• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

課稅處分職權撤銷之研究

簡仕宸 Unknown Date (has links)
民國47年7月10日,商樵先生於《稅務》雜誌上發表〈論課稅命令之確定力〉一文,一開頭即提出一項懸宕百年來之問題:「稽徵機關之課稅命令有無確定力?如有,原課稅命令是否可予變更?在何種情形下始可變更?」此問題直至民國65年制定稅捐稽徵法時,仍未獲得解決。蓋當時立法者似乎對課稅處分存續力仍無認識。 立法者真正認識課稅處分存續力之存在,應係在行政程序法制定後。蓋該法第117條以下規定係專為排除存續力規定。惟該法第117條以下規定僅適用於終局性行政處分。換言之,亦僅適用於終局性課稅處分,即未經法令或稽徵機關添加具有暫時性特徵附款之課稅處分。所謂具有暫時性特徵之附款,主要係指調查保留與暫時性而言。具有暫時性特徵附款之課稅處分,因實質存續力之發生受到限制,故不須法律授權,即可由稽徵機關依職權撤銷。反之,不具有暫時性特徵附款之課稅處分,因實質存續力已發生,故稽徵機關原則上即不得撤銷,除非另有法律授權撤銷之依據,始能再次突破實質存續力之限制,而依職權撤銷之。 原則上,撤銷終局性課稅處分須符合以下之一般職權撤銷要件,即:㈠核課期間未屆滿。㈡實質存續力。㈢違法性。㈣無一般失權事由。其次,課稅處分之撤銷範圍,受爭點更正影響,須依違法瑕疵之類型及違法瑕疵在規制上之影響範圍而定。另外,無稅處分屬於授益處分,撤銷無稅處分,自須依授益處分撤銷規定為之。惟撤銷屬於負擔處分之狹義課稅處分,並重為更不利納稅義務人之狹義課稅處分,是否亦須依授益處分撤銷規定為之,即有疑義,而需要妥適解決。
2

我國核課處分程序重開之探討 / The remedy of tax administrative:Recommence the tax administrative procedure

翁培祐, Weng,Pei Yu Unknown Date (has links)
租稅行政是一種侵益行政,核課處分更具有大量行政處分之特性,而人民對於租稅法律並不熟稔,因此,核課處分必須有一套完善的行政救濟,以盡保障人民權益之最大可能。   我國在2001年開始實施的行政程序法中,參考了德國聯邦行政程序法第48條、第49條及第51條等規定,植入了行政程序重開的制度。但是在該法實施後,各行政機關對於該項制度應如何運用並無定見,甚有誤引誤用者。本論文就此一課題,嘗試從德國行政程序重開制度由來、理念,分析我國行政程序法相關規定之定位,並以侵益之核課處分為客體,整理我國相關判決及釋令,就核課處分重開程序之現行法制加以檢討,期能繪製出稅捐稽徵所涉行政程序重開之草圖。 / The tax administration disposition is one kind of rendered en masse and burden administration dispositions. People are not familiar to the law of the tax, so nuclear lesson is that it must have one perfect administration remedy system even more than to punish, in order to ensure people rights and benefits most heavily and possibly to ensure.   The legislators enacting the recommence administrative procedure in the administrative procedure law that Taiwan began to implement in 2001 had consulted the article 48, 49, and 51 of the administrative procedure law of Germany. However, many administrative authorities were wrongly guided or persons misapply after this law was implemented. This thesis attempts to realize the origin and idea of the German recommenced administrative procedure, and analyse the recommence tax administrative disposition procedure of Taiwan . This thesis will also examine the current legal system of recommence the tax administrative dispositions by the relevant judgments and orders of Taiwan. Finally it is probable to draw out a better system of the recommence tax administrative disposition.

Page generated in 0.0194 seconds