No description available.

No description available.

We are moving towards a more digitalized society; we use smart devices and apps, and we can consume and search for things online. This digitalization provides for massive benefits as our behaviors translate into patterns and information on us, and companies can use this to improve their performance and revenue. However, this digitalization does not only come with benefits but also drawbacks. As we move towards a more digitalized society, risks may arise along the way which may impair our personal autonomy, expose us to risky situations with privacy and cybersecurity issues, and complicate our choices. This thesis investigates consumers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards algorithms, and whether they affect their online behavior, which is also the purpose of the thesis. This thesis uses an exploratory and qualitative method, and in order to fulfill the purpose, long and semi-structured interviews have been conducted with eight interviewees who have shared their thoughts and opinions on different matters related to the increasing presence of algorithms. The main finding is that the consumers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards algorithms are negative. A majority of the interviewees stated that they want for their autonomy to remain intact, that they value their privacy and do not want it to be a tradeoff between privacy and personalization, that they want their “online persona” to be representative, and that they want companies to communicate better and take more responsibility when handling their data. The findings were also that algorithms do not affect the consumer’s online behavior. The study confirms previous studies which have stated that there are benefits and drawbacks with algorithms, and although beneficial, the benefits may impair the consumer’s well-being. The study also confirms that there is a privacy and personalization tradeoff, and in situations where privacy is prominent, trust may promote better marketing outcomes. This study also provides a suggested extension of the paradox of choice by introducing the paradox of customization, and the Technology Acceptance Model which enables investigating acceptance of advanced technologies within devices, rather than acceptance of technology itself.

No description available.

This exploratory study assessed the effectiveness of a cross-age tutoring intervention on adaptive behavior goals of three PreKindergarten/Kindergarten-aged students with labels of autism spectrum disorder. Data were collected in an inclusive environment; the school library. Three fourth grade general education cross-age tutors were trained to use a simple, naturalistic least-to-most prompting strategy to support the young students with individualized adaptive behavior goals while in the library. A mixed method design was utilized in this study; a quantitative single case multiple baseline across participants design to show performance outcomes of the young students as a result of the tutoring intervention, and a constant comparison analysis of qualitative data gathered from observations of students, students' written work, and a research journal. Quantitative results indicated all three young students performed the target behavior in the library with support from their cross-age tutors and this behavior maintained one month after intervention ended as evident through a maintenance probe; all three students made progress on the achievement of adaptive behavior goals in an inclusive environment from this intervention. Qualitative results indicated the cross-age tutoring experience was positive and powerful for all six participants involved as evident through the construction of six themes that emerged from the qualitative data.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:29:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2010-09-20Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T19:59:53Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 andrade_fp_me_arafcl.pdf: 531905 bytes, checksum: 167adb5226ceab33f3a09bc2276bfd89 (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / O presente estudo realiza uma avaliação das diferentes abordagens da racionalidade e suas implicações sobre a compreensão dos fenômenos econômicos. Neste sentido, utilizar-se-á um referencial teórico abrangente, pois a adequada compreensão desse tema exige aproximações teóricas de varias matrizes potencialmente complementares. Isso será feito com o intuito de oferecer um retrato não estilizado da racionalidade, seja na abordagem neoclássica, seja na abordagem de Herbert Simon. A concepção neoclássica se expressa através de postulados, que possuem baixa correspondência com a realidade, sobretudo, por pressupor processos cognitivos de maneira idealizada e incerteza na forma probabilística. Consequentemente, essa representação altera características importantes dos agentes e do ambiente. A concepção de racionalidade limita de Herbert Simon gera avanços nos campos explicativos e descritivos, principalmente para cenários bem estabelecidos. Em especial, permite conhecer como os agentes interpretam e representam diferentes problemas, além disso, contribui para elucidar qual o processo e as ações que ligam o objetivo ao resultado. Por conseguinte, gera avanços significativos em relação à compreensão ofertada pela teoria neoclássica, ademais essas pesquisas produziram como subproduto uma noção de complexidade, pois a racionalidade é limitada em virtude dos processos complexos que caracterizam o ambiente. Neste sentido, a utilização desse conceito em situações instáveis gerou avanços no conhecimento. Entretanto, é necessário aprofundar essa relação para se obter respostas para condições de incerteza forte, questão não restrita ao conhecimento econômico, já que se relaciona com o avanço da filosofia e métodos da ciência / This dissertation makes an evaluation of different approaches of rationality and its implications about the understanding of economical phenomena. For that, it will be adopted a wide-ranging theoretical references, because the appropriate understanding of this subject demands theoretical approximation of various matrices with potential overlapping. This will be done in order to offer a non stylized portrait of rationality, either in a neoclassical approach or the Hebert Simon approach. The neoclassical notion is expressed through assumptions, which are fairly different from reality, due to the fact that presumes the cognitive process in an idealized way and also to associate uncertainty and probabilities. Consequently, this representation changes important characteristics of the agents and environment. The notion of bounded rationality of Hebert Simon generates improvement in the explanatory and descriptive fields, mainly for well-established scenarios. Especially, it allows knowing how the agents interpret and show different problems. Besides that, it contributes to elucidate which process and actions link the object to the result. In consequence, creates remarkable improvements in relation to the understanding offered by the neoclassic theory, moreover, these researches produce as a sub-product a notion of complexity, because rationality is bounded due to complex process that characterized the environment. For this reason, the use of this concept in unstable situations generates improvement of knowledge. Nevertheless, it is necessary to get deep into this relationship to obtain answers in circumstances of strong uncertainty, a matter not exclusive to economics knowledge because it is already related to the advance of philosophy and science methods

No description available.

隨著氣候變遷與溫室效應影響日益明顯，台灣近年發生極端強降雨颱風的次數越來越頻繁，更造成流域地區嚴重災情，而從莫拉克風災經驗可體會到家戶風險溝通的重要性，也意識到我國實務與學術上相關研究的缺乏，故本研究探討家戶風險溝通機制中各項重要因素與調適行為間的關係，以及找出影響家戶調適行為決策之關鍵因素，進而提出家戶風險溝通策略之改善建議，以促進家戶採取調適行為。 本研究經由文獻回顧建立家戶調適行為之風險溝通概念架構，依循此架構研擬問卷，以高屏溪流域地區家戶為研究對象進行問卷調查，透過結構方程模式(SEM)驗證風險溝通架構，了解風險溝通機制各項因素與影響調適行為各因素之關係，後以面對災害回應之強烈將調適行為積極程度分為「消極或低度積極」、「中度積極」與「高度積極」，運用多項式羅吉斯迴歸模型建立家戶應變措施決策模型與調適措施決策模型，找出影響家戶調適行為決策之關鍵因素。 研究結果顯示，調適行為受到內在認知的影響，而內在認知同時受風險溝通機制與外在環境之影響，就風險溝通機制而言，親友鄰居、村里長與地方政府等社區網絡為重要管道。影響調適行為之關鍵因素以災害認知為主，其次為調適行為認知，居住村里次之，其中災害認知與調適行為認知越高，越有可能採取較積極之調適行為，此外，由於自然社會環境、風險溝通特性與社會經濟背景等因素交互影響下，各村里在調適行為決策上也有所差異。最後依據實證結果，與水患自主防災社區風險溝通現況，提出改善家戶風險溝通之策略建議，期望增進風險溝通機制的完備與促進家戶採取調適行為，以減緩極端氣候造成的衝擊。 / Along with the intensification of global climate change and greenhouse effect, typhoons with extreme rainfall strike Taiwan more and more frequently, which cause severe disasters in watershed area. From the experience of Typhoon Morakot in 2009, we realized the importance of risk communication with households and also the lack of related academic research. As a result, this study aims to discuss important factors in risk communication mechanism and their relationships with adaptive behaviors. It also find out key factors influencing decision-making of adaptive behaviors. Based on literature review, this study build a conceptual framework of risk communication process to describe how to trigger adaptive behaviors and encourage adaptive behaviors with risk communication. This study send out questionnaires to the households in Kaoping River Watershed and use structural equation modeling(SEM) to verify the conceptual framework. Then according to attitude of positive degree, adaptive behaviors are classified into“passive or low”,“medium” and “high” levels. By multinomial logistic regression, an empirical analysis was performed to analyze the key factors influencing decision-making of adaptive behaviors. The results show that adaptive behaviors are affected by internal cognition and at the same time internal cognition are affected by risk communication mechanism and external environment. As for risk communication mechanism, family, friends, neighbors and local governments are crucial communication channel. Key factors influencing decision-making of adaptive behaviors are cognition of disaster and adaptive behavior. People with higher cognition of disaster and adaptive behavior would more likely to take positive adaptive behaviors. Besides, community they lived in is also a key factor. Because the interaction of environments, risk communication patterns and socioeconomic attributes, people from different communities would take different adaptive behaviors. Based on empirical results, this study propose suggestions of risk communication strategies in order to better the risk communication mechanism and encourage households to take adaptive behaviors.

L'objectif principal de la thèse est de montrer les apports de l'évaluation contextualisée à l'évaluation de l'intelligence chez les adolescents.e.s, à travers cinq articles. Le premier fait l'état des lieux de l'évaluation contextualisée de l'intelligence. Le second développe les évaluations auto et hétéro-rapportées de l'intelligence. Les trois suivants rendent compte des apports d'outils d'évaluation contextualisée notamment en termes de preuve de validité. Seul le facteur de raisonnement fluide du questionnaire d'auto-évaluation prédit les résultats scolaires. Les liens avec le comportement adaptatif existent, notamment avec le facteur de vitesse de traitement du questionnaire (r=.69). Les questionnaires d'hétéro-évaluations entretiennent des liens modérés à forts avec les résultats scolaires. Enfin, pour le test de performance composé de sept subtests, seule une épreuve (intelligence cristallisée) corrèle positivement et significativement avec la moyenne scolaire générale (r=.42); et trois avec le comportement adaptatif (corrélations néanmoins faibles). Les résultats et implications de ces résultats sont discutés dans la conclusion et une ouverture sur la réalité virtuelle est proposée. / The main objective of the thesis is to show the contributions of the contextualized evaluation to the evaluation of the intelligence of teenagers, through five articles. The first takes stock of the contextualized evaluation of intelligence. The second develops self and hetero-reported assessments of intelligence. The following three report the contributions of contextualized evaluation tests, particularly in terms of proof of validity. Only the fluid reasoning factor of the self-report questionnaire predicts school results. The links with adaptive behavior exist, notably with the processing speed factor of the questionnaire (r = .69). Hetero-assessment questionnaires have moderate to strong links to school performance. Finally, for the performance test composed of seven subtests, only one subtest (crystallized intelligence) correlates positively and significantly with school results (r = .42); and three with adaptive behavior (yet weak correlations). The results and implications of these results are discussed in the conclusion and an opening on virtual reality is proposed.

研究目的：本研究的目的，是以縱貫研究的方式探討自閉症類疾患兒童自學齡前期至學齡期的臨床診斷穩定度、自閉症狀嚴重度變化、適應行為型態與其變化、內外化行為。 研究方法：本研究納入28名自閉症類疾患與18位非自閉症類疾患，於三個時間點進行評估：時間點一平均生理年齡為2歲半、時間點二為4歲、時間點三為9歲半。本研究分析三個時間點之臨床診斷穩定度以及後兩個時間點之評估資料。症狀嚴重度方面，以自閉症診斷會談問卷修訂版之晤談評估；適應行為方面，以文蘭適應行為量表第二版評估；認知功能方面，時間點二時以穆林發展量表評估，時間點三時使用魏氏兒童智力量表第四版評估；內外化行為方面，時間點三時以阿肯巴克實證衡鑑系統中的兒童行為檢核表評估。 研究結果：本研究結果顯示，自閉症類疾患從學齡前期至學齡期的臨床診斷穩定度高，若分亞型來看，自閉性疾患的診斷穩定度比其他未註明之廣泛性發展疾患高。症狀嚴重度方面，學齡期時自閉症類疾患兒童的溝通、侷限及重複刻板行為有顯著改善，社交行為亦有改善趨勢。適應行為方面，學齡前期及學齡期皆未發現自閉症類疾患與非自閉症類疾患之表現型態有差異，兩組在社會化領域的表現皆較其他領域來得差。自閉症類疾患的適應行為於學齡期時，年齡當量顯著增加，但社會化適應行為標準分數反而退步；進一步以認知功能分組檢視，則發現高功能自閉症類疾患在日常生活技巧與社會化領域的進步幅度顯著較多。內外化行為方面，學齡期時自閉症類疾患個案的退縮/憂鬱分量尺與社會問題分量尺之分數高於非自閉症類疾患，且自閉症類疾患在退縮/憂鬱、社會問題、注意力問題等三個分量尺上，皆有超過一半的個案達到邊緣範圍以上之分數；未發現內外化行為與自閉症狀嚴重度之間的相關。 結論：自閉症類疾患兒童到了學齡期大部分仍維持臨床診斷，顯示其自閉特徵仍然穩定存在，不過症狀嚴重度的整體趨勢會隨著年紀改善；但若以個體差異來看，每位個案進步的程度呈現高異質性，每位個案症狀改變的程度可能不同。自閉症類兒童的社會化適應行為從學齡前期至學齡期皆為其弱項，雖適應行為會隨著年齡進步，但社會化適應行為仍追不上同儕程度；高功能自閉症類疾患兒童的適應行為在日常生活技巧與社會化領域的進步幅度顯著較多，可能與認知功能有關。內外化行為方面，自閉症類疾患兒童的退縮/憂鬱問題、社會問題、注意力問題較多，但與症狀嚴重度無關。 / Purposes: The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine the stability of clinical diagnosis, symptom severity, adaptive function and enternal/external behavior from toddler to school age in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Methods: Twenty eight children diagnosed with ASDs and eighteen children with Non-ASDs participated at time 1 (mean chronological age was 2.5 years old), and then followed at time 2 (mean chronological age was 4 years old) and at time 3 (mean chronological age was 9.5 years old). This study examines the stability of clinical diagnosis from time 1 to time 3, and analyze the measurement data between time 2 and time 3. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) was used to measure autistic symptom severity at time 2 and time 3; Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II (VABS-II) was used to measure daily adaptive behavior at time 2 and time 3; Mullen Scale of Early Learning (MSEL) or Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) was used to measure cognitive function at two time points; Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6-18 (CBCL/6-18) was used to measure enternal and external behavior at time 3. Results: The stability of clinical diagnosis was high from toddler age to school age, and the stability of Autistic Disorder was higher than Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified. The ADI-R scores of communication domain, repetitive and stereotyped behavior domain were decreased at school age, while reciprocal social interaction domain was also declined but no significant difference. All domains of VABS-II standard score were no significant difference between ASDs and Non-ASDs at two time point, and the score of social domain was worst in both two groups. The VABS-II standard score of social domain was reduced although the age equivalent was increased at school age, and the standard score of other domains were no significant difference between the two time points but all age equivalents were improved at school age. Dividing ASDs to high-function ASDs and low-function ASDs to analyze the growth rate of adaption behaviors, the results indicated that the growth rate of adaption behaviors were higher in high-function ASDs at daily skill domain and social domain. Children with ASDs had significant higher scores on Withdrawn/Depressed scale and Social Problem scale than Non-ASDs in CBCL, and over 50 percent of ASDs scored above the borderline range at Withdrawn/Depressed scale, Social Problem scale and Attention Problem scale. In addition, there were no significant correlations between CBCL and ADI-R. Conclusions: In summary, the study showed that most of ASDs sustained the clinical diagnosis from preschool age to school age, however, the autistic symptom severity was declined. Additionally, the improvement of symptom severity of individual ASDs was high variability. The social adaptive behavior was worst in both toddler age and school age in ASDs. Although these children with ASD developed some of adaptive behaviors in the school age, the magnitude of improvement couldn’t equal to the change of their chronological age, especially in socialization domain. The growth rate of daily skill domain and social domain were higher in high-function ASDs than low-function ASDs, might associated with cognitive function. More Children with ASDs had withdrawn/depressed problem, social problem and attention problem, but there were not related to autistic symptom severity.