No description available.

Voltaire a-t-il été rénovateur ou défenseur du classicisme ? Bien qu'il l'appréciât, il s'opposait à l'introduction de la galanterie qui était la tradition classique. Car, pour lui, la puissance de la tragédie, c'était d'inspirer la crainte et la pitié afin d'instruire les hommes. À ses yeux, la galanterie ne pouvait qu'affaiblir le rôle éducatif de la tragédie. Ainsi, il a tenté d'instruire dans le théâtre français des scènes qui inspirent la terreur, tout en respectant la bienséance du classicisme. Pour ce qui est de la pitié, il a mis en avant l'importance des liens familiaux ; les liens du sang font entendre la voix de la nature. Cela nous amène à la question de la nature humaine. En réalité, Voltaire avait confiance en la nature de l'homme, tout en soutenant l'empirisme. De là, une contradiction apparaît. Si l'homme est façonné par son environnement, il y a des cas où il se dénature et commet un crime. Voltaire pensait plutôt que l'homme était originellement l'être faible qui commit la faute. Alors, le crime s'unit à la nature humaine. Cependant, il croyait malgré tout à la bonté de l'homme car ce dernier possède la capacité de se régénérer. C'est là qu'intervient la force du remords. Pour Voltaire, ce sentiment est une des composantes de la vertu gravée dans la nature humaine. Même si un mortel commet un crime, il peut se régénérer grâce au remords. L'être humain, selon lui, résulte de sa nature bonne et l'empirisme. Voltaire a tenté jusqu'à sa mort d'être à la fois dramaturge et philosophe afin de mettre en lumière le rapport de la vertu et de la régénération. Pensant toujours à éduquer l'homme, tantôt il défend la tradition classique, tantôt il introduit de la modernité dans le classicisme. Toutefois, pour lui, moderniser la tradition classique était un moyen de la conserver, non pas de la détruire. En effet, il pensait que la tragédie classique était la plus efficace manière d'éduquer les hommes. La tragédie voltairienne, c'est donc l'intégration de la modernité à la tradition du classicisme.

Taking Saba Mahmood's question 'Can secularism be other-wise?' (2010) as the starting point for a critical-historical investigation of the 'secular body' (Asad 2003; Hirschkind 2011), my thesis develops in two stages. In the first, I argue that current works of secular theory - particularly A Secular Age (Taylor 2007) - tend to rely on an excessively rationalistic conception of Enlightenment thought for the construction of their central conceptual categories (e.g. the 'immanent frame', 'buffered self', or 'modern exclusive humanism'), thus reinforcing a double-binary linking rationality to Euro-American secularity, and emotion to subaltern 'religion'. Against Taylor and others, I emphasise the contradictory, 'assembled' nature of Enlightenment discourse, and point to alternative, more body-centred strands of thought in key figures of the seventeenth-eighteenth-century French Enlightenment, such as Descartes, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Diderot, Helvétius, and Holbach. Against common perceptions, and drawing on a range of philosophical works, institutional reports, and stage plays in French and in translation, I suggest these figures in some ways reinstated emotion and the body against the rationalistic tendencies of the past. Insofar as 'the secular' was shaped by the Enlightenment, it emerged out of a conscious project of nationalist cultivation, based fundamentally on manipulating the body and emotions. In the second stage, I consider the way Orientalist representations of non-Western religions meshed with prevalent theories of political manipulation to generate an affective system of anti-Catholic propaganda geared towards the national good. Though existing critiques of Taylor tend to focus on the importance of religious (i.e. Christian) constructions of Oriental religions for the genealogy of secularity (e.g. Mahmood 2010), I suggest a distinctively secular form of Orientalism emerged in the eighteenth century, in which anti-religion, racism, and nationalism merged into a powerful weapon of republican discourse, congruent with ambient theories of emotion. The aesthetic manipulation of racist and Orientalist tropes in Montesquieu's Lettres Persanes (1721) and Voltaire's Le Fanatisme (1741), for example, can be read as a practical response to existing theory on the power of images to regulate people's passions in the national interest.

Manzoni in giovane età fu un grande ammiratore di Voltaire, che poi abbandonò o distrusse. La prima fase del lavoro analizza le prime biografie manzoniane, attraverso le quali si è cercato di capire quando si è diffusa la notizia, infondata, ma che ancora oggi trova credito, della distruzione da parte di Manzoni di tutti i volumi l’edizione del 1785 di tutte le opere di Voltaire. Si è poi provveduto ad analizzare la bibliografia critica manzoniana, per definire al meglio lo status quaestionis degli studi. In particolare si è messo in luce il ruolo fondamentale della lezione crociana, riferimento obbligato per tutti coloro che si sono interessati ai debiti di Manzoni nei confronti delle opere di Voltaire. Sono state poi analizzate le citazioni dirette di Voltaire nelle opere di Manzoni. Questa analisi ha permesso di isolare i singoli passi in cui Voltaire viene citato direttamente, l’ipotesi di partenze era quella che potesse esistere una “funzione Voltaire” nell’opera manzoniana; in molti casi, però, il rimando all’autore francese è in negativo: Manzoni sente infatti la necessità di correggere ed emendare quanto affermato dall’illuminista. / Manzoni was a great admirer of Voltaire, who then abandoned or destroyed. The first phase of this work analyzes the old Manzoni’s biographies, through which it was tried to understand when born the unfounded news on Manzoni's destruction of all volumes of all the works of Voltaire. Then we analyzed the Manzoni’s critical bibliography, to better define the status quaestionis of the studies. Then this work analyzes Voltaire's direct quotes in Manzoni's works.

Managementtool for InfiniBand / Managementtool für InfiniBand

À la fin du XVIIe siècle, la dissolution du pacte allégorique semblait avoir à tout jamais disjoint la fable et le conte, la première prenant en charge seule un but didactique et le second se définissant comme un récit pur, sans intention de transmettre un quelconque message. Paradoxalement, de la fin du XVIIe siècle jusqu'aux années 1775, un nombre important de contes affichent, dès leurs seuils (titres, épigraphes, frontispices, préfaces), une fonction cognitive : on assiste à l'émergence d'une nouvelle catégorie du conte, qui se réconcilie avec les savoirs. Cette thèse vise à montrer que la portée philosophique et morale de ce sous-genre réside moins dans le message transmis que dans le mode de déchiffrement qu'il induit et dans la singularité de l'expérience qu'il fait vivre au lecteur. Les contes à visée morale et philosophique ne sont pas des illustrations d'une thèse préalable, ils déclenchent la réflexion du lecteur grâce à un dispositif narratif particulier, qui repose sur un pacte de lecture non plus allégorique, mais analogique : le lecteur est amené à faire des liens entre ce qui a priori est sans rapport, à prendre une posture critique à l'égard de tous les discours (notamment religieux, politiques, pseudo-scientifiques et même fictionnels), et à s'interroger sur lui-même, en somme à être philosophe, au sens où l'entendait le XVIIIe siècle. Après avoir repéré les constantes structurelles et thématiques de ces textes, aussi divers soient-ils, nous étudions l'entremêlement des discours philosophiques et moraux et de la fiction, dans les contes de Fénelon, Montesquieu, Saint-Hyacinthe, Crébillon, Diderot, Rousseau, Voltaire et Marmontel.

The aim of the present study is to paint an overall picture of how Voltaire interacted with the books that made up his personal library. Situated at the crossroads between history of the book, literary history and literary studies in the standard meaning of the term, it seeks to deepen our understanding of the ways in which Voltaire used his books and of the different types of notes that he left in them. These notes are of course texts in themselves – short ones, to be sure, but texts all the same – and their material, literary and polemical significance have never before been studied in depth. We begin by classifying the marginalia according to the function they seem to have played for Voltaire and, based on their material characteristics, by developing methodologies to analyse these short manuscripts, along with the non-verbal markings that accompany them. An analysis follows of the ways in which Voltaire used the white spaces in his books, then of the links that can be established between the signs of his reading and the genesis of his published works. Finally, we study the poetics of the marginal notes as well as the dynamics at work in the annotated library as a whole. Throughout, Voltaire’s notes and reading habits are placed in the context of the critical literature that has grown up around the subject of marginalia. Along the way, we compare his marginal notes to those of other literary figures of the period, for the subject of this study is clearly the marginalia of a writer, which are necessarily inextricably linked to his principal activity – writing. Indeed, one might speak of an interpenetration, of a blurring of boundaries between reading and writing. Beyond the marks of Voltaire's reading, the study of marginalia raises questions that are relevant for other non-canonical and paratextual materials. To place them in the spotlight transforms their status, and a note that was 'marginal' comes to be considered a text in its own right.

Mémoire numérisé par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal.

My diploma thesis called Search of happiness in Voltaire's novels aims to analyse the theme of happiness in prose works Micromegas, L'Ingénu, Zadig and Candide. The analysis is preceded by an introduction showing the evolution of the theme of happiness through different historical periods. This theoretical part is also followed by a definition of philosophical novel as a typical Voltaire's way of expressing his philosophical thoughts. The analysis itself underlines common points of view found in the novels which all describe a world full of evil, disasters and misfortune. Good and honest heroes enter into this bad world and they struggle to find their place in the sun. Their nice personalities present a big contrast to the merciless world which surrounds them. The analysed examples from novels highlight major problems in Voltaire's time but a lot of parallels are found in today's world. I systematically pay attention to these parallels throughout the diploma. The analysis leads to the description of incorrigibly bad world, where only small islands of happiness can be found represented by friendship and love. We can only deal with such a life thanks to a meaningful activity which can make it bearable. The philosopher's approach to the theme which still captures people's attention is evaluated in the...

Mémoire numérisé par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal