Spelling suggestions: "subject:"parekh"" "subject:"sereda""
1 |
A synchronic approach to the Serek ha-Yahad (1QS) : from text to social and cultural contextSkarström Hinojosa, Kamilla January 2016 (has links)
The purpose of this study is to investigate the social and cultural contexts of 1QS (Serek ha-Yahad) by means of a textual study. The analysis of the text is performed in a synchronic perspective. This means that lexical choices, grammatical forms, references, topics, themes, and intertextuality are analyzed text-internally. By doing so, this study sheds new light on old questions of textual cohesion and coherence, questions that until now have been dealt with mostly from a diachronic perspective. The text analysis entails investigation in view of three interrelated dimensions of language function: ideational, interpersonal, and textual. These imply language as transmitting information, creating and sustaining relations, and functioning to organize itself into cohesive units. Although applying some of the terminology from the field of text linguistics (SFL), the focus in this study is on what a text means rather than why. This means that the semantic-pragmatic aspects of language are of foremost interest here. The analysis is performed from bottom and up, then from top down again. Words, phrases, and sentences are investigated up to the broadest linguistic level, namely, to the semantic discourse itself. With an understanding of the larger discourse at hand thanks to this analysis of textual cohesion and coherence, textual details are once again revisited and interpreted anew. In this work, 1QS is analyzed from beginning to end—chronologically, so to say. Then, at the end of each major section, the discourse is analyzed overall. Following the text analysis, conclusions of the investigations are presented. The conclusions argue that the hierarchal structure of the community and its stringent regulations are to be understood as a corrective in response to corrupt society. It is also argued that language in 1QS has a performative function. Rather than describing the way things are, it aspires to evoke the ideal society. Instead of understanding 1QS and the community mirrored in it as a deviant group with little or no contact with the surrounding world, it is then understood as a potent contribution to late Second Temple Jewish discourse concerning how to create a just society and a sanctifying cultic practice. In the final chapter, the insights gained from textual analysis of 1QS are brought into encounter with the theoretical framework posited by French historian and philosopher René Girard (1923–2015). In light of Girard’s philosophy, the hierarchal organization of the community (the Yahad) as well as its regulations can be interpreted as an effort to prevent a mimetic crisis. The function of the scapegoat in 1QS is discussed in light of Girard’s grand theory of the mechanisms of scapegoating in all societies. The study closes with the tentative hypothesis that the community in 1QS deconstructs the scapegoating mechanism by taking the role of the scapegoat upon itself.
|
2 |
Covenant (berith) in Daniel and the Dead Sea Scrolls : an exposition of Daniel 9-12 and selected sections of the Damascus Document (CD), Community Rule (1QS), Hymns Scroll (1QHA) and War Scroll (1QM)Linington, Silvia 11 1900 (has links)
The following thesis comprises a systematic, synchronic study of the term בְּרִית (berîṯ,
covenant) in the book of Daniel, the Damascus Document, the Community Rule (Serekhha-
Yaḥad), the Hymn Scroll (Hodayot) and the War Scroll (Milḥamah). The basic text
used for Daniel is the BHS, and for the Dead Sea Scrolls the Dead Sea Scrolls Electronic
Library, supplemented by other editions.
Apart from an introduction (chapter 1), the work is divided into two sections. The
second chapter begins with a discussion of some introductory matters, such as the dating
and purpose of the book of Daniel. The remainder of the chapter comprises two
subsections, consisting firstly of an exegesis of Daniel 9 and secondly an exposition of
Daniel 10-12 with particular reference to covenant terminology. The prayer in Daniel 9 is
given much space since it is replete with covenant language, though the word בְּרִית only
occurs at Daniel 9:4. The main focus of the second subsection is the vision report in Daniel
11, with particular emphasis on Daniel 11:20-45 where the word בְּרִית occurs.
The third chapter contains four subsections, each giving an exegesis of those
parts of the Damascus Document, Community Rule, Hymn Scroll and War Scroll where
the term בְּרִית occurs. Each subsection is preceded by a brief introduction to the scroll
concerned, looking at such issues as the provenance and dating of the scroll without going
into too much detail, and followed by a conclusion, summarising the findings in each
section. While such issues as the nature of the community represented by each scroll are
mentioned where appropriate, they do not form a major emphasis in this study.
Throughout, particular prominence is given to specific terminology used in order
to determine the authors’ theological emphases. A few terms that are related to ,בְּרִית
‘covenant’, such as חֶסֶד (ḥeseḏ ‘mercy, lovingkindness’), אָהָב (’āhāḇ; [covenant] love), אָלָה
(’ālāh; ‘curse, oath’), are also included in this study at the relevant places.
The conclusion (chapter 4) draws together the findings of all sections and seeks
to compare the terminology used in Daniel with that of the Dead Sea Scrolls. / Old Testament & Ancient Near Eastern Studies / D. Th. (Old Testament)
|
3 |
Covenant (berith) in Daniel and the Dead Sea Scrolls : an exposition of Daniel 9-12 and selected sections of the Damascus Document (CD), Community Rule (1QS), Hymns Scroll (1QHA) and War Scroll (1QM)Linington, Silvia 11 1900 (has links)
The following thesis comprises a systematic, synchronic study of the term בְּרִית (berîṯ,
covenant) in the book of Daniel, the Damascus Document, the Community Rule (Serekhha-
Yaḥad), the Hymn Scroll (Hodayot) and the War Scroll (Milḥamah). The basic text
used for Daniel is the BHS, and for the Dead Sea Scrolls the Dead Sea Scrolls Electronic
Library, supplemented by other editions.
Apart from an introduction (chapter 1), the work is divided into two sections. The
second chapter begins with a discussion of some introductory matters, such as the dating
and purpose of the book of Daniel. The remainder of the chapter comprises two
subsections, consisting firstly of an exegesis of Daniel 9 and secondly an exposition of
Daniel 10-12 with particular reference to covenant terminology. The prayer in Daniel 9 is
given much space since it is replete with covenant language, though the word בְּרִית only
occurs at Daniel 9:4. The main focus of the second subsection is the vision report in Daniel
11, with particular emphasis on Daniel 11:20-45 where the word בְּרִית occurs.
The third chapter contains four subsections, each giving an exegesis of those
parts of the Damascus Document, Community Rule, Hymn Scroll and War Scroll where
the term בְּרִית occurs. Each subsection is preceded by a brief introduction to the scroll
concerned, looking at such issues as the provenance and dating of the scroll without going
into too much detail, and followed by a conclusion, summarising the findings in each
section. While such issues as the nature of the community represented by each scroll are
mentioned where appropriate, they do not form a major emphasis in this study.
Throughout, particular prominence is given to specific terminology used in order
to determine the authors’ theological emphases. A few terms that are related to ,בְּרִית
‘covenant’, such as חֶסֶד (ḥeseḏ ‘mercy, lovingkindness’), אָהָב (’āhāḇ; [covenant] love), אָלָה
(’ālāh; ‘curse, oath’), are also included in this study at the relevant places.
The conclusion (chapter 4) draws together the findings of all sections and seeks
to compare the terminology used in Daniel with that of the Dead Sea Scrolls. / Biblical and Ancient Studies / D. Th. (Old Testament)
|
Page generated in 0.0391 seconds