Global ETD Search

1	Akademiskt entreprenörskap : Utbildningens betydelse för entreprenörskapet / Academic entrepreneurship – : The value of education within entrepreneurship Johanson, Eric, Ovén, Morgan January 2008 (has links) No description available. Academic entrepreneurship Akademiskt entreprenörskap
2	Akademiskt entreprenörskap : Utbildningens betydelse för entreprenörskapet / Academic entrepreneurship – : The value of education within entrepreneurship Johanson, Eric, Ovén, Morgan January 2008 (has links) No description available. Academic entrepreneurship Akademiskt entreprenörskap
3	ORD, TID & PENGAR : En kvalitativ studie av hinder och motsättningar i arbetsprocessen med forskningskommersialisering i högskolenära inkubatorer. Kvarnström, Daniel, Mannervik, Amanda January 2013 (has links) Uppsatsens syfte är att undersöka vilka hinder och motsättningar som rådgivare och forskare upplever i forskningskommersialiseringsprocessen inom högskolenära inkubatorer. Studien bör ses som en förstudie för att i ett senare skede kunna skapa en effektiv innovationsprocessmodell för högskolenära inkubatorer. Uppsatsens frågeställningar har undersökts ur ett innovationstekniskt perspektiv med hjälp av teorier om bland annat inkubatorer, innovationsprocesser och akademiskt entreprenörskap. Resultatet visar att det finns ett antal kulturkrockar som medför risk för att rådgivare och forskare talar förbi varandra. Andra hinder och motsättningar i forskningskommersialiseringsprocessen är skillnader i språkbruk, forskarens multipla roller, uppfattningar om arbetstempo samt att matchningen mellan entreprenör och forskare är svårorganiserad och tidskrävande. / This essay seeks to examine which obstacles and oppositions business coaches and researchersexperience in the research commercialization process in university business incubators. This studyshould be seen as a pre-study with the intention of contributing to later on building a newinnovation process model for university business incubators. Essay questions have been examinedfrom the perspective of innovation technology and are linked to theories about incubators,innovation processes and academic entrepreneurship. The result is that there is a number of culturalclashes that brings along a risk for misunderstandings between business coaches and researchers.Other obstacles and oppositions in the research commercialization process is differences inlinguistic use, the multiple roles of the researcher, interpretation of working pace and also that thematching between researcher and entrepreneur is time-consuming and hard to organize. Research commercialization Academic entrepreneurship Scientific norms and values Business incubator Forskningskommersialisering Akademiskt entreprenörskap Akademiska normer och värderingar Företagsinkubator
4	Working Together : Exploring Relational Tensions in Swedish Academia Fridholm, Tobias January 2010 (has links) This study explores the basic social conditions for high-quality university research, and focuses on research in science and technology in Sweden. Swedish research policy has adopted more of a market perspective on academic research and its role in society. This has meant the promotion of competition between researchers, increased focus on efficiency at universities, and attempts to make academia harmonize more with industry and other actors. How do such policies affect the variety of perspectives within the academic system? How do they affect the positions and identities of individual academics? These issues are discussed through the concept of "relational tensions". Relational tensions refer to social strains arising when interacting actors have different perspectives. Relational tensions can stimulate creativity, but may also cause unproductive conflicts. The discussion is underpinned by interviews with university researchers and a case study of Uppsala BIO-X, a program to commercialize university research in biotechnology. Typical cases of relational tensions are identified. These concern both interpersonal relations and differences between organized science and industry. A notable observation concerns potential frustration of individual academics, as competition and efficiency tends to make their positions and identities more contested. Researchers cope with relational tensions in three identified ways: socialization, seclusion, and lateral authority. Socialization is natural and often necessary, but reduces the variety of perspectives. Seclusion serves to retain variety and independence, but reduces interaction with others. Lateral authority is to formally or informally lend a researcher more authority, which improves the chance of maintaining a variety of perspectives without reducing interaction. The sustained usefulness of academic research arguably depends on its ability to foster and communicate a variety of perspectives. Hence, (i) promoting lateral authority seems fruitful within academia and in relations between academia and industry, and (ii) encouraging competition and efficiency may to some extent be counterproductive. / Research Excellence and Science-Based Industrial Systems Economic geography Relational tensions Academic research Academic entrepreneurship Research commercialization Creativity Creative milieus Innovation Innovation systems Trust Authority Research policy Triple helix Biotechnology Swedish research Universities Expertise Professionalism Professions Research collaboration Collaborations Research funding Ekonomisk geografi Relationella spänningar Akademisk forskning Akademiskt entreprenörskap Forskningskommersialisering Kreativitet Kreativa miljöer Innovation Innovationssystem Tillit Auktoritet Forskningspolitik Trippel helix Bioteknik Svensk forskning Universitet Expertis Professioner Professionalism Samverkan Tredje uppgiften Forskningsfinansiering Human geography, economic geography Kulturgeografi, ekonomisk geografi

1

Page generated in 0.0924 seconds