The presented work examines the special characteristics of electricity produced by the wind as a renewable resource into which considerable hopes are being placed. Production of electricity from wind, as well as from other renewable sources, is a subject of many legislatively enshrined preferential rules. These subsidies and regulatory provisions help the energy producers but represent additional costs to every final customer and tax payer. The aim of this work is to analyse the key arguments of wind energy advocates, which are 1) economic advantage of this production due to zero costs for 'fuel' and 2) negligible burden on the environment due to zero carbon dioxide emissions. The work takes into account all aspects of wind energy production, including their financial and extra-financial implications, and shows their indefensibility in economic terms and in terms of environmental protection. Besides, I have attempted to identify institutional aspects and forms of government which is known to give interest groups a chance to succeed in their rent-seeking activities and as a result allow prosperity of the above-mentioned ineffective energy production. Attention is also paid to the observation that, given the specific technological features of electricity production from the wind, it is not possible to fully apply the conclusions of a traditional theory of economic regulation onto the current position of key players in the electricity market.

Um Strommärkte so zu konzipieren damit sie sowohl zur Verringerung der Nutzung fossiler Brennstoffe als auch zur Deckung des steigenden Energiebedarfes beitragen, ist Wissen über die Präferenzen der Konsumenten notwendig. Die vorliegende kumulative Dissertation untersucht Präferenzen für Elektrizitätsattribute von privaten Haushalten und trägt zu einem tieferen Verständnis dieser in unterschiedlichen Kontextsituationen bei. Der erste Artikel betrachtet statistische Methoden um die zwei am häufigsten angewandten Modelle – das Random Parameter Logit und das Latent Class Logit Modell – zu vergleichen. Der Artikel trägt dazu bei, den Prozess der Modellwahl zu verbessern und für die angewandte Forschung im Energiebereich anzupassen. Basierend auf den empirischen Ergebnissen des ersten Artikels untersucht der zweite Artikel die Präferenzen von privaten Haushalten in Hyderabad, Indien mit besonderem Fokus auf die physische Qualität der Energieversorgung. Die Ergebnisse deuten auf eine geringe Zahlungsbereitschaft der Konsumenten hin. Jedoch unterscheiden sich die Präferenzen der Haushalte. Die Artikel 3 und 4 basieren auf Datenerhebungen in Deutschland. Im dritten Artikel werden die Präferenzen privater Haushalte hinsichtlich der Organisationsform von Stromanbietern untersucht. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Kunden bereit sind mehr zu zahlen, wenn die Stromversorgung von Genossenschaften oder Stadtwerken übernommen wird. Der vierte Artikel betrachtet die Erfolgsfaktoren von Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Governance des Stromanbieters die Zahlungsbereitschaft für Strom beeinflussen. Insbesondere Genossenschaften werden den großen Privatunternehmen und Aktiengesellschaften vorgezogen. / In order to design electricity markets to simultaneously reduce the share of fossil fuels in energy production and meet the increasing demand for electricity, knowledge on consumer preferences is necessary. The goal of this cumulative dissertation is to contribute to the understanding of preferences of private households for electricity supply attributes in different contexts. In Paper 1 I review statistical methods to compare two frequently applied models, the random parameters logit and the latent class logit. The methods presented here can be readily used by other researchers and practitioners to better understand model performance which ultimately contributes to improving model choice in applied energy research. Based on the empirical findings of Paper 1, Paper 2 identifies preferences of private households in Hyderabad in India for electricity supply quality. The results indicate that willingness to pay for improvements are, on average, rather low. However, the preferences strongly vary between subjects. Papers 3 and 4 investigate preferences of German private households. In \textbf{Paper 3}, the respondents stated their preferences for the organization of the electricity distribution company under different renewable energy scenarios. It turned out that most people are willing to pay more for electricity supplied by municipally-owned companies and cooperatives. This additional willingness to pay increases disproportionally when the share of renewable energy is high. The paper identifies non-profit orientated distribution companies as potential drivers of the energy transition. Paper 4 investigates the determinants for the success of energy cooperatives in Germany. The results indicate that the governance of distribution companies impacts the choices of private households for electricity supply contracts. Especially, people preferred cooperative-like governance attributes.

Operation of the electricity markets is subject to a number of strict and specific constraints such as continuous load-generation balance, security of supply, and generation technology related limitations. Contributions have been made to two important problems of the Electricity Markets, in the context of this study. In this study, Price Based Unit Commitment problem in the literature, which is a tool for the GENCO for operations planning, is extended considering the interdependencies between the Natural Gas (NG) and Electricity infrastructures and the uncertainty of Wind Power generation. The effect of the NG infrastructure physical limitations is considered via linearized NG transmission system equations, and the Wind energy sources and conventional generation resource uncertainties are simulated by Monte-Carlo simulations. The contribution of the forward energy Bilateral Contracts (BC), as a financial risk hedging tool is also included by modeling these in the proposed PBUC framework. In the case studies , it is observed that a GENCO could prevent its financial losses due to NG interruptions, by depositing only a portion of the midterm interrupted NG in the storage facilities. The Security Constrained Unit Commitment (SCUC) Problem is widely accepted tool in the industry which models the market clearing process. This study integrates two novelties to the SCUC problem / &bull / A discrete demand response model to consider active participation of the consumers, &bull / A hybrid deterministic/stochastic contingency model to represent the N-1 contingencies together with the uncertainties related with the wind power generation and system load. It is observed that the curtailment of available wind power capacity would enable the TSO to take corrective actions against occurrence of the contingencies and realization of the uncertainties in the most possible economical manner.

Ogni tecnologia produttiva ha un proprio profilo di dispacciamento ottimale che non dovrebbe essere alterato dall’ingresso delle intermittenti tecnologie rinnovabili per mantenere la migliore allocazione di prezzo e quantità. La nostra ricerca si focalizza sul mercato elettrico italiano. Considerando il comportamento di Edison Trading sul mercato, noi analizziamo se l’incremento di energia rinnovabile porta alla riduzione del prezzo e della produzione di energia grazie all’efficienza. I nostri principali risultati suggeriscono che le rinnovabili hanno un impatto negativo sulle quantità offerte. Gli impianti solari e di pompaggio portano ad un consistente incremento del prezzo elettrico; il contrario vale per le altre rinnovabili. La nostra analisi sul mercato italiano aggregato considera il comportamento di tutti gli operatori del mercato elettrico (quelli aventi consistenti e limitate quote di mercato) nel quindicesimo giorno di ogni mese nel periodo gennaio 2013 - giugno 2015. Possiamo aspettarci lo stesso risultato in termini di impatto sul prezzo e quantità, data la crescente potenza lorda eolica e solare? I nostri risultati empirici sottolineano che le tecnologie intermittenti possono solamente portare ad incrementi di prezzo, mentre i più grandi operatori di mercato (Enel, Eni ed Edison) utilizzano la tecnologia CCGT efficientemente, poichè producono quando il prezzo è più alto. / Each power plant has its own optimal dispatchable profile that should not be altered by the entrance of intermittent renewables to maintain the best allocation of price and quantity. Our research focuses on the Italian electricity market. Focusing on the market behaviour of Edison Trading, we investigate if the increase in renewable energy leads to a decrease in energy price and in energy production due to efficiency. Our main results suggest that renewables have a negative impact on the quantity supplied. Solar and pumped-storage technologies lead to a consistent increase in the electricity price, while the reverse is true for the other renewables. Our analysis on the aggregate Italian electricity market considers the behaviour of all electricity market operators (with low and high market shares) on the 15th day of each month in the period January 2013 - June 2015. Can we expect the same results in terms of the impact on price and quantity, given the increase in gross wind and solar power? Our empirical findings point out that the intermittent technologies can only lead to price increases, whereas the biggest market players (Enel, Eni and Edison) use CCGT technology efficiently since they produce when the price is higher.

Local electricity markets can be defined broadly as 'future electricity market designs involving domestic customers, demand-side response and energy storage'. Like current deregulated electricity markets, these localised derivations present specific stochastic optimisation problems in which the dynamic and random nature of the market is intertwined with the physical needs of its participants. Moreover, the types of contracts and constraints in this setting are such that 'games' naturally emerge between the agents. Advanced modelling techniques beyond classical mathematical finance are therefore key to their analysis. This thesis aims to study contracts in these local electricity markets using the mathematical theories of stochastic optimal control and games. Chapter 1 motivates the research, provides an overview of the electricity market in Great Britain, and summarises the content of this thesis. It introduces three problems which are studied later in the thesis: a simple control problem involving demand-side management for domestic customers, and two examples of games within local electricity markets, one of them involving energy storage. Chapter 2 then reviews the literature most relevant to the topics discussed in this work. Chapter 3 investigates how electric space heating loads can be made responsive to time varying prices in an electricity spot market. The problem is formulated mathematically within the framework of deterministic optimal control, and is analysed using methods such as Pontryagin's Maximum Principle and Dynamic Programming. Numerical simulations are provided to illustrate how the control strategies perform on real market data. The problem of Chapter 3 is reformulated in Chapter 4 as one of optimal switching in discrete-time. A martingale approach is used to establish the existence of an optimal strategy in a very general setup, and also provides an algorithm for computing the value function and the optimal strategy. The theory is exemplified by a numerical example for the motivating problem. Chapter 5 then continues the study of finite horizon optimal switching problems, but in continuous time. It also uses martingale methods to prove the existence of an optimal strategy in a fairly general model. Chapter 6 introduces a mathematical model for a game contingent claim between an electricity supplier and generator described in the introduction. A theory for using optimal switching to solve such games is developed and subsequently evidenced by a numerical example. An optimal switching formulation of the aforementioned game contingent claim is provided for an abstract Markovian model of the electricity market. The final chapter studies a balancing services contract between an electricity transmission system operator (SO) and the owner of an electric energy storage device (battery operator or BO). The objectives of the SO and BO are combined in a non-zero sum stochastic differential game where one player (BO) uses a classic control with continuous effects, whereas the other player (SO) uses an impulse control (discontinuous effects). A verification theorem proving the existence of Nash equilibria in this game is obtained by recursion on the solutions to Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman variational PDEs associated with non-zero sum controller-stopper games.

In modern days electric power systems, the penetration of renewable resources and the introduction of free market principles have led to new challenges facing the power producers and regulators. Renewable production is intermittent which leads to fluctuations in the grid and requires more control for regulators, and the free market principle raises the challenge for power plant producers to operate their plants in the most profitable way given the fluctuating prices. Those problems are addressed in the literature as the Economic Dispatch, and they have been discussed from both regulator and producer view points. Combined Cycle Power plants have the privileges of being dispatchable very fast and with low cost which put them as a primary solution to power disturbance in grid, this fast dispatch-ability also allows them to exploit price changes very efficiently to maximize their profit, and this sheds the light on the importance of prices forecasting as an input for the profit optimization of power plants. In this project, an integrated solution is introduced to optimize the dispatch of combined cycle power plants that are bidding for electricity markets, the solution is composed of two models, the forecasting model and the optimization model. The forecasting model is flexible enough to forecast electricity and fuel prices for different markets and with different forecasting horizons. Machine learning algorithms were used to build and validate the model, and data from different countries were used to test the model. The optimization model incorporates the forecasting model outputs as inputs parameters, and uses other parameters and constraints from the operating conditions of the power plant as well as the market in which the plant is selling. The power plant in this mode is assumed to satisfy different demands, each of these demands have corresponding electricity price and cost of energy not served. The model decides which units to be dispatched at each time stamp to give out the maximum profit given all these constraints, it also decides whether to satisfy all the demands or not producing part of each of them.

<p>In the US, seven regional transmission organizations (RTOs) operate wholesale electricity markets within three largely independent transmission systems, the largest of which includes five RTO regions and many vertically integrated utilities.</p> <p>RTOs operate a day-ahead and a real-time market. In the day-ahead market, generation and demand-side resources are optimally scheduled based on bids and offers for the next day. Those schedules are adjusted according to actual operating conditions in the real-time market. Both markets involve a unit commitment calculation, a mixed integer program that determines which generators will be online, and an economic dispatch calculation, an optimization determines the output of each online generator for every interval and calculates locational marginal prices (LMPs).</p> <p>The use of LMPs for the management of congestion in RTO transmission systems has brought efficiency and transparency to the operation of electric power systems and provides price signals that highlight the need for investment in transmission and generation. Through this work, we aim to extend these efficiency and transparency gains to the coordination across RTOs. Existing market-based inter-regional coordination schemes are limited to incremental changes in real-time markets. </p> <p>We propose a multi-regional unit-commitment that enables coordination in the day-ahead timeframe by applying a distributed approach to approximate a system-wide optimal commitment and dispatch while allowing each region to largely maintain their own rules, model only internal transmission up to the boundary, and keep sensitive financial information confidential. A heuristic algorithm based on an extension of the alternating directions method of multipliers (ADMM) for the mixed integer program is applied to the unit commitment. </p> The proposed coordinated solution was simulated and compared to the ideal single-market scenario and to a representation of the current uncoordinated solution, achieving at least 58% of the maximum potential savings, which, in terms of the annual cost of electric generation in the US, could add up to nearly $7 billion per year. In addition to the coordinated day-ahead solution, we develop a distributed solution for financial transmission rights (FTR) auctions with minimal information sharing across RTOs that constitutes the first known work to provide a viable option for market participants to seamlessly hedge price variability exposure on cross-border transactions.

Vehicle-to-Anything (V2X) est un terme générique qui explique l'utilisation de batteries de véhicules électriques pour obtenir une valeur supplémentaire lors de périodes de non-utilisation. Les services V2X génèrent des revenus de la batterie grâce à la charge dynamique monodirectionnelle (V1X) ou bidirectionnelle (V2X) afin de fournir des avantages au réseau électrique, de réduire la consommation énergétique des bâtiments et des maisons ou de fournir une alimentation de secours aux charges. Une méta-analyse du potentiel économique donne des résultats contradictoires avec la littérature et indique que la gestion de la consommation électrique, l'adéquation des ressources et le report de l’investissement dans le réseau ont plus de valeur que d’arbitrage sur les marchés d’énergie et réserve secondaire. Bien que je convienne que le développement soit pour et par le marché, je souligne que V2X se développera dans les limites du contexte réglementaire; les régulateurs ont donc un rôle de catalyseur à jouer.Une question importante est de savoir dans quelle mesure une utilisation supplémentaire de la batterie du véhicule affectera la capacité de la batterie au cours de sa durée de vie. Il est donc essentiel de comprendre les subtilités de la dégradation de la batterie pour estimer les coûts. Les batteries Li-ion sont des systèmes électrochimiques compliqués qui présentent deux phénomènes de dégradation simultanés, le vieillissement calendaire et le vieillissement cyclique. Dans les applications véhiculaires, le vieillissement du calendrier a tendance à être l’effet dominant de dégradation de la durée de vie, ce qui réduit le temps, élément le plus important de la dégradation; par conséquent, le coût de la dégradation dépend fondamentalement du temps.Une affirmation centrale de cette thèse est que le coût marginal de V2X n’est ni nul ni négligeable comme l’a accepté la littérature économique, mais dépend fortement de la dégradation de la batterie. Nous proposons ici une théorie des coûts marginaux V2X qui repose sur deux principes: 1.) il existe un coût d’efficacité associé au chargement de la batterie, et 2.) le véritable coût de dégradation de V2X prend en compte le coût d’opportunité, c’est-à-dire, la dégradation au-delà de ce qu’aurait été l’utilisation normale du véhicule.Avoir un concept clair du coût marginal de V2X, permet de comptabiliser et d’équilibrer correctement tous les coûts réels: coût de l’électricité, coûts d’efficacité du système et dégradation de la batterie. Cela permettra d’élaborer des stratégies de charge optimales et d’informer correctement les offres du marché de l’énergie. Il en résulte une compréhension plus nuancée des coûts marginaux. L’impact de la batterie V2X sur la vie de la batterie pourrait être considéré comme un coût, un bénéfice ou nul. Je conclus que le V2X peut offrir une valeur économique supérieure à celle précédemment entendue et que cette valeur supplémentaire sera réalisée grâce à l'amélioration simultanée de l'efficacité de la charge et de la réduction de la dégradation de la batterie EV. / Vehicle-to-Anything (V2X) is an umbrella term to explain the use of electric vehicle batteries to derive additional value during times of non-use. V2X services generate revenue from the battery asset through dynamic mono-directional (V1X) or bi-directional (V2X) charging to provide benefits to the electric grid, to reduce energy consumption of buildings and homes, or to provide back-up power to loads. A meta-analysis of economic potential gives results contradictory to the literature and indicates that Bill Management, Resource Adequacy, and Network Deferral are more valuable than Energy Arbitrage and Spinning Reserves. While I concur that development is of and by the market, I emphasize that V2X will develop within the constraints of the regulatory environment; therefore regulators have an enabling role to play.An important question is to what extent additional use of the vehicle battery will affect battery capacity over its lifetime, therefore understanding the intricacies of battery degradation is crucial to estimate costs. Li-ion batteries are complicated electrochemical systems which exhibit two concurrent degradation phenomena, Calendar Aging and Cycling Aging. In vehicular applications, Calendar Aging tends to be the dominating life degradation effect, which reduces to time being the most important component of degradation; therefore degradation cost is fundamentally time-dependent.A central claim of this dissertation is that gls{v2x} Marginal Cost is not zero nor negligible as the economic literature has accepted but is highly dependent on battery degradation. Herein, a gls{v2x} Marginal Cost Theory is proposed which is based on two main principles: 1.) there is an efficiency cost associated with charge operation, and 2.) the true gls{v2x} degradation cost takes opportunity cost into account, that is, only considers degradation beyond what would have been experienced by operating the vehicle normally.Having a clear concept of gls{v2x} Marginal Cost which can properly account for and balance all true costs: the cost of electricity, the system-efficiency costs, and battery degradation, will allow for development of optimal charge strategies and will properly inform energy market bids. This results in a more nuanced understanding of marginal costs as the resultant battery lifetime impact from gls{v2x} can be either be considered a cost, a benefit, or zero. I conclude that gls{v2x} may offer greater economic value than previously understood and that this additional value will be realized through the simultaneous improvement in charge efficiency and reduction of gls{ev} battery degradation.

Die Erreichung der ehrgeizigen Dekarbonisierungsziele Deutschlands erfordert eine massive Ausweitung der Onshore-Windenergie. In den letzten Jahren sahen sich Onshore-Wind Projektentwickler zunehmend mit sozialen und Umweltbedenken aufgrund von Landnutzungskonflikten konfrontiert. Aus regulatorischer Sicht stellen die weitere Integration von Onshore-Windkapazitäten in das deutsche Energiesystem besondere Herausforderungen in Bezug auf geografische und zeitliche Aspekte der Stromerzeugung dar. Die hohen Windgeschwindigkeiten und die vergleichsweise geringe Bevölkerungsdichte haben dazu geführt, dass Investoren in der Vergangenheit überproportional in den nördlichen Bundesländern Windparks entwickelten. Eine starke gleichzeitige Einspeisung von Strom an nahegelegenen Windstandorten führt jedoch zu einem Druck auf die Großhandelsstrompreise, was die Markterträge der Entwickler reduziert. Diese Arbeit zielt daher darauf ab, einen Beitrag zum zukünftigen Design des deutschen Energiesystems zu leisten und insbesondere den weiteren Ausbau der Onshore-Windenergie in Deutschland unter Berücksichtigung sozialer, Umwelt- und wirtschaftlicher Einschränkungen zu untersuchen. Dabei werden GIS-Software und ein neues inverses Zeitreihenmodellierungsverfahren genutzt, um das Windpotenzial und Landnutzungskonflikte zu analysieren. Zukünftige Marktszenarien werden mit Hilfe eines dekomposierten Kraftwerkseinsatz und -investitionsmodells hinsichtlich ihrer Wirkungen auf die ökonomische Effizienz der Marktintegration von Onshore-Windenergie bewertet, wobei Preisentwicklungen für CO2-Emissionszertifikate eine entscheidende Rolle spielen. Die Ergebnisse deuten auf eine abnehmende Rentabilität der Onshore-Windenergie in Deutschland hin, während der Süden Deutschlands aus ganzheitlicher Perspektive einen größeren Beitrag zur Windenergie leisten könnte.:I Analysis framework 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Research motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 Research objective, aims and questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.3 Scientific contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.3.1 Research focus specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.3.2 Contribution regarding renewable energy potentials and levelised generation cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.3.3 Contribution regarding generic wind time series modelling 12 1.3.4 Contribution regarding electricity market modelling and model decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1.3.5 Contribution regarding evaluating the market integration of wind energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 1.4 Organisation of thesis and software tools applied . . . . . . . 20 2 Basics of electricity economics 23 2.1 Pricing and investments in electricity markets . . . . . . . . . 23 2.1.1 Long-term market equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.1.2 Short-term market equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.2 Interplay of price formation and renewable support . . . . . . 27 2.2.1 Definitions and concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.2.2 Quantity and price effect of environmental policies and implications for geographic deployment pathways 29 II Regionalisation of data inputs 33 3 GIS-based windenergy potential analysis 35 3.1 Framing the approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.1.1 Taxonomy of renewable potentials . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.1.2 GIS-based analysis procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3 Three-stage sensitivity analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2 Land assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2.1 Land characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2.2 Results on the land availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.3 Technical potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.3.1 Technical wind turbine configuration . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.3.2 Electrical energy conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.3.3 Wind-farm design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.3.4 Results on the technical potential . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.4 Economic potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3.4.1 Cost-potential curves at a country level . . . . . . . . 49 3.4.2 Cost-potential curves at a regional level . . . . . . . . 52 4 Generic wind energy feed-in time series 55 4.1 Generic wind speed data in energy systems analysis . . . . . . 55 4.1.1 Motivation of generic time series . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.1.2 Incorporation of time series generation into modelling setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.2 Dynamic adjustment of model size via clustering . . . . . . . 56 4.2.1 Introduction to hierarchical and partitional cluster methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.2.2 Euclidean distance as proximity measure . . . . . . . . 57 4.2.3 Linkage of observations and cluster verification . . . 58 4.2.4 Specification of input data and data organisation . . . 59 4.2.5 Results on cluster algorithm selection and representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 4.3 Vector autoregressive stochastic process with Normal-to- Weibull transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 4.3.1 Wind characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 4.3.2 Data description and handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.3.3 Additive modelling procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 4.3.4 Standard Normal-to-Weibull transformation . . . . . . 64 4.3.5 Time series decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 4.3.6 (V)AR-Parameter estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 4.3.7 Statistical dependence between different locations . . 73 4.3.8 Time series simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 4.3.9 Results on time series simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 III Market model-based investigation 81 5 Modelling investment decisions in power markets 83 5.1 Motivation for illustration of model decomposition . . . . . . 83 5.2 Simplified market model formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.2.1 Power plant dispatch problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.2.2 Capacity expansion extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.2.3 Constraint matrix structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.3 Complexity reduction via Benders decomposition . . . . . . . 87 5.3.1 Benders strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 5.3.2 Single-cut procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.3.3 Multi-cut procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4 Acceleration strategies for decomposed market models . . . . 98 5.4.1 Scenario solver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.4.2 Distributed computing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.4.3 Regularisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.5 Numerical testing of model formulation and solving strategy 99 5.5.1 Preliminary remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 5.5.2 Effects of multiple cuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 5.5.3 Effects of scenario solver and parallelisation . . . . . . 101 5.5.4 Effects of regularisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 5.6 Implications for a large-scale application . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6 ELTRAMOD-dec: A market model tailored for investigating the European electricity markets 107 6.1 Understanding the model design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.1.1 Market modelling fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.1.2 ELTRAMOD-dec’s model structure and solving conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.1.3 Central capacity planning assumptions . . . . . . . . . 109 6.1.4 Central market clearing assumptions . . . . . . . . . . 110 6.2 Mathematical formulation of ELTRAMOD-dec . . . . . . . . . 111 6.2.1 Nomenclature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.2.2 Master problem equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 6.2.3 Subproblem equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 6.2.4 Program termination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.2.5 Research-specific extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.3 Data description and model calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 6.3.1 Base year modelling data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 6.3.2 Model performance validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 6.3.3 Target year modelling data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 6.4 Determination of ELTRAMOD-dec’s solving conventions and tuning parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 6.4.1 Framing some modelling experiments . . . . . . . . . 137 6.4.2 Effects of regularisation on convergence behaviour . 138 6.4.3 Effects of time slicing on solution accuracy . . . . . . 142 6.4.4 Effects of decomposition on solving speed . . . . . . . 145 7 Model-based investigation of onshore wind deployment pathways in Germany 149 7.1 Scenario framework and key assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 7.1.1 Scenario creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 7.1.2 Definition of market configuration . . . . . . . . . . . 152 7.1.3 Summary on scenario key assumptions . . . . . . . . . 154 7.2 Results on market integration at a market zone level . . . . . 155 7.2.1 Introducing market integration indicators . . . . . . . 155 7.2.2 Market integration indicators for baseline calculation 156 7.2.3 Market integration indicators for increased renewable uptake calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 7.2.4 Market integration indicators for ultimate renewable uptake calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 7.3 Results on market integration at a detailed regional level . . . 160 7.3.1 Introducing regional market integration indicators . . 160 7.3.2 Regional market integration indicators for baseline calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 7.3.3 Regional market integration indicators for increased renewable uptake calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 7.3.4 Regional market integration indicators for ultimate renewable uptake calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 8 Summary and conclusions 169 8.1 Findings regarding the market integration . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 8.1.1 Onshore wind resources constitute a limiting factor for achieving Germany’s energy transition . . . . . . 169 8.1.2 Distribution of wind farm fleet has a strong impact on market premia in the centre and south of Germany 170 8.2 Findings regarding the technical underpinning . . . . . . . . . 173 8.2.1 Generic wind speed velocities can be a powerful tool for power system modellers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 8.2.2 Decomposition enables efficient solving of large-scale power system investment and dispatch models . . . . 174 8.3 Implications for policymakers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 IV Appendix 179 A Additional tables and figures 181 B Code listings 187 Bibliography 199 / Achieving Germany's ambitious decarbonisation goals requires a massive expansion of onshore wind energy. In recent years, onshore wind project developers have increasingly faced social and environmental concerns due to land use conflicts. From a regulatory perspective, further integrating onshore wind capacity into the German energy system poses particular challenges regarding geographical and temporal aspects of electricity generation. High wind speeds and comparatively low population density have led investors to disproportionately develop wind farms in the northern states in the past. However, a strong simultaneous electricity feed-in at nearby wind sites suppresses wholesale electricity prices, reducing developers' market returns. This study aims to contribute to the future design of the German energy system and, in particular, to examine the further expansion of onshore wind energy in Germany, considering social, environmental, and economic constraints. GIS software and a new inverse time series modelling approach are utilised to investigate wind potential and land use conflicts. Future market scenarios are evaluated using a decomposed power plant dispatch and investment model regarding their effects on the economic efficiency of onshore wind energy market integration, with price developments for carbon emission certificates playing a crucial role. The results indicate a decreasing profitability of onshore wind energy in Germany, while from a holistic perspective, southern Germany could make a more significant contribution to wind energy at reasonable increases in support requirements.:I Analysis framework 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Research motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 Research objective, aims and questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.3 Scientific contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.3.1 Research focus specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.3.2 Contribution regarding renewable energy potentials and levelised generation cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.3.3 Contribution regarding generic wind time series modelling 12 1.3.4 Contribution regarding electricity market modelling and model decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1.3.5 Contribution regarding evaluating the market integration of wind energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 1.4 Organisation of thesis and software tools applied . . . . . . . 20 2 Basics of electricity economics 23 2.1 Pricing and investments in electricity markets . . . . . . . . . 23 2.1.1 Long-term market equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.1.2 Short-term market equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.2 Interplay of price formation and renewable support . . . . . . 27 2.2.1 Definitions and concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.2.2 Quantity and price effect of environmental policies and implications for geographic deployment pathways 29 II Regionalisation of data inputs 33 3 GIS-based windenergy potential analysis 35 3.1 Framing the approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.1.1 Taxonomy of renewable potentials . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.1.2 GIS-based analysis procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3 Three-stage sensitivity analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2 Land assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2.1 Land characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2.2 Results on the land availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.3 Technical potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.3.1 Technical wind turbine configuration . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.3.2 Electrical energy conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.3.3 Wind-farm design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.3.4 Results on the technical potential . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.4 Economic potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3.4.1 Cost-potential curves at a country level . . . . . . . . 49 3.4.2 Cost-potential curves at a regional level . . . . . . . . 52 4 Generic wind energy feed-in time series 55 4.1 Generic wind speed data in energy systems analysis . . . . . . 55 4.1.1 Motivation of generic time series . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.1.2 Incorporation of time series generation into modelling setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.2 Dynamic adjustment of model size via clustering . . . . . . . 56 4.2.1 Introduction to hierarchical and partitional cluster methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.2.2 Euclidean distance as proximity measure . . . . . . . . 57 4.2.3 Linkage of observations and cluster verification . . . 58 4.2.4 Specification of input data and data organisation . . . 59 4.2.5 Results on cluster algorithm selection and representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 4.3 Vector autoregressive stochastic process with Normal-to- Weibull transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 4.3.1 Wind characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 4.3.2 Data description and handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.3.3 Additive modelling procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 4.3.4 Standard Normal-to-Weibull transformation . . . . . . 64 4.3.5 Time series decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 4.3.6 (V)AR-Parameter estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 4.3.7 Statistical dependence between different locations . . 73 4.3.8 Time series simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 4.3.9 Results on time series simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 III Market model-based investigation 81 5 Modelling investment decisions in power markets 83 5.1 Motivation for illustration of model decomposition . . . . . . 83 5.2 Simplified market model formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.2.1 Power plant dispatch problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.2.2 Capacity expansion extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.2.3 Constraint matrix structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.3 Complexity reduction via Benders decomposition . . . . . . . 87 5.3.1 Benders strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 5.3.2 Single-cut procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.3.3 Multi-cut procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4 Acceleration strategies for decomposed market models . . . . 98 5.4.1 Scenario solver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.4.2 Distributed computing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.4.3 Regularisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.5 Numerical testing of model formulation and solving strategy 99 5.5.1 Preliminary remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 5.5.2 Effects of multiple cuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 5.5.3 Effects of scenario solver and parallelisation . . . . . . 101 5.5.4 Effects of regularisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 5.6 Implications for a large-scale application . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6 ELTRAMOD-dec: A market model tailored for investigating the European electricity markets 107 6.1 Understanding the model design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.1.1 Market modelling fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.1.2 ELTRAMOD-dec’s model structure and solving conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.1.3 Central capacity planning assumptions . . . . . . . . . 109 6.1.4 Central market clearing assumptions . . . . . . . . . . 110 6.2 Mathematical formulation of ELTRAMOD-dec . . . . . . . . . 111 6.2.1 Nomenclature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.2.2 Master problem equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 6.2.3 Subproblem equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 6.2.4 Program termination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.2.5 Research-specific extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.3 Data description and model calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 6.3.1 Base year modelling data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 6.3.2 Model performance validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 6.3.3 Target year modelling data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 6.4 Determination of ELTRAMOD-dec’s solving conventions and tuning parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 6.4.1 Framing some modelling experiments . . . . . . . . . 137 6.4.2 Effects of regularisation on convergence behaviour . 138 6.4.3 Effects of time slicing on solution accuracy . . . . . . 142 6.4.4 Effects of decomposition on solving speed . . . . . . . 145 7 Model-based investigation of onshore wind deployment pathways in Germany 149 7.1 Scenario framework and key assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 7.1.1 Scenario creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 7.1.2 Definition of market configuration . . . . . . . . . . . 152 7.1.3 Summary on scenario key assumptions . . . . . . . . . 154 7.2 Results on market integration at a market zone level . . . . . 155 7.2.1 Introducing market integration indicators . . . . . . . 155 7.2.2 Market integration indicators for baseline calculation 156 7.2.3 Market integration indicators for increased renewable uptake calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 7.2.4 Market integration indicators for ultimate renewable uptake calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 7.3 Results on market integration at a detailed regional level . . . 160 7.3.1 Introducing regional market integration indicators . . 160 7.3.2 Regional market integration indicators for baseline calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 7.3.3 Regional market integration indicators for increased renewable uptake calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 7.3.4 Regional market integration indicators for ultimate renewable uptake calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 8 Summary and conclusions 169 8.1 Findings regarding the market integration . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 8.1.1 Onshore wind resources constitute a limiting factor for achieving Germany’s energy transition . . . . . . 169 8.1.2 Distribution of wind farm fleet has a strong impact on market premia in the centre and south of Germany 170 8.2 Findings regarding the technical underpinning . . . . . . . . . 173 8.2.1 Generic wind speed velocities can be a powerful tool for power system modellers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 8.2.2 Decomposition enables efficient solving of large-scale power system investment and dispatch models . . . . 174 8.3 Implications for policymakers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 IV Appendix 179 A Additional tables and figures 181 B Code listings 187 Bibliography 199

This dissertation details regulation's impact in networked markets, notably in deregulated electricity and internet service markets. These markets represent basic infrastructure in the modern economy; their innate networked structures make for rich fields of economic research on regulatory impact. The first chapter models deregulated electricity industries with a focus on the Texas market. Optimal economic benchmarks are considered for markets with regulated delivery and interrelated network costs. Using a model of regulator, consumer, and firm interaction, I determine the efficiency of the current rate formalization compared to Ramsey-Boiteux prices and two-part tariffs. I find within Texas's market increases to generator surplus up to 55% of subsidies could be achieved under Ramsey-Boiteux pricing or two-part tariffs, respectively. The second chapter presents a framework to analyze dynamic processes and long-run outcomes in two-sided markets, specifically dynamic platform and firm investment incentives within the internet-service platform/content provision market. I use the Ericson-Pakes framework applied within a platform that chooses fees on either side of its two-sided market. This chapter determines the impact of network neutrality on platform investment incentives, specifically whether to improve the platform. I use a parameterized calibration from engineering reports and current ISP literature to determine welfare outcomes and industry behavior under network neutral and non-neutral regimes. My final chapter explores retail firm failure within the deregulated Texas retail electricity market. This chapter investigates determinants of retail electric firm failures using duration analysis frameworks. In particular, this chapter investigates the impact of these determinants on firms with extant experience versus unsophisticated entrants. Understanding these determinants is an important component in evaluating whether deregulation achieves the impetus of competitive electricity market restructuring. Knowing which economic events decrease a market's competitiveness helps regulators to effectively evaluate policy implementations. I find that experience does benefit a firm's duration, but generally that benefit assists firm duration in an adverse macroeconomic environment rather than in response to adverse market conditions such as higher wholesale prices or increased transmission congestion. Additionally, I find evidence that within the Texas market entering earlier results in a longer likelihood of duration. / text