My dissertation investigates the reception of Cicero in the early Roman Empire, focusing on the first 250 years after his death. I show that this reception is primarily constructed by the ancient rhetorical schoolroom, where young Romans first encountered Cicero, reading his speeches and writing Ciceronian declamations. Here they were exposed to a particular version of the man, with emphases often selected for political purposes. When they grew up, that schoolroom image of Cicero continued to permeate their thought and writing. My study unpacks this complex process and lays bare the early Empire's relationship with one of its most significant late Republican predecessors. / The Classics

Zugl.: Diss. Univ. Frankfurt am Main, 2006.

Programm--Königliches Katholisches Gymnasium zu Leobschütz, 1884. / Part I of a work that was originally issued as an inaugural dissertation, Breslau, 1863. "1884. Progr. Nr. 175." Includes bibliographical references.

La conception de l'écriture de l'histoire par les auteurs romains, leur méthodologie historique sont très différentes des nôtres. On a ainsi souvent déploré que le primat littéraire de leur démarche les ait amenés à effacer autant que possible de leurs textes les informations sur leurs recherches préparatoires.Or ces informations existent, bien que ce ne soit pas sous la forme qu'elles adoptent de nos jours : interventions à la première personne, formules introductrices, mais aussi fortes ressemblances dans le traitement de certaines figures, de certains épisodes. Ces traits permettent de saisir les cadres informatifs et narratifs à respecter et, dès lors, de mieux apprécier les choix personnels.Cette thèse étudie ces éléments pour les deux historiens romains du début du IIème siècle ayant écrit sur les premiers empereurs, Tacite et Suétone. Elle étudie ainsi successivement : leur présence visible dans leurs textes (chap. 1) ; les mentions explicites de sources, qu'elles soient nominales ou anonymisées (chap. 2) ; l'influence du genre choisi pour traiter de cette période historique (chap. 3) ; les éléments topiques dans le récit de certaines scènes (chap. 4) ; l'élaboration progressive de certains épisodes (chap. 5) ; le portrait général de chaque empereur (chap. 6) ; la façon dont Tacite et Suétone concevaient l'écriture de l'histoire et leur rapport au passé (chap. 7) ; la conception romaine de cette écriture (chap. 8).Cette recherche met ainsi en évidence les particularités de l'historiographie romaine du IIème siècle, tant par rapport à l'historiographie grecque qu'à celle d'aujourd'hui. Elle fait également apparaître le rapport propre des Romains à leur passé, à la fois souple dans l'établissement des faits historiques et tourné vers le futur. / How Roman authors conceived the writing of history, their historical methodology are very different from ours. For instance, it has been quite often found regrettable that, as their main goal was literary, they cancelled as much as possible any trace of their preparatory researches.But these informations exist, even though not presented as they would be today : there are direct interventions in the first person singular and plural ; introductive formulas ; similarities between the presentation of certain people or how some episodes are narrated. These elements reveal the informative and narrative frames which were to be respected and, as a consequence, the personal choices that were made by the authors.This PhD dissertation aims at studying these pecularities for the two Roman historians of the IInd century CE who wrote on the first emperors, Tacitus and Suetonius. It thus successively studies : their visible presence in their texts (chap. 1) ; the explicit mentions of sources, whether they be nominal or anonymous (chap. 2) ; the influence of the genre chosen to narrate that historical periode (chap. 3) ; the topic elements in the narration of certain scenes (chap. 4) ; the progressive elaboration of certain episodes (chap. 5) ; the general portrait of each emperor (chap. 6) ; how Tacitus and Suetonius conceived the writing of history and their relation to the past (chap. 7) ; how the Roman in general conceived that activity (chap. 8).This research thus demonstrates the pecularities of Roman historiography in the IInd century CE, in front of Greek and modern pratices. It also shows the personal relation Roman society had with its past, at the same time quite flexible about the narration of historical facts and subordinating it to the future.

[pt] O olhar de um escritor latino sobre um dos inúmeros povos que habitavam o território do Império Romano. Palavras que viajam através do tempo e que contribuem para construir representações sobre os povos que ficaram conhecidos como Celtas. A construção de uma narrativa que diz o Outro, mas que ao mesmo tempo fala sobre Si-mesmo, apresentando um jogo de fronteiras identitárias. Nesta dissertação propomos uma análise minuciosa dos textos de Tácito, onde o autor narra e apresenta seu parecer sobre os Brigantes. Povo que tem a sua história relacionada diretamente com a dos Romanos, na medida que integrava a Província romana da Britânia. O objetivo central deste trabalho é compreender os usos que Tácito faz do passado ao escrever sobre os Brigantes. / [en] A Latin writer s view on one of the countless people who inhabited the Roman Empire territory. Words that travel through time and contribute to the construction of representations of the people that became known as Celts. The construction of a narrative that speaks about Another, but at the same time talks about One Self, presenting a game of identity borders. In this dissertation we bring the proposition of a detailed analysis of Tacitus s texts, where the author narrates and presents his opinion about the Brigantes. This People who has it s history directly related to the Romans, as it integrated the Roman Province of Britannia. The main goal of this research is to seek to understand the ways that Tacitus uses the past when he writes about the Brigantes.

Submitted by Kenia Bernini (kenia.bernini@ufpel.edu.br) on 2018-10-22T21:54:01Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Milena_Rosa_Araújo_Ogawa_Dissertação.pdf: 2244885 bytes, checksum: cd3bbd46fad2fc99f2db0148d4a3dd07 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Aline Batista (alinehb.ufpel@gmail.com) on 2018-11-06T18:49:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Milena_Rosa_Araújo_Ogawa_Dissertação.pdf: 2244885 bytes, checksum: cd3bbd46fad2fc99f2db0148d4a3dd07 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Aline Batista (alinehb.ufpel@gmail.com) on 2018-11-06T18:50:05Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Milena_Rosa_Araújo_Ogawa_Dissertação.pdf: 2244885 bytes, checksum: cd3bbd46fad2fc99f2db0148d4a3dd07 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-11-06T18:50:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Milena_Rosa_Araújo_Ogawa_Dissertação.pdf: 2244885 bytes, checksum: cd3bbd46fad2fc99f2db0148d4a3dd07 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-06-21 / Sem bolsa / Nesta dissertação, investigamos a ação política através do emprego da oratória, seu ensino, transformação e sua influência durante o primeiro século de nossa era, no Principado romano no governo de Tito Flávio Domiciano (81-96 d.C.). Utilizamos como principal fonte de investigação O Diálogo dos Oradores, do historiador e senador romano Públio (Caio) Cornélio Tácito (55-117? d.C.). Nosso estudo procurou analisar a trajetória política de Tácito e abordar algumas das principais temáticas de suas cinco obras (Agrícola, Germânia, O Diálogo dos Oradores, História e Anais); discutir os aspectos pessoais e políticos da vida do autor por meio dos conceitos de memória e identidade; apresentar a biografia e compreender as reformas moralizantes do último governante Flaviano; e refletir sobre a oratória romana, o estudo desta e a atuação política em Domiciano. / In this dissertation, we investigate the political action through the use of oratory, its teaching, transformation and its influence during the first century of our era, in the Roman Principality under the government of Tito Flavio Domitian (81-96 A.D). In order to do so, The Dialogue of the Orators of the historian and Roman senator Publio (Caio) Cornélio Tacitus (55-117? A.D.) was used as a main source of investigation. The study sought to analyze the political trajectory of Tacitus and to address the main themes of his five works (Agricola, Germany, A Dialogue on Oratory, The History and The Annals); to discuss the personal and political aspects of the author's life through the concepts of memory and identity; to introduce the biography and to understand the moralizing reforms done by the last Flavian ruler; and to reflect on Roman oratory, its study and the political activity in Domitian.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-07-29T16:17:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Rafael Costa Campos.pdf: 341568 bytes, checksum: d10469953df0b872b1e82b5d3aeaf26c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-04-04 / This dissertation has as objective to establish an analysis about the essential positive aspects of the political administration of the Emperor Tiberius Caesar Augustus during his government (14 37 A.D), throughout the historical narrative of Publius Cornelius Tacitus (55 117? A.D) in his Annals. We show a discussion distributed in three chapters: the first chapter intends to be a presentation of biographical data of the author, of the principal characteristics which composes the formulation of his historical writing, its fundamental interests and the observation of the elements that show up in first instance the characterization that him makes of Tiberius Caesar Augustus. On the second chapter there is an analysis of the essential negative aspects about the Emperor showed up by Tacitus in his book, held up in a historiographical revision of the most important considerations composed by researchers of this subject. On the third chapter we intend to establish a counterpoint which shows positive aspects of the imperial administration of Tiberius Caesar Augustus, emphasizing the lavishness to private individuals and to the extent of City of Rome s population and provinces, just like the undertaking of public buildings, temples and others measures of administrative matter. / Esta dissertação tem como objetivo estabelecer uma análise sobre os principais aspectos positivos da administração política do Imperador Tibério César Augusto durante o seu governo (14 37 d.C.), por meio da narrativa do historiador latino Públio Cornélio Tácito (55 117? d.C.) em seus Anais. Apresentamos uma discussão distribuída em três capítulos: o primeiro capítulo trata-se de uma apresentação de dados biográficos do autor, das principais características que compõem a formulação de sua escrita histórica, os seus principais interesses e a observação dos elementos que evidenciam em primeira instância a caracterização que este faz de Tibério César Augusto. No segundo capítulo encontram-se uma análise dos principais aspectos negativos sobre o Imperador ressaltados por Tácito em sua obra, apoiados em uma revisão historiográfica das mais relevantes considerações empreendidas por pesquisadores sobre o assunto. No terceiro capítulo buscamos estabelecer um contraponto em que se mostra presente aspectos positivos na administração imperial de Tibério César Augusto, considerando-se a concessão de benefícios a particulares e ao restante da população da Cidade de Roma e das províncias, bem como o empreendimento de obras públicas, templos e outras medidas de cunho administrativo.

Analisa-se na primeira parte desta tese a estrutura de composição do Historiarum Liber, obra de maturidade em que Tácito se propõe a relatar a história romana a partir do conturbado ano 69 d.C., o chamado ano dos quatro imperadores. Por meio de requintes na composição narrativa, em que se utiliza de toda uma gama de artifícios retóricos, o autor traça um vasto painel daquilo que considerou execrável nos romanos, bem como daquilo que procurou exaltar como boa forma de governo. Detém-se nos aspectos históricos do ano 69 e apoia-se nos aspectos literários para narrar a época pós-Nero, momento em que o poder se divide entre o senado e o exército. Dessa maneira, do que chegou a nós, o Historiarum liber propõe reflexão acerca das formas de governar, já apontando uma decadência daquilo que Tácito julgava como a força do Império. Na segunda parte, apresenta-se o texto estabelecido por Henri Goelzer para a editora Les Belles Lettres, com nossa tradução a latere, acrescida de notas de cunho gramatical, histórico e literário. / We analyze in the first part of this thesis the structure of composition of the Historiarum Liber, a work of maturity in which Tacitus intends to report the Roman history considering the agitated year of 69 d. C., the so called year of four emperors. Through strategies of refinement in the narrative composition, in which he uses a variety of rhetorical sources, the author pictures an ample frame of those things he considered abominable in Romans, as well as of those things which he tried to exalt as a good form of government. We dwell on the historical aspects of the year 69 and consider the literary aspects so as to narrate the post-Nero age, a moment in which the power is divided between the senate and the army. This way, taking into account what survived in history, the Historiarum liber proposes a meditation on the strategies of government, while pointing to the decadence of that which Tacitus judged as the strength of the empire. In the second part, we present the text established by Henri Goelzer for the French editor Les Belles Lettres, with our translation a latere, added by notes of grammatical, historical and literary nature.

Arbetets syfte är att genomsöka Tacitus första bok ur verket Annales efter versmått och vidare undersöka om genomsökningens resultat förmår att säga någonting om deras roll i Tacitus stil. / Tacitus´Annales I has been scanned for poetic verses. Attempts have been made to identify their role in Tacitus´stylistic efforts.

Note: