Across the animal kingdom, predation is a ubiquitous and omnipresent selective agent for a variety of traits. I aimed to address gaps in our knowledge pertaining to how predation shapes animal behavior. Many species of fish naturally occur in drainages that differ in the density of predators and exhibit obvious population divergence, making them ideal study organisms to investigate predator-driven behavioral evolution. In Chapter 1, I conducted a systematic review of the literature. The purpose of this review was to determine if predation acted as a stronger or weaker selective agent on particular behavioral traits (e.g., foraging, mating, antipredator etc.) across fish. This review showed that predation does not always drive behavior in predictable ways, and that some behavioral traits more consistently diverge than others. It was evident that antipredator behaviors are extremely variable but were typically measured in response to a visual stimulus. Investigations on intraspecific variation pertaining to how fish acquire, process, and respond to information across other sensory modalities are needed. To address this, I focused on a Neotropical fish, Brachyrhaphis rhabdophora (Poeciliidae), from Costa Rica that occur in distinct predation environments. For Chapter 2, I evaluated whether males and females exhibit differential responses to conspecific chemical alarm cues. Chemical alarm cues are released when a prey is injured by a predator and are an honest indicator of risk. It was clear that B. rhabdophora responded to alarm cues, but that males and females sometimes employed different antipredator strategies depending on what predation environment they were from. However, we know that in group-living species, such as B. rhabdophora, risk information can also be acquired indirectly through social cues. There are tradeoffs associated with relying on direct vs. indirect information, and these sources of information may sometimes conflict. For Chapter 3 I considered how B. rhabdophora integrates conflicting information to elicit antipredator behavior. I again exposed fish directly to chemical alarm cues and measured how their antipredator responses changed when visually observing conflicting or reinforcing social information. I found that individuals integrated personal and social information differently based on their evolutionary history with predators. Further, we found evidence that even a single observer fish is able to influence group behavior. Finally, for Chapter 4, I evaluated sex-specific variation in brain size across predation environments. According to the "expensive-tissue hypothesis" there should only be investment in brain tissue when there is sufficient selection for enhanced cognitive abilities. Prey under elevated selection from predators should invest more in cognitive traits to enhance survival, but how sex interplays with this effect is unclear. I found that females had higher relative total brain volumes than males, but males exhibited more variation across predation environments in the relative volumes for certain brain regions. This work as a whole suggests that, yes, evolutionary history matters for a variety of sensory-related traits in B. rhabdophora.

A central goal of life history theory is to understand the selective factors that generate the diversity of reproductive patterns observed in nature. Within lifetime changes in reproductive investment will determine an organism's fitness; however, this area of life history theory has received less attention than comparisons among population that characterize life history traits as a single population mean. Reproductive allocation can be affected by multiple cues; the integration of these cues across an organism's lifetime generates the diversity in life history strategies observed in nature. Life history studies should examine the interacting effects of multiple cues on life history strategies to generate better predictions and generalizations of age-related changes in reproductive investment. An individual's life history strategy is inherently multivariate consisting of a coordinated suite of life history traits that, when combined across the organism's lifetime, determines its fitness. Life history strategies can therefore be described as a trajectory through multivariate space defined by life history traits. Here I describe life history trajectory analysis, a multivariate analytical approach for quantifying and comparing phenotypic change in life history strategies; this methodology is adapted from an analytical framework originally described for studies of morphological evolution. Life history trajectories have attributes (magnitude, direction, and shape) that can be quantified and statistically compared among taxa to determine if life history patterns are predictable. Using the life history trajectory analysis, I demonstrate the effect of prior experience on reproductive allocation in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis. The effect of prior experience resulted in a terminal investment or accentuated response to age-based cues, or resulted in a conservative investment strategy or reproductive restraint. In the livebearing fish Gambusia affinis, females adjust the level of reproductive investment to current reproduction based on age- or environment-based cues. Age-0 females decreased the level of reproductive investment to current reproduction in late summer prior to the onset of fall and winter months. Old females, on the other hand, increased the level of reproductive investment as the summer progressed. The reproductive restraint and terminal investment patterns exhibited by age-0 and age-1 females, respectively, were consistent with the predictions from the cost of reproduction hypothesis. These studies demonstrate how the life history trajectory analysis provides an analytical tool to test predictions of life history theory. Additionally, I provide evidence that organisms use multiple cues to determine the level of reproductive investment and that the strength of the effect of each cue will depend on the age of an individual.

Phylogeography and molecular phylogenetics have proven remarkably useful for understanding the patterns and processes influencing historical diversification of biotic lineages at and below the species level, as well as delimiting morphologically cryptic species. In this dissertation, I used an integrative approach coupling comparative phylogeography and coalescent-based species delimitation to improve our understanding of the biogeography and species limits of Central American freshwater fishes. In Chapter 1, I conducted a literature review of the contributions of phylogeography to understanding the origins and maintenance of lower Central American biodiversity, in light of the geological and ecological setting. I highlighted emerging phylogeographic patterns, along with the need for improving regional historical biogeographical inference and conservation efforts through statistical and comparative phylogeographic studies. In Chapter 2, I compared mitochondrial phylogeographic patterns among three species of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae) codistributed in the lower Nicaraguan depression and proximate uplands. I found evidence for mixed spatial and temporal divergences, indicating phylogeographic “pseudocongruence” suggesting that multiple evolutionary responses to historical processes have shaped population structuring of regional freshwater biota, possibly linked to recent community assembly and/or the effects of ecological differences among species on their responses to late Cenozoic environmental events. In Chapter 3, I used coalescent-based species tree and species delimitation analyses of a multilocus dataset to delimit species and infer their evolutionary relationships in the Poecilia sphenops species complex (Poeciliidae), a widespread but morphologically conserved group of fishes. Results indicated that diversity is underestimated and overestimated in different clades by c. ±15% (including candidate species); that lineages diversified since the Miocene; and that some evidence exists for a more probable role of hybridization, rather than incomplete lineage sorting, in shaping observed gene tree discordances. Last, in Chapter 4, I used a comparative phylogeographical analysis of eight codistributed species/genera of freshwater fishes to test for shared evolutionary responses predicted by four drainage-based hypotheses of Neotropical fish diversification. Integrating phylogeographic analyses with paleodistribution modeling revealed incongruent genetic structuring among lineages despite overlapping ancestral Pleistocene distributions, suggesting multiple routes to community assembly. Hypotheses tests using the latest approximate Bayesian computation model averaging methods also supported one pulse of diversification in two lineages diverged in the San Carlos River, but multiple divergences of three lineages across the Sixaola River basin, Costa Rica, correlated to Neogene sea level events and continental shelf width. Results supported complex biogeographical patterns illustrating how species responses to historical drainage-controlling processes have influenced Neotropical fish diversification.

El Poecílido Gambusia holbrooki, mundialmente introducido en sistemas acuáticos epicontinentales, presenta una alta capacidad invasora y supone una seria amenaza para las comunidades nativas. En la Península Ibérica, destaca su impacto sobre los Ciprinodóntidos nativos, aunque también supone una amenaza para los sistemas salinos, principalmente en regiones áridas. Para contribuir al establecimiento de criterios científicos para el manejo de esta especie, la presente tesis doctoral aporta información básica sobre la estructura y parámetros de la biología de poblaciones habitantes de sistemas salinos del sureste peninsular. Se plantearon tres objetivos generales: (1) Ampliar el conocimiento sobre la biología y ecología de G. holbrooki en sistemas lóticos de carácter salino. (2) Estudiar la interacción trófica entre G. holbrooki y la especie nativa Aphanius iberus en un sistema salino. (3) Realizar y analizar una experiencia de control sostenido sobre una población de G. holbrooki aislada en la cabecera de un arroyo salino. / The Poeciliid Gambusia holbrooki, globally widespread in freshwater aquatic systems, is highly invasive and represents a serious threat to native communities. In the Iberian Peninsula, its impact on the native Cyprinodontids has been emphasized, although it also poses a threat to arid saline systems. To contribute to the establishment of scientific criteria in management plans of its invasive populations, the present PhD thesis aims to provide basic information about population structure and biological traits of G. holbrooki populations inhabiting saline systems in the southeastern Iberian Peninsula, with three general objectives: (1) To increase knowledge of the biology and ecology of G. holbrooki in saline lotic systems. (2) To analyse trophic interaction between G. holbrooki and the native Aphanius iberus in a saline system. (3) To conduct and examine the results of an experience of sustained control of a population of G. holbrooki isolated in the headwaters of a saline stream.