Studiens syfte var att genom sex kvalitativa intervjuer undersöka hur arbetsfördelningen ser ut inom kvinnojourer och vilken roll som volontärerna erhåller i verksamheterna. Vi ville även se vilken inställning till ideellt arbete som uttrycktes inom kvinnojourer samt se vilken betydelse som kvinnojourerna har i samhället kopplat till myndigheter och organisationer. Genom tiderna har kvinnorörelsen bidragit till den utvecklingen inom mäns våld mot kvinnor i nära relationer vi ser idag. Det har gått från att kvinnor uppmärksammat problematiken, ställt upp för sina medmänniskor och varit en stöttande individ, till att det utvecklats kvinnojourer. Samhället har genom uppmärksammandet fått en större förståelse till problematiken och har därför tagit över ansvaret. Idag finns det fortsatt många som arbetar ideellt inom kvinnojourer och som vill vara en god medmänniska genom att hjälpa dessa utsatta kvinnor på sin fria tid. Vårt resultat- och analysdel visade att synen på volontärerna inom kvinnojourerna är delad men att den ändå är övervägande positiv. Inom kvinnojourer sägs det av respondenterna att det inte finns några gränser mellan vad volontärer får och inte får göra, men genom vårt empiriska material kunde vi se att det fanns en osynlig gräns. Denna osynliga gräns uppkommer då volontärer per automatik inte utför arbetsuppgifter som till exempel att sköta kontakten mellan myndigheter, då det har blivit en av de anställdas arbetsuppgifter. Somliga av respondenterna påpekade även att sådana arbetsuppgifter inte kunde ske på grund av brist på utbildning, erfarenhet samt lämplighet som volontärerna saknade. En annan tydlig punkt inom detta avsnitt var att kvinnojourerna allt mer och mer går efter krav som ställs från Socialtjänsten, exempelvis dokumentation. Slutligen visade vårt resultat- och analysdel att det största hindret inom kvinnojourernas verksamhet är myndigheterna, eftersom de tar beslut som kvinnojourerna kan se som tvivelaktiga. Kvinnojourerna menar att de inte ser helheten som personalen på jourerna gör, utan de ser endast delar av det. Slutligen har vi en diskussion kring hela vårt arbete, där vi även diskuterar studiens styrkor och svagheter men också ger förslag till vidare forskning. / The aim for this study has been to explore through six qualitative interviews how division of work looks among workers and volunteers in women-shelters. And also, to address the topic of the attitude against nonprofit work in women-shelters. Ant last to look into what importance the women-shelters has in society linked with the authorities and other organizations linked with the particular area. A change has occurred through time, domestic violence has gone from a private matter within the family to an acknowledge social problem in the community because of the woman movement and their care for their fellow women in society. Through the attentiveness society has gained a larger understanding for the complex of the problem and has taken over the responsibility for battered woman. Even though there has been a change in woman shelters with more professional workers rather than volunteers, the nonprofit work has not yet gone out of time. Our results and analytic part show that the view of volunteer’s within women-shelters are divided but mainly the view is positive. The respondents don’t say openly that there are boundaries that tells the volunteers what they can and can’t do within the women’s-shelter. Although we could see in our empiric material that an invisible boundary does exist. The invisible line occurs when volunteers by automatic doesn’t exercise the same tasks as works by example contact authorities, thus that is a tasked carried out by workers. It was pointed out by some of the workers that those types of tasks could be performed by volunteers due their lack of education, experience and adequacy. Another clear matter in the results and analytic part was that women-shelters in higher extent match the criteria that comes from the social services by example the need for documentation. Furthermore, the results and analytic part shows that the biggest difficulties for the women-shelter organizations are the authorities. Primarily by reason of some om the decisions that can be seen as questionable. The womenshelters mean that the social services don’t see the whole picture but only a part of it. Finally, we have a discussion who discuss our entire study in whole where we also meditate the study’s strengths and weaknesses. We also give suggestions for further research options.

Trafficking in human beings and prostitution is an increasing occurrence within the EU. However, vast differences in legal frameworks regarding prostitution can be detected among member states.The Netherlands is an example where prostitution is regarded a legal activity. In other member states legal standings toward prostitution remain ambivalent, where Sweden here serves an example. Finally, Lithuania is among member states where prostitution is considered illegal.The purpose of this paper is therefore to study underlying attitudes and approaches that these three countries have in this rather delicate political question. By interpreting the content and quoting parts of propositions, an ideology analysis is constructed.The theory chapter consists of Rousseau’s theories, Objectivism, Radical Feminist Theory, and Sex-positive Feminist Theory. A model with the most important features of these theories is constructed and works as a base for the analysis.The general results suggest that the Government of Lithuania consistently uses arguments pending towards Radical Feminist Theory and Rousseauan values, with catholic morality as an additional important feature in the argumentation against prostitution. The Government of Sweden also views prostitution with predominantly Rousseauan and Radical Feminist theories. The Government of the Netherlands arguments greatly differ from these viewpoints. Instead, individualistic and sex-positive arguments remain dominant here.