Under de senaste åren har revisionsbranschen genomgått betydande förändringar med införandet av digitalisering och olika digitala verktyg. Under det senaste året har Artificiell Intelligens (AI) blivit alltmer framträdande och förväntas fortsätta att utvecklas. Revisionsbyråer integrerar digitala verktyg för att optimera revisionsprocessen, förbättra kvaliteten på revisionerna och reducera risken för konkurrens. Användning av AI-teknik kan signalera att revisionsbyrån ligger i framkant med tekniska verktyg och därmed öka revisionens trovärdighet. Tidigare forskning betonar fördelarna med att implementera digitala verktyg, som AI-teknik, i revisionsarbetet. Det förväntas att detta ska medföra effektivisering, flexibilitet, resursbesparing samt möjlighet att fokusera på andra mer komplexa arbetsuppgifter för revisorn. Syftet med den föreliggande studien är att undersöka hur användningen av AI-teknik och digitalisering påverkar revisionsprocess, revisionskvalitet och revisorns kompetenskrav. Studien utforskar dessutom revisorers uppfattning och acceptans av teknologiska innovationer hos revisionsbyråer som ingår i The Big Four. För att åstadkomma detta genomfördes intervjuer med elva revisorer av olika yrkesbefattning. Resultaten från den föreliggande studien indikerar att majoriteten av respondenterna har en positiv inställning till AI-tekniken och dess framtida utveckling. Dessutom framhåller respondenterna att tekniken är ett värdefullt hjälpmedel och stöd under revisionsprocessen genom att erbjuda vägledning och insikter.  Studien framhäver vikten av att använda AI-teknik inom revision med försiktighet och betonar att revisorns mänskliga kompetens och expertis fortfarande är avgörande för både revisionskvalitet och klientförtroende. Trots att majoriteten av respondenterna ser potential i hur AI-teknik kan förbättra deras arbete, påpekar studien att tekniken fortfarande är i ett tidigt utvecklingsstadium. Studien har resulterat i att AI-teknik inte är så etablerad som tidigare forskning har indikerat. Det har också observerats att revisorer behöver ökad kunskap om AI för att effektivt kunna använda tekniken i sin revision, vilket kan åstadkommas genom utbildning. Dessa slutsatser indikerar att AI-tekniken fortsätter att genomgå betydande förbättringar och att dess fulla potential ännu inte har realiserats. / Artificial Intelligence and Digitalization in the Auditing Industry: Challenges and Opportunities for the Auditing Process and Audit Quality In recent years, the auditing industry has undergone significant changes with the introduction of digitalization and various digital tools. Over the past year, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly prominent and is expected to continue developing. Audit firms are integrating digital tools to optimize the auditing process, improve audit quality, and reduce the risk of competition. The use of AI-technology can signal that the audit firm is at the forefront of technological tools, thereby increasing the credibility of the audit. Previous research emphasizes the benefits of implementing digital tools, such as AI-technology, in auditing work. It is expected that this will lead to increased efficiency, flexibility, resource savings, and the ability for auditors to focus on other, more complex tasks.The purpose of the present study is to examine how the use of AI-technology and digitalization affects the auditing process, audit quality, and the competence requirements for auditors. The study also explores auditors' perceptions and acceptance of technological innovations at audit firms within The Big Four. To achieve this, interviews were conducted with eleven auditors of various professional positions. The results from the present study indicate that the majority of respondents have a positive attitude towards AI-technology and its future development. Additionally, the respondents highlight that the technology is a valuable tool and support during the auditing process by providing guidance and insights.The study highlights the importance of using AI-technology in auditing with caution and emphasizes that the auditor's human competence and expertise remain crucial for both audit quality and client trust. Although the majority of respondents see potential in how AI-technology can enhance their work, the study points out that the technology is still in an early stage of development. The study has shown that AI-technology is not as established as previous research has indicated. It has also been observed that auditors need increased knowledge about AI to effectively use the technology in their audits, which can be achieved through education. These conclusions indicate that AI-technology continues to undergo significant improvements and that its full potential has yet to be realized.

本研究主要在探討會計師事務所查帳人員在面臨時間壓力的情況下，對其查帳工作態 度的影響。根據以往的研究，查帳人員面臨時間壓力時，生理上、心理上有重大變化 。本研究則主要著重於在時間壓力下，查帳人員於查帳工作本身的影響。在心理學上 ，人格特質對個人工作態度會有重大影響，故本研究將此變數納入，藉以測試在不同 人格特質下，於不同工作壓力情境下，對查帳工作態度之影響，至所謂工作態度，本 研究係指以下三項變數： ヾ低報查帳時間（Underreporting chargeable time） ゝ挪報查帳時間（Shifting chargeable time） ゞ降低查帳品質（Reducing audit quality） 研究結果：發現人格特質愈傾向Ａ類型者，在時間壓力大時，較不會有這三種情形出 現，反之，人格特質為Ｂ類型者，較易有這三種情形出現。但如果時間壓力不大時， 則無論人格特質為何，則三種情形皆不顯著發生。

無論在企業組織中的任何工作情境下，當一個人的角色產生衝突、模糊、及過荷時，會使得個人產生工作壓力，連帶影響其工作滿足及工作績效。所謂角色衝突(role conflict)，係指預期的行為彼此間產生衝突與摩擦；角色模糊(role ambiguity)，係指員工不確定或不明白如何執行工作，不確定或不明自工作的期望是什麼，不確定或不明自工作績效及期望結果間的關係。而角色過荷(role overload)，係指員工承受過多的工作責任和活動績效。 　　內部稽核人員係組織內的幕僚人員，其職務之範圍，可涵蓋整個組織，所涉及的層面，包括人與事，廣泛而複雜。內部稽核人員在企業中同時對高階管理、受查核單位及自己的稽核專業負責，因此，內部稽核人員往往因為身兼多重角色，而且角色間又相互衝突，而承受角色壓力。本研究探討國內企業內部稽核人員不同構面的角色壓力、工作滿足，及內部稽核工作品質間之問題。在研究過程中，為了解我國內部稽核人員的角色壓力對工作滿足，工作滿足對內部稽核工作品質，以及角色壓力與工作滿足對內部稽核工作品質之關係，本研究發展了四個假說，分別為：假說一：內部稽核人員的角色壓力對工作滿足呈負相關。假說二：內部稽核人員的工作滿足對內部稽核工作品質呈正相關。假說三：內部稽核人員的色壓力對內部稽核工作品質呈負相關。假說四：內部稽核人員的角色壓力會透過工作滿足而對內部稽核工作品質產生間接效果。 　　根據實證分析，本研究之研究結論為，一、內部稽核人員的角色壓力對工作滿足呈負相關。當內部稽核人員受到越大的角色壓力，其工作滿足就越低；反之，當內部稽核人員受到越小的角色壓力，其工作滿足就越高。二、內部稽核人員的工作滿足對內部稽核工作品質呈正相關。當內部稽核人員獲得越高的工作滿足，則內部稽核工作品質就越佳；反之，當內部稽核人員無法獲得越高的工作滿足，則內部稽核工作品質就不佳。三、內部稽核人員的角色壓力對內部稽核工作品質呈負相關。當內部稽核人員的角色壓力大，則內部稽核工作品質就越不佳；反之，當內部稽核人員的角色壓力小，則內部稽核工作品質就越佳。四、內部稽核人員的角色壓力會透過工作滿足而對內部稽核工作品質產生間接效果。本研究以Baron and Keny(1986)之中介模式加以驗證，結果得知內部稽核人員的角色壓力對內部稽核工作品質並不直接產生效果，角色壓力會透過工作滿足，以工作滿足作為中介，而對內部稽核工作品質產生間接效果。 / Employees, under whatever working environment, are facing role conflict, role ambiguity as well as overload in a business organization, which inevitably will affect their job satisfaction and performance. "Role conflict" in this paper refers to the disagreement and friction resulting from an expected behavior. And role ambiguity means the employees are not clear or un-known as how to do the work, what is to expect from the work, nor what is the relationship between work performance and the expected results. Whereas "role overload" indicates that the employees take too much responsibility from the job and activity performance. 　　This study tries to examine the relationship among the role stress, the job satisfaction and the internal audit quality of the internal auditors in Taiwan. The research models established in Bron and Kenny's study are adopted. The four regression models explicitly incorporate efficient and effective measures, and reflect the interactive nature of outcome-generating activities for the internal auditors. Forty-one pair questionnaires are included in the sample. 　　The results of this study are as following: Firstly, a role stress is negatively related to job satisfaction, implying that higher role stress reduces job satisfaction; and vice versa. Secondly, there is an obvious positive relationship between auditor's job satisfaction and the internal audit quality; the more of job satisfaction, the better of the internal audit quality. Thirdly, the relationship between auditor's role stress and the internal audit quality is reverse; noting their role stress decreases the internal audit quality. Finally, the effect of auditor's role stress against the internal audit quality probably is indirectly generated through their job satisfaction.

La promulgation de la loi de la sécurité financière (LSF) en 2003 a modifié l’architecture institutionnelle et la pratique d’audit en France. Au travers l’adjonction de nouvelles règles imposées par cette loi aux spécificités persistantes depuis 1966 comme le co-commissariat aux comptes et la durée du mandat de six ans, le marché d’audit se montre unique. Cette recherche examine l’impact de cette fusion réglementaire sur la qualité et le coût de l’audit en France. En se basant sur un échantillon composé par 888 observations du SBF 250 sur la période 2005-2010, nous avons révélé l’apport de la rotation des équipes signataires dans la restriction de la discrétion managériale. Outre son avantage dans la promotion de la qualité de l’audit, ce dispositif favorise la négociation à la baisse des honoraires d’audit. Nous avons aussi souligné l’évolution sous forme parabolique de la composante discrétionnaire sur la durée de mandat. En effet, la qualité de l’audit est inférieure pendant la première et la dernière phase de l’engagement. Ce postulat renvoie au renforcement de la compétence dans le temps et l’érosion de l’esprit critique à la fin du mandat. Le décalage, issu de la fusion réglementaire, favorise le maintien du niveau de la qualité élevé sur le marché français. L’association des deux équipes avec des durées auditeur-audité différentes est une contrainte à la discrétion managériale. Toutefois, ce décalage ne doit pas être excessif pour limiter la domination du plus ancien. Cet inconvénient du régime du co-commissariat aux comptes s’est trouvé limité sur le marché français. Nos résultats confirment son efficacité, essentiellement dans le cas d’un collège composé par deux Big 4. / In 2003, the promulgation of the financial security act (LSF) has changed the institutional architecture and audit practice in France. Through the addition of new rules imposed by this act to the persistent specificities since 1966 as the joint audit and tenure of six years, the audit market shows unique. This research examines the impact of this regulatory merger on the quality and the cost of the audit in France. Based on a sample composed by 888 observations of the SBF 250 over the 2005-2010, we found the contribution of rotation audit partners in restricting managerial discretion. Besides its advantage in promoting audit quality, this device supports the negotiation of lower audit fees. We also emphasized the evolution in the parabolic form of the discretionary accruals over tenure. Indeed, the audit quality is lower during the first and last phase of the engagement. This assumption refers to strengthening the skills over time and erosion of critical appraisal at the end of audit tenure. The shift from regulatory fusion helps to maintain the level of high quality on the French market. The combination of the two teams with different listener-audited tenures is a constraint to managerial discretion. However, this shift should not be excessive to limit the oldest’ domination. This drawback of the system of joint audits is limited in the French market. Our results confirm its effectiveness, mainly in the case of two Big 4.