台灣地區工業區開發已近50年，民國84年中央工業主管機關不再開發工業區，由地方政府與興辦工業人接續為工業區開發主流。就工業區開發資料顯示，有興辦工業人開發大型工業區不易，及開發商不易尋找之情況，前者乃取得完整大面積土地困難，為開發主體問題，後者乃在政府開發工業區未編列預算所致，為開發模式問題，因此本文認為「編定工業區開發模式」課題，有研究之必要。 　　本研究宗旨就工業區開發模式中資金籌措為主題，以工業區開發規劃至開發完成之過程為軸線，經由(一)市場與政府理論，論證工業區開發主體及數量變化。(二)對不同開發主體在開發過程中，所產生交易成本、代理成本、衝突成本異同討論。(三)對開發模式之交易成本等相關文獻、法制面、實務面、分析研究，以及對實際參與工業區開發人士進行深入訪談，發覺工業區開發困境所在。 經研究認為地方政府擁有公權力及行政資源，所開發工業區交易成本最低，為編定工業區開發最佳模式，爰此本研究建議編定工業區開發必須搭配以下措施：(一)政府編列預算。(二)公私統包開發。(三)引進不動產估價師制度。(四)引進銀行融資制度。(五)工業區銷售採預售制度。 　　透過上述工業區開發配套措施，除有益於開發商參與工業區開發，及減少民眾抗爭之衝突成本，使得開發順利外，尚可降低搜尋成本、協商成本，及時間成本等，達成降低編定工業區開發交易成本之目的，提昇工業區開發之效率。 / The development of industrial sites in Taiwan has been carried out continuously for nearly 50 years. In 1995, the central government made a decision that they no longer played an active role in developing industrial sites, and thereafter, the task was taken over by local governments as well as host industrialists. The literature that recorded such development shows that some host industrialists encountered difficulty in developing large-scale industrial sites, and also it was difficult to find developers. The problem of the former was caused by the difficulty in looking for large area of land, which was a problem of development entity, and the problem of the latter was caused by no budget arranged by the government, which was a problem of development mode. Thus, in this text, it is considered that a study on “the Development Mode of Projected Industrial Sites” has become essential. The purpose of this study is to explore the subject of fund raising in the process of industrial site development, from the stage of its planning up to its accomplishment, which goes through (1) the theory of market and government: to discuss and verify entity and quantity variation in industrial site development. (2) the discussion about similarities and dissimilarities in transaction cost, agent cost, and conflict cost emerging in the process of development. (3) the analysis and research of transaction cost of development mode through relative literature, legal aspect, and practical aspect, as well as interviewing personnel who took take part in the actual development of industrial sites in order to find out potential problems. As a result of research, it is deemed that the transaction cost in developing industrial sites is lowest when executed by a local government as it holds civic rights and administrative resources, so that turns out to be the best mode in projected industrial site development. It is therefore proposed in this study that when developing projected industrial sites, following measures should be taken: (1) budget planned by the government (2) execution of consolidated development contract for both public and private projects (3) introduction of real estate appraiser system (4) introduction of bank loan system (5) adoption of advance booking for selling and purchasing premises in industrial sites. By taking above supplementary measures for developing industrial sites, the benefits include encouraging developers’ involvement in developing industrial sites, reducing conflict cost arose by mob protest so as to facilitate development process, and further lowering searching cost, negotiation cost, time cost etc. As a result, the purpose of reducing transaction cost of developing projected industrial sites can be achieved, and the efficiency of such development can be elevated.

本文主要在探討與捷運共構商用不動產市場開發模式之研究，期能參考國外經驗及以市場調查與潛在業者訪談方式，建立商用不動產之市場分析模式，作為開發者投資開發時之產品規劃依據，並評估以開發者之企業文化及潛在業者之經營意願，建議全案之營運或銷售模式，及進行開發效益分析與比較。 經以機場捷運A8車站為例進行研究，獲致結論主要為：捷運共構之商用不動產乃政府衡量車站用地以徵收方式取得困難，遂以鼓勵民間(地主及投資開發者)投資、參與公共建設方式，由政府與民間共享開發效益，達到三贏局面之最佳開發模式，由財務及其他各方面分析效益得知，政府除可免去取得私有土地紛爭或時程延宕外，亦可透過共同開發，挹注重大交通建設經費，民間亦可經由參與公共建設共享獎勵及開發效益，獲取高於土地被徵收時之利益，為一值得效法與推廣之開發模式。 惟開發者應在投資開發前，審慎評估個案之市場定位及投資效益，以作為規劃設計及將來營運模式之參考，避免規劃錯誤造成將來營運或產銷之效益不彰，影響投資報酬，並可作為前期招商之依據，因此建立可靠的商用不動產市場分析方式甚為重要。本文主要重點在於以個案分析進行商用不動產市場開發模式之研究，以作為後續開發相關案例之參考。 / This article is to explore the MRT structure of the commercial real estate’s market model of development. With drawing on foreign experience, the market research and interviews with potential operators, we can establish the commercial real estate market analysis model, as developer’s product planning principles when develop. And according to the corporate culture and potential industry management, it will be recommended to the case of operations or sales model, and to develop effective analysis and comparison. Taking the co-structure building of A8 MRT station to the airport as a case study, to achieve the main conclusions are: To avoid the difficulities of acquiring private land, the government submits to encourage private investment (landlord and investment developers) to participate in public construction, share benefit to both the government and private. The MRT structure of commercial real estate is the best model of development to have a win-win situation. From financial and other aspects of effection, the government could dismiss the disputes of acquiring private land and avoiding the time-delay of engineering development. By co-structure of MRT and the commercial real estate building, the government could inject major transportation infrastructure funding, people can also enable the sharing through participation in public construction and development of effective incentive to get higher than the interest of the land acquired. Thus it is resumed a worthy example to follow and a promotion of the development model. However, developers should evaluate assessment of the case of market position and investment results carefully in investment before development, and be a reference business model for future planning and design, so as not to cause an affected or inefficient investment returns of future operation and marketing sales because of planning errors, and also can be used as a basis for merchants. So how to set up a commercial real estate market analysis methods is important. This article focuses on commercial real estate market to establish a development model, as a reference for follow-up development of related cases.

從1982年之《國際海洋法公約》規定相關國家在爭議之海域劃界達成協議之前，有權利就爭議海域的管理和開發做出臨時性的安排。而共同開發正是作為一種解決海域劃界爭端而被廣泛採用的臨時性辦法，共同開發方案一經提出便得到了國際實踐的認同。 通過國際實踐案例的分析，並從中汲取國際共同開發成功案例中的經驗和啟示，總結出國際共同開發的管理模式及其特點並促進我國參與南海油氣共同開發，強化與周邊國家區域利益協調和合作局勢，積極推動共同開發合作建立，避免南海周邊國家避開我國簽訂雙邊或多邊協議去侵占我國南海油氣資源及海域主權，並就我國南海管轄權範圍內積極進行合作以維護我國在南海的海洋權利。 / 1982’s International Law of the sea has prescribed that the related countries are liable to make every effort to make an interim arrangement upon the management and utilization of maritime space after coming an agreement on maritime delimitation. Joint development that is the interim arrangement with broad adoption on solving the dispute of maritime delimitation, which now has been acknowledged in international practices. Through analyzing the international cases, and the ultimate goal of this paper is that R.O.C will learn the experience and inspiration from the successful international joint development model, effectively accelerate the joint development of oil and gas, strengthen the coordination and cooperation of regional benefit with surrounding countries, and actively promote the joint development and cooperation to establish, to avoid the neighboring countries of the South China Sea to avoid bilateral or multilateral agreements signed to occupy Republic of China's oil and gas resources and sea sovereignty, and within the jurisdiction of China's South China Sea within the active cooperation to safeguard Republic of China's maritime rights in the South China Sea.