華山創意文化園區的產業化發展受到一個由國家、藝術社群與企業三方構成的社會結構影響，藝術社群、國家與企業三者在不同階段扮演了關鍵的角色。此轉型過程經歷文化創意產業化的價值張力現象和政策磨合，揭示了上述行為者對於空間規劃與產業發展的不同主張，一方面造成其不同的信任與競合關係；另一方面也造成空間功能的轉向－此地區由一個位於前端的藝術創作聚落轉變成為靠近後端的大眾文化消費園地。 本文認為文化創意產業化的過程將引發行為者不同的價值取向，其原因為：一、精緻藝術與通俗文化的特性不同；二、創作前端與市場後端的需求與運作邏輯不同。而為了尋求文化與產業的永續發展，政府必須回應這種特殊的產業特性，扮演彈性的平台角色，一方面能夠觸動行為者的相互交流、理解與信任關係，使其自由溝通並跨界合作，誘發各種創新的可能；另一方面需要釐清空間的角色與功能，讓有效的補助與保護機制連結網絡關係及群聚效應。如此一來，這樣的制度環境能夠鼓勵創新，不因產值思維而壓抑創意，而創作前端與市場後端能夠充分活化與溝通，進一步完整價值鏈機能。 / The industrialized development of Huashan Creative Park was influenced by the social structure, composed of the state, the community of artists and the enterprise. These three factors played crucial roles within different phases. The Industrialization of culture and creativity resulted in tensions between discrepant values as well as policy modification within the transition, which displayed diverse positions toward spatial planning and industrial development from different factors. The tensional phenomenon not only altered the relationships of trust and contention among factors but also brought about functional change of the space－this cluster of art creation near the front end of value chain turned into a pop culture consuming park near the back end. This paper argues that industrialization of culture and creativity will lead to dissimilar value orientations of factors because of two reasons：the first, distinct features of fine art and pop culture；the second, different needs and logic of creating front end and consuming back end of the value chain. In order to build up sustainable development of culture and industry, the government is suggested to deal with this kind of special industrial feature and take a role as a flexible platform. On the one hand, this platform should induce interaction, understanding, and trust between factors as well as generate free communication, synergies among multi-fields, and all possibilities of innovation, on the other hand, it can clarify the significances and functions of spaces as well as connect network and cluster effect to complete the function of value chain by an appropriate protective system and subsidies. As a result, this institutional environment can encourage innovation and interaction between creation and market instead of oppressing creativity due to output value requests.