Muslims and islam are unquestionably a part of European social life. In recent times, however, different events, such as the enlargement of the EU and the fact that muslims to a higher extent demand their rights, have brought a number of questions to the fore concerning muslims and islam in Europe. Moreover, we can see an increasing level of islamophobia in contemporary Europe, but also that the EU has launched several programs to increase both the diversity and the unity throughout the Union and to combat islamophobia. However, most of these programs focus on islam as religion and muslims in general, and such a narrow viewpoint runs the risk of missing important issues. In this new context it would be interesting to widen the scope and ask what place not only the muslim community and islam, but also sharia (an important element in islam), may have in future Europe – especially when it comes to muslim identity? My main objects are to see how the concept of sharia is constructed in the debates in the European Parliament, how that discourse relates to a social practice – the increasing islamophobic ideas in Europe – and what effect this may have on muslim identity in a European context. The results shows that the Parliament constructs sharia as, for example, something archaic, threatening, inhuman and misogynistic. In that sense, the discourse fits in with the predominant order of discourse regarding islam and muslims (in Europe) – and strengthen it. Though my results are neither absolute nor uniform, they show, persuasively enough, that sharia (as it is seen by the Parliament) is not consistent with and can not be included in or accepted by “European norms and values”. However, this must be said with one reservation: sharia is not always excluded as a whole. Still, it is not difficult to maintain that it is sharia as such that activates the (negative and) excluding connotations. Thus, an “approved” European muslim identity, as it seems, can not have too close connections with sharia, if (any) at all. Moreover, there is a risk that muslims themselves take on a restricting practice concerning their identity. In all, this will to a large extent circumscribe the possible muslim identities in Europe. To form a substantial and really pluralistic diversity in Europe, the EU, and others, must liberate itself from the logic of these discourses. But this is not an easy thing to do. One way that might be profitable, is to challenge the prevailing discourse with new narratives – narratives and voices that for the most part must come from the muslims themselves. Despite the fact that these voices do exist, as has been shown, the question is how and under what circumstances they can be seen – or rather heard. Unfortunately the answer is not to be found in this thesis; the need of further research is obvious.

A integração regional denominada Mercado Comum do Sul – MERCOSUL – gera um processo de transbordamento para diversos setores sociais dos países membros, induzido pela necessidade de minoração do déficit democrático, entendido como falta de representação e acesso às decisões do MERCOSUL e combinado com a falta de controle, de transparência e de responsabilização dos atores decisórios. A União Europeia, assim como o Parlamento Europeu, possui mecanismos que visam a minorar o déficit democrático existente na integração regional e podem servir de modelo para o MERCOSUL. A comparação entre a UE e o MERCOSUL, e entre o PARLASUL e o PE se utiliza de mecanismos de aproximação de teorias e de metodologias que possibilitam a análise comparada em nível histórico, institucional, jurídico e político. Ao longo da tese, foram analisadas as atribuições, o controle e a fiscalização, a legitimidade, a participação e a representação no PARLASUL e no PE. As principais fontes dos dados utilizados nesta tese são documentos, tratados e protocolos internacionais, regimentos, legislação e entrevistas realizadas com autoridades relacionadas com o MERCOSUL, especialmente parlamentares do PARLASUL. A utilização do capital social na integração regional pode minorar o déficit democrático e colaborar na criação e na consolidação de redes que qualificam e facilitam a participação e a ação política mais transparente e democrática. A utilização dos pressupostos da democracia pode diminuir a percepção negativa das populações dos países membros do MERCOSUL, em relação às instituições e aos partidos políticos. As proposições da presente tese refletem uma necessidade de adaptação da integração regional aos valores democráticos, representados pela democracia (mais) participativa. Um modelo institucional que indica uma maior participação da sociedade civil e das populações na integração regional, no escopo de minorar o alto déficit democrático existente, é viável a partir da eleição de parte dos representantes do PARLASUL com fortes vínculos associativos, com capital social legitimado e reconhecido socialmente. / The Regional integration known as the Southern Common Market - MERCOSUL, generates the spill over effect for various social sectors of the member countries induces the need for mitigation of the democratic deficit, understood as a lack of representation and access in the decisions of MERCOSUL, combined with the lack of control, transparency and accountability decision-making actors. The European Union, and the European Parliament have mechanisms to reduce the existing democratic deficit in regional integration, and can serve as a model for MERCOSUL. The comparison between the UE and MERCOSUL, and between PARLASUL and the European Parliament uses approaching mechanisms, theories and methodologies that enable comparative analysis in historical, institutional, legal and political level. Assignments were analyzed, control and oversight, legitimacy, participation and representation in PARLASUL and the European Parliament. The main sources of the data used in the thesis are documents, international treaties and protocols, regulations, legislation and interviews with related authorities with MERCOSUL, especially PARLASUL’s parliamentarians. The use of social capital in regional integration can reduce the democratic deficit and contribute to the creation and consolidation of networks that qualify and facilitate participation and more transparent and democratic political action. The use of democracy assumptions may decrease the negative perception of people in MERCOSUL member countries, the institutions, and political parties. Propositions of this thesis reflect a need for adaptation of regional integration to democratic values represented by democracy (more) participatory. An institutional model that indicates a greater involvement of civil society and populations in the regional integration, in scope to mitigate high existing democratic deficit, it is feasible from the part of election the representatives of PARLASUL with strong associative links, with the social capital legitimated and recognized socially.

This thesis examines how American and German constitutionalism, as shaped by the U.S. Supreme Court and the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), have mediated the tension between threats to stability and the imperative of renewal through occasional or constant interventions in their democratic processes. To do this, it primarily assesses the 1960s U.S. reapportionment cases and the European Parliament electoral threshold cases of 2011 and 2014. It also considers the ideas of four thinkers, theorists and jurists who have wrestled with the dilemma of how to maintain the bond between citizen and state: Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde, Hannah Arendt, Thomas Jefferson and Alexis de Tocqueville. Stability and renewal represent the twin orientation points for constitutionalism and the courts against which they must adjust to possible democratic threats, or new political and social forces in need of recognition. Threats to the state can emerge either from a surfeit of illiberal views in politics and society aimed at destroying an existing constitutional order, or when democratic channels become starved of new opinions through the constitutional or unconstitutional exclusion of voters and parties. A distinctive feature of the approach taken is the conceptual division between the ‘legal/institutional' space in which the Supreme Court and Bundesverfassungsgericht interpret constitutional meaning, and the ‘civic space' in which citizens accept or reject constitutional meaning. One central question is how American and German constitutionalism, and the U.S. Supreme Court and Bundesverfassungsgericht shape and influence the vital civic space that is integral to the democratic relationship between citizen and state, and the survival of the state itself. Ultimately it is concluded that without acceptance of the importance of law and constitutionalism by citizens in the civic space, the influence of the Supreme Court and the Bundesverfassungsgericht becomes purely institutional and effectively consigned to the courtroom.

A integração regional denominada Mercado Comum do Sul – MERCOSUL – gera um processo de transbordamento para diversos setores sociais dos países membros, induzido pela necessidade de minoração do déficit democrático, entendido como falta de representação e acesso às decisões do MERCOSUL e combinado com a falta de controle, de transparência e de responsabilização dos atores decisórios. A União Europeia, assim como o Parlamento Europeu, possui mecanismos que visam a minorar o déficit democrático existente na integração regional e podem servir de modelo para o MERCOSUL. A comparação entre a UE e o MERCOSUL, e entre o PARLASUL e o PE se utiliza de mecanismos de aproximação de teorias e de metodologias que possibilitam a análise comparada em nível histórico, institucional, jurídico e político. Ao longo da tese, foram analisadas as atribuições, o controle e a fiscalização, a legitimidade, a participação e a representação no PARLASUL e no PE. As principais fontes dos dados utilizados nesta tese são documentos, tratados e protocolos internacionais, regimentos, legislação e entrevistas realizadas com autoridades relacionadas com o MERCOSUL, especialmente parlamentares do PARLASUL. A utilização do capital social na integração regional pode minorar o déficit democrático e colaborar na criação e na consolidação de redes que qualificam e facilitam a participação e a ação política mais transparente e democrática. A utilização dos pressupostos da democracia pode diminuir a percepção negativa das populações dos países membros do MERCOSUL, em relação às instituições e aos partidos políticos. As proposições da presente tese refletem uma necessidade de adaptação da integração regional aos valores democráticos, representados pela democracia (mais) participativa. Um modelo institucional que indica uma maior participação da sociedade civil e das populações na integração regional, no escopo de minorar o alto déficit democrático existente, é viável a partir da eleição de parte dos representantes do PARLASUL com fortes vínculos associativos, com capital social legitimado e reconhecido socialmente. / The Regional integration known as the Southern Common Market - MERCOSUL, generates the spill over effect for various social sectors of the member countries induces the need for mitigation of the democratic deficit, understood as a lack of representation and access in the decisions of MERCOSUL, combined with the lack of control, transparency and accountability decision-making actors. The European Union, and the European Parliament have mechanisms to reduce the existing democratic deficit in regional integration, and can serve as a model for MERCOSUL. The comparison between the UE and MERCOSUL, and between PARLASUL and the European Parliament uses approaching mechanisms, theories and methodologies that enable comparative analysis in historical, institutional, legal and political level. Assignments were analyzed, control and oversight, legitimacy, participation and representation in PARLASUL and the European Parliament. The main sources of the data used in the thesis are documents, international treaties and protocols, regulations, legislation and interviews with related authorities with MERCOSUL, especially PARLASUL’s parliamentarians. The use of social capital in regional integration can reduce the democratic deficit and contribute to the creation and consolidation of networks that qualify and facilitate participation and more transparent and democratic political action. The use of democracy assumptions may decrease the negative perception of people in MERCOSUL member countries, the institutions, and political parties. Propositions of this thesis reflect a need for adaptation of regional integration to democratic values represented by democracy (more) participatory. An institutional model that indicates a greater involvement of civil society and populations in the regional integration, in scope to mitigate high existing democratic deficit, it is feasible from the part of election the representatives of PARLASUL with strong associative links, with the social capital legitimated and recognized socially.

The problem of world poverty is appalling in human terms. Almost half of all the humankind lives below the poverty line of $2 per day, whereas affluent parts of the world continue to enjoy enormous technological and economical progress. In the light of such discrepancy, the debate in political philosophy regarding “global justice” has renewed significance. The current debate between those who agree global justice is important, is those who think that positive duties towards poor is enough, and those who think that morality requires a re-designation of the ground rules operating at the global level. The Cosmopolitan view grounds its theoretical framework in this second view. This study aims to analyse if, and how, the normative debate in the European Parliament reflects the assumptions, arguments and considerations of the Cosmopolitan approach. This study identifies central concepts of the Cosmopolitan approach, and then analyses how these concepts are discussed in the European Parliamentary debates. In addition, I identify who discusses what in the parliamentary debates. The analysis reveals how Cosmopolitan ideas are reflected in the discourse within the debates, and the second dimension identifies which party groups discuss and hold which key concepts of Cosmopolitanism.

Participation in the European Parliament Election has steadily declined since the start in 1979. In 2004 less than half (47.8%) of the voting-age population of the European Union used their right to vote. This has actualized questions asking if the European Parliament is a good representation of the European citizens. The paradigm when it comes to explaining the electoral turnout in the European Parliament Election is the second-order theory. Though the theory explains the low voter participation, it does not explain why the European Parliament Election has become a second-order election. Thus, in this thesis will search for the underlying variable explaining why the European Parliament Election is a second-order election. Through our research we find that distances are important in the European Union, and they create centres and peripheries within the European Union. By looking at Rokkan and Urwin‟s horizontal and vertical types of peripheries, where the vertical type consists of Rokkan and Urwin‟s three domain of social life, our research concludes that centre-periphery structures within the European Union are the underlying variable, explaining why the European Parliament Election is a second-order election.

This study aims at describing if discrepancies can be found between the rhetoric in Swedish political parties’ electoral campaigns to the European Parliament elections in 2004 and their representatives’ actual behavior in the European Parliament and to develop plausible explanations to these possible discrepancies. The research method that is being used is content analysis, aiming to answer four research questions regarding the electoral campaigns to the European Parliament elections in 2004 and the behavior by the parties’ representatives during the following term of office. The main findings are that some discrepancies can be found regarding which questions are raised most frequently in the electoral campaigns and in the European Parliament, but that no discrepancies can be found regarding the positions taken in questions in the electoral campaigns and in the European Parliament. The plausible explanations that are presented are that the parties raise certain questions in the campaigns with the purpose of maximizing the number of votes and then raise other questions in the European Parliament, that size of the party group matters and that the individuals representing the parties might effect the coherence between rhetoric and actual behavior.

La dimension parlementaire de l’action extérieure de l’Union européenne, entendue comme la place occupée par le Parlement européen et par les parlements nationaux des Etats membres en tant qu’acteurs de l’action extérieure, se déploie à deux niveaux. Elle s’exprime tout d’abord, au sein de l’Union, à travers l’exercice des pouvoirs parlementaires octroyés par les traités (et le cas échéant par les droits constitutionnels nationaux), et ce de façon incontestable. Elle s’exprime ensuite sur la scène internationale au travers de multiples actions de diplomatie parlementaire, en l’absence de cadre juridique érigé par les traités, et ce de façon ambiguë. Dans l’un comme dans l’autre cas, la dimension parlementaire de l’action extérieure apparaît comme un atout, mais sous conditions, pour la poursuite de l’objectif d’affirmation de l’Union sur la scène internationale. Elle est en effet, en principe, un atout pour la légitimité démocratique de l’action de l’Union et pour la cohérence matérielle de l’action extérieure. Néanmoins, dans la pratique, cet atout demande à être confirmé. Afin d’être un atout effectif, la dimension parlementaire de l’action extérieure de l’UE suppose, à cet égard, d’assurer une conciliation harmonieuse de la légitimité démocratique de l’action de l’UE avec l’affirmation de l’Union sur la scène internationale. La quête de cette conciliation conduit à la formulation de réponses – réalisées ou réalisables – qui suivent un mouvement distinct selon l’espace d’expression des parlements. Lorsque le Parlement européen et les parlements nationaux agissent au sein de l’Union, les solutions résident dans la réalisation de multiples adaptations à partir du cadre juridique et institutionnel érigé par les traités. Ces adaptations, qui restent perfectibles, expliquent que la dimension parlementaire de l’action extérieure soit aujourd’hui encore un processus en construction. Lorsque le Parlement européen et les parlements nationaux agissent sur la scène internationale, les solutions résident dans la structuration d’un cadre juridique global, les règles juridiques existantes étant pour l’heure parcellaires et incomplètes. En définitive, l’action extérieure de l’Union s’enrichit d’une dimension parlementaire qui suppose, au sein de l’Union, d’approfondir les multiples adaptations réalisées à partir du cadre juridique existant et, sur la scène internationale, de structurer un cadre juridique global pour l’heure inexistant. / The parliamentary dimension of the European Union’s External Action, to be understood as the involvement of the European Parliament and of the National Parliaments of EU Member States as actors of the External Action, is rolled out on two levels. Firstly, it is undoubtedly articulated within the European Union, through the exercise of parliamentary powers conferred by the treaties (and, where appropriate, by national constitutional Law). Secondly, it is ambiguously articulated on the international scene through various parliamentary diplomatic actions, without any legal framework set up by the treaties. In both cases, the parliamentary dimension of the External Action appears to be an asset, but under conditions, for the assertion of the European Union on the international scene. It is, in principle, an asset for the democratic legitimacy of the EU’s Action and for the coherence of the External Action. However, it needs to be confirmed in practice. In order to be a truly effective asset, the parliamentary dimension of the EU’s External Action requires reconciling the democratic legitimacy of the EU’s Action with the assertion of the European Union on the international scene. The quest for this conciliation leads to different answers – effective or desirable – which follow a particular pattern depending on the parliaments’ “area of expression”. When the European Parliament and the National Parliaments act within the EU, these answers consist of multiple adaptations of the legal and institutional framework established by the treaties. These adaptations, which are still imperfect, can explain why the parliamentary dimension of the External Action is still a process under construction. When the European Parliament and the National Parliaments act on the international scene, the solutions consist of the structuring of a comprehensive legal framework, since the existing legal rules remain piecemeal and incomplete. Eventually, the EU’s External Action is enriched by a parliamentary dimension which implies deepening, inside the EU, the multiple adaptations achieved from the existing legal framework, and which implies structuring, on the international scene, a global legal framework, which is missing for the moment.

The main objective with the thesis was to analyze institutional change in the European Union pre-and-post financial debt crisis, with particular focus on the roles of the Parliament, the Commission, the Council as well as the Court of Justice. To attain the objective, the thesis intended to answer the subsequent queries; (i) what notable institutional changes were brought in the European Union pre-and-post financial debt crisis; (ii) what role did the Parliament, the Commission, the Council and the Court of Justice play pre-and-post financial debt crisis; were their roles enhanced by the financial debt crisis? In order to attain the objective, the thesis utilized an institutional analysis and development framework. This theoretical framework relied on a qualitative content analysis.  The results of the thesis exhibit that the European Union’s progression route was not free from crises. With the Union’s expansion, more decisions ought to be taken by the four institutional bodies. The role of the European institutional bodies resulted in various institutional changes with the establishment of the Treaty of Lisbon; from having a normative power to encompass an executive one. The Treaty of Lisbon also changed the decisionmaking procedure to an ordinary legislative procedure. Apropos decision-making, the Treaty of Lisbon also enhanced the Council and the Parliament’s role pre-financial debt crisis by making the Parliament and Council equal in the new co-decision procedure. The role of the Council has been dynamic since its formation, while the role of the three other institutions could somewhat vary throughout the pre-financial debt crisis. With regards to institutional change after the financial debt crisis, the results reveal that institutional changes occurred mainly in economic and fiscal policies, for instance strengthening the EMU with the intergovernmental Treaty on Stability and Coordination and Governance. Whilst the Treaty of Lisbon brought more supranationalism in the European Union, the period after the financial debt crisis rather celebrated intergovernmentalism in the Union. The role of the Council was dynamic even post-financial debt crisis, decreasing the role of the Commission in the agenda setting. However, with the introduction of the Six-Pack and the Banking Union, the Commission and the Parliament’s role became evidently enhanced, whilst the Court of Justice, did not play a key role in the financial debt crisis.

This diploma thesis characterizes a specified field of the civil law that deals with the judicial proceedings of inheritance through the analysis of professional literature and relevant case law. The attention is especially devoted to development of the legislation, the proceedings in the beginning of this judicial proceedings and its parties, the minor included, possible discretions of the decedent with his belongings, the conflicts appeared in this judicial proceedings, the settlement of the estate in entirety, the question of the overextended asset and the selected issues of judicial proceedings of inheritance with the international aspect (Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council).The thesis points out the main amendments which have been brought to the judicial proceedings of inheritance by the recodification of the private law that has been in effect in Czech Republic since 01. 01. 2014. The thesis was composed by the method of description with elements of analysis and synthesis. The individual legal institutes are described, analytically examined and evaluated. There are presented their mutual connections and the view of the problematic as a whole. The comparative method was used as well by evaluating the present legislation with the former one that was in effect in the Czech Republic until 31. 12. 2013.