2009. The pediatric population was divided into subgroups according to the physiological parameters of development established by the World Health Organization. The pharmaceutical dosage forms were classified according to the first level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemistry system. Thereafter, the use of pharmaceutical dosage forms was classified as follows: licensed, unlicensed - registered, label, off-label, unlicensed - dispersion and licensed/label according to FDA and ANVISA. During the study period, 6948 patients were identified, being 56.7% male, mean age 3.1 (± 3.5) years, mean length of hospitalization 17.5 (± 29.8) days, 1120 causes of hospitalization and 79 service units. The most prevalent cause of hospital stays was related to birth at the hospital, being the obstetric center the most required unit for hospitalization. Of the 617 pharmaceutical dosage forms identified, 17.6% were related to infectious agents for systemic use. The average pharmaceutical dosage forms per patient were 6.1. Regarding the unlicensed use, 1.1% and 14.9% of the pharmaceutical dosage forms were classified according to the analysis from ANVISA and FDA, respectively. The off-label use was present in 36.5% and 37.3% according to ANVISA and FDA, respectively. This work emphasizes the need to establish a consensus on the classification of the use of drugs in the pediatric population among countries, and underline the necessity of increase the number of clinical trials performed in this population, since there were a high number of pharmaceutical dosage forms with use information only for adult populations being used in children.

Bakgrund: Tidigare forskning visar på en stressig arbetsmiljö för sjuksköterskor med flera komplexa arbetsuppgifter. Behovet av att delegera arbetsuppgifter ökar i och med detta och kraven på att delegera patientsäkert beskrivs som centralt. Den tidigare forskningen ger ingen klar bild över vem som har vilket ansvar i delegeringsfrågan. Syfte: Syftet med examensarbetet var att undersöka sjuksköterskors ansvar vid delegering av hälso- och sjukvårdsinsatser i kommunal verksamhet. Metod: Studien följer en kvalitativ ansats med en innehållsanalys. Insamlingen av data skedde via inspelade semistrukturerade intervjuer. För examensarbetet blev sex sjuksköterskor intervjuade. Resultat: Tre kategorier utformades av resultatet: ansvar gentemot patienten vid delegering, ansvar under delegeringstillfället och ansvar efter utförd delegering. Gemensamt hade informanterna ett standardiserat – webbaserad – delegeringsrutin. Dock fanns det lite till ingen uppföljning på delegeringar. Slutsats: delegeringsprocessen är komplex med oklar ansvarsbild. Sjuksköterskan ansvarar för att patienten i slutänden får god och säker vård även om det är helg, kväll eller sjukdomsfall i personalgruppen. / Background: Previous studies show a stressful work environment for nurses with complex job assignments. The demand to delegate job assignments is increasing as an aftermath and the requirement to delegate job assignments with patient safety in mind is described as a central factor. The previous studies gave no clear image of who has the responsibility in delegations. Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the registered nurses’ experiences of responsibility during delegations. Method: The study has a qualitative approach and is assembled in content analysis. Data has been collected through semi structured interviews. For the study six nurses have been interviewed. Result: The manifested results formed up in three categories: responsibility towards patients when delegating, responsibility during the delegation and responsibility after the delegation. The informants had in common that they were following a standardized web-based delegation routine. Though there was slight to no follow up on the delegations. Conclusion: The delegation process is complex with unclear responsibility. The nurse is responsible for ensuring that the patient receives good and safe care in the end, even if it is weekend, evening or illness in the staff group.

Objetivos: Descrever o uso e determinar a prevalência de medicamentos potencialmente perigosos e de uso off label e não aprovados em prescrições de unidades de pediatria geral de um hospital universitário no sul do Brasil. Método: Estudo transversal, realizado de novembro de 2007 a janeiro de 2008, envolvendo pacientes até 14 anos de idade, com período de internação superior a 24 horas. Pacientes de unidades de terapia intensiva e oncologia pediátrica foram excluídos. A classificação quanto aos critérios de aprovação da Food and Drug Administration foi realizada pela fonte terciária DrugDex-Micromedex e a classificação dos potencialmente perigosos, pelo Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Resultados e discussão: No período de estudo foram analisadas 342 prescrições de 342 pacientes. O sexo masculino foi o mais freqüente (57%) e mais da metade dos pacientes já apresentavam doenças crônicas à internação. Analgésicos foi a classe terapêutica mais prescrita (26,9%) e entre os off label, os antiespasmódicos (31,5%) foram os mais prevalentes. Das prescrições analisadas, aproximadamente 39% tiveram pelo menos um medicamento de uso off label prescrito, principalmente em relação à indicação terapêutica (38,4%) e à idade (21,9 %), e 11,8% dos pacientes fizeram uso de fármacos não aprovados. Do total de itens (2026), cerca de 6% foram classificados como potencialmente perigosos, destacando-se os analgésicos opióides (35%). Não houve relação de associação entre medicamentos de uso off label e os potencialmente perigosos. Conclusão: As frequências encontradas de medicamentos off label e não aprovados estão de acordo com a literatura e podem ser consideradas elevadas. Os potencialmente perigosos, apesar da baixa prevalência, oferecem risco pelos efeitos prejudiciais que possam vir a causar nos pacientes. Assim, os medicamentos em destaque neste estudo representam uma preocupação constante em hospitais. / Objectives: Describe the use and determine the prevalence of high-alert medications, off label use and unlicensed drugs in prescriptions of general pediatric units of a university hospital in southern Brazil. Method: Cross-sectional study, performed from November 2007 to January 2008, involving patients up to 14 years of age, with admission period over 24 hours. Patients of intensive care and pediatric oncology units were excluded. The classification regarding the Food and Drug Administration approval criteria was performed according to the DrugDex-Micromedex tertiary source and the classification of high-alert medications according to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Results e discussion: In the study period, 342 prescriptions were analyzed. Males were more frequent (57%) and over half of the patients already presented chronic diseases for admission. Analgesic drugs were the most frequently prescribed therapeutic class of drugs (26.9%) and among the off-label drugs, antispasmodic drugs (31.5%) were the most prevalent. Around 39% of the analyzed prescriptions had at least one off-label use drug, especially in relation to therapeutic indication (38.4%) and age (21.9%), and 11.8% of the patients received unlicensed drugs. About 6% of the total items (2026) were classified as high-alert medications, such as opioid analgesic drugs (35%). No relation of association was observed between off-label use and high-alert medications. Conclusion: The frequency analyses found of off-label and unlicensed drugs are according to the literature and can be considered as high. The high-alert medications, although of low prevalence, offer risks due to negative effects that can occur in patients. Then, the drugs highlighted in this study constitute a constant concern in hospitals.

Objetivos: Descrever o uso e determinar a prevalência de medicamentos potencialmente perigosos e de uso off label e não aprovados em prescrições de unidades de pediatria geral de um hospital universitário no sul do Brasil. Método: Estudo transversal, realizado de novembro de 2007 a janeiro de 2008, envolvendo pacientes até 14 anos de idade, com período de internação superior a 24 horas. Pacientes de unidades de terapia intensiva e oncologia pediátrica foram excluídos. A classificação quanto aos critérios de aprovação da Food and Drug Administration foi realizada pela fonte terciária DrugDex-Micromedex e a classificação dos potencialmente perigosos, pelo Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Resultados e discussão: No período de estudo foram analisadas 342 prescrições de 342 pacientes. O sexo masculino foi o mais freqüente (57%) e mais da metade dos pacientes já apresentavam doenças crônicas à internação. Analgésicos foi a classe terapêutica mais prescrita (26,9%) e entre os off label, os antiespasmódicos (31,5%) foram os mais prevalentes. Das prescrições analisadas, aproximadamente 39% tiveram pelo menos um medicamento de uso off label prescrito, principalmente em relação à indicação terapêutica (38,4%) e à idade (21,9 %), e 11,8% dos pacientes fizeram uso de fármacos não aprovados. Do total de itens (2026), cerca de 6% foram classificados como potencialmente perigosos, destacando-se os analgésicos opióides (35%). Não houve relação de associação entre medicamentos de uso off label e os potencialmente perigosos. Conclusão: As frequências encontradas de medicamentos off label e não aprovados estão de acordo com a literatura e podem ser consideradas elevadas. Os potencialmente perigosos, apesar da baixa prevalência, oferecem risco pelos efeitos prejudiciais que possam vir a causar nos pacientes. Assim, os medicamentos em destaque neste estudo representam uma preocupação constante em hospitais. / Objectives: Describe the use and determine the prevalence of high-alert medications, off label use and unlicensed drugs in prescriptions of general pediatric units of a university hospital in southern Brazil. Method: Cross-sectional study, performed from November 2007 to January 2008, involving patients up to 14 years of age, with admission period over 24 hours. Patients of intensive care and pediatric oncology units were excluded. The classification regarding the Food and Drug Administration approval criteria was performed according to the DrugDex-Micromedex tertiary source and the classification of high-alert medications according to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Results e discussion: In the study period, 342 prescriptions were analyzed. Males were more frequent (57%) and over half of the patients already presented chronic diseases for admission. Analgesic drugs were the most frequently prescribed therapeutic class of drugs (26.9%) and among the off-label drugs, antispasmodic drugs (31.5%) were the most prevalent. Around 39% of the analyzed prescriptions had at least one off-label use drug, especially in relation to therapeutic indication (38.4%) and age (21.9%), and 11.8% of the patients received unlicensed drugs. About 6% of the total items (2026) were classified as high-alert medications, such as opioid analgesic drugs (35%). No relation of association was observed between off-label use and high-alert medications. Conclusion: The frequency analyses found of off-label and unlicensed drugs are according to the literature and can be considered as high. The high-alert medications, although of low prevalence, offer risks due to negative effects that can occur in patients. Then, the drugs highlighted in this study constitute a constant concern in hospitals.

Objetivos: Descrever o uso e determinar a prevalência de medicamentos potencialmente perigosos e de uso off label e não aprovados em prescrições de unidades de pediatria geral de um hospital universitário no sul do Brasil. Método: Estudo transversal, realizado de novembro de 2007 a janeiro de 2008, envolvendo pacientes até 14 anos de idade, com período de internação superior a 24 horas. Pacientes de unidades de terapia intensiva e oncologia pediátrica foram excluídos. A classificação quanto aos critérios de aprovação da Food and Drug Administration foi realizada pela fonte terciária DrugDex-Micromedex e a classificação dos potencialmente perigosos, pelo Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Resultados e discussão: No período de estudo foram analisadas 342 prescrições de 342 pacientes. O sexo masculino foi o mais freqüente (57%) e mais da metade dos pacientes já apresentavam doenças crônicas à internação. Analgésicos foi a classe terapêutica mais prescrita (26,9%) e entre os off label, os antiespasmódicos (31,5%) foram os mais prevalentes. Das prescrições analisadas, aproximadamente 39% tiveram pelo menos um medicamento de uso off label prescrito, principalmente em relação à indicação terapêutica (38,4%) e à idade (21,9 %), e 11,8% dos pacientes fizeram uso de fármacos não aprovados. Do total de itens (2026), cerca de 6% foram classificados como potencialmente perigosos, destacando-se os analgésicos opióides (35%). Não houve relação de associação entre medicamentos de uso off label e os potencialmente perigosos. Conclusão: As frequências encontradas de medicamentos off label e não aprovados estão de acordo com a literatura e podem ser consideradas elevadas. Os potencialmente perigosos, apesar da baixa prevalência, oferecem risco pelos efeitos prejudiciais que possam vir a causar nos pacientes. Assim, os medicamentos em destaque neste estudo representam uma preocupação constante em hospitais. / Objectives: Describe the use and determine the prevalence of high-alert medications, off label use and unlicensed drugs in prescriptions of general pediatric units of a university hospital in southern Brazil. Method: Cross-sectional study, performed from November 2007 to January 2008, involving patients up to 14 years of age, with admission period over 24 hours. Patients of intensive care and pediatric oncology units were excluded. The classification regarding the Food and Drug Administration approval criteria was performed according to the DrugDex-Micromedex tertiary source and the classification of high-alert medications according to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Results e discussion: In the study period, 342 prescriptions were analyzed. Males were more frequent (57%) and over half of the patients already presented chronic diseases for admission. Analgesic drugs were the most frequently prescribed therapeutic class of drugs (26.9%) and among the off-label drugs, antispasmodic drugs (31.5%) were the most prevalent. Around 39% of the analyzed prescriptions had at least one off-label use drug, especially in relation to therapeutic indication (38.4%) and age (21.9%), and 11.8% of the patients received unlicensed drugs. About 6% of the total items (2026) were classified as high-alert medications, such as opioid analgesic drugs (35%). No relation of association was observed between off-label use and high-alert medications. Conclusion: The frequency analyses found of off-label and unlicensed drugs are according to the literature and can be considered as high. The high-alert medications, although of low prevalence, offer risks due to negative effects that can occur in patients. Then, the drugs highlighted in this study constitute a constant concern in hospitals.

Aproximadamente apenas um terço dos medicamentos utilizados em crianças tem sido estudado de forma adequada e apresentam informações sobre eficácia e segurança do produto. Este fato se deve a dificuldade de realização de ensaios clínicos na população pediátrica tornando-a mais propensa a erros de medicação, predominantemente devido à necessidade de prescrições de apresentações farmacêuticas não aprovadas e não indicadas para uso pela indústria e agência de fiscalização sanitária. Dessa forma, uma ferramenta importante que pode ser utilizada para análise do uso de medicamentos nesta população compreende os estudos da utilização de medicamentos. O presente estudo analisou as prescrições medicamentosas realizadas para crianças hospitalizadas no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo, com a finalidade de estabelecer o perfil de utilização de medicamentos de acordo com os critérios de aprovação e indicação da Agencia Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) e da Food and Drugs Administration (FDA). O estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa do respectivo hospital, e classificado como transversal, retrospectivo e observacional. Através do banco de dados informatizado, foram analisadas todas as prescrições medicamentosas a crianças menores de 12 anos no período compreendido entre 01/08/2008 a 31/07/2009. A população pediátrica foi dividida em subgrupos de acordo com os parâmetros fisiológicos do desenvolvimento estabelecidos pela Organização Mundial de Saúde. As apresentações farmacêuticas foram classificadas de acordo com o primeiro nível do sistema Anatomical Therapeutic Chemistry e, por conseguinte, foi realizada a classificação de uso das mesmas em: licenciado, não licenciado - registro, indicado, não indicado, não licenciado - dispersão e licenciado/indicado de acordo com a ANVISA e FDA. Durante o período analisado, foram identificados 6948 pacientes, 56,7% do sexo masculino, média de idade 3,1 (±3,5) anos, média de internação 17,5 (±29,8) dias, 1120 causas de internação e 79 unidades de atendimento. A causa de internação mais frequente esteve relacionada ao nascimento no hospital, sendo dessa forma, o centro obstétrico a unidade mais requisitada para hospitalização. Das 617 apresentações farmacêuticas identificadas, 17,6% foram referentes aos agentes infecciosos de uso sistêmico. A média de apresentações farmacêuticas por paciente foi de 6,1. Em relação ao uso não licenciado - registro 1,1% e 14,9% das apresentações farmacêuticas assim foram classificadas de acordo com a análise da ANVISA e FDA, respectivamente. O uso não indicado esteve presente em 36,5% e 37,3% de acordo com a ANVISA e FDA, respectivamente. Dessa forma, este trabalho ressalta a necessidade em se estabelecer um consenso sobre a classificação de uso dos medicamentos na população pediátrica entre os países, além de enfatizar a necessidade de aumentar a realização ensaios clínicos nesta população, uma vez que houve um elevado número de apresentações farmacêuticas com informações de uso apenas na população adulta sendo utilizadas em crianças / Approximately only one-third of the drugs used in children has been studied adequately and presents information about its effectiveness and safety. This fact is due to the difficulty of conducting clinical trials in the pediatric population making them more prone to medication errors, mainly due to the need for pharmaceutical dosage forms unapproved and off-label for use by industry and regulatory agency. Thus, an important tool that can be used to analyze the use of drugs in this population comprises studies of drug utilization. This study analyzed drug prescriptions for children hospitalized at the Clinical Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo, in order to establish the profile of drug utilization in accordance to the criteria for approval and indication of the Brazilian Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) and the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA). The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the respective hospital, being classified as cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study. Through the computerized database, all drug prescriptions to children under the age of 12 were analyzed in the period of August 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2009. The pediatric population was divided into subgroups according to the physiological parameters of development established by the World Health Organization. The pharmaceutical dosage forms were classified according to the first level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemistry system. Thereafter, the use of pharmaceutical dosage forms was classified as follows: licensed, unlicensed - registered, label, off-label, unlicensed - dispersion and licensed/label according to FDA and ANVISA. During the study period, 6948 patients were identified, being 56.7% male, mean age 3.1 (± 3.5) years, mean length of hospitalization 17.5 (± 29.8) days, 1120 causes of hospitalization and 79 service units. The most prevalent cause of hospital stays was related to birth at the hospital, being the obstetric center the most required unit for hospitalization. Of the 617 pharmaceutical dosage forms identified, 17.6% were related to infectious agents for systemic use. The average pharmaceutical dosage forms per patient were 6.1. Regarding the unlicensed use, 1.1% and 14.9% of the pharmaceutical dosage forms were classified according to the analysis from ANVISA and FDA, respectively. The off-label use was present in 36.5% and 37.3% according to ANVISA and FDA, respectively. This work emphasizes the need to establish a consensus on the classification of the use of drugs in the pediatric population among countries, and underline the necessity of increase the number of clinical trials performed in this population, since there were a high number of pharmaceutical dosage forms with use information only for adult populations being used in children.

Este trabajo es una investigación cualitativa, no experimental, de nivel descriptivo. Se estudia la ética empresarial en una universidad no licenciada, con el objeto de conocer el trasfondo ético de la universidad en sus distintos niveles jerárquicos, conectando a su vez la consecuencia del no licenciamiento. Se hizo la pregunta de investigación «¿Cuál es la gestión de la ética empresarial que afecta a una universidad particular no licenciada?» La población fue una universidad particular no licenciada, el muestreo es no probabilístico por conveniencia, la unidad de análisis es un total de 14 colaboradores administrativos y docentes. / This work is a qualitative, non-experimental, descriptive research. It studies business ethics in an unlicensed university in order to know the ethical background of the university in its different hierarchical levels, at the same time connecting the consequence of non-licensing. The research question was formulated "What is the management of business ethics, which affects a particular unlicensed university?" The population was a private unlicensed university, the sampling is non-probabilistic for convenience, the unit of analysis is a total of 14 administrative and teaching collaborators.