<p dir="ltr">Current artificial intelligence (AI) systems are proficient at tasks in a closed-world setting where the rules are often rigid. However, in real-world applications, the environment is usually open and dynamic. In this work, we investigate the effects of such dynamic environments on AI systems and develop ways to mitigate those effects. Central to our exploration is the concept of \textit{novelties}. Novelties encompass structural changes, unanticipated events, and environmental shifts that can confound traditional AI systems. We categorize novelties based on their representation, anticipation, and impact on agents, laying the groundwork for systematic detection and adaptation strategies. We explore novelties in the context of stochastic games. Decision-making in stochastic games exercises many aspects of the same reasoning capabilities needed by AI agents acting in the real world. A multi-agent stochastic game allows for infinitely many ways to introduce novelty. We propose an extension of the deep reinforcement learning (DRL) paradigm to develop agents that can detect and adapt to novelties in these environments. To address the sample efficiency challenge in DRL, we introduce a hybrid approach that combines fixed-policy methods with traditional DRL techniques, offering enhanced performance in complex decision-making tasks. We present a novel method for detecting anticipated novelties in multi-agent games, leveraging information theory to discern patterns indicative of collusion among players. Finally, we introduce DABLER, a pioneering deep reinforcement learning architecture that dynamically adapts to changing environmental conditions through broad learning approaches and environment recognition. Our findings underscore the importance of developing AI systems equipped to navigate the uncertainties of the open world, offering promising pathways for advancing AI research and application in real-world settings.</p>

Cette recherche se caractérise, premièrement, par une discussion théorique sur le concept d'agent autonome, basée sur des éléments issus des paradigmes de l'Intelligence Artificielle Située et de l'Intelligence Artificielle Affective. Ensuite, cette thèse présente le problème de l'apprentissage de modèles du monde, en passant en revue la littérature concernant les travaux qui s'y rapportent. A partir de ces discussions, l'architecture CAES et le mécanisme CALM sont présentes. CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) constitue une architecture pour décrire des systèmes bases sur la dichotomie agent-environnement. Il définit l'agent et l'environnement comme deux systèmes partiellement ouverts, en couplage dynamique. Dans CAES, l'agent est compose de deux sous-systèmes, l'esprit et le corps, suivant les principes de la situativite et de la motivation intrinsèque. CALM (Constructivist Anticipatory Learning Mechanism) est un mécanisme d'apprentissage fonde sur l'approche constructiviste de l'Intelligence Artificielle. Il permet a un agent situe de construire un modèle du monde dans des environnements partiellement observables et partiellement déterministes, sous la forme d'un processus de décision markovien partiellement observable et factorise (FPOMDP). Le modèle du monde construit est ensuite utilise pour que l'agent puisse définir une politique d'action visant à améliorer sa propre performance / This research is characterized, first, by a theoretical discussion on the concept of autonomous agent, based on elements taken from the Situated AI and the Affective AI paradigms. Secondly, this thesis presents the problem of learning world models, providing a bibliographic review regarding some related works. From these discussions, the CAES architecture and the CALM mechanism are presented. The CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) is an architecture for describing systems based on the agent-environment dichotomy. It defines the agent and the environment as two partially open systems, in dynamic coupling. In CAES, the agent is composed of two sub-systems, mind and body, following the principles of situativity and intrinsic motivation. CALM (Constructivist Learning Anticipatory Mechanism) is based on the constructivist approach to Artificial Intelligence. It allows a situated agent to build a model of the world in environments partially deterministic and partially observable in the form of Partially Observable and Factored Markov Decision Process (FPOMDP). The model of the world is constructed and used for the agent to define a policy for action in order to improve its own performance

Dans cette thèse, nous nous intéressons au problème du suivi comportemental des piétons au sein d'un environnement critique partiellement observé. Tandis que plusieurs travaux de la littérature s'intéressent uniquement soit à la position d'un piéton dans l'environnement, soit à l'activité à laquelle il s'adonne, nous optons pour une vue générale et nous estimons simultanément à ces deux données. Les contributions présentées dans ce document sont organisées en deux parties. La première partie traite principalement du problème de la représentation et de l'exploitation du contexte environnemental dans le but d'améliorer les estimations résultant du processus de suivi. L'état de l'art fait mention de quelques études adressant cette problématique. Dans ces études, des modèles graphiques aux capacités d'expressivité limitées, tels que des réseaux Bayésiens dynamiques, sont utilisés pour modéliser des connaissances contextuelles a priori. Dans cette thèse, nous proposons d'utiliser des modèles contextuelles plus riches issus des simulateurs de comportements d'agents autonomes et démontrons l’efficacité de notre approche au travers d'un ensemble d'évaluations expérimentales. La deuxième partie de la thèse adresse le problème général d'influences mutuelles - communément appelées interactions - entre piétons et l'impact de ces interactions sur les comportements respectifs de ces derniers durant le processus de suivi. Sous l'hypothèse que nous disposons d'un simulateur (ou une fonction) modélisant ces interactions, nous développons une approche de suivi comportemental à faible coût computationnel et facilement extensible dans laquelle les interactions entre cibles sont prises en compte. L'originalité de l'approche proposée vient de l'introduction des "représentants'', qui sont des informations agrégées issues de la distribution de chaque cible de telle sorte à maintenir une diversité comportementale, et sur lesquels le système de filtrage s'appuie pour estimer, de manière fine, les comportements des différentes cibles et ceci, même en cas d'occlusions. Nous présentons nos choix de modélisation, les algorithmes résultants, et un ensemble de scénarios difficiles sur lesquels l’approche proposée est évaluée / In this thesis, we are interested in the problem of pedestrian behavioral tracking within a critical environment partially under sensory coverage. While most of the works found in the literature usually focus only on either the location of a pedestrian or the activity a pedestrian is undertaking, we stands in a general view and consider estimating both data simultaneously. The contributions presented in this document are organized in two parts. The first part focuses on the representation and the exploitation of the environmental context for serving the purpose of behavioral estimation. The state of the art shows few studies addressing this issue where graphical models with limited expressiveness capacity such as dynamic Bayesian networks are used for modeling prior environmental knowledge. We propose, instead, to rely on richer contextual models issued from autonomous agent-based behavioral simulators and we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through extensive experimental evaluations. The second part of the thesis addresses the general problem of pedestrians’ mutual influences, commonly known as targets’ interactions, on their respective behaviors during the tracking process. Under the assumption of the availability of a generic simulator (or a function) modeling the tracked targets' behaviors, we develop a yet scalable approach in which interactions are considered at low computational cost. The originality of the proposed approach resides on the introduction of density-based aggregated information, called "representatives’’, computed in such a way to guarantee the behavioral diversity for each target, and on which the filtering system relies for computing, in a finer way, behavioral estimations even in case of occlusions. We present the modeling choices, the resulting algorithms as well as a set of challenging scenarios on which the proposed approach is evaluated

Cette recherche se caractérise, premièrement, par une discussion théorique sur le concept d'agent autonome, basée sur des éléments issus des paradigmes de l'Intelligence Artificielle Située et de l'Intelligence Artificielle Affective. Ensuite, cette thèse présente le problème de l'apprentissage de modèles du monde, en passant en revue la littérature concernant les travaux qui s'y rapportent. À partir de ces discussions, l'architecture CAES et le mécanisme CALM sont présentés. CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) constitue une architecture pour décrire des systèmes basés sur la dichotomie agent-environnement. Il définit l'agent et l'environnement comme deux systèmes partiellement ouverts, en couplage dynamique. L'agent, à son tour, est composé de deux sous-systèmes, l'esprit et le corps, suivant les principes de la situativité et de la motivation intrinsèque. CALM (Constructivist Anticipatory Learning Mechanism) est un mécanisme d'apprentissage fondé sur l'approche constructiviste de l'Intelligence Artificielle. Il permet à un agent situé de construire un modèle du monde dans des environnements partiellement observables et partiellement déterministes, sous la forme d'un processus de décision markovien partiellement observable et factorisé (FPOMDP). Le modèle du monde construit est ensuite utilisé pour que l'agent puisse définir une politique d'action visant à améliorer sa propre performance. / Esta pesquisa caracteriza-se, primeiramente, pela condução de uma discussão teórica sobre o conceito de agente autônomo, baseada em elementos provenientes dos paradigmas da Inteligência Artificial Situada e da Inteligência Artificial Afetiva. A seguir, a tese apresenta o problema da aprendizagem de modelos de mundo, fazendo uma revisão bibliográfica a respeito de trabalhos relacionados. A partir dessas discussões, a arquitetura CAES e o mecanismo CALM são apresentados. O CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) é uma arquitetura para a descrição de sistemas baseados na dicotomia agente-ambiente. Ele define agente e ambiente como dois sistemas parcialmente abertos, em acoplamento dinâmico. O agente, por sua vez, é composto por dois subsistemas, mente e corpo, seguindo os princípios de situatividade e motivação intrínseca. O CALM (Constructivist Anticipatory Learning Mechanism) é um mecanismo de aprendizagem fundamentado na abordagem construtivista da Inteligência Artificial. Ele permite que um agente situado possa construir um modelo de mundo em ambientes parcialmente observáveis e parcialmente determinísticos, na forma de um Processo de Decisão de Markov Parcialmente Observável e Fatorado (FPOMDP). O modelo de mundo construído é então utilizado para que o agente defina uma política de ações a fim de melhorar seu próprio desempenho. / This research is characterized, first, by a theoretical discussion on the concept of autonomous agent, based on elements taken from the Situated AI and the Affective AI paradigms. Secondly, this thesis presents the problem of learning world models, providing a bibliographic review regarding some related works. From these discussions, the CAES architecture and the CALM mechanism are presented. The CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) is an architecture for describing systems based on the agent-environment dichotomy. It defines the agent and the environment as two partially open systems, in dynamic coupling. The agent is composed of two sub-systems, mind and body, following the principles of situativity and intrinsic motivation. CALM (Constructivist Learning Anticipatory Mechanism) is based on the constructivist approach to Artificial Intelligence. It allows a situated agent to build a model of the world in environments partially deterministic and partially observable in the form of Partially Observable and Factored Markov Decision Process (FPOMDP). The model of the world is constructed and used for the agent to define a policy for action in order to improve its own performance.

Cette recherche se caractérise, premièrement, par une discussion théorique sur le concept d'agent autonome, basée sur des éléments issus des paradigmes de l'Intelligence Artificielle Située et de l'Intelligence Artificielle Affective. Ensuite, cette thèse présente le problème de l'apprentissage de modèles du monde, en passant en revue la littérature concernant les travaux qui s'y rapportent. À partir de ces discussions, l'architecture CAES et le mécanisme CALM sont présentés. CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) constitue une architecture pour décrire des systèmes basés sur la dichotomie agent-environnement. Il définit l'agent et l'environnement comme deux systèmes partiellement ouverts, en couplage dynamique. L'agent, à son tour, est composé de deux sous-systèmes, l'esprit et le corps, suivant les principes de la situativité et de la motivation intrinsèque. CALM (Constructivist Anticipatory Learning Mechanism) est un mécanisme d'apprentissage fondé sur l'approche constructiviste de l'Intelligence Artificielle. Il permet à un agent situé de construire un modèle du monde dans des environnements partiellement observables et partiellement déterministes, sous la forme d'un processus de décision markovien partiellement observable et factorisé (FPOMDP). Le modèle du monde construit est ensuite utilisé pour que l'agent puisse définir une politique d'action visant à améliorer sa propre performance. / Esta pesquisa caracteriza-se, primeiramente, pela condução de uma discussão teórica sobre o conceito de agente autônomo, baseada em elementos provenientes dos paradigmas da Inteligência Artificial Situada e da Inteligência Artificial Afetiva. A seguir, a tese apresenta o problema da aprendizagem de modelos de mundo, fazendo uma revisão bibliográfica a respeito de trabalhos relacionados. A partir dessas discussões, a arquitetura CAES e o mecanismo CALM são apresentados. O CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) é uma arquitetura para a descrição de sistemas baseados na dicotomia agente-ambiente. Ele define agente e ambiente como dois sistemas parcialmente abertos, em acoplamento dinâmico. O agente, por sua vez, é composto por dois subsistemas, mente e corpo, seguindo os princípios de situatividade e motivação intrínseca. O CALM (Constructivist Anticipatory Learning Mechanism) é um mecanismo de aprendizagem fundamentado na abordagem construtivista da Inteligência Artificial. Ele permite que um agente situado possa construir um modelo de mundo em ambientes parcialmente observáveis e parcialmente determinísticos, na forma de um Processo de Decisão de Markov Parcialmente Observável e Fatorado (FPOMDP). O modelo de mundo construído é então utilizado para que o agente defina uma política de ações a fim de melhorar seu próprio desempenho. / This research is characterized, first, by a theoretical discussion on the concept of autonomous agent, based on elements taken from the Situated AI and the Affective AI paradigms. Secondly, this thesis presents the problem of learning world models, providing a bibliographic review regarding some related works. From these discussions, the CAES architecture and the CALM mechanism are presented. The CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) is an architecture for describing systems based on the agent-environment dichotomy. It defines the agent and the environment as two partially open systems, in dynamic coupling. The agent is composed of two sub-systems, mind and body, following the principles of situativity and intrinsic motivation. CALM (Constructivist Learning Anticipatory Mechanism) is based on the constructivist approach to Artificial Intelligence. It allows a situated agent to build a model of the world in environments partially deterministic and partially observable in the form of Partially Observable and Factored Markov Decision Process (FPOMDP). The model of the world is constructed and used for the agent to define a policy for action in order to improve its own performance.

Cette recherche se caractérise, premièrement, par une discussion théorique sur le concept d'agent autonome, basée sur des éléments issus des paradigmes de l'Intelligence Artificielle Située et de l'Intelligence Artificielle Affective. Ensuite, cette thèse présente le problème de l'apprentissage de modèles du monde, en passant en revue la littérature concernant les travaux qui s'y rapportent. À partir de ces discussions, l'architecture CAES et le mécanisme CALM sont présentés. CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) constitue une architecture pour décrire des systèmes basés sur la dichotomie agent-environnement. Il définit l'agent et l'environnement comme deux systèmes partiellement ouverts, en couplage dynamique. L'agent, à son tour, est composé de deux sous-systèmes, l'esprit et le corps, suivant les principes de la situativité et de la motivation intrinsèque. CALM (Constructivist Anticipatory Learning Mechanism) est un mécanisme d'apprentissage fondé sur l'approche constructiviste de l'Intelligence Artificielle. Il permet à un agent situé de construire un modèle du monde dans des environnements partiellement observables et partiellement déterministes, sous la forme d'un processus de décision markovien partiellement observable et factorisé (FPOMDP). Le modèle du monde construit est ensuite utilisé pour que l'agent puisse définir une politique d'action visant à améliorer sa propre performance. / Esta pesquisa caracteriza-se, primeiramente, pela condução de uma discussão teórica sobre o conceito de agente autônomo, baseada em elementos provenientes dos paradigmas da Inteligência Artificial Situada e da Inteligência Artificial Afetiva. A seguir, a tese apresenta o problema da aprendizagem de modelos de mundo, fazendo uma revisão bibliográfica a respeito de trabalhos relacionados. A partir dessas discussões, a arquitetura CAES e o mecanismo CALM são apresentados. O CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) é uma arquitetura para a descrição de sistemas baseados na dicotomia agente-ambiente. Ele define agente e ambiente como dois sistemas parcialmente abertos, em acoplamento dinâmico. O agente, por sua vez, é composto por dois subsistemas, mente e corpo, seguindo os princípios de situatividade e motivação intrínseca. O CALM (Constructivist Anticipatory Learning Mechanism) é um mecanismo de aprendizagem fundamentado na abordagem construtivista da Inteligência Artificial. Ele permite que um agente situado possa construir um modelo de mundo em ambientes parcialmente observáveis e parcialmente determinísticos, na forma de um Processo de Decisão de Markov Parcialmente Observável e Fatorado (FPOMDP). O modelo de mundo construído é então utilizado para que o agente defina uma política de ações a fim de melhorar seu próprio desempenho. / This research is characterized, first, by a theoretical discussion on the concept of autonomous agent, based on elements taken from the Situated AI and the Affective AI paradigms. Secondly, this thesis presents the problem of learning world models, providing a bibliographic review regarding some related works. From these discussions, the CAES architecture and the CALM mechanism are presented. The CAES (Coupled Agent-Environment System) is an architecture for describing systems based on the agent-environment dichotomy. It defines the agent and the environment as two partially open systems, in dynamic coupling. The agent is composed of two sub-systems, mind and body, following the principles of situativity and intrinsic motivation. CALM (Constructivist Learning Anticipatory Mechanism) is based on the constructivist approach to Artificial Intelligence. It allows a situated agent to build a model of the world in environments partially deterministic and partially observable in the form of Partially Observable and Factored Markov Decision Process (FPOMDP). The model of the world is constructed and used for the agent to define a policy for action in order to improve its own performance.

<p dir="ltr">In the dynamic realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI), this study explores the multifaceted landscape of Trustworthy AI with a dedicated focus on achieving both explainability and acceptance. The research addresses the evolving dynamics of AI, emphasizing the essential role of human involvement in shaping its trajectory.</p><p dir="ltr">A primary contribution of this work is the introduction of a novel "Trustworthy Explainability Acceptance Metric", tailored for the evaluation of AI-based systems by field experts. Grounded in a versatile distance acceptance approach, this metric provides a reliable measure of acceptance value. Practical applications of this metric are illustrated, particularly in a critical domain like medical diagnostics. Another significant contribution is the proposal of a trust-based security framework for 5G social networks. This framework enhances security and reliability by incorporating community insights and leveraging trust mechanisms, presenting a valuable advancement in social network security.</p><p dir="ltr">The study also introduces an artificial conscience-control module model, innovating with the concept of "Artificial Feeling." This model is designed to enhance AI system adaptability based on user preferences, ensuring controllability, safety, reliability, and trustworthiness in AI decision-making. This innovation contributes to fostering increased societal acceptance of AI technologies. Additionally, the research conducts a comprehensive survey of foundational requirements for establishing trustworthiness in AI. Emphasizing fairness, accountability, privacy, acceptance, and verification/validation, this survey lays the groundwork for understanding and addressing ethical considerations in AI applications. The study concludes with exploring quantum alternatives, offering fresh perspectives on algorithmic approaches in trustworthy AI systems. This exploration broadens the horizons of AI research, pushing the boundaries of traditional algorithms.</p><p dir="ltr">In summary, this work significantly contributes to the discourse on Trustworthy AI, ensuring both explainability and acceptance in the intricate interplay between humans and AI systems. Through its diverse contributions, the research offers valuable insights and practical frameworks for the responsible and ethical deployment of AI in various applications.</p>

This contributed book contains the short papers presented at the 1st International Conference on Hybrid Societies 2023. Organized by the DFG-funded Collaborative Research Centre 'Hybrid Societies' at Chemnitz University of Technology.:Flourishing from, for, and with Social Machines: Considering the Eudaimonics of Hybrid Societies - Banks J. How do vehicle size, speed, TTC, age and sex affect cyclists’ gap acceptance when interacting with (automated) vehicles? - Springer-Teumer S., Trommler D., Krems J.F. Assessing Driver Uncertainty Respecting Response Actions in Lane Change Maneuvers - Yan F., Eilers M., Baumann M. Using Functionally Anthropomorphic Eyes to Indicate Robotic Motion - Schweidler P. & Onnasch L. Living Labs as Third Spaces: Low-threshold participation, empowering hospitality, and the social infrastructures of continuous presence - Pentzold C., Rothe I., Bischof A. Artificial Morality - Armbruster D., Mandl S., Strobel A. Reducing Prejudice via Virtual Reality: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Evidence - Stein J.-P., Gnambs T., Appel M. Policy Learning with Spiking Neural Network for Robot Manipulation Tasks - Abdelaal O. M. & Röhrbein F. / Dieser Konferenzband enthält die Kurzbeiträge, die auf der 1st International Conference on Hybrid Societies 2023 vorgestellt wurden. Veranstaltet vom DFG-geförderten Sonderforschungsbereich 'Hybrid Societies' der Technischen Universität Chemnitz.:Flourishing from, for, and with Social Machines: Considering the Eudaimonics of Hybrid Societies - Banks J. How do vehicle size, speed, TTC, age and sex affect cyclists’ gap acceptance when interacting with (automated) vehicles? - Springer-Teumer S., Trommler D., Krems J.F. Assessing Driver Uncertainty Respecting Response Actions in Lane Change Maneuvers - Yan F., Eilers M., Baumann M. Using Functionally Anthropomorphic Eyes to Indicate Robotic Motion - Schweidler P. & Onnasch L. Living Labs as Third Spaces: Low-threshold participation, empowering hospitality, and the social infrastructures of continuous presence - Pentzold C., Rothe I., Bischof A. Artificial Morality - Armbruster D., Mandl S., Strobel A. Reducing Prejudice via Virtual Reality: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Evidence - Stein J.-P., Gnambs T., Appel M. Policy Learning with Spiking Neural Network for Robot Manipulation Tasks - Abdelaal O. M. & Röhrbein F.