Administrative Litigation have two function which include to achieve ¡§right to get protection¡¨ (Ubi jus ibi remedium) and result of protection for administrative litigation have to match the timing otherwise the late of justice is not justice. Whether the work of administrative litigation is achieve above two function is dependent on the type of administrative is complete or not. Firstly, the essay is to introduce the type of legislate of administrative litigation in improved country England America French Germany Japan and Taiwan. It has also introduced Taiwan administrative litigation as one independent charter which base on across of two strait Taiwan and mainland China have got the same culture and contact to each other very often. Secondly, to introduce the history, process and basic theory of administrative litigation system in order to understand the background of administrative litigation system in China. Further more to discuss the type of China¡¦s administrative litigation. Finally list three suggestions as conclusion.

Le droit de la construction et de la rénovation de l'habitat est aujourd'hui une discipline qui donne lieu à un contentieux administratif fourni et lourd d'enjeux techniques comme politiques. Il s'agira de mener une étude comparée des droits français et thaïlandais pour tenter de déterminer si des principes directeurs permettent d'ordonner la discipline. Bien que les spécificités en matière d'urbanisme soient prises en compte par le juge administratif français et thaïlandais, les insuffisances et les inadaptations persistantes des règles du contentieux administratif et l'hésitation du juge à interpréter de manière adaptée cette matière sont constatées. / The law of construction and renovation of housing is a discipline which gives rise to an administrative litigation. It will be a question of leading a study compared under French and Thai law to try to determine if guiding principles allow to order the discipline. Although specificities regarding town planning are taken into account by French and Thai administrative judge, inadequacies and persistent maladjustments of the rule on administrative court procedure and hesitation of the judge to interpret in an adapted way are noticed.

Il est fondamental, dans chaque système juridique, de pouvoir contester une décision prise par l'administration notamment dans un pays où celle-ci est omniprésente dans tous les domaines de la société. Dans la plupart des pays, cette contestation prend la forme d'un recours gracieux ou d'un recours juridictionnel. Jusqu'en 1996 au Vietnam, il existe seulement le recours gracieux devant l'Administration mais ce recours s'est révélé inefficace. Dès lors, l’ordonnance de 1996, suivi de deux amendements ont instauré pour la première fois le recours juridictionnel. Néanmoins, la compétence de la juridiction administrative demeure très restreinte, l’Administration conserve la compétence générale dans le règlement des conflits avec les administrés. Ainsi, le droit d'accès au juge n'est pas assuré car la plupart des requêtes introductives d’instance est rejetée faute de compétence du juge. Une récente loi en 2010 est de nouveau intervenu pour élargir la compétence de la juridiction administrative. Malgré la volonté du législateur, les nouvelles dispositions ne répondent pas encore à l'exigence de plus en plus forte de la société vietnamienne pour examiner des recours contre l’Administration devant un organe indépendant. Il est urgent de trouver un mécanisme qui permet d’assurer le droit d'accès au juge. Cette thèse aborde les problématiques relatives à l'introduction d'instance de premier ressort devant la juridiction administrative vietnamienne ; et à la lumière du droit français, elle apporte des propositions d’amélioration de la législation vietnamienne en la matière. / Contesting an administrative act is a fundamental right in every legal system. In Vietnam, it is possible to make an appeal for reconsideration but this process is not effective. Thus, in 1996, the Vietnamese legislator established, for the first time, a jurisdictional appeal. However, this appeal was very limited thereby rendering ineffective the right of access to administrative justice. The amendments of contentious rules in 1998 and 2006, and more recently the law on administrative procedures in 2010 (taken into effect as of 1st of July 2011) were issued with the aim of expanding the competence of administrative jurisdiction. Indeed, in the absence of the satisfaction of rules regarding competence and admissibility, the petition instituting proceedings can be rejected by the administrative judge. The right of access to justice is additionally prevented par gaps in the law on administrative procedures or the strict interpretations of the judge. Furthermore, the overlapping of rules may influence the rights of citizens. Although there are many administrative disputes, the new dispositions don’t meet the needs of Vietnamese society. This thesis addresses the issues regarding the registration of administrative lawsuits of Vietnam to give a vision to improve the law on administrative procedure in the light of the achievements of the French law.

廣播電視是人民表達思想與言論之重要媒體，具有反映公意，強化民主，啟迪新知，促進文化、道德、經濟等各方面之發展功能，並負有形成公共意見之社會責任。以廣播電視方式表達言論之自由，國家固應予以保障。惟基於權利不得濫用之法理，如有藉傳播媒體妨害善良風俗、破壞社會安寧、危害國家利益或侵害他人權利等情形者，國家亦得依法予以限制。（司法院釋字第364號解釋參照） 對於欲經營衛星廣播電視事業者，衛星廣播電視法係採許可方式以為管制，賦予主管機關得遂行事前審查之機制，以確保進入市場之經營者，能提供真實正確且未被操控之資訊、意見及娛樂，並促進人民對政府及公共事務之關心，進而引起公眾討論，善盡其增進人民知之權利及監督政府施政等公共責任。主管機關於遂行事前管制之相關作為時，應受到法治國原則之制約，依法行政則是最基本之要求，其他諸如平等原則、比例原則、以及行政法上一般原理原則等，亦應確實遵守。在行政決定之程序上，應符合形式及實質之正當性，以維護人民權益。 經營許可之法律管制規範內容，對於人民之基本權利，諸如言論自由、營業自由、財產權等影響甚為重大。本文擬透過學理及實務之見解，探討衛星廣播電視法律管制之規範內容，並以經營許可為本文研究重心。有關衛星廣播電視之行政爭訟，主要原因是行政處分之違法或不當所致。因此，本文擬從衛星廣播電視事業提起訴願及行政訴訟之案件中，挑選幾件較具代表性之個案，以為探討分析。 關鍵詞：衛星廣播電視、經營許可、行政爭訟 / Broadcasts is important media which enable people to state their ideas and commentary, thereby allowing public opinion to be expressed. By providing the platform for people to express themselves these media play crucial roles in terms of reinforcing democracy, advancing knowledge, and promoting cultural, moral and economic development. At the same time, broadcasting, with all their influential power, should take a certain social responsibility. The freedom of speech through these media is protected under the legal system. However, in order to prevent these media from abusing their privilege the state should restrain their freedom according to related laws and regulations if they spread immoral materials, disturb the public, endanger the state, or infringe upon the rights of others.（Reference：No.364. Justices of the Constitutional Court, Judicial Yuan.） The satellite broadcasting industry is regulated by the Satellite Broadcasting Act. The Act ensures that the operators provide truthful information, opinion and entertainment by enacting laws of operation permit, requiring standardized applications from the operators which will be evaluated by specialized regulatory agency. This Act can also enhance citizens’ care for the government and public affair, serving as the informer which triggers public discussion and therefore promote people’s right to know and to supervise the government and its policies. The regulatory agency should follow the law when they conduct the regulation ex ante. In addition to acting upon the principle of administration according to law, the regulatory agency should also follow other codes such as the egalitarianism, proportionality. The procedure should be justice in letter and in spirit so as to protect people’s right. The operation permit is very important in terms of protecting people’s fundamental rights such as the freedom of speech, freedom of business operations, and property right. Focusing on the regulations of operation permit, this research proposes to discuss the contents of the satellite broadcasting law from both theoretical and practical approaches. It is worth noticing that most of the administrative petition and administrative litigations are caused by illegal or inappropriate administrative sanctions. Therefore in this paper I will try to analyze the most representative cases. Keywords: Satellite broadcasting, Operation permit, Administrative petition and administrative litigation.

La procédure suivie devant le juge administratif est traversée par une double évolution qui justifie qu’une étude soit consacrée à l’office des parties. A mesure que le droit du contentieux administratif se transforme en un droit du procès administratif, on observe que ce procès n’est plus pensé comme un procès fait à un acte, mais comme un procès entre parties. Le renversement des perspectives auquel invite le point de vue des parties est possible grâce à un instrument d’analyse finaliste du droit : l’office. Ce concept permet de s’interroger sur l’adéquation entre les facultés dont disposent et les charges que supportent les parties – i.e. l’office stricto sensu – et les finalités que l’ordre juridique leur assigne – i.e. l’office lato sensu. Comprises comme les personnes physiques ou morales qui participent au lien juridique d’instance en raison d’un litige né de prétentions propres et contraires sur un droit, les parties au procès poursuivent deux finalités complémentaires : la détermination intéressée de la matière litigieuse et la participation loyale à l’instance. Dès lors, le point de vue des parties permet de mettre en lumière non seulement les facultés et les charges que la doctrine néglige lorsqu’elle envisage le procès administratif sous l’angle exclusif du juge, mais aussi que leur office stricto sensu peut être perfectionné en vue de mieux répondre aux finalités de leur office lato sensu. En permettant de renoncer à une opposition dogmatique entre les procès civil et administratif, l’étude de l’office des parties encourage à inscrire la recherche et l’enseignement du droit du procès administratif dans une perspective résolument processualiste. / The procedure before administrative courts is characterised by a double evolution, which justifies a study to be devoted to the office of the parties in an administrative hearing. As the law of administrative litigation increasingly transforms itself into the law of administrative hearings, one can observe that this process is no longer considered as a trial made to an act, but as a trial between parties. The perspective switch, to which the point of view of the parties to the trial invites, is made possible thanks to an instrument of finalist analysis of the law : the office. This concept makes it possible to question the adequacy between the powers and the charges of the parties - that is, the office stricto sensu - with the goals assigned to them by the legal order - namely, the office lato sensu. Understood as the physical or legal persons who participate in the legal relationship because of a dispute arising from own and contrary claims to a right, the parties to the lawsuit pursue two complementary goals : the interested determination of the dispute and the fair participation in the instance. This study allows to draw two conclusions. On the one hand, the office stricto sensu can be improved in order to better converge toward the office lato sensu. On the other hand, it shows that an opposition between the civil lawsuit and the administrative lawsuit is no longer possible. This study about the parties office in administrative lawsuit reveals the importance of research and teaching in procedural law.

This dissertation analyses the ability of Chinese lawyers to use administrative litigation to protect individuals and groups from an authoritarian state that frequently infringes on their rights. These plaintiffs fill administrative courts in China, opposing the overzealous tactics of police, challenging the expropriation of their land, and disputing the seizure and demolition of their homes. Empirically, it relies on several unique data sources in a mixed-methodological approach. Qualitative and small-n quantitative data from 126 interviews with a random sample of Chinese lawyers and 52 additional interviews are supplemented by documentary sources. These findings are then tested against official data and a large survey of Chinese lawyers. This research demonstrates that administrative litigation is part of a polycentric authoritarian system that helps the Chinese state to monitor its agents, allows limited political participation, and facilitates economic development (Chapter One). By giving ordinary Chinese a chance to hold their local governments accountable in court, administrative litigation represents a significant step towards rule of law, but its limited scope means that it has not been accompanied by dramatic liberalisation (Chapter Three). In part, this is because the most prolific and successful administrative litigators are politically embedded lawyers, insiders who challenge the state in court but eschew the most radical cases and tactics (Chapter Four). The tactics that allow politically embedded lawyers to successfully litigate administrative cases rely on and contribute to China’s polycentric authoritarianism by drawing in other state, quasi-state, and non-state actors (Chapter Five). Multinationals in China are largely failing to contribute to the development of China’s legal system because they readily accept preferential treatment from the Chinese state as an alternative to litigation (Chapter Six). While administrative litigation bolsters China’s polycentric authoritarianism in the short term, it offers tremendous potential for rationalisation, liberalisation, and even democratisation in the long term.

En une décennie, le Conseil d’État a profondément modifié les termes de la contestation juridictionnelle des contrats des personnes publiques. À une politique de stabilisation formelle de la chose contractée, agissant sur l’accès au juge du contrat, a succédé une politique de stabilisation matérielle. Le recul du principe d’irrecevabilité des conclusions d’annulation dirigées contre le contrat s’est accompagné d’une rigidification du prononcé de l’annulation. La mise en évidence d’une irrégularité propre à justifier la disparition rétroactive du contrat de l’acte a été volontairement compliquée.Chaque étape de l’instance est affectée par le phénomène de stabilisation. À tous les moments de l’examen du contrat, des techniques juridictionnelles sont susceptibles d’écarter le risque d’annulation rétroactive de l’acte. En cela, la stabilisation est transversale.La doctrine a maintes fois souligné ses manifestations au stade de la sanction du contrat. Dorénavant, en présence d’une irrégularité, le juge du contrat dispose de pouvoirs de sanction différenciés et adaptés à la gravité du vice. En conséquence, le contrat vicié n’est plus nécessairement exposé à l’annulation. Les pouvoirs de sanction qui autorisent un maintien partiel ou total du contrat irrégulier sont caractéristiques de la stabilisation palliative. Mais le conditionnement du régime de l’action contentieuse affecte également l’examen juridictionnel stricto sensu. Le droit de critique du contrat s’exerce à présent dans un périmètre plus réduit qu’auparavant. C’est ainsi que d’autres procédés juridictionnels agissent sur la caractérisation de l’irrégularité. Ils ont pour effet de repousser la déclaration d’irrégularité. Dans cette perspective, la stabilisation est préventive.L’ouvrage propose une étude d’ensemble du phénomène stabilisateur. Suivant la chronologie du procès fait au contrat, la stabilisation préventive est appréhendée avant la stabilisation palliative du contrat. / Within a decade, the Conseil d’Etat deeply changed the terms of the judicial complaints towards public persons’ contracts. A policy of substantive stabilization replaced a former policy of formal stabilization of the res contracted – which was influencing the access to the judge of the contract. The decline of the rule of inadmissibility of the claims for anulment towards the contract came together with a tensioning on the anulment sentencing. The claim for an irregularity justifying the contract retroactive disappearence has been intentionally complicated.Each step of the proceedings is impacted by the phenomenon of stabilization. At each moment of the contract examination, judicial techniques are likely to eliminate the risk of retroactive anulment of the contract. This shows that the stabilization is transversal. Legal doctrine showed many times those occurrences at the step of the penalty on the contract. From now on, facing an irregularity, the judge of the contract may use some powers of penalty, quite different and adapted to the seriousness ouf the irregularity. Thus, the irregular contract is not necessarily supposed to be anulled. Powers of penalty that allow a partial or global maintenance of an irregular contract are typical examples of a palliative stabilization. But the conditioning of the legal action system also impacts the strictly speaking judicial examination of the contract. The right to contest the contract may now be exercised in a more reduced scope. In this way, other legal processes act on the charcaterisation of the irregularity. The serve to reject the statement of irregularity. From this perspective, this is a preventive stabilization.This work provides an overview study of the stabilization phenomenon. Regarding the timeline of the contract trial, the preventive stabilization will is first presented, before the palliative one.

Il a été longuement discuté de savoir si le système d'arbitrage est applicable pour régler les litiges administratifs qui concernent certains contrats administratifs ou d’autres sans rapport avec le contrat administratif. Dans cette thèse, les trois questions spécifiques sont analysées tour à tour : (1) Est-il possible pour un arbitre ou un tribunal arbitral de trancher des questions relevant du droit administratif? (2) Y a-t-il, ou devrait-il y avoir, des limitations à l'autorité des arbitres et des tribunaux arbitraux? (3) Enfin, après la délivrance d'une sentence arbitrale, quel rôle devrait jouer l'État dans la phase de contrôle judiciaire? La première question concerne l'arbitrabilité et a été discutée dans la première partie (FIRST PART: ARBITRABILITY). La deuxième question a été discutée dans la deuxième partie (SECOND PART: PARTICULAR QUESTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS IN ARBITRATION PROCEDURE). Enfin, sur la dernière question a fait l’objet d’une troisième partie (THIRD PART: JUDICIAL REVIEW AND EXECUTION OF ARBITRATION AWARD). Dans cette thèse, nous avons comparé les systèmes de quatre pays (Canada, Chine, France, Taïwan). En conclusion, nous pouvons donc conclure que l’évolution de la conception du contrat administratif implique de nombreux aspects, y compris les aspects juridiques, économiques, politiques et même culturels. Le développement de la fonction de contentieux administratif, comme ‘’subjectivement orienté" ou "objectivement orienté" aura une incidence sur l'acceptation de l'arbitrage en matière administrative. Dans l'ensemble, l'arbitrage sera plus acceptable dans les systèmes dont la fonction est plus ‘’subjectivement orientée" que dans ceux dont la fonction est "objectivement orientée". / While arbitration has traditionally been considered as a means to resolve private disputes, its role in disputes involving administrative contracts is a crucial question in administrative law. In brief, the three specific questions are (1) Can arbitrators or arbitral tribunals decide issues involving administrative law? and (2) Is there, or should there be, any limitation on the authority of arbitrators or arbitral tribunals? (3) Moreover, after the issue of an arbitration award, what role should the State play in the judicial review phase? The first question, the issue of arbitrability, is discussed in part 1 (FIRST PART: ARBITRABILITY). The second question will be discussed in part2 (SECOND PART: PARTICULAR QUESTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS IN ARBITRATION PROCEDURE). Finally, on the question of what happens after the arbitration award, we will discuss judicial review in part 3 (THIRD PART: JUDICIAL REVIEW AND EXECUTION OF ARBITRATION AWARD). We compare legal systems between the four countries: in France, in Canada, in China and in Taiwan. We believe that an administrative contract, at least in its function and conception, is gradually becoming different from a private contract. Innovation with respect to administrative contracts will also reflect the concentration and function of the administrative litigation systems in each country. In addition, the “objective” or “subjective” function of administrative litigation will also affect the degree of arbitrability, as well as arbitration procedures. Taken together, arbitration will be more acceptable in systems whose function is more “subjectively oriented” than in those whose function is “objectively oriented". Finally, “the arbitration of administrative matters” traditionally has been an important question in administrative and arbitration law. In the future, we will continue to see it shine in the doctrine and jurisprudence of both the administrative and arbitration law fields.

Submitted by RONALDO MEDEIROS (medeirossre@hotmail.com) on 2015-11-24T18:57:49Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação de Mestrado da FGV - RONALDO RAIMUNDO MEDEIROS - versão final.pdf: 1446785 bytes, checksum: bfe6567afb7c93013fe71c693f23fb66 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Renata de Souza Nascimento (renata.souza@fgv.br) on 2015-11-24T19:01:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação de Mestrado da FGV - RONALDO RAIMUNDO MEDEIROS - versão final.pdf: 1446785 bytes, checksum: bfe6567afb7c93013fe71c693f23fb66 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-11-25T11:14:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação de Mestrado da FGV - RONALDO RAIMUNDO MEDEIROS - versão final.pdf: 1446785 bytes, checksum: bfe6567afb7c93013fe71c693f23fb66 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-08-26 / A partir da constatação da falta de uniformidade das decisões do contencioso administrativo tributário estadual (CATE) sobre um mesmo tema específico do ICMS, a exemplo das saídas por transferência de mercadorias entre estabelecimentos pertencentes ao mesmo titular, cuja normatividade legal vigente se encontra positivada no inciso I do art. 12, da Lei Complementar nº 87/96, este trabalho objetiva estudar, por meio de uma pesquisa qualitativa de jurisprudência realizada junto aos Tribunais Administrativos Estaduais, que disponibilizam suas decisões na rede mundial de computadores (internet), se a existência de jurisprudência sumulada do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) sobre esse tema controvertido do ICMS (Enunciado de Súmula nº 166) contribuiu para dar uma maior segurança jurídica à dimensão crítica da relação jurídica tributária, no sentido de tornar mais previsível e isonômica a lide administrativa de natureza tributária. De acordo com a amostra de jurisprudência administrativa obtida de diferentes Tribunais Administrativos Estaduais, podemos concluir que a existência de jurisprudência sumulada do STJ não está tendo, majoritariamente, eficácia no CATE, pelos argumentos mais diversos classificados e agrupados no presente trabalho, os quais servirão, juntamente com a dogmática jurídica existente sobre o tema, como alicerce à resposta normativa a ser sugerida de como as justiças administrativas estaduais deveriam interpretar a jurisprudência dos Tribunais Superiores (STF e STJ), com vista a tornar o contencioso administrativo tributário mais previsível e isonômico, e, desta forma, contribuir para a efetivação da tão almejada justiça fiscal. / Based on the observation of lack of uniformity of decisions of the state administrative tax litigation (CATE), on the specific subject of the incidence of ICMS, like the outputs for transfer of goods between establishments belonging to the same owner, whose current legal normativity is positively valued in item I of Article 12 of Complementary Law No. 87/1996, this study aims at investigating, by means of case through a qualitative research of jurisprudence held with the State Administrative Courts, which provide their decisions on the world wide web (internet), the existence of precedent jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice – (STJ), about this controversial subject of ICMS (Statement of Precedent No. 166),contributed to give greater legal certainty to the state tax administrative proceedings, in making the most predictable administrative litigation and isonomic in relation to the decisions of those Fiscal Administrative Justice Organs of second instance. According to the sample of administrative jurisprudence obtained from different State Administrative Courts, we can conclude that the existence of this precedent jurisprudence of the STJ is not having, mainly, effectiveness in CATE, by the most diverse arguments grouped and classified in this work, which will serve, along with the existing legal doctrine on the subject as the foundation for the normative answer to be suggested on how the state administrative justices should interpret the jurisprudence of the Superior Courts (STF and STJ), in order to make the tax administrative litigation more predictable and isonomic, and thus contribute to the realization of the so aspired tax justice.

Définies comme des procédures juridictionnelles visant à la prévention, à la cessation ou à la réparation des dommages infligés à des individus en nombre indéterminé, les actions collectives ont profondément modifié la place du juge et celle de l'administration dans la concrétisation des normes générales en droit brésilien et en droit colombien. Contrairement à la doctrine pour laquelle ces actions témoigneraient de l'existence d'une catégorie d'intérêt située entre l'intérêt individuel et l'intérêt général, cette recherche révèle que les actions collectives ne peuvent être comprises qu'en prenant en compte l'évolution du contentieux administratif. Elles s'inscrivent en effet dans un mouvement où les compétences de l'administration sont progressivement dévolues au juge et permettent à ce dernier de prendre une décision à la place de l'administration même en l'absence d'une atteinte portée à un individu déterminé. Elles invitent par-là le chercheur à établir une classification des comportements susceptibles d'être prescrits par le juge. Ces derniers se rapportent en effet toujours à des individus en nombre indéterminé, mais ce rapport peut être direct ou indirect. Quand il s'agit d'un rapport indirect avec des individus en nombre indéterminé, les comportements se rapportent directement à certains objets ou à certains individus parfaitement identifiés. Quand les comportements se rapportent directement à des individus en nombre indéterminé, ceux-ci peuvent être de qualité indéterminée ou déterminée. Et si ces individus sont de qualité déterminée, ils peuvent être en nombre illimité ou en nombre limité. / Defined as judicial proceedings aiming to prevent, to stop or to compensate damages to an indefinite number of human beings, collective actions have deeply changed the role of the judge and the one of public administration in enforcing general norms in Brazilian and Colombian Law. Instead of analysing these actions using the concept of collective interest considered by many as an interest located between individual and public interests, this research shows that collective actions can only be understood in the context of judicial review of administrative decisions. Indeed, these procedures represent a step further in the process of giving judges powers traditionally conferred on administrative authorities and allow judges to take a decision in place of these authorities even when there’s no violation of an individual right. Collective actions invite to question the classification of behaviours that might be prescribed by the judge. These behaviours always refer to an indefinite number of human beings, but this relation of one person's behaviour to other persans can be direct or indirect. When it is indirect, the behaviour refers directly to some abjects or to identified individuals. When behaviour refers directly to an indefinite number of human beings, these ones might be identifiable or undetermined individuals. When they are identifiable, they might be in limited or unlimited number.