Investing in the Swedish stock market has over time proven to be an effective way to increase wealth. Nationally speaking, Sweden’s population is also one of the best in the world at investing their savings. Four out of five swedes invest at least some part of their private savings into mutual funds which approximately amounts to 8.4 million people. Consequently, in 2022, the aggregated amount of household wealth invested into fund shares and stocks was a staggering 3.1 trillion Swedish crowns. With such a huge interest in the stock market it is important to understand how risk-adjusted returns should be evaluated. Traditionally there has been a choice between active and passive investment strategies, depending on how the investor views the market's pricing of securities. This study investigates, using the Carhart four-factor model, how asset pricing varies over time depending on different levels of market volatility. The theories that have been used for this study are mainly the efficient market hypothesis and the adaptive market hypothesis. With these as a starting point, various asset pricing models have been tested (Carhart four-factor model & CAPM) and examined with statistical tests to produce reliable results. The results of this study can be used to draw conclusions that both theoretically and practically contribute to the expanding body of knowledge regarding factor models and Smart Beta investment strategies, specifically in the Swedish stock market. The study suggests that the Carhart four-factor is a reliable method to determine risk-adjusted returns in the Swedish stock market, mainly when it’s used during normal market conditions. It also appears that, based on the study’s observation of alpha, the dynamics of asset pricing in the Swedish stock market are more in line with the adaptive market theory rather than the efficient market theory. This insight can be used as an argument for how the Swedish stock market can be assumed to behave. In turn, this can give investors more understanding for which risk factors are considered significant during different times of market volatility, and how their risk premiums should be discounted when valuing securities. By emphasizing the importance of various risks being priced in different ways during different times of market volatility it is possible to manage the risk exposure of security portfolios in a more accurate and desirable way. Finally, it can be stated that the results are both on par with previous research that advocates and opposes factor models. The study found the effectiveness of the Carhart four-factor model in explaining the risk-adjusted returns to vary over time and that it cannot be assumed with statistical certainty to improve upon the CAPM in all market climates.

Chapter 1: Intuition suggests that constraint investment strategies will result in losses due to a limited portfolio allocation. Yet prior research has shown that this is not the case for a particular set of constraint mutual funds so-called Socially Responsible Investing, SRI. In this paper I show that such assets do face loses to portfolio efficiency due to their limited asset universe. I contribute to the literature by employing two techniques to estimate asset performance. First, I estimate a DEA based efficiency score that allows for direct comparison between ex-post efficiency rankings and test the ex-ante relevance of such scores by including them into asset pricing models. Second, I further check if these results are consistent when comparing the performance of ethical funds based on the alphas of traditional asset pricing models even after adjusting for coskewness risk. Overall, the results suggest that ethical funds underperform traditional unconstraint investment assets. Chapter 2: Starting after the turn of the millennium, inflation has been persistently higher than the short term T-Bill rate. Following the traditional view, this will imply a negative real rates of return that have become commonplace in the US economy. This paper examines the possibility that if an inflation risk discount contained in nominal rates exist and can explain low or negative real rates, using consumption based asset pricing model. Evidence suggests using the traditional Fisher equation to calculate real rates leads to an overestimate of real rates due to a modest inflation risk premium. To achieve non-negative real rates in a consumption based asset pricing framework the covariance between consumption growth and inflation innovations would have to be at least thirty times larger than empirically found, and in opposite direction, for the Post-Volker era. Still, though the after 2000’s covariance is positive, which suggest a discount on risk free, the magnitude is still too small to explain negativity of real rates. JEL Classification : E21, E31 Key Words : Mutual Funds, Performance, Data Envelop Analysis, Coskewness, Risk Factors, Real Returns, Consumption Bases Asset Pricing Models, Inflation

O objetivo deste trabalho é comparar diferentes formas de estimação de modelos de apreçamento de ativos. Além dos métodos tradicionais, que utilizam toda a amostra no processo de estimação dos parâmetros do modelo, será utilizado o método rolling, que estima os parâmetros através da utilização de janelas móveis de tamanho fixo. Com isso, utilizando a técnica de backtesting, procura-se averiguar se o método rolling proporciona um ganho na qualidade de ajuste em modelos de apreçamento de ativos. / The aim of this project is to compare methods of estimating asset pricing models. In addition to using traditional methods, which estimate the models parameters by using the entire sample at once, the rolling method will be used. This method estimates the models parameters by using a rolling window of fixed size through the sample. By using backtesting, we seek to investigate whether the rolling approach provides an improvement in the goodness of fit in asset pricing models.

This thesis contributes to the literature in the finance and accounting field throughout its three empirical chapters. The first empirical chapter contributes to the literature on accounting conservatism in several ways; first, it investigates the accounting conservatism of US insurance companies using four measures, namely, non-operating accruals, skewness of earnings and cash flows, book to market ratio and asymmetric timeliness measures. Second, this paper compares these four measures in order to determine the association and differences between them. Finally, the level of accounting conservatism of the insurance companies is compared to that of a sample of commercial banks to check whether they have similar levels of accounting conservatism. The results of the first chapter suggest that the changes in accounting performance, as measured by return over assets, can be partly explained by accounting conservatism, since it is measured by the accumulation of non-operating accruals, skewness of operating cash flow and accruals, book to market ratio, adjusted book to market ratio and Basu's asymmetric measure. All of these four measures give robust evidence that insurance companies' accounts tended to be conservative for the whole sample period, and that the level of conservatism has risen over the years. More interestingly, a t test for the differences in means suggests that accruals conservatism show on average a higher level of accounting conservatism than book value conservatism does. Finally, our results, based on a constant sample consist of 92 banks and 46 insurance companies whose data are available for all the sample years; they suggest that both insurance companies and banks have similar levels of accounting conservatism due to their similar reporting characteristics. The second empirical chapter contributes to the existing literature on equity valuation in two ways. First, it confirms the importance of imposing linear information dynamics when predicting the equity values of insurance companies, because the restricted models result in fewer error metrics. Second, it highlights the role of the accruals components in the equity valuation of US insurance companies by demonstrating that the incorporation of accrual components in the residuals income valuation model suggested by Ohlson (1995) has smaller error metrics than those of aggregate net income. Our results are based on a sample of US insurance companies, which consists of 718 firm-year observations over the period from 2001 to 2012. For instance, our results suggest that total accruals, changes in insurance reserve, changes in account receivables, and deferred acquisition costs have an incremental ability to predict equity market value over abnormal earnings and book values. Furthermore, the predictive ability of changes in insurance reserves is higher than the predictive ability of changes in account receivables and the change in deferred acquisition costs without imposing the LIM structures. However, when the LIM structure is imposed the predictive ability of changes in deferred acquisition costs is higher than the predictive ability of both changes in accounts receivable and changes in insurance reserves. Our final empirical chapter contributes to the literature on accounting anomalies by investigating the value to price anomaly (V/P), where the fundamental value (V) is estimated using the residual income valuation model. Motivated by the findings of Hwang and Lee (2013), Fama and French (2015), and Fama and French (2016), Chapter Four asks whether V/P strategies reflect the risks factor or whether this is better explained by market inefficiency, and whether Fama and French's five-factor model can explain the excess return of V/P. To answer the previous questions we use data from the merger of COMPUSTAT, CRSP, I/B/E/S for all the non-financial firms listed in AMEX, NYSE, and NASDAQ during the period from 1987 to 2015. Our findings suggest that the V/P ratio is positively correlated to future stock returns after controlling for several firm characteristics, which are known to be proxies of common risks. Our results indicate that the omission of risk factors is not likely to be an explanation of the V/P effect. To answer the second question, we compare the performances of different asset pricing models by calculating the GRS F-statistics. Our findings clearly indicate that the five-factor model of Fama and French performs better than either the CAPM or the traditional Fama and French three factor model. These results confirm that the excess returns of V/P strategy vary due to the differences in size, the B/M ratio, operating profit and betas across quintile portfolios. However, these factors cannot explain all the variation in excess returns; moreover, the stocks in the high V/P may be riskier than the stocks in the low V/P portfolios in certain other dimensions.

This study employs widely excepted asset pricing models to test their explanatory power in the context of Istanbul Stock Exchange listed companies between 1990 and 2010. The risk factors, beta, size, book-to-market equity, and momentum are used to form portfolios and their factor loadings are estimated. The results of this study are mostly in line with the previous academic research, and some unique attributes of the return generation mechanism of Istanbul Stock Exchange are reported.

[pt] Esta Dissertação apresenta um modelo para extrair fatores capazes de prever a volatilidade do índice de ações IBOVESPA, representativo do mercado de ações brasileiro. Esta metodologia é diferenciada por utilizar fatores que não incluem ativos da classe de ações. São utilizados fatores extraídos de classes de ativos de crédito, taxas de juros, moedas e commodities para precificar a volatilidade de um índice de ações. Além disso, os fatores são extraídos de painéis de volatilidades filtradas por modelos do tipo GARCH. / [en] It will be presented a model that is able to extract factors capable of predicting the volatility of IBOVESPA market index, which is representative of Brazilian equity market. This methodology is different from others because it won t use any inputs from equity asset classes. It will be used factors extracted from credit risk, interest rates, exchange rates and commodities data for pricing the volatility of an equity index. Besides that, those factors will be extracted from panels of volatility filtered by GARCH models.

O objetivo deste trabalho é comparar diferentes formas de estimação de modelos de apreçamento de ativos. Além dos métodos tradicionais, que utilizam toda a amostra no processo de estimação dos parâmetros do modelo, será utilizado o método rolling, que estima os parâmetros através da utilização de janelas móveis de tamanho fixo. Com isso, utilizando a técnica de backtesting, procura-se averiguar se o método rolling proporciona um ganho na qualidade de ajuste em modelos de apreçamento de ativos. / The aim of this project is to compare methods of estimating asset pricing models. In addition to using traditional methods, which estimate the models parameters by using the entire sample at once, the rolling method will be used. This method estimates the models parameters by using a rolling window of fixed size through the sample. By using backtesting, we seek to investigate whether the rolling approach provides an improvement in the goodness of fit in asset pricing models.

Previous research conducted on the US markets has found that retailers' trading imbalances can contribute to excess return opportunities, especially on Small Cap stocks. Therefore, we argue that this can be seen as an anomaly. However, anomalies that are found historically may not tell the whole truth. This is because these anomalies have been established on respective studies' specific markets and time periods. Researchers that have investigated the issue argue that it is essential to further challenge anomalies by replicating them in other settings to see if the evidence still holds. Hence, the purpose of this study is to examine if the retailers' trading imbalance anomaly can be replicated on Swedish Small Cap listed firms. We have examined this by using cross-sectional regressions in the spirit of Fama and MacBeth. This thesis concludes that the retailers’ trading imbalances cannot be replicated when applied to the chosen setting. We argue that the reasons for this are that retailers’ trading imbalances are not persistent, are not compensated when providing liquidity into the markets, and that it does not contain useful information about future stock returns. In addition, we also argue that inherent differences in the US markets compared to the Swedish Small Cap listed firms are affecting our possibility to successfully replicate the anomaly.

Cette thèse porte sur les choix des investisseurs de long terme en matière de gestion de portefeuille ainsi que sur les primes de risque offertes par le marché financier Français. Les travaux réalisés dans cette thèse se proposent d’apporter un éclairage ainsi que des arguments en faveur des placements à caractère long, risqué et productifs.En matière de gestion de portefeuille, ce travail apporte plusieurs réponses en matière d’allocation d’actifs et de stratégies optimales d’investissement. Tout d’abord, et en se basant sur des indices boursiers actions et obligataires, il s’avère que le marché français est efficient au sens faible et que l’hypothèse de marche aléatoire n’y est pas rejetée. Ce premier résultat implique que les rentabilités anormales que l’on peut mesurer sur ce marché émanent de facteurs de risque à rémunérer et non pas d’anomalies. Ainsi, dans le deuxième article, on démontre une prime de valeur persistante au sein du marché Français sur la période étudiée. Par contre, la prime de taille n’est observable que pour les titre à ratio valeur comptable sur valeur de marché très faibles ou très élevés ainsi que pour les titres ayant une rentabilité cumulée passée élevée. Aussi, investir dans les entreprises à momentum élevé mène toujours à des rentabilités meilleures quelle que soit la taille de l’entreprise considérée. On confirme également que la bonne spécification du portefeuille de marché est sine qua non pour une évaluation correcte des actifs financiers. Dans le troisième article, et dans une optique multi-périodiques de gestion de portefeuille, l’écart-type des rentabilités annualisées des actifs risqués décroit lorsqu’on allonge la période de détention ce qui implique que les gestionnaires de portefeuille tendent à biaiser les allocations vers des actifs plus sûrs et négligent par cela un manque à gagner. Ce travail démontre également que détenir un portefeuille d’actions de petites capitalisations s’avère un placement optimal pour les investisseurs ayant un horizon long. Ces résultats mettent en lumière des règles prudentielles inefficaces du point de vue des assurés d’une part, et, mettent en évidence la nécessité de mesures visant à relancer les marchés pour les petites entreprises et de faciliter leur accès au financement direct d’autre part. / This thesis focuses on long term investments and risk premiums within the French financial market. The results bring evidence supporting placements in long term, risky and productive assets. In terms of portfolio management, this thesis brings several answers regarding the optimal allocation strategies. The first article demonstrates that the French financial market is weak form efficient since we could not reject the random walk hypothesis based on the variance ratio methodology. This first contribution implies that abnormal returns are resulting from risk factors and not from anomalies. Thus, the second article revisits famous asset pricing models and highlights optimal portfolio strategies. We find that value and momentum premiums are persistent in the French market. However, size premium is only observable in extreme book to market and momentum strategies. Moreover, we show that market portfolio choice is sine qua non to models performances and that the latest is surprisingly increasing in times of distress. The third article considers the term structure of risk-return tradeoff. Based on a VAR model, we find that excess annualized standard deviation of stocks excess returns with respect to bonds and bills decreases as we lengthen investment horizon which means that investors may bias their portfolios towards safe assets and neglect additional return. Furthermore, we measured the time diversification effect among stock portfolios by distinguishing small and big capitalizations and prove that it is more profitable to hold small capitalizations than big capitalizations stocks in the long run. These results shed light on inefficient prudential rules from the viewpoint of policyholders on one hand, and, on the other hand, highlight the necessity of implementing measures to revive the markets for small enterprises and facilitate their access to direct financing through the market.

>Magister Scientiae - MSc / In this thesis, we discuss methods for optimising the expected rate of return of a portfolio with minimal risk. As part of the work we look at the Modern Portfolio Theory which tries to maximise the portfolio's expected rate of return for a cer- tain amount of risk. We also use Quadratic Programming to optimise portfolios. Generally it is recognised that portfolios with a high expected return, carry higher risk. The Modern Portfolio Theory assists when choosing portfolios with the lowest possible risk. There is a nite number of assets in a portfolio and we therefore want to allocate them in such a way that we're able to optimise the expected rate of return with minimal risk. We also use the Markowian approach to allocate these assets. The Capital Asset Pricing Model is also used, which will help us to reduce our e cient portfolio to a single portfolio. Furthermore we use the Black-Litterman model to try and optimise our portfolio with a view to understanding the current market conditions, as well as considering how the market will perform in the future. An additional tool we'll use is Value at Risk. This enables us to manage the market risk. To this end, we follow the three basic approaches from Jorion [Value at Risk. USA: McGraw-Hills, 2001]. The Value at Risk tool has become essential in calcu- lating a portfolio's risk over the last decade. It works by monitoring algorithms in order to nd the worst possible scenarios within the portfolio. We perform several numerical experiments in MATLAB and Microsoft Excel and these are presented in the thesis with the relevant descriptions.