No description available.

Inaug.-Diss.--Cologne. / Added thesis t.p. has imprint: Köln, 1965. Bibliographie: p. 111-115.

Texte remanié de: Th. Ph. D.--Chapel Hill, N.C.--University of North Carolina, 1990.

No description available.

Esta tesis doctoral presenta un estudio de las dos polémicas literarias más importantes del siglo XVII en las que se vio envuelto Lope de Vega. Por un lado, la polémica sobre la nueva lengua poética de Luis de Góngora, estudiada aquí a partir del intercambio de cartas y censuras que mantuvieron Lope de Vega y Diego de Colmenares; por otro, la polémica sobre la preceptiva aristotélica y el papel que debía desempeñar en el marco de la creación literaria contemporánea, analizada aquí a partir de las sátiras y libros en latín que se intercambiaron Pedro de Torres Rámila y Lope de Vega. Las ideas literarias de Lope y sus rivales se presentan enmarcadas en las diferentes tradiciones sobre teoría literaria que existían en la época. / This Ph.D. dissertation presents a study of the two most important literary polemics of the seventeenth century in which Lope de Vega was involved. On one side, it deals with the polemic about the new poetic language used by Luis de Góngora; this question is studied here through the analysis of the letters and censorships that Lope de Vega and Diego de Colmenares exchanged. On the other side, the polemic about Aristotelian precepts and the role they should play within the framework of contemporary literary creation is studied here through the satires and Latin texts that Pedro de Torres Rámila y Lope de Vega exchanged. Lope's literary ideas, as well as those held by his rivals, are presented within the frame of the different literary theory traditions existing at that time.

Diss. : Paderborn : 1991.

This dissertation makes a case for the importance played by four short stories, Lope de Vega's Novelas a Marcia Leonarda, in the development of the modern novel, and will contribute an exhaustive analysis of Lope's narrative strategy and the way he confronts and solves the various problems between theory and narrative practice, reconsidering the boundaries of fiction and revealing the permeability and porosity of the new genre The Novelas a Marcia Leonarda have received scarce attention by critics and only a handful of generic works and articles have been published on the subject. Critics have perceived "inconsistencies" to Aristotle's theory in the text, such as the numerous digressions or the implausability of certain episodes and characters. My dissertation claims just the opposite: these alleged inconsistencies are legitimate under the light of a different approach, as they are intended as devices to enhance the narrative. I consider the love-offering that frames the Novelas a Marcia Leonarda to be the key to interpretation of the real driving force that underlies all four stories; as love offerings, the four novelas are written exclusively to gratify a very particular reader. From this perspective, the literary creative process itself is depicted as a dialogue between two lovers, whose mutual interaction brings the story to life. The complicity between them makes the articulation of the story a game of two, where it is "allowed" to simultaneously praise the virtues and parody the weaknesses of the existing narrative forms. Considering the dialogue with Marcia as the key point of departure, my dissertation examines all the components that take part in the process of the gestation of the four stories: elements that belong to oral communication (such as the overall empathetic tone and the inclusion of spontaneous digressions), conventions and techniques from the most influential novelistic genres at the time (such as the Chivalric novel, the Pastoral novel, the Moorish novel and the Byzantine novel), the intertextual dialogue with Cervantes and some references to Lope's own biographical anecdotes and intimate facts about his relationship with Marta de Nevares, his last love and the alter ego of the reader Marcia. / text

Texte abrégé de: Thèse--Lettres--Bordeaux III, 1978.

Tesis doctoral--Universidad de Oviedo, 1990. / Contient la seconde partie de la thèse soutenue par l'auteur. Bibliogr. p. 27-34. Notes bibliogr.

No description available.