Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-04-14T14:19:29Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_VINICIUS_GONCALVES_CARNEIRO_PARCIAL.pdf: 1785022 bytes, checksum: d03a666af7b53f5454406d7c560f182e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-14T14:19:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_VINICIUS_GONCALVES_CARNEIRO_PARCIAL.pdf: 1785022 bytes, checksum: d03a666af7b53f5454406d7c560f182e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-01-09 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The Oulipo (Ouvroir de litt?rature potentielle [Workshop of Potential Literature]) is a post-World War literary movement founded by mathematicians and writers amongst whom we find famous personalities such as Raymond Queneau, Italo Calvino, Georges Perec and Jacques Roubaud. The Oulipo is based on the formal constraint as a "machine" of artistic creation in two ways: on the one side, an analytical approach which studies "plagiats par anticipation [anticipatory plagiarism]", i.e., the writers who worked on the formal constraints before the Oulipo; on the other hand, a synthetic approach based on innovation and experimentation with new literary constraints. Firstly, this doctoral dissertation discusses concepts (implicitly or explicitly) presented in the manifestos of the group and in the critical texts and interviews with Georges Perec, concerning mainly the concept of constraint. Secondly, it discusses these notions in the work of Perec, including the lipogram novel La disparition (2009a [1969]). The heart of this part is to analyze the relationship between the discourse of the Oulipo and its immediate and visible effects in La disparition, therefore between constraint and aesthetic formalism. As theoretical basis, the concepts of metatextuality as proposed by Bernard Magn? (1986; 1989), the death of the author as proposed by Roland Barthes (2004), intertextuality as proposed by Kristeva (2005) and reader as proposed by Wolfgang Iser (1996; 1999) and Umberto Eco (1991) are essentials, among others. At the end, extracts of La disparition translated into Portuguese by the author are presented, based on the theoretical work of Haroldo de Campos (2004), which considers translation as a device of critical appropriation. / O grupo liter?rio Oulipo (Ouvroir de litt?rature potentielle [Ateli? de Literatura Potencial]) surgiu na d?cada de 1960, na Fran?a, e postulava, a partir da aproxima??o entre literatura e matem?tica, a utiliza??o de contraintes para a cria??o liter?ria e para os estudos sobre literatura. Conforme o Oulipo, que tinha entre seus integrantes Raymond Queneau, Italo Calvino, Jacques Roubaud e Georges Perec, toda a obra liter?ria possui restri??es formais, cabendo ao escritor ter consci?ncia desse processo. Um dos romances que tornaram o grupo famoso foi La disparition, de 1969, escrito sem a vogal ?e?, a mais utilizada em franc?s. Nessa obra, a restri??o est? intimamente ligada a um jogo metatextual, em que se alude constantemente ? aus?ncia da vogal. Partindo da hip?tese de que nem um autor, grupo ou movimento liter?rio tem controle sobre os sentidos ou interpreta??es dos textos a ele ligados, este estudo se prop?e a debater os postulados oulipianos, sobretudo o conceito de contrainte, e suas consequ?ncias nos estudos liter?rios. Al?m disso, apresenta-se uma an?lise da obra de Georges Perec, com destaque para o romance La disparition (2009a [1969]). Para efetivar tal an?lise, prop?e-se tamb?m a tradu??o de extratos do livro, sendo a tradu??o aqui entendida como cr?tica (CAMPOS, 2004). A discuss?o te?rica partir? de alguns conceitos da teoria liter?ria, como os de morte do autor de Roland Barthes (2004), de intertextualidade de Julia Kristeva (2005), de metatextual de Bernard Magn? (1986; 1989), de leitor de Wolfgang Iser (1996; 1999) e Umberto Eco (1991) e de jogo de Huizinga (2012) e Agamben (2007), dentre outros.

L'écriture du souvenir chez Marguerite Duras, Georges Perec et Danilo Kiš présente un phénomène de répétition avec variations, impliquant à la fois le recours (volontaire) à l'invention et le travail (inconscient) du fantasme. L'analyse des textes démontre que ces reprises sont motivées par le désir de donner accès à l'événement passé et à son impact après coup, et par un désir autre, qui est de l'ordre d'une résistance à la rencontre du réel. La thèse saisit la réécriture du souvenir comme le résultat d'un compromis entre ces deux désirs : chez les trois auteurs, le texte autobiographique porte les traces du conflit dont il résulte. À dégager ces traces, on constate qu'une triple faillite de la mémoire, de l'enquête et du témoignage est en partie compensée par la reprise du souvenir. Les modifications apportées, sur le plan de la narration, tendent à donner à voir de plus près l'événement passé, soit en faisant partager au lecteur la perte de repères et le non éprouvé du trauma, soit en cédant la parole à celui qui a vu (par l'extrait de document), soit encore, par une identification du sujet (vivant) à ce témoin direct (mort). L'autorité narrative profite alors d'un sabotage de l'identité, le déni d'un moi se montrant garant de la prétention à parler au nom de l'autre. La représentation de cet autre dans le récit - il s'agit généralement d'un parent mort au cours de l'enfance - oscille entre la saturation de l'image et le blanc laissé vide, entre un « tout dire » et un « dire le rien », pour déboucher finalement sur une construction métaphorique, dont le réseau arborescent rappelle celui du signifiant lacanien tenant lieu d'une représentation absente. De plus, certaines variations apportées au souvenir semblent avoir pour but de satisfaire un désir de maîtrise, par une inversion des rapports de force, qui, dans certains cas, tient de la vengeance. Ainsi, le fantasme et l'invention viennent pallier un manque au sein de l'écriture autobiographique, et rendre possible, d'une part, la transmission d'une vérité factuelle et psychique, d'autre part, une riposte à la réalité de l'expérience, aux faits et au trauma, une réplique aux morts. ______________________________________________________________________________ MOTS-CLÉS DE L’AUTEUR : Souvenir, Enfance, Fantasme, Répétition, Vérité.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2004. / Title from first page of PDF file. Document formatted into pages; contains vii, 179 p. Includes abstract and vita. Advisor: Eugene Holland, Dept. of French and Italian. Includes bibliographical references (p. 165-179).

We live in an era of fragmented memory. Though the wars and catastrophes of the twentieth century may have preceded our birth, we remain haunted by their lingering presence. Many studies have been conducted on the delayed nature of trauma, the power of the past to govern the present: it is precisely for this reason that trauma is a contemporary theme in both the social sciences and humanities. Psychology has demonstrated that a symbolization of the traumatic past is of the utmost importance to the process of liberating oneself from its encumbering grasp. However, in the wake of events that surpass human understanding, notably the Holocaust and the bombing of Hiroshima, the question arose of how such brutal realities could possibly be represented. It is here that literature comes into play. The present study considers the theme of trauma and its various representations in five literary works: L’Immaculée Conception by Gaétan Soucy, Savannah Bay by Marguerite Duras, the film Hiroshima mon amour by Duras and Alain Resnais, Le ciel de Bay City by Catherine Mavrikakis and Georges Perec’s W ou le souvenir d’enfance. It will demonstrate that these authors, rather than yield to that which resists representation, embrace the dilemma. This study’s progression will be twofold, looking first at an individual trauma based on fictional events in order to examine the literary means of symbolizing reality. The works in the succeeding chapters move toward historical and collective phenomena, departing from fiction with respect to the events, but not, however, in regard to the symbolization of these realities. The authors continue to resort to the imaginary to represent the horrors of the past. This recourse raises certain questions: what is the role of literature in representing trauma? What is the iii relationship between fiction and reality, and finally, can writing aid in the process of healing from a traumatic past? / Thesis (Master, French) -- Queen's University, 2010-09-30 15:58:43.88

Thesis (Ph. D.)--UCLA, 2008. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 251-270).

Thesis (Doctoral)--Université de Caen/Basse-Normandie, U.F.R. sciences de l'homme, spécialité langue et littérature française, 2000. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Doctoral)--Université de Caen/Basse-Normandie, U.F.R. sciences de l'homme, spécialité langue et littérature française, 2000. / Includes bibliographical references.

Esta tese propõe o estudo das relações entre o método infraordinário de observação do cotidiano, desenvolvido por Georges Perec, tendo como foco os romances La Vie mode demploi (1978), do próprio Perec, e Los detectives salvajes (1998), de Roberto Bolaño. O objetivo é, primeiramente, defender a ideia de que Bolaño foi uma espécie de plagiário original de Perec, reconhecendo no romance La Vie mode demploi ressonâncias para a produção de sua mais celebrada obra. Num segundo momento se faz uma analogia entre produção literária e imanência do comum, com destaque para a teoria oulipiana (Oulipo Ouvroir de Littérature Potentielle, espécie de Sala de Costura da Literatura Potencial) como uma arte combinatória. Por fim, apontando semelhanças e diferenças entre esses autores, defendemos a tese de que, apesar das distâncias culturais e geográficas, podemos correlacioná-los pela maneira como potencializam os objetos em suas descrições, revisitam o passado, e tentam subverter a tradição literária. Pode-se afirmar que as possíveis relações entre Perec e Bolaño remontam à revolução narrativa dos anos 70, com a prosa de ambos rasurando certo horizonte estético. E em ambos os romances visualiza-se uma espécie de puzzle literário. Todas essas possibilidades de leitura, interpretação e combinação se encontram nas referidas obras dos escritores elencados. Desse modo, acreditamos que com o método infraordinário de Georges Perec é possível compreender e interpretar melhor alguns escritos de Roberto Bolaño / This thesis proposes the study of relations between linfra-ordinaire method of observing the everyday, developed by Georges Perec, focusing on the novels La Vie mode d' emploi (1978 ), Perec 's own, and Los detectives salvajes (1998 ), Roberto Bolaño. The aim is, first, to defend the idea that Bolaño was a kind of original plagiarist Perec, recognizing the novel La Vie mode d' emploi resonances for the production of his most celebrated work. Secondly it makes an analogy between literary production and immanence of the ordinary, especially the theory oulipiana (Oulipo - Ouvroir of Littérature Potentielle, sort of Sewing Room of Potential Literature) as a combinatory art. Finally, pointing out similarities and differences between these authors, we defend the thesis that, despite cultural and geographical distances, we can correlate them by way potentiate the objects in their descriptions, revisit the past, and attempt to subvert the literary tradition. It can be stated that the possible relations between Perec Bolaño and go back to narrative revolution of the 70s, with prose both rasurando certain aesthetic horizon. In this novels visualized a kind of literary puzzle. All these possibilities of reading, interpretation and combination are listed in these works of writers. Thus, we believe that with Georges Perec linfra-ordinaire method can better understand and interpret the writings of Roberto Bolaño some

Esta tese propõe o estudo das relações entre o método infraordinário de observação do cotidiano, desenvolvido por Georges Perec, tendo como foco os romances La Vie mode demploi (1978), do próprio Perec, e Los detectives salvajes (1998), de Roberto Bolaño. O objetivo é, primeiramente, defender a ideia de que Bolaño foi uma espécie de plagiário original de Perec, reconhecendo no romance La Vie mode demploi ressonâncias para a produção de sua mais celebrada obra. Num segundo momento se faz uma analogia entre produção literária e imanência do comum, com destaque para a teoria oulipiana (Oulipo Ouvroir de Littérature Potentielle, espécie de Sala de Costura da Literatura Potencial) como uma arte combinatória. Por fim, apontando semelhanças e diferenças entre esses autores, defendemos a tese de que, apesar das distâncias culturais e geográficas, podemos correlacioná-los pela maneira como potencializam os objetos em suas descrições, revisitam o passado, e tentam subverter a tradição literária. Pode-se afirmar que as possíveis relações entre Perec e Bolaño remontam à revolução narrativa dos anos 70, com a prosa de ambos rasurando certo horizonte estético. E em ambos os romances visualiza-se uma espécie de puzzle literário. Todas essas possibilidades de leitura, interpretação e combinação se encontram nas referidas obras dos escritores elencados. Desse modo, acreditamos que com o método infraordinário de Georges Perec é possível compreender e interpretar melhor alguns escritos de Roberto Bolaño / This thesis proposes the study of relations between linfra-ordinaire method of observing the everyday, developed by Georges Perec, focusing on the novels La Vie mode d' emploi (1978 ), Perec 's own, and Los detectives salvajes (1998 ), Roberto Bolaño. The aim is, first, to defend the idea that Bolaño was a kind of original plagiarist Perec, recognizing the novel La Vie mode d' emploi resonances for the production of his most celebrated work. Secondly it makes an analogy between literary production and immanence of the ordinary, especially the theory oulipiana (Oulipo - Ouvroir of Littérature Potentielle, sort of Sewing Room of Potential Literature) as a combinatory art. Finally, pointing out similarities and differences between these authors, we defend the thesis that, despite cultural and geographical distances, we can correlate them by way potentiate the objects in their descriptions, revisit the past, and attempt to subvert the literary tradition. It can be stated that the possible relations between Perec Bolaño and go back to narrative revolution of the 70s, with prose both rasurando certain aesthetic horizon. In this novels visualized a kind of literary puzzle. All these possibilities of reading, interpretation and combination are listed in these works of writers. Thus, we believe that with Georges Perec linfra-ordinaire method can better understand and interpret the writings of Roberto Bolaño some

This Master’s thesis examines the ways in which the Holocaust continues to figure in French-Jewish autobiographical fiction. I examine texts by two leading authors, Georges Perec (1936-1982) and Philippe Grimbert (b.1948). I treat Perec as a first-generation survivor of the Holocaust as he was a child during the war and suffered the loss of both his parents, while Grimbert was born to Holocaust survivors shortly after the war and thus belongs to what has come to be known as the second generation. In both Perec’s W ou le souvenir d’enfance (1975) and Grimbert’s Un secret (2004) the body plays a central role as a site on which traumatic memory is inscribed. Trauma also determines the form and language of both novels, influencing not only the narrative structure but also the semantics utilized by the narrators. These post-Holocaust autofictions confront similar themes: both deal with the concept of the “unspeakable” and attempt to address the “emptiness” in the wake of the Holocaust and come to terms with the tremendous loss of life. Although thirty years separate Perec’s W and Grimbert’s Un secret, the overwhelming parallels between the two texts suggest that the trauma of the Holocaust has been passed on from one generation of survivors to the next through the disturbances of language. In my analysis, I illuminate common tropes that appear in these two works as instances of transgenerational traumatic transmission. The introduction provides a description of both works, a discussion of the autofictional genre and its use in both texts, and an overview of the trauma and literary theory with which I engage. The first chapter, “Traumatic Memory and its Inscription on the Body,” offers a close study of the body in both works. Both works juxtapose athletes who possess superior physical capabilities to weaker individuals who are marked by deformities, wounds or symbolic scars. I discuss the location of the narrators’ wounds in both texts and what this might suggest in psychoanalytic terms. I argue the location of the wounds, on the narrator’s mouth in W and on the narrator’s eyebrow in Un secret, are linked to what type of work these narrators undergo throughout both texts vis-à-vis trauma. Specifically, I use Freud’s Das Unheimlich to discuss the wound above the narrator’s eye in Un secret, linking it to the processes of testimony and remembrance. The second chapter, “Doubled Narrators and Narratives,” focuses on the various instances of doubling present in both works. I pay close attention to the doubled narrators, Gaspard Winckler in W, and Simon in Un secret, as well as to the presence of two alternative narratives in each text. I use Lacan’s theory of the mirror stage to support my argument that the doubling present in both texts provides a mirror that is crucial to the narrators’ processes of remembering, witnessing, and recording. In addition, Gabriele Schwab’s text, Haunting Legacies: Violent Histories and Transgenerational Trauma is fundamental to my argument that the legacy of trauma is inherited by the second generation. The third chapter, “The Influence of Trauma on the Production of Time” comprises an in-depth analysis of the poetics of time in Perec and Grimbert. Identifying Marcel Proust’s À la recherche du temps perdu as an influential model for Perec and Grimbert, I explore the opening paragraphs of all three works, noting particularly how the interaction between the adverb “longtemps” and the passé composé destabilizes the representation of time in order to convey the fragmentary nature of memory.