Inaug.-Diss.--Cologne. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. 593-619).

Thesis--Munich. / Bibliography: p. i-xiv.

Diss.--Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften an der Philosophischen Fakultät III--Berlin--Humboldt-Universität, 1999. / Bibliogr. p. 159-171. Index.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-08-20T17:09:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2008-06-11. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2015-08-20T17:27:18Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000841025.pdf: 761372 bytes, checksum: 34f2c75736c0e51f72934d9f4e613adb (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / Este trabalho tem como objeto de análise a perspectiva de Max Weber em relação ao socialismo. Esse grande clássico do pensamento social sustentou posição muito crítica em relação à exequibilidade do projeto socialista. Mais precisamente, este trabalho delineia e analisa a crítica weberiana ao socialismo em sua dupla abrangência: Weber contrapõe-se tanto à ideia de que a emancipação humana seria atingida em uma sociedade socialista estabelecida, quanto às próprias possibilidades de êxito de uma revolução social que caminhasse no sentido da construção dessa sociedade. Inicialmente revelados os argumentos weberianos que sustentam tal postura, passa-se à sua subsequente discussão crítica à luz do contexto histórico na qual o pensador alemão os forjou. A cadeia de valores que norteavam o autor - base de sua postura político-ideológica - parece influenciar sobremaneira seu ponto de vista sobre o modo de produção socialista, o qual via apenas como extensão radicalizada da dominação burocrática, algo já existente em seu predecessor, o capitalismo moderno. Tomando precisamente essa ideia como central, não vislumbrava saída para a jaula de ferro da burocracia, apresentando-a como algo inexorável na modernidade, seja no capitalismo, seja no seu suposto antípoda, o socialismo. Por fim, muito embora desdobramentos históricos das experiências socialistas tenham dado razão a Weber, apresentam-se alguns elementos críticos à elaboração teórica weberiana, problematizando-se alguns aspectos de sua argumentação, cuja força e influência são inegáveis. Para isso, textos variados de sua obra são percorridos e analisados, embora tome como documento central a célebre Conferência sobre o Socialismo, proferida por Weber em 1918 / This work aims to analyse Max Weber's perspective in relation to the socialism. This great classic of the social thought argued against the feasibility of the socialist project from a very critical point of view. More precisely, this work delineates and analyses the double biased Weberian criticism towards socialism: Weber not only opposes the idea that the human emancipation would be reached in an established socialist society, but also criticises the possibilities of success of a social revolution that could lead to that sort of society. Unveiled the arguments that underpin Weber's criticism, the subsequent critical discussion of the author's reasons is addressed in the light of the historical background in which the German thinker has come up with them. The chain of values that guided the author, which provides the basis for his political-ideological position, seems to exert great influence on the view he holds on socialism, which he has only seen as an extensive form of the bureaucratic domination, something that has already existed in its predecessor, the modern capitalism. Taking that very idea as pivotal, that negative view of socialism, Weber has considered there was no way out for the cage of iron of bureaucracy, thus claiming it was something inexorable in modern times, either in capitalism or in socialism, capitalism's supposed antipodal. Finally, even though some historical developments of the socialist experiences give reason to Weber's arguing, the Weberian theorisation and his arguing, whose strength and influence are undeniable, are questioned here based on some critical elements. In order to do so, a wide range of Weber's works are browsed and analysed; the famous Conference on Socialism, though, proffered by Weber in 1918, is here taken as the fundamental document for research

Orientador: Élide Rugai Barros / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-16T08:53:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LimaRezende_GabrielSampaioSouza_M.pdf: 3439693 bytes, checksum: 6e177a6b042284816d7e6f7447d8a2ab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 / Resumo: Este trabalho é o resultado de um estudo sobre o papel que a música cumpre dentro da obra de Max Weber, centrado essencialmente em uma interpretação de seu texto Os fundamentos racionais e sociológicos da música. Tomando-o como um ponto de intersecção entre os "universos" das ciências humanas e dos estudos sobre música, buscamos verificar como Weber se apropriou das análises e reflexões apresentadas nas obras que lhe serviram de base para a construção de sua narrativa sobre o processo de racionalização da música ocidental; ou seja, tentamos compreender como o estudioso, a partir das bases teóricas e epistemológicas que sustentavam a sua teoria sociológica, se aventurou no universo de estudos sobre música que o circundava. Nossa análise se desenvolveu em três partes. Primeiramente, discutimos os pressupostos teórico metodológicos sobre os quais estaria assentado o estudo weberiano. Em seguida, acompanhamos as principais etapas da narrativa que o sociólogo constrói sobre a racionalização da música ocidental, para, finalmente, traçarmos as linhas de uma possível interpretação dos significados dessa narrativa dentro do contexto mais amplo de sua obra. / Abstract: This work is the result of a study on the role that music plays in the work of Max Weber, focused in an interpretation of his text The rational and sociological foundations of music. Assuming it as an intersection point between the "universes" of the human sciences and of the music studies, we tried to verify how Weber appropriated himself of the analyses and reflections presented in the works that served him as a basis for the construction of his narrative about the rationalization process of the Western music; in other words, we tried understand how the author, from the theoretical and epistemological bases that underlies his sociological theory, ventured himself in the universe of studies about music that surrounded him. Our analysis is developed in three parts. Firstly, we discuss the theoretical and methodological tenets that underlies Weber's study. In following, we investigate the main steps of the narrative that he builds about the rationalization of the Western music and, finally, we draw the lines of a possible interpretation of the meanings of this narrative in the wider context of his work / Mestrado / Cultura / Mestre em Sociologia

Orientador: Octavio Ianni / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-28T06:17:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Altomare_MarceloCarlos_D.pdf: 10554700 bytes, checksum: 845fd06aac8cc885b13c9b943139beea (MD5) Previous issue date: 2000 / Resumo: Nao informado / Abstract: Not informed. / Doutorado / Doutor em Sociologia

Doctorat en philosophie et lettres / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

Zugl.: Bonn, Univ., Diss., 2003.

Thesis (PhD)--University of Stellenbosch, 2011. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Max Weber’s text, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1904-5), also called “the Weber thesis”, has animated debates on the relationship between religion, particularly Calvinism, and capitalism for over a century. Many studies have been done to test the validity of the relationship between religion, particularly Protestantism, and capitalism in different parts of the world. However, the case of the relationship between Calvinism and capitalism in South Africa has received limited scholarly attention. In the view of the political economist Francis Fukuyama, ‘the failure of the Calvinist Afrikaners to develop a thriving capitalist system until the last quarter of the [19th] century’ is an anomaly that needs explanation. My doctoral thesis takes up this challenge and offers an understanding of the engagement of Boers/Afrikaner Calvinists with trade, later modern industrial capitalism, from 1652 to 1948. In order to understand the South African case study — Calvinism found roots at the Cape in 1652 and is significant still today — I have employed historical sociology as my methodology. My preference was guided by Weber’s use of a form of this methodology. This allows for nuanced understandings of Calvinism and forms of capitalism at different periods in its evolution. I have employed Weberian sociological theory, including his ideal type constructs such as the Protestant ethic, bureaucracy and the spirit of capitalism, to gain greater insight. In my analysis I have also relied on Weber’s Verstehen (interpretive) frameworks to offer more nuanced results. To add to the conceptual framework, I have used Weber’s metaphor of the “switchmen” in order to trace the impact of ideas. Of course, the focus is on Calvin’s ideas as they were reintroduced at different periods in South African Calvinist history: often to suit new socio-political conditions and material interests. I trace the values of the Protestant ethic and the attitudes expressing the spirit of capitalism, following Weber, through an investigation of bureaucratisation of business and government. I show the increased convergence of the Afrikaner Calvinist volk with the spirit of modern industrial capitalism in the early 20th century through the call by the elite among the Afrikaners acting as ideological “switchmen” through their ideas and wanting to alleviate poverty amongst the group. Finally, the thesis shows the validity of the Weber thesis and its use for the study of Afrikaner Calvinism, including in period that follows after 1948. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Max Weber se teks, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1904-5), ook genoem “die Weber tesis”, het debatte oor die verhouding tussen religie, veral Calvinisme, en kapitalisme vir meer as ‘n eeu geanimeer. Daar is vele studies wat poog om die geldigheid van ‘n verband tussen religie, veral Protestantisme en kapitalisme in ander dele van die wêreld te beoordeel. Die verhouding tussen Calvinisme en kapitalisme in Suid Afrika het egter beperkte akademiese ondersoek gekry. Na die siening van die politieke ekonoom Francis Fukuyama is “die onvermoë van die Calvinistiese Afrikaners om ‘n welvarende kapitalistiese stelsel te ontwikkel tot voor die laaste kwart van die [19de] eeu” ‘n anomalie wat verduideliking benodig. My doktorale tesis neem die uitdaging aan en bied insig in die verband tussen Afrikaner Calvinisme en handel, later, moderne industriële kapitalisme, van 1652 tot 1948. Historiese sosiologie, gelei deur ‘n Weberiaanse benadering, is as metodologie toegepas om insig te kry in die Suid-Afrikaanse gevallestudie – Calvinisme vestig in die Kaap in 1652 en is tans nog betekenisvol. Dit het my in staat gestel om ‘n genuanseerde begrip van Calvinisme en die vorms van kapitalisme in verskillende tydperke in sy evolusie te ontwikkel. Weberiaanse sosiale teorie, insluitend sy ideale tipes konsepte, soos die Protestante etiek, burokrasie en die gees van kapitalisme is toegepas om beter insig te kry. In my analise het ek op Weber se Verstehen (interpretatiewe) raamwerke gesteun om meer genuanseerde resultate op te lewer. Weber se metafoor van die “switchmen” is aangewend om die nalatenskap van idees te volg. Die fokus is natuurlik veral op die wyse waarop Calvyn se idees herhaaldelik gebruik is gedurende verskillende tydperke in Suid-Afrikaanse Calvinistiese geskiedenis: soms om nuwe sosio-politieke kondisies en materiële belange te bevredig. Ek het die waardes van die Protestante etiek en houdings wat, volgens Weber, die gees van kapitalisme uitdruk, in die burokratisering van besigheid en regering ondersoek. Ek het toenemende konvergensie tussen die Afrikaner Calvinistiese volk en die gees van moderne industriële kapitalisme in die vroeë 20e eeu, gevoed deur die oproep van die elite onder die Afrikaners wat waarneem as ideologiese “switchmen” deur hulle idees in die poging om armoede onder die groep te verlig, uitgelig. Laastens, die tesis bewys die geldigheid van die Weber tesis en sy toepassing in die studie van Afrikaner Calvinisme, insluitend die tydperk wat volg na 1948.

在政治事務中，權力與倫理應當有著什麼樣的區別與關聯？乃是一個至為重要的問題 。德思想家韋伯（MAX WEBER, １８６４－１９２０） 對政治事務的思考，亦特別著 重於此。他的基本觀點是：人對人的權力宰制無法取消，亦即整個社會徹底地倫理化 乃是不可能的，在此限制之下，政治行動及制度的唯一倫理可能性在於責任；而政治 事務要不淪為純然的權力徵逐而墮入虛無，亦唯有憑藉責任倫理來提昇。於是責任倫 理不僅是唯一可能的政治倫理，亦是必要的政治倫理。此即為本文的主要論題之所在 。為突顯韋伯上述觀點，本文將韋伯置於左抗馬克思，右拒尼采的立場來考察；馬克 思可視為從「倫理」的立場對「權力」的最猛烈批判，而尼采則可看做從「權力」的 度對「倫理」的最徹底顛覆，他們共同構成了西方現代文明的最嚴重威脅。韋伯處此 左右夾擊之中，則要求西方現代人做一個政治上成熟的人，採取責任倫理的實踐立場 ，並以此為唯一必要且可能的生存之道。 本文分為五章。第一章緒論，指出研究目的與範圍，並對主題所在的脈絡及論述架構 做一說明。第二章討論兩個先決問題：其一，韋伯與政治思想的關係、其二，韋伯與 馬克思及尼采的關係，以做為下一章論述的準備。第三章以「馬克思－韋伯－尼采」 這一對比為基本架構，從個體的人格、行動及群體的制度三個層次，來正面舖陳韋伯 的基本觀點。第四章從「學術與政治的關係」這一角度對韋伯的基本觀點加以評估與 辯護。第五章結論並提出未來研究的方向。