1 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Heterotopic ossification is frequent and well known complication after primary total hip arthroplasty. Prophylaxis is crucial, ohterwise when ossification is matured, the only treatment option is surgical removal during revision hip surgery. Prophylaxis options are pre, peri- and postoperative modalities. Effectiveness of the profylaxis step sis the aim of this disertation. The goal of Study 1 was to prove the positive side effect of tranexamic acid application to reduce the heterotopic ossification ratio after elective total hip replacement. The goal of Study 2 was to prove the reduction in HO ratio with experimental modification of anterolateral approach with electrosurgery. The goal of Study 3 was to detect the knowledge among czech orthopaedic surgeons in ossification issues and compare the results of questionnaire with german results. 2 MATERIAL AND METHODS Study 1 Cohort of 401 total hip replacements were assessed prospectivelly. Stratification of particular degrees in Brooker scale, sex, laterality and fixation type were evaluated. The average follow up was 6,10 year (40m to 113m). Hips from 2012 are referential and hips from 2016 are administered to tranexamic acid procotol. Other secondary prophylactic modalities (farmacoprophylaxy or radiotherapy), tertiary...

No description available.

Introdução: O implante auditivo de tronco encefálico (ABI) é indicado para pacientes com perda auditiva neurossensorial severa a profunda quando há impossibilidade de realização do implante coclear. Em pacientes com surdez por meningite e ossificação coclear total bilateral, o ABI é a opção para a reabilitação auditiva. Objetivos: O estudo tem por objetivo avaliar a contribuição do ABI para os limiares audiométricos e para a percepção de fala após no mínimo 12 meses de uso em pacientes com ossificação coclear total por surdez pós-meningite, bem como descrever as complicações do procedimento. Material e métodos: Dez pacientes com surdez pósmeningite foram submetidos ao ABI por via retrolabiríntica ampliada em um centro terciário de assistência e ensino. Todos os pacientes foram operados pela mesma equipe cirúrgica e a avaliação audiológica foi realizada pelo mesmo fonoaudiólogo. Foram realizados audiometria tonal e testes de percepção de fala no pré-operatório e no mínimo 12 meses após a ativação do implante. Foram descritas as complicações associadas ao procedimento. Resultados: Oito de dez pacientes implantados permaneceram usuários. Dois pacientes não apresentaram respostas auditivas e abandonaram o seguimento. Os oito pacientes apresentaram melhora estatisticamente significativa nos limiares audiométricos, bem como nos testes de discriminação de palavras e vogais comparando pré e pós-operatório com média de seguimento de 3,3 anos. Em dois pacientes, a discriminação de sentenças em formato fechado somente no modo auditivo foi de 30% e 40%. Todos os oito usuários referiram benefício com o uso do ABI. Não houve complicações relacionadas ao procedimento. Conclusão: O ABI via retrolabiríntica ampliada é uma opção terapêutica segura para pacientes com surdez pós-meningite e com presença de ossificação coclear total bilateral, contribuindo para melhora nos limiares audiométricos e nos testes de percepção de fala. Embora a melhora nos testes audiológicos seja inferior à do implante coclear, a maioria dos pacientes do estudo usa o ABI diariamente por um período superior a 8 horas e refere benefício em seu cotidiano / Introduction: The Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) is an option to auditory restoration in patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss who cannot be fitted with a cochlear implant. This is the only option in patients with post meningitis hearing loss presenting with bilateral total cochlear ossification. Objectives: The main objective of the study is to evaluate the hearing contribution in audiometry and speech perception tests at least 12 months after ABI implantation in patients with post-meningitis profound hearing loss. The complications of the procedure were also described. Materials and Methods: Ten patients with post-meningitis hearing loss went an ABI through extended retrolabyrinthine approach in a tertiary center by the same surgeons. The same audiologist was responsible for audiological follow-up. Tonal audiometry and speech perception tests were made before and at least 12 months after the ABI activation. The procedure complications were described for all patients. Results: Eight of ten patients became ABI users. Two patients had no auditory response and abandoned the treatment. Eight users showed benefit in tonal audiometry, word and vowels perception tests after an average follow up of 3.3 years. Two patients were able to recognize 30 and 40% of closed sentences without lip reading. There were no complications due to the ABI procedure. Conclusion: The extended retrolabyrinthine approach for the ABI is a safe surgical option for patients with post-meningitis hearing loss and totally ossified cochleae. It contributes to hearing performance in audiometry and speech perception tests. Even though the ABI results are poorer than the cochlear implants, in this study the majority of patients use their ABI more than eight hours a day and report benefits in daily activities

Introdução: O implante auditivo de tronco encefálico (ABI) é indicado para pacientes com perda auditiva neurossensorial severa a profunda quando há impossibilidade de realização do implante coclear. Em pacientes com surdez por meningite e ossificação coclear total bilateral, o ABI é a opção para a reabilitação auditiva. Objetivos: O estudo tem por objetivo avaliar a contribuição do ABI para os limiares audiométricos e para a percepção de fala após no mínimo 12 meses de uso em pacientes com ossificação coclear total por surdez pós-meningite, bem como descrever as complicações do procedimento. Material e métodos: Dez pacientes com surdez pósmeningite foram submetidos ao ABI por via retrolabiríntica ampliada em um centro terciário de assistência e ensino. Todos os pacientes foram operados pela mesma equipe cirúrgica e a avaliação audiológica foi realizada pelo mesmo fonoaudiólogo. Foram realizados audiometria tonal e testes de percepção de fala no pré-operatório e no mínimo 12 meses após a ativação do implante. Foram descritas as complicações associadas ao procedimento. Resultados: Oito de dez pacientes implantados permaneceram usuários. Dois pacientes não apresentaram respostas auditivas e abandonaram o seguimento. Os oito pacientes apresentaram melhora estatisticamente significativa nos limiares audiométricos, bem como nos testes de discriminação de palavras e vogais comparando pré e pós-operatório com média de seguimento de 3,3 anos. Em dois pacientes, a discriminação de sentenças em formato fechado somente no modo auditivo foi de 30% e 40%. Todos os oito usuários referiram benefício com o uso do ABI. Não houve complicações relacionadas ao procedimento. Conclusão: O ABI via retrolabiríntica ampliada é uma opção terapêutica segura para pacientes com surdez pós-meningite e com presença de ossificação coclear total bilateral, contribuindo para melhora nos limiares audiométricos e nos testes de percepção de fala. Embora a melhora nos testes audiológicos seja inferior à do implante coclear, a maioria dos pacientes do estudo usa o ABI diariamente por um período superior a 8 horas e refere benefício em seu cotidiano / Introduction: The Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) is an option to auditory restoration in patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss who cannot be fitted with a cochlear implant. This is the only option in patients with post meningitis hearing loss presenting with bilateral total cochlear ossification. Objectives: The main objective of the study is to evaluate the hearing contribution in audiometry and speech perception tests at least 12 months after ABI implantation in patients with post-meningitis profound hearing loss. The complications of the procedure were also described. Materials and Methods: Ten patients with post-meningitis hearing loss went an ABI through extended retrolabyrinthine approach in a tertiary center by the same surgeons. The same audiologist was responsible for audiological follow-up. Tonal audiometry and speech perception tests were made before and at least 12 months after the ABI activation. The procedure complications were described for all patients. Results: Eight of ten patients became ABI users. Two patients had no auditory response and abandoned the treatment. Eight users showed benefit in tonal audiometry, word and vowels perception tests after an average follow up of 3.3 years. Two patients were able to recognize 30 and 40% of closed sentences without lip reading. There were no complications due to the ABI procedure. Conclusion: The extended retrolabyrinthine approach for the ABI is a safe surgical option for patients with post-meningitis hearing loss and totally ossified cochleae. It contributes to hearing performance in audiometry and speech perception tests. Even though the ABI results are poorer than the cochlear implants, in this study the majority of patients use their ABI more than eight hours a day and report benefits in daily activities

No description available.

Abstract Heterotopic ossification is a pathological condition in which bone forms outside the skeletal system. It can also occur in skin, which is the case in some genetic disorders. In multiple miliary osteoma cutis (MMOC), tiny bone fragments develop in the dermis and nearby subcutaneous tissue of the face and upper chest region during middle age. The etiology of the disease is poorly understood. The origin of the osteoma-forming cells is not known and also unknown are the signaling factors that direct the skin cells towards an osteogenic lineage. The purpose of this study was to investigate MMOC and the pathogenesis of ectopic bone formation by combining patient study and cell biology methods. The results from an extensive review of the literature and five new cases revealed MMOC as a distinct disease entity, where heterotopic bone formation is intramembranous. No correlation was found between MMOC and acne scars, hormonal disturbances or GNAS gene mutations. In cell culture studies mouse and human dermal fibroblasts and mouse dermal papilla (DP) cells were found to differentiate into osteoblast-like matrix mineralizing cells. The bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) homodimer and BMP-2/7 heterodimer had significant effects on the osteogenic differentiation of the above mentioned cells. Interestingly, the BMPs enhanced the differentiation of mouse cells but reduced it in human cells. In mouse DP cells and human fibroblasts BMP-2/7 was more potent than BMP-4. The skin area affected by osteomas in patients was compared to their unaffected skin and also to the corresponding skin areas in controls with regard to osteogenic differentiation and gene expression studies. MMOC patients’ skin differs from controls both in osteoma and unaffected skin areas, which suggests MMOC is not only a local but also a systemic skin disease. The results confirm the previous findings that gene expression in skin is different in different parts of the body, which could explain why the osteomas develop in certain skin areas. The results of this study provide new information about MMOC and heterotopic ossification in skin and could be useful when developing treatments for MMOC. This study also presents new information about BMPs and their different effects in mouse and human cells, which may stimulate discussion about the generalization of mouse studies in humans and the clinical use of BMPs. / Tiivistelmä Virhesijaintinen luutuminen on patologinen tila, jossa luuta muodostuu luisen tukirangan ulkopuolelle. Tätä voi tapahtua myös ihossa, kuten käy tietyissä sairauksissa. Ihon lukuisat jyvämäiset osteoomat on tauti, jossa pieniä luujyväsiä ilmaantuu verinahkaan ja ihonalaiskudokseen keski-iässä. Taudin syytä, osteoomia muodostavien solujen alkuperää tai sitä, mitkä viestinvälittäjät saavat esiastesolut siirtymään luusolulinjalle, ei tiedetä. Tässä työssä tutkittiin ihon lukuisia jyvämäisiä osteoomia ja virhesijaintista luutumista yhdistämällä kliinisiä ja solubiologisia menetelmiä. Laajasta kirjallisuuteen perehtymisestä ja viidestä omasta potilaasta saadut tulokset osoittivat ihon lukuisten jyvämäisten osteoomien olevan oma erillinen tautinsa, jossa virhesijaintinen luutuminen tapahtuu suoran luutumisen mekanismilla. Tauti ei näytä olevan yhteydessä aknearpiin, hormonihäiriöihin tai GNAS-geenin mutaatioihin. Soluviljelykokeissa hiiren ja ihmisen verinahan fibroblastien ja hiiren karvatupen nystyn solujen havaittiin erilaistuvan osteoblastityyppisiksi soluväliainetta mineralisoiviksi soluiksi. Luun morfogeneettisillä proteiineilla (BMP) 4 ja 2/7 oli merkitsevä vaikutus yllä mainittujen solujen erilaistumisessa. Yllättävää kyllä, ne edistivät hiiren solujen, mutta vähensivät ihmisen solujen erilaistumista. Hiiren karvatupen soluille ja ihmisen fibroblasteille BMP-2/7 oli tehokkaampi kuin BMP-4. Potilaiden osteoma-aluetta verrattiin heidän terveeseen ihoalueeseensa samoin kuin vastaaviin ihoalueisiin kontrollihenkilöillä käyttäen menetelminä solujen erilaistamista luuta muodostavaan suuntaan sekä geenien ilmentymisen tutkimista. Potilaiden iho erosi kontrollien ihosta sekä osteooma-alueella että terveellä ihoalueella, mikä viittaa taudin olevan koko elimistöön vaikuttava. Tulokset vahvistavat aikaisempia löydöksiä siitä, että geenien ilmentyminen ihossa on erilaista eri puolilla kehoa. Tämä voisi selittää osteoomien esiintymisen vain tietyllä alueella. Tämän tutkimuksen tulokset antavat uutta tietoa ihon lukuisista jyvämäisistä osteoomista ja virhesijaintisesta luutumisesta ja saattavat olla hyödyksi kehitettäessä taudin hoitoa. Tutkimus antaa uutta tietoa luun morfogeneettisten proteiinien erilaisesta käyttäytymisestä hiirellä ja ihmisellä, mikä herättänee keskustelua hiirikokeiden yleistämisestä ihmiseen ja luun morfogeneettisten proteiinien kliinisestä käytöstä.

Σκοπός: Η προσέγγιση και η αντιμετώπιση των κακώσεων της Αυχενικής Μοίρας της Σπονδυλικής Στήλης (ΑΜΣΣ) εξακολουθεί και σήμερα να παρουσιάζει διαφορές μεταξύ των διαφόρων κέντρων. Κατά καιρούς μάλιστα έχουν προταθεί πλείστοι τρόποι αντιμετώπισης: από συντηρητική με κρανιακή έλξη μέχρι πολύ επιθετική χειρουργική αντιμετώπιση με συνδυασμένες πρόσθιες και οπίσθιες προσπελάσεις. Στόχος της διατριβής ήταν η παρουσίαση της χειρουργικής εμπειρίας της Ορθοπαιδικής Κλινικής του Πανεπιστημίου Πατρών στην αντιμετώπιση των ασθενών αυτών και η ανάλυση των επιπλοκών των διαφόρων μεθόδων σταθεροποίησης. Έγινε προσπάθεια να απαντηθούν τα ακόλουθα ερωτήματα: 1) Ποια πρέπει να είναι σήμερα η διαγνωστική προσέγγιση των ασθενών με κάκωση στην ΑΜΣΣ; 2) Ποιοι ασθενείς χρειάζονται σταθεροποίηση; 3) Τι είδους σταθεροποίηση και ποιες είναι οι επιπλοκές αυτής; Ακολούθως, ποιος πρέπει να είναι ο σύγχρονος αλγόριθμος προσέγγισης των ασθενών με κακώσεις στην ΑΜΣΣ; 4) Ποιες είναι οι μακροχρόνιες επιπτώσεις της σταθεροποίησης; Μεθοδολογία: Εκατόν-δώδεκα ασθενείς με ασταθείς κακώσεις στην ΑΜΣΣ υποβλήθηκαν στην Κλινική μας σε πρόσθια, οπίσθια σταθεροποίηση ή και στις δύο. Ένας ασθενής θεωρούνταν ότι είχε ασταθή κάκωση της ΑΜΣΣ εάν είχε 5 ή παραπάνω βαθμούς με βάση τα κριτήρια αστάθειας των White & Panjabi. Τουλάχιστον ένας χρόνος παρακολούθησης (follow-up) ήταν αναγκαίος για να ενταχθεί ένας ασθενής στη μελέτη, με αποτέλεσμα να επιλεγούν τελικά 97 ασθενείς. Εβδομηντατέσσερις ασθενείς υποβλήθηκαν σε αριστερή προσθιοπλάγια προσπέλαση [Ομάδα Α]. Σε 65 ασθενείς έγινε πρόσθια αποσυμπίεση και τοποθέτηση φλοιοσπογγώδους λαγονίου αυτομοσχεύματος και σταθεροποίηση με πλάκα και βίδες, είτε με πλάκα της AO/ASIF ή με πλάκα CSLP. Στους υπόλοιπους 9 ασθενείς, η αποκατάσταση της σπονδυλικής στήλης περιελάμβανε τη χρήση κλωβού πλέγματος τιτανίου στο οποίο τοποθετούνταν σπογγώδη αυτομοσχεύματα από την περιοχή της σωματεκτομής. Εικοσιτρείς ασθενείς υποβλήθηκαν σε οπίσθια σταθεροποίηση είτε με πλάκες πλαγίων ογκωμάτων (πλάκες Roy-Camille) (19 ασθενείς), ή με πολυαξονικές βίδες (4 ασθενείς) [Ομάδα Β]. Αποτελέσματα – Συμπεράσματα: 1) Εφόσον η κλινική εικόνα ενός ασθενούς με κάκωση στην ΑΜΣΣ επιβάλλει τη διενέργεια αξονικής τομογραφίας, η διερεύνηση μπορεί να γίνει με ασφάλεια με τη χρήση ενός σύγχρονου πολυτομικού αξονικού τομογράφου (MDCT) και μόνο, παραλείποντας τις απλές ακτινογραφίες. 2) Τα κριτήρια αστάθειας των White και Panjabi υπαγορεύουν μια ασταθή κάκωση στην ΑΜΣΣ, η οποία θα πρέπει να αντιμετωπίζεται κατά προτίμηση με χειρουργικό τρόπο. 3) Η στατιστική ανάλυση των αποτελεσμάτων δεν ανέδειξε στατιστικά σημαντικές διαφορές μεταξύ των 2 ομάδων σταθεροποίησης όσον αφορά τις κλινικά σημαντικές επιπλοκές (p=0.26). Ομοίως, οι κλινικά μη σημαντικές επιπλοκές, καθώς και το ποσοστό επανεγχειρήσεων δε διέφεραν στατιστικά μεταξύ των δύο ομάδων (p=0.245 και p=0.475 αντίστοιχα). Ωστόσο, η πρόσθια σταθεροποίηση παρουσιάζει σημαντικά πλεονεκτήματα, μπορεί να αντιμετωπίσει το σύνολο σχεδόν των κακώσεων της ΑΜΣΣ συμπεριλαμβανομένου των εξαρθρημάτων, και μόνο κατ’ εξαίρεση απαιτείται συμπληρωματική σταθεροποίηση. Επιπλέον, η εξέλιξη της μεθόδου βοήθησε στην εξάλειψη επιπλοκών που παρατηρούνταν με τα παλαιότερης τεχνολογίας υλικά. Ως εκ τούτου, οι τρέχουσες ενδείξεις για οπίσθια σταθεροποίηση είναι τα μη ανατασσόμενα εξαρθρήματα, οι κακώσεις πολλαπλών επιπέδων και οι ασθενείς με τραχειοστομία. 4) Η οστεοποίηση των παρακειμένων διαστημάτων στις κακώσεις της ΑΜΣΣ φαίνεται ότι έχει διαφορετική αιτιολογία από αυτή της αυχενικής σπονδύλωσης, μπορεί να εμφανιστεί πολύ πρώιμα στην μετεγχειρητική περίοδο και, ακόμα και όταν είναι εμφανής ακτινολογικά, σπανίως προκαλεί συμπτώματα. / Aim: The diagnostic approach and management of patients with cervical spine injuries differs among various centers. Conservative management with skeletal traction to aggressive surgical treatment with combined anterior and prosterior stabilization are within the possible alternatives. We aimed at presenting the experience from the surgical treatment of these patients gathered in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery in the University Hospital of Patras. We further analyzed the complications associated with each approach and we tried to answer the following questions: 1) Which is the current diagnostic approach of patients with cervical spine injuries? 2) Which patients should be stabilized? 3) What type the stabilization should be and which are its complications? Moreover, which is the appropriate algorithm in the treatment of these patients? 4) Which are the long-term consequences of the stabilization? Materials & Methods: One hundred and twelve patients with unstable cervical spine injuries underwent anterior, posterior stabilization or both. A patient was considered to have an unstable injury if he had ≥ 5 points in the White and Panjabi checklist. At least one year of follow-up was necessary for a patient to be included in the study, which yielded a total of 97 patients. Seventy-four patients underwent a left-sided anterolateral approach [Group A]. Sixty-five of them had anterior decompression and iliac bone grafting. The remaining 9 patients underwent corpectomy and cervical spine reconstruction with titanium mesh cage, filled with morselized autograft from the corpectomy site. All these patients were instrumented using an anterior cervical plate. Twenty-three patients underwent posterior stabilization, either with lateral mass plates of Roy-Camille (19 patients), or polyaxial screws and rods (4 patients) [Group B], along with concomitant iliac bone autografting. Results – Conclusions: 1) If there is a need for computed tomography (CT) in a patient with cervical spine injury, the diagnostic work-up can be done with safety using only a modern multi-detector CT, obviating the need for plain radiographs. 2) The White and Panjabi criteria imply an unstable injury which should be preferentially stabilized by surgical means. 3) Statistical analysis of the clinically significant complications did not reveal significant difference between the posterior procedures and the anterior ones (p=0.26). Likewise, insignificant complications, as well as reoperation rates did not differ significantly among the two groups (p=0.245 and p=0.475 respectively). However, anterior stabilization for cervical spine injuries presents several advantages, can deal with almost all types of injuries and it only exceptionally requires supplemental stabilization. It should be also stressed that the advances in technology and metallurgy have eliminated the complications observed with older implants. Current indications for posterior stabilization are the irreducible dislocations, multilevel injuries and patients with tracheostomy. 4) Adjacent-level ossification in cervical spine injuries appears to be of different etiology than in cervical spondylosis, it may appear very early in the postoperative period and, even when it is evident radiographically, it very rarely (if ever) produces any symptoms.

No description available.