Rebuilding burned bridges with adequate access to human rights – one brick at a time. Internal displacement is a fast-growing issue which does not receive the attention it needs from the international community. This is arguably due to the perspective of international law upon internal discplacement – that it is a national problem which the affected state needs to address according to its own domestic rules and policies. At the same time, we are witnessing an ever-changing world with recurring issues relating to climate change and natural disasters. The repeated earthquakes in Syria, Turkey and Afghanistan, floodings in Ethiopia and Australia, rising sea levels which threaten the drowning of entire cities such as Venice, Khulna and Bangkok ought to be wake-up calls to the international community that climate change and natural disasters are not only of domestic concern at this point, but an international problem. The number of internally displaced persons are increasing each year, yet no binding international instrument exists to act as guidance for states when faced with the issue of internal displacement. The one aspect which differentiates the internally displaced with a refugee is the corssing of the home country border – they share vulnerabilities and needs yetare seen as two completely different situations. This is problematic as it leads the internally displaced to “fall between the cracks” of international law, meaning that there are not internationally legally binding instruments which the internally displaced can rely on. The added dimension of internal displacement due to climate change and natural disasters further complicates the problem as returning to one’s home becomes an even greater obstacle. This paper seeks to examine the standing of internally displaced persons within international law, with specific focus on internally displaced persons due to climate change and natural disasters. As there is no legally binding instrument for this group of people, the only point of reference is the Geneva Convention and the protection it demands for refugees – can the same be demanded for the internally displaced when the legal viewpoint is that this is purely of national concern?

Oro för klimatet är något som blir allt vanligare hos både barn och vuxna. Majoriteten av de studier som genomförts inom området klimatoro har undersökt äldre barn och vuxnas mående kopplat till klimatkrisen. Fokus för denna studie ligger därför på de yngre barnen, i årskurs två och tre, för att undersöka vad de känner inför klimatförändringarna. Tidigare forskning har visat att transformativa och deliberativa arbetsmetoder är fördelaktiga att använda vid undervisning om komplexa ämnesområden som klimatförändringar. Därför undersöker denna studie även om lärare använder dessa arbetssätt under sin geografiundervisning. Studien är genomförd med semistrukturerade intervjuer av två lärare och tre elevgrupper med fem elever vardera. Förutom intervjuer genomfördes även mer kreativa inslag som rankningsövningar och teckningsmoment. Resultatet visade att de intervjuade lärarna, till viss del, använde transformativa och deliberativa arbetsmetoder när de hade möjlighet att dela upp klassen i mindre grupper. De intervjuade lärarna ansåg att dagens elever var väl insatta i miljörelaterade frågor, jämfört med tidigare årskullar och gärna deltog i diskussioner inom ämnet. Samma lärare ansåg däremot inte att undervisningen bidragit till att förändra elevernas inställning till klimatet. Det framgår dessutom av resultatet att klimatförändringar är ett komplext ämnesområde som är svårt för ett flertal elever att samtala om. Det kan bero på elevernas unga ålder, då de på grund av detta ännu inte haft så omfattande undervisning inom området samt att eleverna ännu inte nåtts av stora mängder information om klimatförändringar. Resultatet för teckningsmomentet, som genomfördes med eleverna, visade att drygt hälften av eleverna kände oro för klimatförändringar vilket är en lägre andel än vad tidigare forskning visat. Det bedöms bero på att eleverna i denna studie är yngre än de barn och unga vuxna som deltagit i tidigare forskning. På grund av studiens begränsade storlek kan den dock inte anses vara representativ för alla lågstadielärare och unga elevers åsikter. / Concern about the climate is something that is becoming increasingly common among children. Most of the studies that have been done around this subject have investigated older childrens feelings about to the climate crisis. This studie will therefore focus on the younger children, in class two and three, to see how they feel about climate change. Previous research has shown that transformative and deliberative methods are beneficial to use when teaching about complex areas such as climate change. Therefore, our study examines whether the interviewed teachers use these working methods during their geography teaching. The study3 av 52is carried out with semi-structured interviews of two teachers and three student groups with five students each. In addition to the interview, we also used more creative elements such as ranking exercises and a drawing session. The results showed that the interviewed teachers used transformative and deliberative learning when they had the opportunity to divide the class into smaller groups. The teachers also considered that today's students were well versed in environment-related issues compared to previous students and that they are happy to participate in discussions on the subject. Based on the results the teachers did not consider that the teaching contributed to changing the students attitude towards the climate. It also appears from the results that climate change is a complex subject and that it was difficult for several students to answer the questions during the interview. This may be due to the young age of the students, as they have not yet been taught a lot in the field and have not yet been reached by any large amounts of information about climate change. The results for the drawing session, which was carried out with the students, showed that just over half of the students felt concerned about the climate change, which is a lower percentage than previous research has shown. It is judged to be due to the fact that the students in this study are younger than the children and young adults who participated in previous research. However, due to the limited size of the study, the results cannot be considered representative of the views of all primary school teachers and young students. / <p>2024-01-12</p>