Bakgrund: Hållbarhetsredovisning är ett relativt nytt område och den är frivillig för företagen att upprätta. Den regleras inte av några lagar och har heller inte krav på extern granskning, vilket den finansiella redovisningen har. Detta gör att företag kan skriva i stort sett vad som helst. Trovärdigheten i detta sammanhang är ifrågasatt och det finns oklarheter kring vad den innebär, vilket gör det till ett intressant ämne att titta närmare på. Syfte: Uppsatsens syfte är att undersöka vilka egenskaper som kännetecknar trovärdighet i en hållbarhetsredovisning och därmed bidra med kunskap som kan hjälpa till att öka trovärdigheten i företags hållbarhetsredovisningar. Avgränsningar: Undersökningen begränsas till att utreda trovärdigheten kring den hållbarhetsredovisning som upprättas frivilligt av företagen, inte den som är obligatorisk enligt Årsredovisningslagen. Detta på grund av att den omfattas av den finansiella redovisningens lagar och regler. Genomförande: Uppsatsens empiri har samlats in genom en kvalitativ metod där åtta intervjuer genomförts med företag, intressenter och granskare för att få olika perspektiv på trovärdigheten i hållbarhetsredovisningar. Resultat: Studiens resultat visar att viktiga egenskaper för trovärdighet är öppenhet och ärlighet, vilket innebär att ge ut rätt mängd information samt redovisa både positiva och negativa delar av företagets verksamhet. Att upprätta redovisningen på ett konsekvent sätt och arbeta enhetligt med hållbarhetsfrågor inom företaget ger också en bra grund för att skapa trovärdighet. Företagets integritet kan stärkas genom en extern verifiering av informationen, dock behöver granskaren få en tydligare roll. För att göra hållbarhetsredovisningen användbar samt relevant och därmed mer trovärdig är det viktigt för företaget att identifiera sina intressentgrupper. / Background: Sustainability reporting is a relative new discipline and it is voluntary for the companies to produce this kind of report. The report is not regulated by any laws and an external verification is not required, as it is for the financial annual report. The effect of this is that the companies can write whatever they want. The credibility in this context is questioned and it is not clear what it means, which makes it an interesting subject to look closer into. Purpose: The purpose of this report is to examine the credibility characteristics in a sustainability report and contribute with knowledge which can help companies to strength the credibility in their sustainability reports. Demarcation: This survey is limited to only examine the voluntary sustainability reports and their credibility, not the one which is required by the law. The reason is that this sustainability information is included in the regulations of the financial annual report. Methods: The report use a qualitative method and the primary source of this survey are eight interviews. These interviews are made with companies, stakeholders and auditors to get different views of what credibility means in a sustainability report. Results: The results of the survey show that important credibility characteristics are openness and honesty. This means to produce right amount of information and present both positive and negative information of the company’s activities. To be consequent and have a uniform way to work with sustainability questions is important and creates a good ground for credibility. The integrity of the company can be strength by an external verification, but the one who checks the report needs to have a clearer role. To make the sustainability report useful and relevant and thereby more credible is it important that the company identify their stakeholders.

Background: Companies today are under increasing pressure from their stakeholders to become more and more transparent regarding the way they deal with the impact on the environment and the communities where they operate in. This type of information is mainly provided by means of sustainability reports. Several guidelines have been developed to aid report makers on the way. Currently however these sustainability reports still differ widely in the quantity of information provided which makes them difficult to compare and it is therefore important to understand the factors that can influence the amount of information being published. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the factors having an impact on the amount of sustainability information published by Swedish companies using the guidelines developed by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Method: Telephone interviews were conducted with eleven of the twenty-three Swedish companies listed in the GRI register in order to get their point of view regarding these factors. Results: The study identified that the willingness to communicate with more than one stakeholder group is the most important factor that can influence the amount of information disclosed in sustainability reports. The authors also argue that a proactive attitude towards identifying legitimation strategies instead of an adaptive approach can also influence the degree of disclosure. Finally, a positive attitude towards the GRI guidelines may also contribute to producing a more detailed report.

Datum:           2009-05-29 Författare:     Sanne Jotorp, sjp07001@student.mdh.se                         Linnéa Olsson, lon08004@student.mdh.se Handledare:   Ann-Sofi Paul Titel:               Ett företagsperspektiv på bestyrkt hållbarhetsredovisning - Vilka motiv kan finnas till ett bestyrkande Nivå:               Kandidatuppsats i ekonomistyrning Syfte:              Syftet med undersökningen är att utifrån ett företagsperspektiv beskriva vilka motiv som kan tänkas finnas till ett bestyrkande. Ambitionen är att försöka förstå vad ett bestyrkande kan innebära för företagets interna hållbarhetsarbete och för förhållandet till interna och externa intressenterna. Metod:            Undersökningen har formen av en förstudie och en kvalitativ undersökningsmetodik har tillämpats. Till grund för den teoretiska referensramen ligger en litteraturstudie. Empirin grundar sig på semistrukturerade intervjuer som har genomförts med ett urval av företag. I analysen fångas en helhetsbild av de samband och mönster som kan utläsas ur insamlade data. Slutsats:          De tendenser som kan skönjas i undersökningen visar att legitimitet för företagets handlingar kan stärkas i förhållande till både interna och externa intressenter. De motiv till ett bestyrkande som tydligast kan urskiljas är dels att hållbarhetsrapporteringen och det interna hållbarhetsarbetet kan säkerställas och effektiviseras. Dessutom kan de interna intressenternas förståelse för hållbarhetsfrågor öka och transparensen gentemot externa intressenter öka. Nyckelord:     Hållbarhet, hållbarhetsredovisning, bestyrkande, legitimitet, intressenter. / Date:               2009-05-29 Authors:         Sanne Jotorp, sjp07001@student.mdh.se                         Linnéa Olsson, lon08004@student.mdh.se Tutor:             Ann-Sofi Paul Title:               A Corporate Perspective on Assurance of Sustainability Reporting - What kind of motives might there be for an assurance Level:             Bachelor Thesis in Management Accounting Purpose:         The purpose of the essay is to describe, from a corporate perspective, what kind of motives there might be for an assurance. The ambition is to try to understand what an assurance can mean for the internal corporate sustainability work and the corporate relationship to internal and external stakeholders. Method:         The essay has the form of a preliminary study and a qualitative study method has been used. A scholarly literature study forms the base of the theoretical reference frame. Semistructured interviews have been made with a sample of corporations to form the base of the empirical material. In the analysis the connections and the patterns that can be interpreted has been captured to give a general picture. Conclusion:    The tendencies that can be discerned shows that legitimacy for the actions of a corporation can be strengthened in the relationship to both internal and external stakeholders. The motives for an assurance that most clearly can be discerned are partly that the internal sustainability reporting and internal sustainability work can be ensured and made more effective. Furthermore the internal stakeholders understanding of sustainability questions can increase and the transparency towards external stakeholders can increase. Keywords:     Sustainability, sustainability reporting, assurance, legitimacy, stakeholders.

Sustainability reporting has emerged as an outcome of corporate social responsibility, giving companies an opportunity to show transparency towards their stakeholders. The Global Reporting Initiative, a largely voluntary sustainability reporting standard, has become increasingly popular, providing a framework making reports consistent and comparable. However, Holmen, SAS, SKF, Vattenfall and Vin & Sprit were the only Swedish companies complying with application level A, the highest level of compliance, of the GRI framework in their 2007 sustainability reports. The purpose of this thesis is therefore to analyze why these five Swedish companies are sustainability reporting and why they are doing so according to the GRI standard. A theoretical background regarding CSR, sustainability and GRI is provided in order to get a basic understanding of the context of the thesis. The theoretical framework for the study is based on the stakeholder concept and the legitimacy theory, utilizing the internal marketing and brand identity theories for the analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the five managers of the companies in order to gather the relevant data. The study showed that the five companies investigated are sustainability and GRI reporting as a result of their company size, industry type, reporting tradition, ownership structure and various stakeholder-driven motives. The motives were found to be specific to either sustainability or GRI reporting, where the majority were linked to the practice of sustainability reporting.

Corporate finance reporting is based in rigorous, rules-based frameworks yet environmental and social reporting does not seem to have these normalised tools. The sustainable development of the business movement, in terms of increased environmental and social responsibility, will remain marginal as long as policy decisions maintain their direction towards old models of corporate governance that are not based on the key principles of the triple-bottom line, CSR and accountability. This thesis attempts to gauge to what extent Public-Private Partnership performs a transparent and independent source and appraisal of the standards of Governance for Sustainability for selected firms. This investigation is delimited to an Environmental Social Governance metric analysis and comparison of non-financial corporate data disclosure in sustainability reports from the mining and metals industry in the Nordic countries. It has been inferred from the analysis that an extrapolation can be made based on the financial predictions and trend prospecting of LKAB, Boliden Group, Lundin Mining Corporation, and the Swedish Association of Mines, Mineral and Metal Producers for the future growth of both the Nordic mining sector and sustainability reporting. As a result, ‘best-practice’ in reporting procedures could be exported to where demand is highest from pioneering firms with the ‘first-mover’ advantage, to SME’s and other interested firm’s outside of the Nordic countries. It has been identified that using the Global Reporting Initiative reporting framework enhances partnerships in businesses that adopt and use its index to the extent where it becomes integrated into their management chains and business strategies. The more comprehensively a firm discloses its non-financial performances with relation to the GRI framework, the more integrated reports appear to become. The standardisation of the accurate reporting and disclosure used from the GRI G3.1 varies greatly just between three firms in the same sector and region.

The awareness and interest concerning corporate social responsibility has grownamong both firms and their stakeholders, which has resulted in a continuous upwardtrend regarding CSR reporting. This has led to the emergence of reporting frameworklike Global Reporting Initiative. The issues is that there are limited regulationscontrolling what should be reported and how it should be reported, thus most CSRreporting is voluntary. This creates differences among firms and within industries.The differences make it difficult to compare reporting between firms and to assess thebenefits of CSR reporting.The purposes of this study is to explain what variables affects the CSR reportingquality and what the rationale behind CSR reporting is, which includes investigatingthe effect of reporting quality on cost of capital. The evolution of CSR reporting willalso be examined.The nature of the study is quantitative with a deductive approach. Hypotheses will bedeveloped from prior theory and tested statistically using multiple regression analysis.The theoretical foundation of this study is stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory andinformation asymmetry. The chosen variables are argued by prior literature to effectreporting quality. The variables are board diversity, ownership concentration, separatesustainability reports, external assurance, GRI application levels and industry. Ameasure of reporting quality will be developed using content analysis and theestimation for cost of capital will be calculated based on a model for rPEG. Thesample consists of firms listed on Nasdaq OMXS30 index in 2006, 2008 and 2010.Statistical support for positive association between reporting quality and boarddiversity, ownership concentration, external assurance, GRI A and GRI B and theindustries industrials, consumer goods and basic materials were found. An indirectassociation between reporting quality and cost of capital was found. The findings arein agreement with the rationale behind CSR reporting; a firm can do well by doinggood. It was further concluded that the development during this time period hasfollowed the previous trend and continuously increased.

The full cost of climate change is not accounted for in today’s financial reporting. Today’s sustainability reporting mainly consists of disclosures which do not affect any financial statement. If externalities were accounted for it would help stakeholders become aware of companies’ true sustainability. The purpose of this thesis is to identify and describe ways for companies to account for their climate impact, in general and by incorporating externalities into the financial statements. A qualitative method is used in the form of a descriptive case study with a Swedish perspective. The study is based on interviews with accountants and company representatives who work actively with sustainability reporting issues. The main finding of the study is that the best way to account for negative externalities is to use full cost accounting. However, it is difficult to use in practice since monetising externalities is difficult. The currently most used frameworks (the GRI guidelines and the GHG Protocol) account for externalities to some extent, but have no connection to financial reporting. An evolving framework within integrated reporting has the potential to increase the connection between the current disclosures in sustainability reports and financial reporting. So far the best solution to account for externalities is to separately account for taxes, fees and cap-and-trade since externalities are internalised in these costs. The effects of accounting for negative externalities will differ depending on the degree of climate impact the company has. It will also depend on how far down the value-chain emissions are accounted for. It will nevertheless be an incentive to reduce climate impact and act as a management tool. / Den fulla kostnaden av klimatförändringar redovisas inte i dagens finansiella redovisning. Dagens hållbarhetsredovisning består mestadels av upplysningar som inte påverkar några finansiella rapporter. Om externaliteter redovisades skulle det hjälpa intressenter att bli medvetna om företags verkliga hållbarhet. Syftet med uppsatsen är att identifiera och beskriva sätt för företag att redovisa sin klimatpåverkan. Både generellt och i de finansiella rapporterna. En kvalitativ metod används i form av en beskrivande fallstudie med svenskt perspektiv. Studien är baserad på intervjuer med redovisningskonsulter och företagsrepresentanter som arbetar aktivt med frågor som rör hållbarhetsredovisning. Den viktigaste slutsatsen av studien är att det bästa sättet att redovisa negativa externaliteter är att använda full cost accounting. Dock är det svårt att använda i praktiken eftersom det är svårt att monetärisera externaliteter. De för närvarande mest använda ramverken (GRIs riktlinjer och GHG Protocol) inkluderar till viss del externaliteter, men har ingen koppling till finansiella rapporter. Ett ramverk inom integrerad rapportering är under utveckling och det kan potentiellt öka kopplingen mellan upplysningarna i hållbarhetsredovisningar och finansiell rapportering. Den hittills bästa lösningen för att redovisa externaliteter är att separat redovisa miljöskatter, avgifter och handel med utsläppsrätter eftersom externaliteter internaliseras i dessa kostnader. Effekterna av att redovisa negativa externaliteter kommer att bero på företagets grad av klimatpåverkan. Det kommer också att bero på hur långt ner i värdekedjan utsläpp redovisas. Det kommer oavsett att bli ett incitament för att minska klimatpåverkan och fungera som ett verktyg för förvaltning och styrning av företaget.

<p>Background: Companies today are under increasing pressure from their stakeholders to become more and more transparent regarding the way they deal with the impact on the environment and the communities where they operate in. This type of information is mainly provided by means of sustainability reports. Several guidelines have been developed to aid report makers on the way. Currently however these sustainability reports still differ widely in the quantity of information provided which makes them difficult to compare and it is therefore important to understand the factors that can influence the amount of information being published.</p><p>Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the factors having an impact on the amount of sustainability information published by Swedish companies using the guidelines developed by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).</p><p>Method: Telephone interviews were conducted with eleven of the twenty-three Swedish companies listed in the GRI register in order to get their point of view regarding these factors.</p><p>Results: The study identified that the willingness to communicate with more than one stakeholder group is the most important factor that can influence the amount of information disclosed in sustainability reports. The authors also argue that a proactive attitude towards identifying legitimation strategies instead of an adaptive approach can also influence the degree of disclosure. Finally, a positive attitude towards the GRI guidelines may also contribute to producing a more detailed report.</p>

The present study examines how legitimacy is created in consultants’ translation of the Integrated Reporting (IR) framework in a Swedish context. The aim was to understand which logics from the sociology of worth (SOW) the consultants’ translation of the IR framework will build on in making it a legitimate practice in a Swedish context. The study employed three aspects presented by Patriotta et al. (2011), where actors provide justifications in order to attain legitimacy, to describe the translation process. Boltanski and Thévenot’s SOW was applied to discern what logics that were present and compromised upon in the translation process to make the IR framework a legitimate practice in a Swedish context.  The present study mainly found the logics of fame, industrial and market, but other logics was also found in the process of making a legitimate translation of the IR framework by the consultants. Thus resulting in a broad compromise of logics, generating potentially vague and ambiguous statements of sustainability. If integrated reporting is the future for corporate reporting, then these dominating logics in the translation of the IR framework might set the tone for the sustainability reporting that will be spread by consultants in a Swedish context.

Sedan Brundtlandsrapporten presenterades 1987 har begreppet hållbar utveckling tagit stora steg. Det ökade intresset ledde i början av 1990-talet till miljöredovisningen och i mitten av 1990-talet till social redovisning. Under tidigt 2000-tal fokuserades det istället på Triple Bottom Line för att även inkludera den ekonomiska aspekten. Ansvarsfrågan har sedan dess växt och förväntningarna på att företagen skall ta ansvar för en hållbar utveckling har ökat. Trycket har ökat på företag att hållbarhetsredovisa. Sveriges regering beslutade 2007 att samtliga statliga bolag skall hållbarhetsredovisa enligt GRI. Även ett EU-direktiv är på väg. Detta tvingar privatägda börsnoterade bolag med fler än 500 anställda att hållbarhetsredovisa för räkenskapsåret som inleds efter den 31 december 2016. Fram till dess och än idag är dock hållbarhetsredovisningen en frivillig handling för privatägda bolag.Det finns inget krav på privata bolag att hållbarhetsredovisa och inget tvingande ramverk. Studiens syfte är därför att undersöka varför privatägda bolag hållbarhetsredovisar och hur GRI upplevs som hjälpmedel ur företagsperspektiv. Studien blickar även mot hållbarhetsredovisningens framtid.För att nå studiens syfte använder vi oss av en kvalitativ metod för att skapa oss en djupare förståelse för området. Uppsatsens syfte kommer uppfyllas genom intervjuer med representanter från fem svenska privatägda bolag och med hjälp av de utvalda företagens hållbarhetsredovisningar. Studiens teoretiska referensram består av intressent-, legitimitets- och signalteorin.Slutsatsen vi finner är att företagen redovisar för att på ett transparent sätt visa hur de arbetar och tar ansvar för en hållbar utveckling. Studien visar att företagen redovisar för sina intressenter och att en efterfrågan finns på dessa frågor, vilket gör att intressentteorin inte kan uteslutas. Samtidigt anser vi att det ur företagssynpunkt är ett sätt att visa att de arbetar i linje med samhällets normer och värderingar, vilket kopplas till legitimitetsteorin. Vidare finner vi att det kan minska informationsasymmetrin mellan företag och intressent. Studien visar att vi inte kan bortse från någon av de utpekade teorierna. Däremot visar studien att intressent- och legitimitetsteorin på ett mer omfattande sätt än signalteorin kan förklara varför företagen hållbarhetsredovisar. / Since the Brundtland Commission was presented in 1987, the concept of sustainable development has taken large steps. The increased interest resulted in the early 1990s to the environmental reporting and in the mid-1990s to the social reporting. During the early 2000s the focus switched to the Triple Bottom Line to include the economic aspect as well. The issue of responsibility has grown and the expectations that companies should take responsibility for sustainable development have increased. Pressure has increased on companies to report sustainability. The Swedish government decided in 2007 that all state-owned companies have to use sustainability reporting according to GRI. An EU-directive is on the way. This also includes the privately owned listed companies with more than 500 employees to report sustainability for the fiscal year that begins after December 31, 2016. Until then, and even today, the sustainability report is a voluntary act of privately owned companies.There is no requirement for private companies to report sustainability and no mandatory framework. This study aims to investigate why privately owned companies establish sustainability reporting and how GRI is perceived as guidance from the business perspective. The study also looks towards the future of sustainability reporting.To reach the study’s purpose, we use a qualitative approach to create a deeper understanding of the area. The essays purpose will be fulfilled by interviews with five Swedish private companies and with the help of the selected companies’ sustainability reports. The study’s theoretical framework consists of stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory and signal theory.The conclusion that we find is that companies’ report these issues is to transparently show how they work and take responsibility for a sustainable development. The study shows that the companies reports to their stakeholders and there is a demand to report these questions, which tells us that we can’t ignore the stakeholder theory. At the same time through the companies perspective it’s a way to show that they act in line with the society’s norms and values, which connects to the legitimacy theory. Furthermore we find that it can reduce the information asymmetry between company and stakeholder. The results shows that we can´t exclude any of the examined theories to explain why companies report sustainability. However the study shows that the stakeholder-, and legitimacy theory, in a more extensive way than the signaling theory. can explain why companies report sustainability.Note that the study is written in Swedish