No description available.

While innovation has been a critical tool for the success of hospitality businesses, there has been little research concerning how hospitality service innovation is created. Focusing on knowledge development for service innovation, this dissertation examines hospitality open innovation processes by highlighting the critical role of customers as important external stakeholders for knowledge creation. More specifically, this research examines how hospitality brand community members engage in brand activities that co-create non-transactional knowledge value for open innovation. To achieve the research purpose, the dissertation consists of four independent studies. The design of the four studies followed a theory development process focusing on bibliometric analysis (Study 1), exploratory analysis (Study 2), empirical analysis (Study 3), and experimental analysis (Study 4). Study 1 conducted bibliometric co-citation analysis to examine the foundation and evolution of the service innovation research in both hospitality and tourism and service management literature. Study 2 examined how hospitality (hotel) customers engage in an online brand community and what types of value are co-created from their engagement behaviors. Study 3 empirically developed a multi-dimensional measure of customer engagement behaviors for co-creating non-transactional value. Lastly, Study 4 examined how hospitality online brand community members participate in open innovation behaviors as a result of customer empowerment and social recognition. Study 1 identified critical research opportunities for future hospitality and tourism research in terms of innovation creation, diffusion, and evaluation. Most importantly, open innovation via customer engagement was identified as a critical topic to understand hospitality innovation creation. In Study 2, customer engagement behaviors, motivations, and value co-creation were qualitatively analyzed in the context of an online hotel brand community. Using mixed-methods, including netnography analysis and qualitative written interviews, a conceptual framework of value co-creation via customer engagement was developed. Based on this framework, Study 3 developed a scale consisting of 15 items measuring customer engagement behaviors in terms of influential-experience value, C-to-B innovation value, relational value, and citizenship value. Lastly, Study 4 found a causal process that customer empowerment makes a positive impact on the intention of open innovation engagement and the creativity of ideas by mediating intrinsic motivation. / Doctor of Philosophy / While innovation has been a critical tool for the success of hospitality businesses, there has been little research concerning how hospitality service innovation is created. Focusing on knowledge development for service innovation, this dissertation examines hospitality open innovation processes by highlighting the critical role of customers as important external stakeholders for knowledge creation. More specifically, this research examines how hospitality brand community members engage in brand activities that co-create non-transactional knowledge value for open innovation. To achieve the research purpose, the dissertation consists of four independent studies. The design of the four studies followed a theory development process focusing on bibliometric critical literature review analysis (Study 1), exploratory analysis (Study 2), empirical analysis (Study 3), and experimental analysis (Study 4). Specifically, Study 1 critically analyzed service innovation academic studies published in the last decade in both hospitality and tourism and service management journals to get insights into future research directions. Study 2 analyzed how hospitality (hotel) customers engage in online brand community activities in terms of the benefits of the behaviors and the motivations for the engagement behaviors. Study 3 developed a practical tool to measure customer engagement behaviors. Lastly, Study 4 investigated how hospitality online brand community members participate in idea sharing behaviors in terms of customer empowerment and social recognition. Study 1 identified critical research opportunities for future hospitality and tourism research in terms of innovation creation, diffusion, and evaluation. Most importantly, open innovation via customer engagement was identified as a critical topic to understand hospitality innovation creation. Focusing on the open innovation, Study 2 analyzed hospitality customers' various engagement activities and contents created from the activities in an online hotel brand community. A conceptual framework of value co-creation via customer engagement behaviors was developed. Based on this framework, Study 3 developed a scale consisting of 15 items measuring customer engagement behaviors in terms of influential-experience value, C-to-B innovation value, relational value, and citizenship value. Lastly, Study 4 found that customers are likely to share their service ideas with hospitality practitioners when they enjoy doing so with the belief that their ideas can affect brand management decisions.

The "clicks and bricks" strategy, combining online and offline shopping, is crucial in today's retail environment to meet customer demands. This approach enhances consumer engagement and satisfaction by blending the practical advantages of physical stores with the convenience of online shopping. However, there are challenges to overcome when implementing clicks and bricks, including technological integration, reliable inventory control, and consistent service quality. This study focuses on exploring the impact of this strategy on consumer value co-creation, emphasizing engagement, satisfaction, and the factors that contribute to successful implementation.

Yes / The study extends customer-led co-creation research to the related staff-led value co-creation domain. In particular, the purpose of the study is to investigate the role of staff engagement as a facilitator of staff-led value co-creation. Design/methodology/approach: A new conceptual framework develops a model of staff-led value-creation, using three types of staff-led co-creation. A quantitative approach is used. Survey collection yielded a sample of 1165 employees in an Australian not-for-profit context across nineteen organizations. AMOS SEM (Structural Equation Modelling) analyzes the data. Findings: A major finding is the nexus between staff engagement and staff-led value co-creation. The nexus applies for three types of staff-led co-creation and three staff categories. Different explanatory mechanisms apply to each type of staff-led value co-creation. Research Limitations/implications: The not-for-profit context may not generalize to the for-profit sector, but future research could clarify this matter. Practical implications: The results can inform organizations wishing to create greater service contributions through greater staff participation, which can include a staff-initiating (staff-led) role. Different value co-creation targets require different corporate triggers, reflecting the different explanatory mechanisms of each co-creation type. Social Implications: The not-for-profit context provides major social implications. Originality/value: The emphasis on staff-led value co-creation augments the customer-led co-creation literature. Additionally, exploring the (staff) engagement to (staff) value co-creation nexus is a novel contribution.

Yes / Sharing economy is flourishing and increasingly customers are shifting towards “using instead of owning” products and services. The objective of our research is to empirically prove that low organizational trust can trigger strict organizational practices such as ethics training and audits but excessive use of both of these practices can negatively impact the relationship quality in sharing economy. In doing so, it has detrimental effects on co-creation and co-innovation particularly when the goals are related to emotional cognitive, material support and relationship building. This study, therefore, targets to scrutinize the dark side of B2B sharing economy platforms using the ethical theory of organizing. The unique contribution of this study is first, showcasing the relationships between ethical climate, ethical practices and consequences. Second, it highlights that B2B alliances that perceive strictness in ethics audits have a low level of willingness to enhance relationship quality. However, the effect of strictness in ethics training does not lead to the development of a low level of willingness to enhance relationship quality. This is an interesting finding and generates a theoretical debate. The findings of the study will promote the development of an ethical model that addresses the negative aspects of the B2B sharing economy.

全球部落格的熱潮和影響力，吸引許多國外企業紛紛成立企業部落格，然而台灣的企業部落格仍非常少。本研究欲了解為什麼台灣企業部落格的發展較國外落後，以及台灣已成立的企業部落格，其成立的動機、經營部落格社群的作法，和部落格帶給企業的效益。 本研究以Rogers (2003)的創新決策過程為骨幹，探討台灣企業採用部落格決策的各個階段。並以虛擬社群成員發展的前三個階段：吸引會員、增加參與、建立忠貞，探討企業如何經營虛擬社群，以及透過Prahalad & Ramswamy (2000)提出的共創價值平台的四個要素，評估企業部落格應具備的條件。本研究採取個案研究法，從十家台灣持續經營的企業部落格中，選擇瀏覽人次及部落格上互動最多的三家個案：Yahoo!奇摩拍賣部落格、風潮音樂部落格、毛寶Simple Life部落格，進行深度的個案訪談。另外訪談兩位企業部落格的專家，了解台灣企業部落格的發展概況。 透過個案研究，本研究發現目前台灣已成立的企業部落格，通常是由熟悉部落格的員工提出採用部落格的構想，主管同意給予時間經營，是一個由下而上的過程，和企業一般的決策過程不同。而在企業部落格的經營方面，企業可以和個人部落客合作，提供專業、有趣的內容吸引網友前來。部落格應時常邀請顧客互動，而企業希望以部落格和顧客共創價值，應具備以下條件：企業與顧客都感興趣的主題、顧客可以獲得有價值的資訊和美好的經驗、真實透明的原則、制定網友回應文章的規則。在建立網友忠誠度方面，企業部落格經營者應多呈現個人的特色，並熱情回應網友，時常拜訪網友的部落格，與網友建立關係。 企業若能持續投入時間經營部落格，只需花費少許的錢，能透過部落格與顧客共創價值：與顧客對話、顧客知識、運用顧客口耳相傳的力量。這些價值挹注回企業，能帶來的效益：增加企業的能見度、提昇人性化的品牌形象、澄清媒體錯誤報導、提升搜尋引擎結果的排名。然而，目前台灣企業部落格的數量仍不多，本研究認為原因為：台灣本身部落格的發展起步慢之外；台灣企業看重短期的效益的心態；相較於國外，台灣少有企業高層想以部落格和顧客直接對話；台灣還沒有專業的企業部落格顧問形成，以輔導企業。

Problem: Development of a firm’s offering is a vital weapon for competition. Obtaining knowledge on customer expectations and translating those into product development and superior service delivery is surrounded by prioritisation decisions. Industrial vending systems are proven to be a growing field in terms of deployments but have received little academic attention, especially regarding service quality perception to support customer-oriented innovation processes for suppliers, facilitating such decisions. Purpose: To identify key drivers of positive service quality perception and customer satisfaction as well as trust and commitment indicators for business-to-business industrial vending systems. Method: Through an explanatory approach, qualitative data on multiple cases was gathered. 14 in-depth semi-structured interviews were held with customers currently using a specific industrial vending system. Conclusion: Solution characteristics of industrial vending systems impact service quality perception through compliance with customer requirements. A total of 13 customer satisfaction drivers were identified for the investigated industrial vending system, the most important being efficiency, user-friendliness and timeliness. Further, the presence of individual- and company level trust in customer-supplier relationships positively impacts commitment intentions. Contribution: Adds novel knowledge on customer satisfaction for industrial vending systems and contributes with suggestions for managers on how trust and commitment affect customer satisfaction, which can be incorporated into the value promise design, product development and marketing strategies. / ISNET (finansierad av KK-stiftelsen)

The current public procurement process of pharmaceuticals is characterized by a lack of overall perspective and distrust between the pharmaceutical industry and buying Swedish county councils. This is due to the historical context between the two parties. There also exist cost inefficiencies due to a high cost focus and the lack of an overall cost perspective. These factors have affected how the parties on the pharmaceutical market interact and act in relation to each other. The public procurement situation is something both the studied pharmaceutical company (MSD Sverige AB) and the studied buyers (Region Östergötland, Region Jönköpings län and NT-rådet) are aware of and agree on has to change. Therefore, the way public procurement of pharmaceuticals is carried out has to change for it to the meet current challenges, and future demand, of the Swedish health care.The studied pharmaceutical company wishes to increase the service orientation in public procurement processes, something the county councils and NT-rådet are in favour of. Furthermore, the company wants to achieve a value co-creation between itself and the buyers, however, the possibility of achieving value co-creation is somewhat debatable among the buyers since they have different opinions of its feasibility. Nevertheless, the report assumes that value co-creation is possible in the studied system. At the same time interviews have demonstrated the existence of different opinions and thoughts regarding value adding services amongst the different buyers, i.e. there is a lack of consensus if sufficient resources exist to change the procurement process and what part the pharmaceutical company should play if the service orientation increases. Moreover, there exist divided opinions regarding how the interaction with the pharmaceutical company should take place since the majority of the buyers wishes to have a clear separation from the pharmaceutical industry, something making the development of value adding service more difficult.Since there exist disagreements regarding how a change to the procurement process practically should be carried out and there is a distrust between the parties, the aim of the report is to demonstrate similarities and dissimilarities between them within four key areas: business relationships, cost efficiency, strategies and service orientation. The purpose is also to illustrate how a changed procurement process could benefit all parties and the process as a whole. The authors do this by creating a strategic framework, which is based on the four presented key areas and scientific theories. It shows where the parties are today and where they theoretically should be in the future to improve the procurement process, meet today’s and future challenges. The buyers’ biggest challenge is to improve the cost efficiency and use of resources, for the studied pharmaceutical company the biggest challenge is to create new business opportunities. The basis for the report and strategic framework is that both parties should benefit from drawn conclusions since they are in a symbiotic/cooperative relationship due to the dependency between each other’s businesses. Therefore, the framework has to be developed with the aim of promoting value co-creation and render a positive change to the procurement process possible.The presented framework demonstrates that an increase service orientation, through the introduction of value adding services, is the key to value co-creation, improve use of resourcesIIand a more cost efficient procurements processes of pharmaceuticals. Yet, both the analysis and conclusion clearly shows that value co-creation between the parties is not possible today, but in the future, due to existing business relationships. These are affected negative because of the existing distrust between the parties, thus preventing the creation of better business relationships. Therefore, the negative business relationship prevents an increased service orientation and the introduction of value adding services in the procurement processes. This in its turn hinder the buying parties from improving their use of resources and increasing the cost efficiency. Bad business relationships also mean the studied pharmaceutical company will lose business opportunities. Consequently, both parties will fail to address their current and future challenges. Therefore, improving business relationships is a key factor for reaching value co-creation and increase the overall cost perspective in the public procurement process of pharmaceuticals. Better business relationships will also decrease the distrust and allow for increased service orientation, something that will improve cost efficiency and efficient use of resources in procurement processes and open up for new business opportunities. / Läkemedelsupphandling präglas idag av ett bristande helhetsperspektiv och förtroende mellan läkemedelsindustrin och upphandlande landsting i Sverige, vilka härstammar från den historiska kontexten. Det finns även en kostnadsineffektivitet till följd av en hög kostnadsfokus och det bristande helhetsperspektivet. Dessa faktorer har påverkat hur aktörerna inom läkemedelsupphandling interagerar med, och agerar i förhållande till, varandra. Situationen är något både det studerade läkemedelsbolaget (MSD Sverige AB) och de studerade upphandlarna (Region Östergötland, Region Jönköpings län samt NT-rådet) är medvetna och överens om måste förändras. Därför måste sättet läkemedelsupphandlingar görs på idag förändras för att möta existerande utmaningar och framtida sjukvårdsbehov, dock är aktörerna oense kring hur en sådan förändring praktiskt ska ske.Läkemedelsbolaget vill öka tjänsteorienteringen, genom att erbjuda läkemedelskompletterande mervärdestjänster, vilket även regionerna och NT-rådet generellt ställer sig positiva till. Dessutom vill läkemedelsbolaget uppnå ett gemensamt värdeskapande, något som upphandlade aktörer har delade åsikter kring om det är möjligt eller inte. I rapporten antas dock att ett gemensamt värdeskapande går att uppnå i det studerade systemet. Samtidigt har genomförda intervjuer visat att åsikter och tankar kring mervärdestjänster skiljer sig åt bland upphandlande aktörer, bland annat huruvida resurser finns för att förändra upphandlingsprocessen och vilken roll läkemedelsbolaget ska ha vid en ökad tjänstorientering. Det råder även delade meningar kring interaktionens utformning med läkemedelsbolaget då majoriteten av upphandlande aktörer vill ha en tydlig separation från läkemedelsindustrin, något som försvårar en utveckling av mervärdestjänster.Eftersom det existerar oenigheter kring hur en förändring av läkemedelsupphandling praktiskt ska ske och en misstro finns mellan aktörerna visar rapporten på likheter och skillnader mellan aktörerna inom fyra identifierade kärnområden: affärsrelationer, kostnadseffektivitet, strategi samt tjänsteorientering. Rapporten visar också hur en förändrad läkemedelupphandling skulle kunna gynna båda parter och läkemedelsupphandlingen som helhet. Författarna gör detta genom skapandet av ett strategiskt ramverk, vilket bygger på nyss nämnda kärnområden. Det strategiska ramverket baseras på vetenskapliga teorier och illustrerar vart aktörerna befinner sig inom respektive kärnområde idag samt vad de bör eftersträva för att teoretiskt kunna möta framtidens och dagens utmaningar i samband med läkemedelsupphandling. Regionernas största utmaningar är att förbättra kostnadseffektiviteten och resursutnyttjandet, läkemedelsbolagets största utmaning är att skapa nya affärsförutsättningar. Utgångspunkten i rapporten och det strategiska ramverket är att båda aktörer ska gynnas av författarnas slutsats då aktörerna befinner sig i en symbios-/samarbetsrelation till följd av att deras verksamheter är beroende av varandra. Därför anser författarna att ramverket måste syfta till att uppnå ett gemensamt värdeskapande för möjliggöra en positiv förändring av läkemedelsupphandling.Ramverket, vilket presenteras i rapportens slutsats, lyfter att en ökad tjänsteorientering, genom införandet av mervärdestjänster knutna till läkemedel, i samband med läkemedelsupphandling är nyckeln till ett gemensamt värdeskapande, förbättrat resursutnyttjande och mer kostnadseffektiva läkemedelsupphandlingar. Dock visar både analysen och slutsatsen på att ett gemensamt värdeskapande mellan aktörerna inte är möjligt idag, även om det i framtiden ärIVmöjligt, till följd av den existerande misstron mellan aktörerna, vilken förhindrar att en god affärsrelation skapas. Följaktligen förhindrar den dåliga affärsrelationen en ökad tjänsteorientering och ett införande av mervärdestjänster i samband med läkemedelsupphandling. Det gör i sin tur att regionerna inte kan förbättra sitt resursutnyttjande eller sin kostnadseffektivitet vid läkemedelsupphandling, dessutom får läkemedelsbolaget inga nya affärsmöjligheter. Således misslyckas båda aktörer att möta sina nuvarande och framtida utmaningar. Därför är affärsrelationer det kärnområde och den faktorn som idag är mest avgörande för att aktörerna ska kunna möta sina utmaningar, uppnå ett gemensamt värdeskapande, öka helhetsperspektivet samt förbättra läkemedelsupphandling i framtiden.

Som följd av den digitala och teknologiska utveckling som genomsyrat 2010-talet, har konkurrensen bland företag ökat, då det blivit lättare för konkurrenter att träda in på marknaden. Den ökade konkurrensen har i sin tur inneburit att företag blivit mer motiverade att implementera olika strategier för att bygga en djupare relation till sina kunder, för att få dem att stanna kvar hos dem istället för att välja en konkurrent. En av dessa strategier som företag implementerar i allt större utsträckning är att engagera sina kunder. Detta handlar om att initiera ageranden från kund som går utöver transaktioner.Genom att engagera sina kunder, kan företag skapa värde tillsammans med dem, vilket i sin tur kan leda till förbättrade relationer och lönsamhet. Kundens engagemang kan dock även resultera i värdeförstörande, om det inte hanteras på rätt sätt. Detta kan orsaka konsekvenser i form av förlorade kunder och försämrat rykte för företaget.Syftet med vår studie är att skapa en djupare förståelse för om och hur företags arbete med kundengagemang kan leda till värdeskapande eller värdeförstörande. Vi vill undersöka om företag tar dessa olika utfall i beaktning och hur de i så fall arbetar för att främja värdeskapande och undvika värdeförstörande.För att undersöka detta har vi studerat hur företag inom olika branscher arbetar med att skapa engagemang via sociala kanaler. Detta eftersom utvecklingen på sociala kanaler har gått i samma takt som övrig teknik och hela tiden förändras, samt för att majoriteten av företag idag är aktiva på dessa. Vi har genomfört sju kvalitativa djupintervjuer med personer ansvariga över respektive företags sociala kanaler. Den teoretiska bakgrunden om Customer Relationship Management (hädanefter CRM), Social CRM (hädanefter SCRM), kundengagemang, gemensamt värdeskapande och gemensamt värdeförstörande har ställts i förhållande till det material som insamlats från intervjuerna. Genom detta har vi kunnat besvara studiens problemformulering:Hur skapar företag kundengagemang med hjälp av sociala kanaler?Resultatet av studien visar att företag skapar kundengagemang genom att initiera olika typer av interaktioner med sina kunder. I vilken utsträckning företagen skapar engagemang samt hur mycket de tar hjälp av sociala kanaler för att göra detta varierar mellan dem. Resultaten visar även att värde både kan skapas och förstöras i företagens arbete med kundengagemang, vilket bland annat kan bero på företagets resurser närvarande på sociala kanaler, ömsesidighet och felaktiga interaktioner. Företag som strävar efter att skapa kundengagemang med hjälp av sina sociala kanaler behöver därmed tänka på dessa aspekter för att främja värdeskapande och förhindra värdeförstörande.

Interactions are of critical importance in business-to-business contexts, and value seems to be influenced by the interactions between the supplier, customer and other third parties where these interactions co-creates value. However, as the literature has mostly focused on the positive value co-creation, the interactions that result in failure is instead co-destroying value. This thesis is therefore going to study the negative interaction outcome, value co-destruction, in knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) firms from a supplier perspective, where interactions are shown to be critical, to explore proactive practices that could be utilized in order to prevent value co-destruction between the customer and the KIBS firm as well as practices to recover from value codestruction. Through a qualitative multiple-case study, the data was collected from KIBS representatives in the IT-industry in Sweden, that provided empirical data to further nuance the phenomenon. Customer education, unveiling business opportunities, customer surveys, and business events was discovered to be used for proactively preventing value co-destruction, where the authors also found the time aspect of the relationship between value co-creation and value co-destruction to be of importance in preventing miscommunications that result in value co-destruction. Therefore, the authors of this thesis argue that miscommunications and acknowledgment of the miscommunication that co-destroys value often occurs at different time points, where the proactive practices might be targeted towards preventing the miscommunication or targeted towards the recovery from the value co-destruction.