Dispatched employment has become one of the most popular ways of employment under globalization. The corporate can freely choose the most favorable business environment whereby they can by-pass collective bargaining with trade unions and legal restrictions. Dispatched workers and regularly employed workers in the same client company may experience different working conditions (including wages, working hours, overtime and vacation, etc.). Workers of the same dispatching agency who are dispatched to client companies may also experience different working conditions. Often, working conditions of dispatched workers are relatively poor. This study mainly explores dispatched workers¡¦ working conditions in different companies and how these conditions would affect their organizational commitment to client companies. Four hundred and twenty copies of a questionnaire were distributed to workers who are dispatched to companies located in Kaohsiung, Tainan and Pingtung. Out of these 134 copies were returned and counted as valid response. The findings revealed that (1) working conditions varied across gender and age; (2) dispatched workers tended to accept working conditions below the legal standards; (3) organizational commitment varied across education, job duties and depended on how workers felt about the conditions; (4) working conditions and organizational commitment were significantly related. This study therefore recommends that: Dispatching companies should 1.Employ dispatched workers as full-time workers, rather than merely-registered workers; 2.Provide more training opportunities to dispatched workers; 3.Fulfill their legal obligations to the workers. Client companies should 1.Create a gender-equal working environment; 2.Create sanitary and safe working conditions; 3.Take the responsibility of a joint employer. Authorities of labor affairs should 1.Inspect labor conditions more frequently and closely; 2.Establish a formal legal system to regulate dispatched employment; 3.Specify dispatching agencies and client companies as joint employers in relevant laws and regulations.

This purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between employees¡¦ perception on organizational climate and job involvement, and the moderating effect of employ types. This research involves all employees belonging to the I Research Laboratory, as experimental subjects for questionnaire surveys. We used the personal characteristics as the controlled variables, the organizational climate as an independent variable, the employ type as a moderate variable and the job involvement as a dependent variable. A total of 569 questionnaires were delivered and got 339 valid questionnaires. Based on the valid questionnaires, the hierarchical regression analysis and the Pearson¡¦s correlation analysis were used to analyze the data. Major empirical findings are summarized as follows: 1.There are significant differences in job involvement among difference education degree. 2.There are significant correlations between the awareness of the organizational climate and the job involvement. 3.The employ type has no significant moderating effect on the relationship between organizational climate and job involvement.

隨著貿易全球化，各國企業面臨投資環境的不確定及國際競爭環境的壓力。為因應產業結構快速改變、降低用人成本、彈性運用人力資源、追求經營效率，促成「勞動派遣」的非典型勞動型態。「勞動派遣」有別於傳統僱用關係，它是三方的僱用關係，具有「僱用」與「使用」分離的特色。一般的勞動法，很難全面規範周延，以致於無法保障派遣勞工權益。 為規範勞動派遣，中國大陸迄今已制定《中華人民共和國勞動合同法》（2008年公布施行，2013年修正施行）、《勞務派遣暫行規定》（2014年施行），以補強《勞動合同法》對於勞動派遣規範及法律操作性的不足。中國雖有明文立法規範勞動派遣，但終究因立法不夠周延，產生許多法律灰色地帶。企業趁機鑽研法律漏洞，大量使用勞動派遣，甚至企圖規避勞動派遣法制的新規制，導致「假外包、真派遣」現象，層出不窮。反觀台灣，十餘年來，行政機關多次提出勞動派遣法相關草案。2014年2月，行政院勞工委員會改制為勞動部前，公布《派遣勞工保護法草案》。不過，因勞工團體強烈反對勞動派遣合法化，造成迄今仍無法律可規制勞動派遣的窘境。 兩岸勞動派遣法制發展及面臨的困境，因為國情文化與社會價值觀的不同，多少存有差異。本文總結八點建議，要點如下：一、制定勞動派遣專法規範。二、派遣業設立及監管。三、派遣使用範圍限制。四、均等待遇原則及救濟。五、轉任正職員工機制。六、偽裝派遣之擬制直接僱用。七、雇主責任配置。八、我國《派遣勞工保護法草案》之修改。期待我國早日完成《派遣勞工保護法》立法，中國勞動派遣法規能更加周延，以確實保障派遣勞工權益。 關鍵字：勞動派遣、勞務派遣、職業介紹、人力資源管理、勞資爭議，同工同酬、勞動合同法、派遣勞工保護法草案

「勞動派遣」在國外早已訂定相關之立法規範，日本於一九八五年制定勞動派遣法，德國、美國對勞動派遣亦制定特別的法律與相關規範，在丹麥所有關勞動派遣的禁止規定也於一九九○年廢止，由這些先進國家的例子，可知制定勞動派遣法為世界立法潮流所趨。勞動派遣與傳統僱用之契約關係，最大不同之處在於勞動派遣關係下之派遣勞工，受僱於派遣機構，雙方成立勞動契約(employment contract)關係，但派遣勞工卻在該勞動契約當事人以外之第三人要派機構處提供勞務，接受該第三人之指揮監督與管理，形成「僱用」與「使用」分離之現象。由於勞動派遣型態為勞動市場既存狀態，雖在現行法制上有一定規範，惟此種三角關係的勞動型，態涉及「要派機構」、「派遣機構」及「派遣勞工」三方當事人的互動，在現行勞動法規皆以傳統勞動關係為主要規範標的下，無法完整規範勞動派遣所衍生的問題，而造成許多勞資之間的糾紛。 我國經濟部商業司於一九九九年十月通過核准企業可登記其營業內容為「人力派遣業」，但是，國內目前卻仍未對勞動派遣制定相關法令。相較於國際勞工組織已針對勞動派遣制定相關公約及建議書，德國、日本等先進國家以制定專法之方式來規範「勞動派遣」，我國目前卻對此問題尚無任何明確的法律規範，為保障派遣勞工之就業權益，給予勞資雙方明確之依循方向，落實就業安全之理念與作法，建立符合我國國情需要之勞動派遣法制，為刻不容緩之目標。因此本研究藉由參考比較美國、德國、日本等國之勞動派遣相關規範及法制，以了解各國實施勞動派遣之狀況，並分析各國勞動派遣法制之優缺點，及可能產生之問題進行分析，藉此提供我國未來於制定勞動派遣法時之參考方向。最後，針對我國目前勞動派遣草案進行分析，並提出相關立法建議，以期建構符合我國國情之勞動派遣法制，創造勞資雙贏之局面。 / The standards about legalization of dispatched employment had been enacted in the foreign countries. Legislation of dispatched employment had been enacted in Japan in 1985; besides Germany and America also made special laws and regulations about dispatched employment. All about the forbidden regulations also had been abolished in Denmark. From those examples of developed countries above, we can understand that the legalization about dispatched employment is forced by the world trend. The difference between dispatched employment and typical employment is that the dispatched employees are employed by the dispatched work agency but they provide service to the user enterprise. Because the triangular arrangement of dispatched employment concerns the interaction among user enterprise, dispatched work agency and dispatched workers, so there are many disputations between employees and employers. Although the Department of Commerce of MOEA in Taiwan permitted the enterprise to register their operations as “Employee dispatching industry” in October 1999, there were still no relevant laws about dispatched employment. The International Labor Organization had made the conventions and recommendations about dispatched employment; moreover Germany and Japan also made the relevant laws. In order to protect the rights of dispatched labors, the law-making which correspond with our national conditions is of great urgency. By comparing of the legalization about dispatched employment of America, Germany and Japan, we want to know the practical conditions and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of those countries above. By doing so, we can provide our country with the referential aspects in making the law about the dispatched employment in the future. Finally, in order to establish the legalization about dispatched employment corresponded with our society and to create a win-win situation of employee and employer, we analyze the existent Dispatched Employment Bill in Taiwan and bring forward certain relative lawmaking proposals.