Orientador: Jose Carlos Pinto de Oliveira / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-11T13:32:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Gomes_VicentedePaula_D.pdf: 2624567 bytes, checksum: 6aecc59d0f8b76e4425938903112917f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 / Resumo: Este trabalho averigua a adequação do uso do princípio de causalidade na investigação sociológica da ciência, um dos pilares do ¿programa forte¿ defendido pela Escola de Edimburgo. Para David Bloor, as pesquisas nesse campo devem buscar as ¿causas das crenças, isto é, leis gerais relacionando as crenças às condições que são necessárias e suficientes para determiná-las¿. Nessa definição, predominam elementos identificados com a concepção dedutivista de ciência, entre eles o de que o objetivo da ciência é buscar explicações causais. Análise do vínculo efetivo entre saber e fatores sociais em estudos de casos exemplares revelou que seus autores não utilizam argumentações contendo leis causais e condições necessárias e suficientes. Tal ocorre porque a conexão entre os ¿fatos¿ ivestigados ¿ o saber e os fatores sociais ¿ não tem uma natureza conceitual causal, essa conexão não pode ser representada como a expressão de uma lei causal. Argumentamos que a relação entre os objetos culturais (saber, fatores sociais, etc.) não pode ser expressa causalmente porque os significados destes ¿transcendem¿ a sua dimensão espaço-temporal. Para a adequada caracterização da interpenetração entre experiências psíquicas e situações sociais, a identificação de elementos como a motivação e a intencionalidade dos agentes envolvidos não pode ser efetivada por critérios causais. Apontamos na sociologia do conhecimento de Karl Mannheim um modelo alternativo. Neste, a expressão do vínculo entre os ¿fatos¿ investigados é realizada por método hermenêutico. Aqui, a interpretação é apresentada como o processo de explicitação de como os antecedentes dos atos ou obras humanos ¿ ânimos, ideais, normas, crenças, hábitos, etc., bem como o contexto social destes ¿ imprimem sentido a esses atos e obras. A defesa do método hermenêutico não significa a proposição de um programa ¿fraco¿ para a sociologia da ciência, porque este método é capaz de caracterizar a ¿determinação¿ do conteúdo do conhecimento científico por fatores sociais. A volta a Mannheim não representa um passo atrás em relação ao avanço do programa forte em considerar as ciências naturais vinculadas ao contexto social. Não há impedimento a que uma investigação da relação de uma teoria em ciências naturais e fatores sociais utilize o modelo argumentativo hermenêutico. A proposta hermenêutica tampouco representa uma volta ao debate do século XX, caracterizado por uma oposição entre explicar e compreender. A proposta é atual pois um interpretive turn é cada vez mais presente na filosofia da ciência contemporânea / Abstract: The aim of this work is examine use of principle of causality in sociology of science investigation, like defend the School of Edinburgh¿s strong programme. For David Bloor sociology of science must locate ¿causes of belief, that is, general laws relating beliefs to conditions which are necessary and sufficient to determine them¿. In this definition predominate elements of deductivist conception of science, among them that science must pursue causal explanations. Analysis of link between knowledge and social factors in exemplaries cases studies detected that their authors not use arguments holding causal laws and necessary and sufficient conditions. In that cases the connection among facts not have a causal conceptual nature, this connection not can be represented like a expression of a causal law. The relation among cultural objects not can be express in a causal form because their meanings ¿transcend¿ their space-time dimension. For appropriate characterization of interpenetration between psycho experiences and social situation the identification of elements like motivation and intencionality of subjects not can be brought about by causal criterion. There is a alternative model in Karl Mannheim¿s sociology of knowledge. In this the investigation of facts involved is achieved by hermeneutics method. Here the interpretation é presented like a process of explicitness how the preceding of acts or human works ¿ intention, ideal, rules, beliefs, habits, and his social context ¿ impress meaning to this acts or works. The apology of the hermeneutics method not mean the proposal of a weak programme to sociology of science, because hermeneutics é able to characterize the determination of content of knowledge by social factors. The return to Mannheim not represent a backstep in relation to the progress of strong programme in to consider the natural sciences linked to social context. There is not impediment to a investigation of relation of theory in natural sciences and social factors use the hermeneutics model. Neither hermeneutics proposition represent a return to debate of twentieth century, characterized for a oposition between explanation and understanding. The proposition is up to date because a ¿interpretive turn¿ is more and more present in contemporary philosophy of science / Doutorado / Filosofia da Ciencia / Doutor em Filosofia

This paper deals with corpus linguistics. There are two applications under its scrutiny. Both of these applications are processing data from the corpus DeReKo via corpus-driven approach. It is a co-occurrence analysis and a Co-occurrence database. The aim of the work is to evaluate whether the results obtained by the co-occurrence analysis of the current scope of DeReKo are different from the results of the Co-occurrence database, which was created on a basis of a smaller scale corpus. In addition, this thesis offers illustrative examples of the use of both applications and the evaluation of their effectiveness, depending on the purpose of the research. The theoretical part of the thesis deals with the terminology of corpus linguistics and with the mentioned corpuses, which serve as a basis for the practical part of the thesis. The empirical part of the thesis consists of analyses of the randomly picked words (one from each word class) in both applications. The results confirm that the data obtained with Co-occurrence database and co-occurrence analysis are in many respects different and thus confirm the hypothesis that the corpus size plays a crucial role in the results. Both applications have their advantages and disadvantages. The paper offers a comprehensive overview and by doing so it...

Nur ein Bruchteil der in den Schlagwortnormsätzen abgelegten Informationen wird von heutigen OPACs für die Benutzerrecherche nutzbar gemacht. Wie man das Input-Output-Verhältnis der bibliothekarischen Erschließungsleistung verbessern kann, wird am Beispiel der ISO-Ländercodes gezeigt. Diese werden nicht nur in Datensätzen für Geographika erfasst, sondern z.B. auch bei Personen und Körperschaften. Macht man sie im OPAC recherchierbar, so können sie als Basis für eine Einschränkung nach dem geographischen Raum dienen. Dadurch erhöht sich der Recall bei Anfragen vom Typ "Tourismus in Baden-Württemberg" oder "Klima in Afrika" teils dramatisch, ohne dass sich die Precision verschlechtern würde. Denn über die Ländercodes wird auch Literatur zu kleineren geographischen Einheiten gefunden (z.B. Landkreise, Städte, Landschaften), die bei einer einfachen Schlagwortsuche ausgeblendet bleiben. Im HEIDI-Katalog der UB Heidelberg und im Primo-Katalog der UB Mannheim wurde die Ländercode-Recherche vor kurzem prototypisch in Form eines Drill-down-Menüs realisiert.

Univ., Habil.-Schr.--Kassel, 2001.

Amidst the upheaval of the French Revolution, the British parliamentarian and political theorist Edmund Burke received a vibrant reception in German-speaking Europe. Anxious to uncover the ideological roots of the anarchy that enveloped France – and worried that their own society might be vulnerable to a similar fate – a series of important German thinkers began studying his Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790). This dissertation brings into focus the diverse interpretations of Burke that were assembled in this turbulent era, and explains them vis-à-vis contemporary debates among German idealists (Kant and his heirs) about the philosophical nature of freedom. This dissertation centers on Burke’s three most perceptive and influential students: the civil servant and philosopher August Wilhelm Rehberg; the journalist, translator, and diplomat Friedrich Gentz; and the political economist and cultural critic Adam Müller. For many decades, both German- and English-speaking intellectual historians have shoehorned these thinkers into a rigid ideological box labeled ‘conservatism’. Inspired by Burke, they are said to have turned away from the ideals of Enlightenment, theorizing an illiberal form of politics that was traditionalistic, authoritarian, and reactionary. A careful, contextualized reconstruction of their engagements with Burke, however, renders this thesis untenable. Far from triggering a monolithic backlash against Enlightenment, Burke in fact inspired a series of divergent, and often incompatible, analyses of the Revolution’s origins, grounded in different readings of his Reflections. Rehberg, for instance, saw Burke as a principled skeptic: he admired the Reflections as an incisive critique of the revolutionaries’ philosophical dogmatism. Gentz, an erstwhile student of Kant, disagreed completely, arguing that Burke’s politics were entirely compatible with Kantian metaphysics. In his view, the Reflections’ central insight was that it takes political prudence to realize the rights of man in practice. Müller, finally, read the Reflections as a lament for the fall of Christendom, and as a diagnosis of the social alienation and moral confusion that had followed its demise. In other words, whereas Rehberg was a Humean skeptic and Gentz was a Kantian liberal, Müller was a Trinitarian Christian. Each of these men, moreover, claimed Burke as an ally. What this means is that Rehberg, Gentz, and Müller cannot have jointly invented a single thing called ‘conservatism’, and Burke cannot have inspired it. This becomes clear only after we recognize that at the turn of the nineteenth century, neither the meaning of Enlightenment nor the crux of Burke’s Reflections was clear: these were not fixed variables, but points of contemporary debate. By recapturing the diversity of Burke’s German reception, this thesis invites scholars to consider the ways that his students shepherded their differing visions of Enlightenment through the fires of the Revolution, down into the nineteenth century.

La présente thèse procède à une analyse archéologique des discours sur le « romantisme politique » sous la République de Weimar pour mettre en évidence que ce paradigme constitue un idéologème fondamental de l’univers intellectuel et politique de l’époque. Par le recours à une conception de la « réception » qui met entre parenthèses la fonction « auteur » il s’agit d’analyser les stratégies discursives qui se structurent autour du paradigme « romantique » entre 1918 et 1933. A partir de l’étude d’un corpus d’auteurs pour qui la référence romantique est centrale (Sigmund Rubinstein, Carl Schmitt, Hans Freyer, Othmar Spann, Karl Mannheim, Wilhelm von Schramm, Paul Tillich) ainsi que des réseaux sociaux qui s’organisent autour d’eux, il est possible d’affirmer l’existence d’une sensibilité « romantique » centrale au monde weimarien, qui transcende les oppositions politiques traditionnellement conçues comme imperméables (gauche/droite, conservateur/progressiste, nationaliste/universaliste, etc.) et qui se construit dans l’opposition fondamentale à l’individualisme matérialiste du libéralisme capitaliste. / This PhD thesis offers an archeological analysis of the discourses on « political romanticism » in the Weimar Republic. It shall endeavour to analyze the discursive patterns which revolved around the « romantic » paradigm between 1918 and 1933 by resorting to a concept of « reception » which minimizes the importance of the « author ». By studying the works of thinkers who explicitly refer to « political romanticism » (Sigmund Rubinstein, Carl Schmitt, Hans Freyer, Othmar Spann, Karl Mannheim, Wilhelm von Schramm, Paul Tillich) and the social networks they belong to one may assert the existence of a romantic « sensibility » which is at the core of the intellectual universe of the Weimar Republic, transcends political differences traditionally considered as essential (left/right, conservative/progressive, nationalist/universalist etc.) and is fundamentally opposed to the materialist individualism of capitalist liberalism.

No description available.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T19:25:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 1769.pdf: 580406 bytes, checksum: bafd439f46fd28dbb1dd4c574890c10b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-02-27 / Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos / The ground of Social Science, in the nineteenth century, is an attempt to establish an independent field of knowledge from discussions with the Modern Philosophy. This autonomy appears in the design of social reality on the one hand and the configuration of a new epistemological model on the other. In view of this, this work suggests discussing the prospect of Karl Mannheim as an assessment of previous proposals (Positivism and Marxism) and therefore being able to open a new model of Social Sciences by redefining both the design of social reality on the modern epistemology. Therefore, the bias to this approach is the notion of ideology, used by Mannheim to support as a social ontology that prints the determination in social science, where to find the basis of Social Sciences. In this way for it will redeem the originality of the questions and answers presented by the author for the formation of Social Sciences / A fundamentação das Ciências Sociais no século XIX corresponde a uma tentativa de estabelecer um campo de saber autônomo a partir do debate com a Filosofia Moderna. Tal autonomia aparece na concepção de realidade social, por um lado, e na configuração de um novo modelo epistemológico, por outro. Em vista disso, este trabalho propõe discutir a perspectiva de Karl Mannheim como uma avaliação das propostas anteriores (positivismo e marxismo) e, por conseguinte, sendo capaz de abrir um novo modelo de construção das Ciências Sociais através da redefinição tanto da concepção de realidade social quanto da epistemologia moderna. Para tanto, o viés para fazer esta abordagem será a noção de ideologia, utilizada por Mannheim como suporte de uma ontologia social que imprime a determinação social na ciência, onde se pode encontrar a base das Ciências Sociais. Neste percurso, procurarse- á resgatar a originalidade das questões e respostas apresentas pelo autor para a constituição das Ciências Sociais