No description available.

Autant l’histoire et la théorie de l’édition critique des textes antiques, judéo-chrétiens et médiévaux ont fait l’objet d’études approfondies, autant les origines, le développement, les évolutions, les principes, les débats, les pratiques et les réalisations de l’édition critique des textes modernes ont peu été interrogés, notamment en France, à la différence de l’Allemagne et de l’Angleterre, sinon sous forme d’interventions ponctuelles, ayant surtout pour but de justifier des entreprises particulières. Aujourd’hui, rétrospectivement l’avènement du numérique attire l’attention sur l’historicité – de près de deux siècles – de l’édition critique et/ou savante imprimée, sur l’importance déterminante des formes qu’elle a inventées, ainsi que sur les déterminations liées à la matérialité du support papier et à son économie. Prospectivement, cet avènement incite à observer et à penser les effets induits par la révolution des techniques d’information et de communication : s’agit-il d’un pur progrès matériel en quantité et en rapidité, ou bien du début de mutations intellectuelles et culturelles analogues à celles qui ont résulté du livre imprimé pour nos modes d’écrire et de lire ? Il est grand temps pour la recherche littéraire de se pencher sur ce point aveugle et de le faire au contact d’expérimentations d’édition numérique et de recherches informatiques, en intégrant de surcroît les apports de l’histoire du livre et de la lecture ainsi que ceux des sciences de la communication, avec un regard ouvert sur les expériences étrangères. / The history and theory of the critical edition of ancient, medieval and Judeo-Christian texts have been extensively studied, whereas the origins, developments, principles, debates, practices and achievements of the modern critical editions have been little examined, especially in France. Unlike in Germany and in England, it has only been studied in the form of ad hoc interventions, through articles whose main intent is to justify a personal initiative. Today, the advent of digital technologies retrospectively draws attention to the historicity of the whole sector, and to the critical importance of the form it has taken, of the materiality and of its economy. It leads to observe and to think about the effects of the information and communication technologies’ revolution: is it a purely material progress, in terms of quantity and speed, or is it the beginning of cultural and intellectual changes akin to those which resulted from book printing? It is time for literary research to deal with this blind spot though experiments in digital publishing and computing research and insights into the history of books and reading as well as communication sciences. Experiments with digital publishing made in foreign countries will be taken into account too.

By the eighteenth century, the business of music publishing in Europe had exploded. Europe had become more culturally international, and interest in purchasing and performing music written by foreign composers was in vogue. Unfortunately laws governing copyright and editing of music were either difficult to enforce or non-existent, and most were not applicable on an international level. Around 1750 music publishers Leclerc and Boivin published an edition of flute sonatas in Paris. This edition was attributed to Georg Friderich Handel, whose work, at the time, was the most sought after in Western Europe. This particular collection is identical to an earlier edition published in 1729 in Hamburg, Germany by an unknown German composer, Johann Christoph Schultze. This paper is the first modern critical edition of Schultze’s Six Sonate â Doi Flauti Traversi Senza Basso Con una Ciacconna tra mischiata di doi Canoni nella medesima nascosti (Six Sonatas for Two Flute without Basso and A Chaconne for Two Equal Voices in Canon) and marks the first time the Chaconne has appeared in modern notation. The edition aims to be as true as possible to the 1729 publication, notes standard performance practices, and answers the question as to why the 1750 edition may have been falsely attributed to Handel.

This critical edition presents to the reader, for the first time, a definitive text of Charles Dickens's short story, "George Silverman's explanation". This edition presents a critical unmodernized text. Besides the text of the story, this edition includes historical and textual introductions; lists of substantive and accidental variants; word-division; and of collated editions. / Graduate / 0593

Cette thèse doctorale est le fruit de trois années de recherche, accomplie notamment à Paris et à Rome. Elle porte sur un commentaire au traité Sur les songes de Synésios de Cyrène, dont elle contient la première édition critique. Notre travail de recherche a nous permis d’établir que ce commentaire remonte, à peu près, aux années vingt du XIVe siècle, à savoir à la même période à laquelle Nicéphore Grégoras rédigeait son propre commentaire au même traité de Synésios. Cette coïncidence temporelle nous a amenés à nous poser la question du rapport entre les deux œuvres exégétiques : à laquel, par exemple, il faut attribuer la précédence chronologique ? Qui était l’auteur anonyme du commentaire inédit et quel rapport avait-il avec Grégoras ? L’effort de répondre à ces questions nous a amenés, enfin, à considérer les raisons d’intérêt que les Byzantins de l’époque pouvaient avoir à l’égard du traité de Synésios, étant donné qu’il est le seul, à l’exception de l’épistolaire, qui a été commenté par des savants à Byzance. La dernière partie de la thèse, donc, est dédiée à l’analyse de la première époque des Paléologues (de la fin du XIIIe au début du XIVe siècle). Notre conclusion est que, pendant une période de crise identitaire, les Byzantins pouvaient retrouver dans ce genre d’ouvrages remontant à l’Antiquité leurs propres racines culturelles. / This PhD dissertation deals with a commentary on Synesius of Cyrene’s On Dreams, of which it includes the first critical edition. It is the result of a three-years research: I spent most of this time in Paris and Rome.The research allowed me to establish that the commentary approximately dates back to 1320s, that is, to the same period in which Nicephorus Gregoras wrote his commentary on the same Synesius’ treaty. This chronological coincidence led me to investigate the relationship between these two different exegetical works. I could not avoid wondering, for instance, “Which commentary has the chronological priority?”, “Who is the anonymous author of the inedited scholia and which is his relationship with Gregoras?”. The effort to answer to these questions finally led me to consider the real reasons for interest in the treaty On Dreams in that period, since it is the only Synesius’ work – apart from his epistolary – which has been commented by Byzantine scholars. Thus, the last part of the dissertation is dedicated to the historical analysis of the first Palaiologan period (late 13th – early 14th century). My conclusion is that – during a period of identity crisis – Byzantine scholars might find in this kind of works (dating back to Antiquity) their own cultural roots.

京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(文学) / 甲第24339号 / 文博第913号 / 新制||文||729(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院文学研究科文献文化学専攻 / (主査)教授 VASUDEVA Somdev, 教授 横地 優子, 教授 宮崎 泉 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Letters / Kyoto University / DFAM

No description available.

Le traité Ps. Aristotélicien Περὶ θαυμασίων ἀκουσμάτων (De mirabilibus auscultationibus) est un recueil de 178 brefs chapitres qui décrivent une variété de phénomènes merveilleux. Le texte a été transmis par une vingtaine de manuscrits grecs, copiés entre le XIIe siècle et les premières années du XVIe. Notre étude vise à la reconstruction des relations entre tous les témoins manuscrits afin d'aboutir une nouvelle édition critique du texte, qui doit remplacer l'édition de Bekker (1831), assez vieillie et fondée sur une connaissance assez réduite de la tradition. Tous les manuscrits ont été collationnés et étudiés d'un point de vue codicologique et paléographique. Les résultats peuvent être résumés comme suit : 1. La tradition directe du texte est constituée par trois branches que nous avons nommées αβγ. Les deux premières (αβ) semblent être étroitement liées et on peut en reconstruire un ancêtre commun (ψ). 2. Suite à une eliminatio codicum descriptorum, seulement 7 manuscrits ont été retenus pour l'établissement du texte. Les leçons de ces manuscrits seulement doivent être notées dans l'apparat critique. La thèse est complétée par l'étude des traductions latines médiévales et modernes du traité (dès Barthélemy de Messine, XIIIe siècle, avec édition critique du texte, jusqu'à Antonio Beccaria, fin XVe siècle). Une partie du texte a été consacrée à l'étude de la tradition indirecte et aux éditions imprimées (dès 1497/98 jusqu'au XVIIe siècle). La thèse est complétée par une nouvelle édition critique du texte grec, accompagnée par une traduction italienne et un commentaire philologique. / The Ps.-Aristotelian treatise Περὶ θαυμασίων ἀκουσμάτων (De mirabilibus auscultationibus), a collection of 178 brief chapters dealing with a wide range of topics, has been transmitted to us in little more than 20 Greek manuscripts, copied between the XIIth and the early decades of the XVIth century. The present study aims to reconstruct the relations between all the extant witnesses in view of a new edition of the text, which will finally substitute the one established by Immanuel Bekker in 1831: to this end all manuscripts have been collated afresh and studied in detail from a palaeographical and codicological point of view. The main results of our research may be summarized as follow: 1. The direct tradition of the text can be divided in three main branches (αβγ); the first two families, however, seem to be closely related and it is possible to infer the existence of a common ancestor (ψ) linking these branches of the stemma. 2. After a careful eliminatio codicum descriptorum, only 7 manuscripts turned out to be independent witnesses: only these Greek manuscripts should therefore be retained for the constitution of the text. The study also includes some preliminary observations on the text of the extant Latin translations (the one by Bartholomew of Messina, XIIIth century, and the later Latin paraphrase by Antonio Beccaria, XVth century) and on the fragments of the medieval translation by Leontius Pilatus, preserved only in brief quotations by other authors (mainly Boccaccius and Domenico Silvestri). A section of the work is consecrated to the study of the most ancient indirect tradition (testimonia) and the early printed editions of the text (from 1497/98 up to the XVIIth century). The dissertation is concluded by a new edition of the Greek text, with an Italian translation, and a philological commentary.

A presente dissertação apresenta uma edição crítica de Électre, música incidental de Alberto Nepomuceno, fundamentada por uma leitura hermenêutica. Objetiva-se produzir uma edição que reflita a composição no contexto original ao qual se destinava, levantando elementos que elucidem a influência dos estudos que Nepomuceno realizou na França, ao final do séc. XIX. A pesquisa fundamenta-se no conceito de fusão horizôntica, advindo da hermenêutica filosófica e, por isso, possui um caráter transmetodológico. Por conseguinte, o objeto é abordado a partir dos horizontes interpretativos histórico-cultural, estrutural e intertextual. Ao final, cada horizonte desvelado traz um aporte de compreensão próprio: a proximidade das personalidades e ideais estéticos da Schola Cantorum, o pseudomodalismo francês e a influência \"grega\" de Saint-Saëns. / This dissertation presents a critical edition of Électre, incidental music of Alberto Nepomuceno, founded on a hermeneutic reading. It aims to produce an edition that reflects the composition in the original context to which it was intended, raising elements to elucidate the influence of Nepomuceno\'s studies conducted in France at the end of the 19th century. The research is based on the concept of horizontic fusion, from philosophical hermeneutics and therefore has a transmethodological character. Therefore, the object is approached from the historical and cultural, structural and intertextual interpretive horizons. At the end, each unveiled horizon brings a contribution to the understanding: the proximity of personalities and aesthetic ideals of the Schola Cantorum, the French pseudomodal style and \"greek\" influence from Saint-Saëns.

This dissertation centers on creating a new critical edition of the Rip Van Winkle overture. One of America's earliest opera composers, George Frederick Bristow (1825-1898), completed the opera Rip Van Winkle in 1855. When he revised it twenty-five years later in 1880, the composer omitted the original overture which was then thought to be lost. A concert version of this overture exists today only in manuscript form, located at the New York Public Library. Rip Van Winkle is significant to the history of American Music because it is one of the earliest operas composed by an American, and the first to be written on American subject matter (in this case, Washington Irving's story of the same name). Adding to the work's considerable historical significance is that the overture was one of the first American pieces performed by the New York Philharmonic Society, in which Bristow was a violinist. There is currently no scholarly edition of the overture, and thus this edition will fill a significant gap in the understanding of nineteenth-century American music. This critical edition of the overture to George Frederick Bristow's Rip Van Winkle was created in order to be published and available for performance and study, shedding light on the often under-represented American opera in the United States.