Immunity in criminal law Abstract This thesis aims to offer the reader a view of the institution of parliamentary imunity as it relates to criminal law. This topic frequently divides both the experts in criminal law and also the general public. Despite the fact that most of the time this legal issue is talked about with respect to the constitutional law it has an impact on criminal law, both the substantive criminal law and the procedural criminal law. The complexity of this topic is self-evident and opinions vary greatly across the field, which is one of the reasons why this topic is sought out quite frequently by many students who approach it from various angles. The work is structured in a way to familiarise the reader with the necessary knowledge even if the reader is not an expert in law, but who is, for example, interested in the topic from a political perspective. The thesis covers the basic introduction to the topic, historical evolution of the institution including the legal transformations all the way up to the date this work has been finalised, squaring this institute with the basic principles of democratic state and a comparative analysis of this institute in other European countries. Important part of this thesis is dealing with specific uses of the parliamentary imunity. The conclusion of this...

This thesis analyze institutional and political circumstances, which allowed and influenced the Scottich referendum of independence in september 2014. It discribes political development and situation in Scottich Parliament and Government from the creation of devolution to 2014. As a metodological tools this thesis use theories of Institutionalism, Multi - level governance and performance politics. It focuses on the pre-referendum debate as well. Main sources are official reports of departments of Her Majesty Government and White paper of Scottish Goverment for the referenda, both are combined with reports from BBC. It shows limitations and extentions of institutional influence and reach towards independence. Key words: Great Britain, Scottish Parliament, Scottish Government, SNP, Alex Salmond, referendum,BBC

Diese Anfang 2006 fertiggestellte, nunmehr postum veröffentlichte Publikation untersucht und bewertet detailliert die Positionen zum Vertrag über eine Verfassung für Europa jener Parteien, die im Europäischen Parlament der "Konföderalen Fraktion der Vereinten Europäischen Linken/Nordische Grüne Linke" (GUE/NGL) angehören. Die Debatte zum europäischen Verfassungsvertrag zwang alle linken Parteien in einer erstmalig geführten transnationalen Debatte, ihre Haltung zur EU-Mitgliedschaft des eigenen Landes, ihre Position zum Verfassungsvertrag als solchem sowie ihre generelle Bereitschaft zu verdeutlichen, einem „anderen“ oder „besseren“ Vertrag zuzustimmen. Die Arbeit zeigt eine sehr hohe Fragmentierung der Haltung der linken Parteien zum Verfassungsvertrag und zur Mitgliedschaft ihrer Länder in der EU. / This at the beginning of 2006 finished, now posthumously published publication examines and evaluates in detail the positions of the parties that belong to the European Parliament of the "Confederal Group of the European United Left / Nordic Green Left" (GUE / NGL) about the European constitutional treaty. The respective debate forced them in a transnational debate to define their positions on the EU membership of their country, their position on the Constitutional treaty as such, as well as their overall readiness for agreeing with an "other" or "better" treaty. The work shows a very high level of fragmentation of the attitude of the left parties on the constitutional treaty and the EU membership of their countries.

Landtags-Abgeordnete sind Berufs-Politiker auf Zeit – so wollen es die Spielregeln unserer Demokratie. Wer ein Landtags-Mandat erringt, engagiert sich befristet im Auftrag seiner Wähler für das Allgemeinwohl. Das nächste Wahl-Ergebnis und vor allem der innerparteilich festgelegte Platz auf der Landesliste der eigenen Fraktion entscheiden stets aufs Neue über die berufspolitische Zukunft jedes einzelnen Abgeordneten. In diesem Buch kommen bekannte und weniger bekannte Politiker aller politischen Lager in Thüringen zu Wort, die die Gründerjahre im Freistaat seit Wiedererstehen des Landes mitgeprägt haben. Mit ihren vielfältigen und oft sehr detailreichen Erinnerungen rufen sie die höchst ereignisreiche Zeit seit Oktober 1990 wach. Wie lebt es sich als „Interessen-Vertreter auf Abruf“? Welche persönlichen Erfahrungen vermittelte das Abgeordneten-Dasein – noch dazu in den Jahren umfangreichster Veränderungen seit 1990? Und wie sieht das Leben nach dem oft unfreiwilligen Abschied aus der Berufs-Politik aus? Holger Zürch hat darüber mit einstigen Abgeordneten und Ministern gesprochen, die zwischen 1990 und 2004 dem Thüringer Landtag angehörten. Sie haben die weitreichenden politischen, wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Umgestaltungen der drei DDR-Bezirke Erfurt, Gera und Suhl zum Wiedererstehen des heutigen Freistaats Thüringen gestaltet. Von Holger Zürch im April 2013 für Qucosa.de bearbeitete, gekürzte Version der Original-Ausgabe. Das Buch erschien 2006 im Engelsdorfer Verlag Leipzig (ISBN-10: 3939404012 - ISBN-13: 9783939404019).

Univ., Diss.--Greifswald, 2005. / Literaturverz. S. 269 - 294.

Zugl.: Berlin, Humboldt-Univ., Diss., 2006

Univ., Diss.--Wien, 2000.

Zugl.: Berlin, Freie Univ., Diss.

In 2014 the Czech republic celebrated 10th anniversary of accession to the European Union and the third elections to the European Parliament took place. It is these elections and especially the pre-election campaigns this diploma thesis focuses on. Its main goal is to analyze these pre-election campaigns, evaluate whether they were effective and whether media choices in them were influential to the election results.

This Diploma Thesis deals with obstructions within the legislative process of the Parliament of the Czech Republic, more precisely in hearings at the Lower House. The aim of the thesis is to describe the phenomenon of obstructions and their importance in the legislative process. In the beginning, the author establishes three basic research questions, which he then tries to answer through quantitative methods. Firstly, the author answers the question whether either site of the ideological spectrum tends to use the tactic of obstruction more often. Secondly, he inquires whether there are any differences between the obstructions of a right-wing or a left-wing party. Finally, the author aims to clarify if the long-established parties in the Chamber of Deputies have an advantage in the practice of obstructions and thus are more successful in it than new parties are. The text is divided into three separate chapters with a logical structure starting from theoretical themes and continuing with an empirical analysis. The first part, which is purely theoretical, is followed by a chapter dealing with the legislative process which can be considered as a transition between the theoretical and empirical parts. The following chapter is based on empiricism and analyses stenographic records and interviews with the representatives of political parties. The carried out analyses suggest that it is impossible to state clearly which site of the ideological spectrum tends to use the tactic of obstruction more often, as in the majority of cases parties using this tactic find themselves in the opposition. However, while obstructing, both left-wing and right-wing parties use almost identical tools. Ultimately, it can be stated that parties represented in the House of Deputies for a long period are not more successful in practicing obstructions than other parties, even though they use strategies that are more sophisticated.