Ombord på fartyg är övningar en del av vardagen för alla som jobbar ombord. I likhet med landorganisationer, så som brandkår och ambulans, måste organisationen ombord vara pålitlig vid alla situationer. Syftet med studien är att jämföra säkerhetskulturen i tre olika organisationer inom sjöfarten. De berörda segmenten är Handelsflottan, Kustbevakningen och Marinen. Arbetet kommer med hjälp av en kvantitativ enkätundersökning komparativt undersöka hur säkerhetskulturen skiljer sig mellan de tre organisationerna samt jämföra hur befäl och manskap uppfattar säkerhetskultur. Detta är intressant då dessa organisationer står inför samma utmaningar med tanke på säkerhet men de har olika förutsättningar.  Sammanfattningsvis är tendenserna likartade mellan de tre organisationerna, med ett högt säkerhetstänk och god säkerhetskultur. Befälen utmärker sig med att de i högre grad svarar positivt på de flesta påståenden. Marinen utmärker sig genom att vara den mest enhetliga organisationen, där befäl och sjömän svara likartat på de flesta frågor. Handelsflottan är den organisation som är ojämnast i sina svar. / At sea safety drills are part of everyday life for all who work on board. Similar to shore organizations, such as the fire brigade and ambulance services, the organization on board must be reliable in all situations. The aim of the study is to compare the safety culture in three different organizations within the maritime sector. The concerned segments are the Merchant Navy, the Swedish Coast Guard and the Swedish Navy. The work will, by means of a quantitative survey, investigate how safety cultures differ between the three organizations. As well as compare how officers and crew perceive safety culture. This is interesting as these organizations face the same challenges in terms of safety, but they face different terms. In summary, the trends are similar between the three organizations, with a high level of safety and good safety culture. The officers stand out as more positive towards most questions. The Navy is characterized by being the most unified organization, where officers and crew respond equally on most questions. The Merchant Navy is the organization that is most uneven in its answers.

<p>Entrepreneurship has been entered on a supranational political agenda, in the EU and the OECD, and been emphatically described as a fundamental skill and a concern for schools and education. The agenda is reflected to a varying extent at the national and regional political levels. My aim is to describe, analyze and gain knowledge of what entrepreneurship in the Swedish upper secondary schools imply in practice, against the background of a local context. In particular, the conditions for learning.</p><p>My approach is ethnographically inspired and this multiple case study is limited to two upper secondary school programmes. Data has been collected through observations, video recordings, informal conversations with pupils and teachers and formal conversations with headmasters. The material is analyzed in terms of three socioculturally inspiring foci.</p><p>By means of a cultural-institutional focus, the stability and changeability of the programmes were elucidated. The previous institutional frameworks have been partially questioned by the teachers in the field, which has resulted in the following: In one of the upper secondary schools a new locally adapted programme has been composed, and courses and subjects have been integrated in a new way in the other school’s existing programme. The changes in the upper secondary programmes are to a great extent an example of a meeting between top-down and bottom-up initiatives. The changes of the institutional frameworks are connected to a discursive shift of the responsibility for pupils’ learning and education from teachers to pupils and also to teacher’s ambition to adapt interest- and experience-related teaching.</p><p>In a situated focus, both programmes were identified as communities of practice with a joint enterprise, mutual engagement and a shared repertoire. These three dimensions were useful for examining specific aspects of the teaching. There has above all been an altered balance between reification and participation in the teaching as well as boundary crossing both outside the community of practice and within the community.</p><p>Different conditions for learning were identified through an interpersonal focus. Both collaborative learning and cooperative learning were useful, but not sufficient concepts for describing the various forms of team learning. The conditions of cooperation and the pupils’ communication patterns revealed yet another form of team learning, which I call comparative learning. If the risk of everyday concepts getting the upper hand and trivialization can be avoided in team learning, there is in all these learning processes a potential for the pupils being able to develop strategies for handling complex tasks, taking initiatives and responsibility, cooperating and learning from one another in various different ways. In this way entrepreneurship has had an impact on the practice of the classrooms.</p> / <p>Entreprenörskap har förts upp på en överstatlig politisk agenda, inom EU och OECD, där den skrivits fram som en grundläggande färdighet och en angelägenhet för skola och utbildning. Agendan återspeglas i varierande grad på nationell och regional politisk nivå. Mitt syfte har varit att studera och försöka förstå vad entreprenörskap i den svenska gymnasieskolan kan innebära i praktiken. Utifrån syftet och ett sociokulturellt perspektiv formulerades frågeställningarna enligt följande: Hur framförhandlas, organiseras och realiseras undervisningen inom två studerade gymnasieprogram? Vilka sociala gemenskaper bidrar elever och lärare till och deltar i? Vilka former av lärande visar sig? Den etnografiskt inspirerade studien genomfördes i två gymnasieprogram som genom utvecklingsprojekt deltagit i det länsövergripande och EU-medfinansierade projektet PRIO 1, Prioritet företagsamhet i Västerbotten (2000 – 2005). Empiriska data insamlades genom observationer, videoregistreringar, informella samtal med elever och lärare och formella samtal med skolledare. Dessutom insamlades skriftliga dokument. Materialet har analyserats utifrån tre fokus. Genom ett kulturellt-insitutionellt fokus har programmens stabilitet och föränderlighet synliggjorts. I det ena fallet har ett nytt lokalutformat program satts samman, i det andra fallet har kurser och ämnen integrerats inom det befintliga programmet. Förändringarna ses som ett möte mellan top-down-initiativ och bottom-upp- initiativ. Resultatet visar även en diskursiv förskjutning av ansvar från lärare till elev och lärares strävan att tillrättalägg intresse- och erfarenhetsrelaterad undervisning. Ur ett situerat fokus har båda programmen identifierats som praxisgemenskaper med en gemensam uppgift, ett ömsesidigt engagemang och en gemensam repertoar. Utmärkande drag i undervisningen, men koppling till entreprenörskapstanken, har handlat om förändrade avvägningar mellan reifikation och deltagande i undervisningen samt om gränsöverskridande, dels utanför praxisgemenskapen och dels inom gemenskapen. Genom ett interpersonellt fokus har olika villkor för lärande identifierats. Såväl kollaborativt och kooperativt lärande har varit användbara begrepp för att beskriva formerna för samarbetslärande, men inte tillräckliga. Samarbetets villkor och elevers kommunikationsmönster har avslöjat ytterligare en form av samarbetslärande, vilken jag benämnt komparativt lärande. Denna avhandling har således visat på både gemensamma och särskiljande drag när entreprenörskapsinitiativ omsatts i skolans praktik, på två gymnasieprogram.</p>

Entrepreneurship has been entered on a supranational political agenda, in the EU and the OECD, and been emphatically described as a fundamental skill and a concern for schools and education. The agenda is reflected to a varying extent at the national and regional political levels. My aim is to describe, analyze and gain knowledge of what entrepreneurship in the Swedish upper secondary schools imply in practice, against the background of a local context. In particular, the conditions for learning. My approach is ethnographically inspired and this multiple case study is limited to two upper secondary school programmes. Data has been collected through observations, video recordings, informal conversations with pupils and teachers and formal conversations with headmasters. The material is analyzed in terms of three socioculturally inspiring foci. By means of a cultural-institutional focus, the stability and changeability of the programmes were elucidated. The previous institutional frameworks have been partially questioned by the teachers in the field, which has resulted in the following: In one of the upper secondary schools a new locally adapted programme has been composed, and courses and subjects have been integrated in a new way in the other school’s existing programme. The changes in the upper secondary programmes are to a great extent an example of a meeting between top-down and bottom-up initiatives. The changes of the institutional frameworks are connected to a discursive shift of the responsibility for pupils’ learning and education from teachers to pupils and also to teacher’s ambition to adapt interest- and experience-related teaching. In a situated focus, both programmes were identified as communities of practice with a joint enterprise, mutual engagement and a shared repertoire. These three dimensions were useful for examining specific aspects of the teaching. There has above all been an altered balance between reification and participation in the teaching as well as boundary crossing both outside the community of practice and within the community. Different conditions for learning were identified through an interpersonal focus. Both collaborative learning and cooperative learning were useful, but not sufficient concepts for describing the various forms of team learning. The conditions of cooperation and the pupils’ communication patterns revealed yet another form of team learning, which I call comparative learning. If the risk of everyday concepts getting the upper hand and trivialization can be avoided in team learning, there is in all these learning processes a potential for the pupils being able to develop strategies for handling complex tasks, taking initiatives and responsibility, cooperating and learning from one another in various different ways. In this way entrepreneurship has had an impact on the practice of the classrooms. / Entreprenörskap har förts upp på en överstatlig politisk agenda, inom EU och OECD, där den skrivits fram som en grundläggande färdighet och en angelägenhet för skola och utbildning. Agendan återspeglas i varierande grad på nationell och regional politisk nivå. Mitt syfte har varit att studera och försöka förstå vad entreprenörskap i den svenska gymnasieskolan kan innebära i praktiken. Utifrån syftet och ett sociokulturellt perspektiv formulerades frågeställningarna enligt följande: Hur framförhandlas, organiseras och realiseras undervisningen inom två studerade gymnasieprogram? Vilka sociala gemenskaper bidrar elever och lärare till och deltar i? Vilka former av lärande visar sig? Den etnografiskt inspirerade studien genomfördes i två gymnasieprogram som genom utvecklingsprojekt deltagit i det länsövergripande och EU-medfinansierade projektet PRIO 1, Prioritet företagsamhet i Västerbotten (2000 – 2005). Empiriska data insamlades genom observationer, videoregistreringar, informella samtal med elever och lärare och formella samtal med skolledare. Dessutom insamlades skriftliga dokument. Materialet har analyserats utifrån tre fokus. Genom ett kulturellt-insitutionellt fokus har programmens stabilitet och föränderlighet synliggjorts. I det ena fallet har ett nytt lokalutformat program satts samman, i det andra fallet har kurser och ämnen integrerats inom det befintliga programmet. Förändringarna ses som ett möte mellan top-down-initiativ och bottom-upp- initiativ. Resultatet visar även en diskursiv förskjutning av ansvar från lärare till elev och lärares strävan att tillrättalägg intresse- och erfarenhetsrelaterad undervisning. Ur ett situerat fokus har båda programmen identifierats som praxisgemenskaper med en gemensam uppgift, ett ömsesidigt engagemang och en gemensam repertoar. Utmärkande drag i undervisningen, men koppling till entreprenörskapstanken, har handlat om förändrade avvägningar mellan reifikation och deltagande i undervisningen samt om gränsöverskridande, dels utanför praxisgemenskapen och dels inom gemenskapen. Genom ett interpersonellt fokus har olika villkor för lärande identifierats. Såväl kollaborativt och kooperativt lärande har varit användbara begrepp för att beskriva formerna för samarbetslärande, men inte tillräckliga. Samarbetets villkor och elevers kommunikationsmönster har avslöjat ytterligare en form av samarbetslärande, vilken jag benämnt komparativt lärande. Denna avhandling har således visat på både gemensamma och särskiljande drag när entreprenörskapsinitiativ omsatts i skolans praktik, på två gymnasieprogram.

This thesis concerns the issue of injunctive relief and specific performance in arbitration. The availability of such relief varies significantly between different jurisdictions and the issue is further complicated when parties opt out of litigation in favor of arbitration, not the least in terms of enforcement. In light of this, the thesis aims to determine the consequences for parties opting for arbitration instead of litigation with regard to the availability and enforceability of specific performance and injunctive relief. This overall research question has been answered under the laws of Sweden and the United States of America. First, this thesis has concluded that there are considerable differences between the jurisdictions in the availability of specific performance and injunctive relief in litigation. In Sweden, remedies are issues of substantive law and for many kinds of contracts, the primary remedy for breach. Consequently, courts do not differentiate claims for specific performance or injunctive relief, and routinely grant such claims in no different way than granting monetary relief. Conversely, in the United States, remedies are viewed as procedural issues, not substantive. There, specific performance and injunctive relief are discretionary matters of equity and not rights at law. Hence, the availability of specific performance and injunctive relief is limited as compared to damages. Further, this thesis has concluded that the categorization of reliefs and remedies as substantive and procedural, respectively, is mirrored also in arbitration. While in Sweden, the choice of arbitration as proper contract forum does not affect the availability of the reliefs now in question, it does so in the United States. There, courts have held that the division of remedies into legal and equitable is not applicable in arbitration. Thus, parties have the freedom to by contract control which reliefs an arbitrator may grant. In absence of such agreements, courts have presumed arbitrators to have been given a broad grant of authority, allowing otherwise unavailable reliefs.Third, this thesis has concluded that, inter alia, because of the inherent contempt powers of courts in the United States, the means of enforcing arbitral awards providing specific performance and injunctive relief are more extensive in the United States than in Sweden, where comparable powers do not exist. Further, parties may by means of contract, grant arbitrators the authority to supervise such reliefs and enforce previously granted specific performance and injunctions by contractual fines and sanctions. Again, in absence of explicit contract language such authority is presumed in the United States, but not in Sweden. Overall, the choice of arbitration has consequences in both jurisdictions. In the United States, mostly for the availability of the reliefs in question and in Sweden, mostly for the enforcement.