Thesis 'Analysis of non-current tangible assets in selected entities ' deals with the non-current tangible assets from the point of view of the Czech legislation and IFRS. The theoretical part of the thesis characterises non-current tangible assets in terms of IFRS, which together with examples concern with the issues of definition and evaluation. The Czech legislation is compared with IFRS and the main differences are marked out that prevent a unified view of non-current tangible assets adjusted according to IFRS and the Czech accounting standards. The practical aspect is reflected in an empirical research that analyses non-current tangible assets in entities operating in the area of power and food industries.

No description available.

The goal of this study is to analyze the current methods of expression the Value of Long-term Assets. The captures are in such order that after the explanation of basic terms there is application of the Measurment methods to different types of Assets, like tangible or intangible assets.

This diploma thesis deals with the reporting of non-current tangible assets in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and according to Czech accounting regulations. In the part devoted to IFRS is a detailed description of the approach the reporting of non-current tangible assets according to the standards: IAS 16, IAS 41, IFRS 5 and IAS 36. In the section devoted to Czech accounting regulations is the most valuable part comparison of the reporting in accordance Czech regulation and the reporting of non-current tangible assets in IFRS. The last part of this diploma thesis is the practical part, which deals with the analysis of selected company financial statements.

This diploma thesis deals with possibilities of implementation of chosen International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) into Czech Accounting Legislation. It also describes key characteristics of public sector and general concepts contained in Conceptual Framework. Selected IPSAS are analyzed and compared with national standards in order to outline possibilities of implementation of international approaches to Czech Accounting Legislation. The main part of the thesis is focused on the folowing specific areas: tangible and intangible assets, impairment and non-exchange transactions.

The diploma thesis focuses on comparison of demands for making financial statements complying with Czech Accounting Legislation and International Financial Reporting Standards. Furthermore you will also find definitions for types of business performance indicators and how the values for financial statement transformation change.

A rational long-horizon stock investment decision is a complex process due to uncertainty in supply and demand, competitive advantage, macroeconomic parameters and various perspectives of investors. Today, the '€˜non-tangible assets'€™ (NTA) that include goodwill and intangible assets are a significant part of corporate assets, but their role in stock performance has not well studied. The purpose of this research is to empirically analyze the implications of NTA and of gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States on the stock price. According to the efficient market hypothesis, stock price reflects all relevant information. The research question focused on the extent to which NTA and the GDP reflected in the stock price. To determine the extent to which NTA and GDP reflected on the stock price, regression analysis and other statistical tests were used. The sample for the empirical study was 56 corporations listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (NASDAQ). The required data from October 2007 to September 2018 were collected from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the United States Bureau of Economics (BEA). The key findings of the study are: the NTA and stock price of 45 corporations have a statistically significant correlation as opposed to 11 corporations. The combined NTA of these 11 corporations for the third quarter of 2018 was $531.64 billion. Furthermore, the GDP and stock price of 53 corporations have a statistically significant correlation, but no evidence for three corporations was found. The significance for positive social change is knowledge from this research about the implications of NTA and GDP on stock performance that the investors, policymakers, and other stakeholders could use for preserving the limited resources and creating wealth.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T16:44:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Giuliano Piccioni Silvestre de Meroe.pdf: 1113833 bytes, checksum: fda9676050288b38540f317a7c4ae708 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-05-18 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Changes in economic scenarios, occasioned by the advent of information technology, and driven by the increasing pace of technological innovation, the socalled knowledge economy, puts knowledge as a decisive factor for the success of organizations in the principles of the XXI century. The new economy increasingly values the so-called intangibles - information, ideas, knowledge and intellectual production - which gives rise to organizations rethink their business models, adapting them to the demands of the new economic dynamics. The transition that we experience, challenges the assumptions of the industrial era, in which the measurement of success of organizations was based on the value of their property. Tangible goods are no longer the only reference value for organizations in the new context in focus. Organizations currently negotiating their intangible assets and leverage competitiveness through various components of intangible assets - intellectual property licensing, ownership of ideas and knowledge from outside organizations, externalization of their own ideas and internal knowledge. This picture of changes in contemporary society provides an environment for greater participation of stakeholders in the innovation process of organizations, and reflects an evolution in their business models to an open system, with more porous borders of organizations to the environment. The growing appreciation of the intangible capital - intangible assets, knowledge, ideas, intellectual property, etc. - and the use of IT tools are in two important vectors of the knowledge economy. The purpose of this study is to see whether companies that adopt a model within a collaborative logic, you get competitive advantage by becoming permeable to knowledge outside of their domain. Given this purpose, we will examine the concepts of innovation, will also be evaluated as the practice of a collaborative management model, proposed by Professor Henry Chesbrough, the scientist who coined the term open innovation. The implementation of this model, however, is linked to the organization's ability to strengthen its connections with other agents. For this reason, the study of social capital will be appropriate for this work because we see their relationship with this new management model. From this approach will be possible to understand that building a network of relationships between agents increases the fluidity in the exchange of knowledge, information and ideas among the participating actors. The interdependent relationship of support elements examined - the emergence of a new economy, intangible assets as the main component of value, capital, innovation, intellectual property - leads us to the conclusion that innovation is open on a model, potentially able to leverage competitive advantage for companies that fit into their busines models / As mudanças nos cenários econômicos, ensejadas com o advento das tecnologias de informação, e impulsionadas pela aceleração do ritmo da inovação tecnológica, na chamada economia do conhecimento, colocam o conhecimento como um elemento determinante para o sucesso das organizações, também nos princípios do século XXI. A nova economia valoriza cada vez mais os chamados bens intangíveis (informação, ideas, conhecimento e produção intelectual) o que dá vazão às organizações repensarem seus modelos de negócio, adaptando-os conforme as exigências da nova dinâmica econômica. A transição que experimentamos desafia os pressupostos da era industrial, na qual a mensuração de sucesso das organizações era fundamentada no valor de seus bens materiais. Os bens tangíveis não são mais a única referência de valor para as organizações no novo contexto. As organizações, atualmente, negociam os seus bens intangíveis e alavancam competitividade por de diversos componentes desses bens imateriais (licenciamento da propriedade intelectual, apropriação de ideas e conhecimentos externos às organizações; externalização das próprias ideas e conhecimentos internos). Esse quadro de transformações da sociedade contemporânea propicia um ambiente adequado para maior participação dos atores no processo inovativo das organizações, bem como reflete uma evolução em seus modelos de gestão, para um sistema aberto, com as fronteiras das organizações mais porosas ao meio ambiente e ao contexto. A valorização crescente do capital imaterial e o uso das ferramentas da Tecnologia de Informação constituem-se em dois vetores importantes da economia do conhecimento. A finalidade deste trabalho é verificar se as empresas que adotam um modelo inserido em uma lógica colaborativa obtêm vantagem competitiva ao tornarem-se permeáveis aos conhecimentos além de seus próprios e domínios. Para atender a esse fim, examinamos o conceito de Inovação, como a prática de um modelo de gestão colaborativo, proposto pelo Professor Henry Chesbrough: de inovação aberta. A implantação desse modelo, no entanto, está vinculada à capacidade da organização de consolidar suas conexões com os demais agentes. Por essa razão, o estudo do capital social será apropriado a este trabalho, pois verificamos sua relação com esse novo modelo de gestão. A partir dessa abordagem será possível compreender que a construção de uma rede de relacionamentos entre os agentes eleva a fluidez na troca de conhecimento, informação e ideas. O relacionamento interdependente dos elementos de apoio examinados (emergência de uma nova economia; os bens intangíveis como principal componente de valor; capital social; inovação, propriedade intelectual) leva-nos à concluir que a inovação aberta constitui-se em um modelo potencialmente capaz de alavancar vantagem competitiva para as empresas que o adaptarem a seus modelos de negócios

Värderingsproblematik för materiella anläggningstillgångar har identifierats av författare och företag vilka har belyst avsaknaden av bättre värderingsmöjligheter då vi idag främst använder oss av värdering till anskaffningsvärde som. Problematiken grundar sig i att redovisningen inte helt avspeglar värdet för företags materiella anläggningstillgångar vilket gör att jämförbarheten och trovärdigheten kan ifrågasättas. Syftet med studien är att undersöka olika tillämpningar av värderingsmodeller som finns samt belysa varför företag väljer en viss värderingsmodell. Metodiskt kommer den genomföras som en fallstudie. Detta då uppsatsen bygger på ett kvalitativt tillvägagångssätt för styrkandet av studiens verklighetsförankring. Studien innefattar ett huvudobjekt som fungerar som vetenskapligt fält, Mölndals industriprodukter AB där mer djupgående granskning skett samt kontinuerlig kontakt etablerats. Erhållna resultat som fältarbetet genererat kommer jämföras mot tre ytligt granskade företag vilka kommer fungera som reflektion av övriga marknaden för analys och vidare resonemang. Efter att teoretiska studier genomförts har det empiriska materialet analyserats.Erhållna resultat har påvisat att problematiken med att värdera ett företags materiella anläggningstillgångar delvis bygger på otillräckliga standarder och principer. Vilket gör att det krävs vidare utveckling av värderingsverktygen för att hantera vår alltmer komplexa verklighet. Detta då vi i vår värdering i vissa lägen blir alltför ålderdomliga medan de nya metoderna i vissa lägen visat sig alltför osäkra och opålitliga. / Program: Civilekonomprogrammet

This research project endeavors to frame a methodology that can be used to categorize firm value strategies (production logics) and choices of factor inputs (tangible and intangible assets), which are used to fuel production cycles for goods and services outputs. A secondary goal of the research is to attempt to determine what asset group combinations (resources) are combined by various classes of firms to produce sustainable outcomes for the A/E/C firms in the survey. The National Bureau of Economic Research recently issued a system of national accounts (acknowledging both tangible and intangible assets) that reflects the macro-economy but at the same juncture, lamented the fact that a firm-level micro-economic schema did not exist to mirror the national system. This study makes an effort to redress that void by investigating how such a system of accounts - measured on the input side of the ledger -- could begin to fill in a gap in information and understanding as pointed out by participants in the National Academy of Sciences symposium of 2009 entitled "Intangible Assets: Measuring and Enhancing Their Contribution to Corporate Value and Growth." In brief, the research represents an effort to make a contribution to a growing body of knowledge about intangible assets by solidifying a framework within which both tangible and intangible assets may be more appropriately conceptualized and more adequately measured for purposes of current and future investigations. The research also provides a methodology for beginning to understand how some design and construction industry firms rely on specific asset categories for operating success, corporate stock value and business continuity. It is conceivable that managers would use a variation of the methodology to better balance ongoing investments in their firm's portfolio of tangible and intangible resources. The mixed methods used in this research support the following conclusions: 1) In terms of rank order of asset deployment categories by firms, intangible assets appear to have a modest edge over tangible assets for deployment by value shop firms (architecctural and engineering design firms), but these emphases are not consistent among value chain-oriented (construction) firms. 2) Although pronounced differences were expected, there was little evidence of differences in rank order of asset category accumulation and deployment by firms (according to the Delphi panel) regardless of whether the firm was focused on continuity and longevity or (alternatively) short-term profit maximization. 3) Because of their ambidexterity in production logic, the expert panel had difficulty placing EPC (Engineer - Procure - Construct), design-build and integrated services firms in a single Stabell - Fjeldstad value logic category, and a new composite category was posited based on Delphi panel feedback.