Arbetet är en källstudie över inlägg publicerade på skolverkets hemsida. Studien undersöker reaktioner gentemot förändringar i det samhällsvetenskapliga programmet gällande ämnena religionskunskap, filosofi och psykologi. Skolverkets förslag att slå samman filosofi med psykologi kritiserades utifrån administrativa problem. Ämnena ansågs dessutom vara alltför olikartade för att slås ihop med hänsyn till deras vetenskapliga metoder, innehåll och historik. Resultatet är i linje med Lindes begrepp ämnesprofessionell kod och Hargreaves begrepp påtvingad kollegialitet. Religionskunskapens förstärkta ställning och filosofin och psykologins försvagade ställning kritiserades utifrån en mängd olika synvinklar. Religionsämnets vetenskaplighet och konfessionslöshet ifrågasattes. Kursplanen i religion kritiserades för att vara alltför omfattande, och religionslärarnas kompetens att undervisa i etik ifrågasattes. Filosofin försvarades utifrån dess nära koppling till styrdokument, och psykologin försvarades utifrån mänskliga behov och intresse. Studien fann en stark vilja bland lärarna att avgränsa sina egna ämnen gentemot andra ämnen. / The study is based on contributions to discussion that was published on the homepage of the Swedish National Agency for Education (Skolverket). It examine reactions on the proposals for the Social Science program. The proposal to put together philosophy and psychology in to a single subject was criticized on administrative grounds (problems with assessment, teacher competence etc). The two subjects were also considered to be to different in method, content and history. The result is in line with Andy Hargreaves concept of forced collegiality and Lindes concept of subject specific code. The proposal to increase hours for religious studies (religionskunskap) was criticized from different viewpoints. Religious studies was accused of being to unscientific bound to theological discourse. Its curricula was blamed of being to wide intruding on other subjects, and the teachers competence to educate their pupils in ethics were put in to question. The the proposal to decrease hours for philosophy was criticized on the ground that the subjects curricula was strongly connected to the official goals of the Social Science program. The proposal to decrease hours for psychology was criticized by appeling to its popularity among pupils and that its knowledge was important to satisfy basic human needs. The study discovered a tendency among teachers to classify their own subject in relations to other subjects.

This study applies priming, framing, and exemplification theories to examine the ways in which photos published with a news story influenced readers’ judgments about the ethnicities of the people receiving emergency hunger services. Of particular interest were the perceptions of Caucasian respondents about minorities, and Hispanic perceptions about African Americans and other Hispanics. A sample of 506 college students was randomly assigned to read one of three versions of an online news article about emergency hunger services in Central Florida. One version included two photographs of African American adults receiving food at a food bank. The second version included two photographs of Hispanic adults receiving food at a food bank. The third version was text-only and included no photographs. All three articles included base-rate statistics of ethnicities using emergency hunger services. Results showed images influence the way Caucasians and Hispanics perceive those people suffering from hunger. Key findings included that Caucasians in the study were susceptible to Hispanic primes, which altered their views on their perceptions about the number of Hispanics receiving emergency food services. However, Caucasians’ perceptions of African Americans did not change. Additionally, Hispanic participants were affected by primes in such a way that limitations on societal advancement were perceived more strongly than those of the Caucasian participants. The difference between Caucasians’ stereotypes regarding African Americans and Hispanics is an interesting development. The role of priming stereotype in relation to social issues is discussed

The reclaiming of land can provide for heated controversy between communities. The controversy at the outset may seem simple, but is actually quite complex involving hegemonic factors such as social, political, and economic influence. One such factor is the media. This research examines media coverage via framing in a battle between the United States Navy and the Hawaiian people to claim ownership of a Hawaiian island named Kaho'olawe. This research analyzes 519 newspaper articles from two Hawaiian newspapers--The Honolulu Star Bulletin and The Honolulu Advertiser--over a seven-year period. Six framing devices--advocate, economic, environment, Hawaiian, military, and political--are devised and implemented. This analysis shows that media frames change over time, when a frame changes so does the tone of the article, and each level of article showed different frame usage. For example, the headline of an article tended to use the political frame most. In addition, this analysis is one of the first to examine the use of pictures within each article and between newspapers. The findings suggest that the media's coverage of land debates needs to be examined further to include the use of media frames, quotes, and pictures.

Media framing is present in everything one observes on social media. In athletics, mainly collegiate football, media framing goes into each and every detail that goes out to the public. With Power 5 sports, such as the Southeastern Conference, football is one of the most profitable, newsworthy and highly recruiting-based sports out there. Therefore, the planning that goes into all of the social media channels, specifically on the website called Twitter, is planned down to a science. However, there are times where that is not the case, as crises can arise at any given moment. This research explains how seven SEC football sports information contacts were interviewed about their social media habits for any and all situations that could arise on their platforms, and how they plan to handle it while keeping the brand, overall message and trust of its fanbases.

Multimodal theory has developed out of social semiotics and can be seen as a response to the rise in the use of new technologies for the creation, distribution and consumption of media texts and the need to find new ways of describing and explaining their role in representation and communication. Its development is historical. It is a response to change over time. The incorporation of the visual into social semiotics marks a key moment in the development of multimodal theory. Visual literacy is discussed in relation to changes in modes of representation and a critique of this concept is provided. This is conducted in relation to how the visual modality has been integrated into social semiotics as a platform for research into multimodal communication more generally. Framing is developed along three main lines of enquiry (semiotic, cognitive and affective) as alternative ways of accounting for some of these shifts in communication and each are presented in the form of case studies. Framing and its close relationship with composition in media texts is discussed and this understanding, one that emphasise proximity as a multimodal principle, is applied to the visual design of content, the realisation of context through the provision visual cues, and later to embodiment and urban space. The three case studies, the application of framing to a range of media texts, the critical judgements made about the role visual in contemporary theory and the application of these concepts to multimodality are presented as part of an intellectual journey.

At the end of 2018, more than 68.5 million people were displaced from their homes. Of these displaced persons, 22.5 million of these people were forced to leave their homes and find safety in another country. These people are known globally as refugees. Many of these refugees in recent years have fled to Western countries in Europe and North America. This immigration and the general subject of refugees and their integration into their host countries have recently been a large subject for media. Many of these refugees came from countries and cultures that may carry stigmatic backgrounds including Middle Eastern and African countries. For decades, media portrayals in entertainment, social, media, and news media have shown people from these countries in certain ways that may conflict with truthful characteristics of people from these cultures. The purpose of this study is to help better understand how refugees personal assimilation experiences compare to information distributed by the media. Through researching existing studies of media portrayals of refugees and Muslims through the lens of framing theory readers can better understand what information is distributed in Western cultures about refugees. Then, through conducting in-depth interviews with refugees hosted in Europe and the United States, seeking understanding of refugees personal stories, life experiences, and their perceptions of media representations of people of their same refugee status, readers may additionally better understand any differences in the portrayal of refugees and the experiences had by refugees themselves. Using grounded theory, poignant themes emerged from the interviews to explain how interviewed refugees lives are similar or differ and are affected by Western media portrayals. Emergent themes indicated that primarily polarized news accounts may interfere with refugee acculturation by making social and cultural connections difficult, discrepancies in qualifications, and issues with misunderstanding refugees lack of mobility. Additionally, refugee sentiments about refugee media portrayals and acculturation were evaluated to better understand how the media affects their assimilation processes.

This essay has sought out to study the ideological debate in the Swedish press using the Spanish civil war. To complete this task three newspapers editorial pages were studied during the period 13/07-14/10 -1936. The three newspapers that were studied were Dagens Nyheter (liberal), Norrskensflamman (communist) and Svenska Dagbladet (moderat). This essay used qualitative methods to reach the answers it set out to achieve. The method consisted of thoroughly reading through the editorial pages of the chosen newspapers to highlight how each newspaper framed certain aspects of the conflict. Since this essay was on a small scale the results can only be seen as an indication of how the debate looked and was framed. If the same study was conducted but with more newspapers and a longer time period the results could have been broader. The results show that the different newspapers differentiated on who was to blame, why the civil war had broken out and who they wanted to win. The results also show that the different newspapers framed certain aspects of the war differently. / <p>Slutgiltigt godkännandedatum: 2023-06-02</p>

Wildfires are a part of the growing concern regarding climate issues in our society, and since the 1990s, the intensity of wildfires has grown. As wildfires affect our societies, countries have adapted crisis management strategies to tackle the issue of wildfires with help from international organisations. Research has been done on the topic of framing crisis management and the framing of wildfires. Nevertheless, these two fields have never been studied together. This study aims to examine how international organisations frame wildfire crisis management in the case of Portugal. Official assessment documents from the EU and the OECD have been analysed using a framing method. The findings of the study are that the most persistent framing of Portugal's wildfire crisis management is policy failure; however, depending on what areas one is analysing, fragments of actor failure can also be detected.

Sweden has seen an increase in the use of “speech to the nation” by the recent Prime ministers. It is a type of speech reserved for major crises and since 1974 just six have been held, four of them since 2020. By using a theoretical framework from the framing part of crisis management literature, this paper examines what kind of communication tool “speech to the nation” is. The analysis concludes that the speeches typically seek to acknowledge the severity of the crisis, highlight exogenous causes, and present incremental policy changes which defends status quo. In line with contemporary research about political communication, the speeches have developed into more politicized speeches with more serious descriptions of the crises and with more severe policy-reforms presented. The thesis contributes to the literature about political communication by giving an overview and analysis of every prime ministerial speech to the nation in Sweden since 1974.

Ett budskap uppfattas olika beroende på avsändare. Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) beskriver hur människor kan bearbeta ett budskap på olika sätt, centralt eller perifert, beroende på motivationsnivå. Framing sker när människor tillskriver egna bedömningar av olika ord, vilket kan påverka deras beslutfattande och beteende. Med en experimentell design undersöktes hur ett budskap relaterat till Covid-19 med en forskare eller en influencer som förment avsändare kan uppfattas av individer med olika grad av motivation. 136 studenter (80 kvinnor och 56 män) besvarade en webbbaserad enkät. En tvåvägs variansanalys visade, i strid med ELM, att deltagarna instämde i högre utsträckning i ett budskap när avsändaren var en forskare än när avsändaren var en influencer oavsett motivationsnivå. Högmotiverade deltagare uppfattade däremot budskapets språkliga kvalitet som högre än lågmotiverade. Högmotiverade deltagare gjort en skillnad mellan forskare och influencer. Framing kan vara en förklaring till varför deltagarna instämmer mer eller mindre med forskaren och influencern.