Global ETD Search

1	Právní regulace obsahu smlouvy v B2C vztazích (z hlediska ochrany spotřebitele) / Legal regulation of content of B2C contracts (from the perspective of consumer protection) Krahulíková, Kateřina January 2019 (has links) This diploma thesis deals with the content of the consumer contract and its regulation from the perspective of consumers. The aim of this thesis is to analyse this particular regulation, decide whether it is sufficient, where can be seen some deficiencies and whether the regulations fulfil its function, that is to protect the weaker party. The thesis is divided into five fundamental parts. The first one is concerned with the introductory issues, such as the consumer itself, consumer protection, why is the consumer actually protected, the principles on which is the protection based. The second part looks into the unfair terms in consumer contracts. The emphasis is placed on problematic provisions with respect to the Court of Justice case-law as well as the national case-law. An independent head is devoted to the possibility of the contractual penalty in terms of trade. The third section deals with contractual information requirements. It summarizes the European regulation. It also compares the preceding regulation with the new one in order to find the current tendencies. The contractual information requirements are viewed critically, based on specialized comments and analysis. The national regulation is divided into the general regulation and consumer regulation considering the difference between...
2	互聯網保險保險人說明義務研究兼論第三方平台責任 / The research on the duty of representation of Internet insurer and the responsibility of the third-party platform 丁楚瀟, Ding, Chu Xiao Unknown Date (has links) 進入二十一世紀的第二個十年以來，科技進步推動中國大陸互聯網經濟快速發展，也使得「互聯網+保險」這一商業模式逐漸進入人們的生活。然而在實際運行過程中，中國大陸保險法第17條規定之保險人說明義務並未能在互聯網平台得到很好的實施。實務中，無論是保險公司自營平台或第三方平台，其說明義務履行均未達到保險法、司法解釋以及相關行政法規之要求。說明義務之立法目的在於糾正保險人與要保人之間的信息偏在，但實際履行中成本過高。而互聯網保險，尤其是其中的O2O保險碎片化、快捷化、小額化之特點，使得該制度的缺點進一步被放大。所以立法應當廢止現行說明義務規範，參酌其他國家或地區立法，代之以信息提供義務。其中台灣雖然規定有信息提供義務類似規範，但義務違反之責任仍有缺陷。相較之下，本文建議參考德國保險法與歐盟相關指令進行立法，除信息提供義務之外，增訂承保範圍不一致警示義務、要保人撤銷權與商品資訊書相關規範。中國大陸有大量保險於第三方平台上銷售，相較於保險公司自營平台，第三方平台對於說明義務履行狀況更加令人堪憂，然而卻極少有平台因此而對保險消費者承擔責任。本文認為，在消費領域雖然第三方平台註冊身份有保險代理人與保險經紀人之分，但考量實務運行情況，現階段宜將其統一認定為保險人之代理人。第三方平台作為保險代理人在義務履行有過錯時，仍應因其侵犯保險消費者資訊權之行為，向保險消費者承擔侵權責任。 / From 2010s, scientific and technological evolution promotes the rapid development of Internet economy in Mainland China, and makes the "Internet + insurance" business model become reality. However, the representation duty clause from Article 17 of Insurance Law, does not operate well especially on the Internet. In practice, the explanation on neither the insurance company's own platform nor third-party platform could meet the requests of the insurance law, judicial interpretation and the relevant administrative regulations. The purpose of the representation duty is to correct the information asymmetry between the insurer and the insured, but actually the cost is too high. And the features of internet insurance, especially those O2O insurance, such as, fragmentation, small amount and quickness, make the situation even worse. Therefore, the legislation should abolish the existing obligation of representation duty, and imitate the legislation of advanced countries, to replace it with duty of providing pre-contractual information. Among those countries or districts, although Taiwan has similar regulations to those in Germany and European Union, it is a pity that it has shortcomings in terms of responsibility. Thus, China should follow the German Insurance Law and European directives to amend the law, add the duty of warning about inconsistencies in the cover clause, withdraw right clause and information sheet clause, in addition to duty of providing pre-contractual information clause. In Mainland China , there is a large number of insurance products sold on third-party platforms. Compared to insurance companies’ own platforms, the situation on third-party platforms is even more worrying. However it is disappointing that few third-party platforms take their responsibility towards their consumers. As far as I am concerned, although third-party platforms can be registered as insurance agents or insurance brokers, for now they should be identified as insurers’ agents considering the actual situation when the insured is a consumer. When a third-party platform makes a mistake at work as an insurance agent, it can not be exempted from its identity. On the contrary, the third party platform shall bear the tort liability to the consumer for its behavior of violating consumers’ information rights. 互聯網保險說明義務信息提供義務第三方平台保險代理人 Internet insurance Representation duty Third-party platform Insurance agent
3	La dépendance des distributeurs / The dependence of distributors Le Bescond de Coatpont, Mathieu 08 July 2015 (has links) Les distributeurs sont des intermédiaires économiques car ils offrent sur le marché des produits ou services conçus, fabriqués ou exécutés par d’autres (les fournisseurs). Cette recherche démontre que le degré de protection accordé par le droit positif aux différents distributeurs n’est pas corrélé à leur degré de dépendance aux fournisseurs. Les qualifications de la dépendance sont multiples, incertaines, incohérentes et parfois artificiellement restrictives ou extensives, en droit du travail comme en droit économique. Des distributeurs connaissant un même degré de dépendance à leur fournisseur peuvent être traités de façon différente sans justification au regard des fondements des règles considérées. Il existe ainsi des inégalités de traitement. Il est donc proposé un nouveau droit de la dépendance des distributeurs, plus cohérent et égalitaire. Celui-ci se traduirait par un statut légal des distributeurs remplaçant les multiples statuts spéciaux existants, traçant une frontière plus nette avec le droit du travail et conciliant les intérêts des distributeurs avec la liberté des fournisseurs d’organiser la distribution de leurs produits et services. Dépassant la notion trop restrictive de contrat et les conflits de qualification, ce statut viserait la relation de distribution et prévoirait un régime appréhendant la complexité et l’évolutivité de la dépendance des distributeurs grâce à l’information, à une garantie de revenus et différentes indemnités de fin de relation. / Distributors are economic intermediaries because they offer on the market goods and services produced or served by others (the suppliers). This research demonstrates that the degree of protection offered by the Law to the various distributors isn’t correlated with their degree of dependence towards suppliers. The qualifications of dependence are numerous, incoherent and sometimes artificially restrictive or extensive, in labour law as in business law. Distributors experiencing a same degree of dependence towards their supplier can be treated differently without any justification regarding the grounds of the rules in question. Hence, appear inequalities towards the Law. Therefore, new legal rules are suggested. They would take the form of a statute ruling distributors and replacing the numerous statutes in force at the present time. It would draw a clearer line between labour law and business law and conciliate the distributors’ interests with the freedom of suppliers to organize the distribution of their goods and services. Going other the too restrictive notion of contact and the conflicts between qualifications, this statute would rule the relation of distribution and contain rules comprehending the complex and changing nature of dependence. It would ensure sufficient information of distributors and offer them an income guarantee and various compensations when the relation is terminated. Distributeur Dépendance Fournisseur Distribution Contrat de distribution Franchise Concession Agent commercial Commission-Affiliation Vrp Gérant de succursale Courtage Commission Location-Gérence Dépendance économique Pouvoir Abus Information précontractuelle Revenu garanti Rupture Préavis Justification Motivation Indemnité Non-Concurrence Distributor Dependence Supplier Distribution Distribution agreement Franchise Concession Commercial agent Commission-Based affiliation Travelling salesperson Branch manager Brokerage Commission agent Business-Leasing Economical dependence Power Abuse Pre-Contractual information Income guarantee Termination Notice Justification Motivation Compensation Non-Competition

1

Page generated in 0.1253 seconds