Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-15T19:33:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Luciana Veloso Rocha Portolese Baruki.pdf: 1595537 bytes, checksum: 2f8077e89d1b55d97bb4636fdb505a98 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-02-01 / Fundo Mackenzie de Pesquisa / Mental health problems associated with the work environment have achieved, in the beginning of this century, unprecedented levels. The intensity by which these problems appear, along with the exponentially pattern through which they have been growing, are factors that have transformed mental disorders caused by the exposure to psychosocial risks/hazards at work in such an expressive problem, which can no longer be ignored. In the first part, by addressing the psychosocial called emerging occupational risks, we sought to understand the extent to which they reveal themselves as a category of legal interest. It was thus necessary to find the theoretical basis for a psychosocial approach of the occupational risks so that we could dissect the pathologies increasing afterwards. In a second part, it was developed a legal discussion itself, which was intended to reveal, in specific terms, how insufficient protection stands as an obstacle to the implementation of a framework of preventive psychosocial risks/hazards situations at work. More generally, there was an intention throughout the whole text itself that was not to lose sight of how much suffering and mental illness fall under the Political and Economic Law as a problem that affect primarily the citizenship issues and the construction of a supposed free and fair and society. In this sense,the optics of the psychodynamics of work served as a support for tackling the subject from the viewpoint of work organization instead of the individual approach in coping with stress. / Os problemas de saúde mental relacionados ao meio ambiente do trabalho atingiram, neste início de século, patamares sem precedentes. Seja pela intensidade com que aparecem, seja pela forma exponencial pela qual crescem, os transtornos mentais decorrentes da exposição aos riscos psicossociais no trabalho representam um problema que, de tão expressivo, não pode ser mais ignorado. Em uma primeira parte, através da abordagem psicossocial dos chamados riscos ocupacionais emergentes, buscou-se entender em que medida eles se revelam como categoria de interesse jurídico. Para tanto, foi necessário buscar as bases teóricas da abordagem psicossocial, bem como dissecar as patologias em aumento. Em uma segunda parte, travou-se uma discussão jurídica propriamente dita, a qual pretendeu, em termos específicos, revelar como a proteção insuficiente se coloca como um obstáculo para a implementação de um regime jurídico preventivo dos riscos psicossociais no trabalho. Em termos mais genéricos, objetivou-se nunca perder de vista o quanto o sofrimento e o adoecimento psíquico se inscrevem, no âmbito do Direito Político e Econômico, como um problema essencialmente afeto à problemática da cidadania e à construção de uma pretensa sociedade livre e justa. Para tanto, a ótica da psicodinâmica do trabalho serviu de apoio para o enfrentamento do tema sob o ponto de vista da organização do trabalho, em detrimento do enfrentamento individual do stress.

La spécificité de l’objet de la PI imprime une singularité au régime du contrat d’entreprise. L’affirmation se constate aussi bien au sujet de la PLA qu’au sujet de la PIND et appelaient donc la recherche d’une théorie générale. Concernant la PLA, l’existence de droits moraux de l’auteur perturbe la relation contractuelle et justifie la mise en œuvre d’un formalisme important. L’objectif du législateur est alors de tenter de protéger l’auteur, envisagé comme la partie faible face au maître de l’ouvrage. Et quoique certaines exceptions aient été mises en place, elles demeurent insuffisantes. Une telle méthode « principe – exception » se révèle néanmoins alternativement inutile ou préjudiciable, de sorte qu’il conviendrait de convertir les exceptions en règle commune. À titre d’exemple, l’attribution initiale des droits d’auteur au maître de l’ouvrage dans le cadre de l’œuvre collective ou le logiciel devrait être généralisé. Si la protection apportée à l’entrepreneur dans le cadre du droit de la propriété littéraire et artistique apparaît ainsi excessive, elle est au contraire insuffisante dans le cadre du droit de la propriété industrielle. En effet, en dépit de fondements identiques, le contrat d’entreprise relatif aux droits de propriété industrielle est régi par les dispositions du Code civil, lesquelles ne protègent pas l’auteur ou le créateur. Ainsi, dans ce cadre, l’inventeur ne bénéficie pas d’un droit à la rémunération proportionnelle, car l’aspect économique domine toutes les étapes de la relation contractuelle, de l’obtention de la création à son exploitation. Néanmoins, les règles de l’attributions du droit à la création industrielle ne sont pas claires / The specificity of the subject of intellectual property entitled to a singularity of the contract of enterprise regime. The assertion is evident both on the literary and artistic property as about industrial property and therefore called the search for a general theory.Concerning the literary and artistic property, the existence of moral rights of the author disrupts the contractual relationship and justify the implementation of an important formalism. The aim of the legislator is then to try to protect the author, seen as the weak party to face the project Owner. And although some exceptions have been introduced, they remain insufficient. Nevertheless, such a method "principle - exception" proves alternately unnecessary or harmful, so the exceptions should be converted into common rule. For example, the initial attribution of copyright to the Owner project under the collective work or software should be generalized.If the protection provided to the contractor under the law of literary and artistic property thus appears excessive, it is insufficient otherwise under the law of industrial property. Indeed, despite identical basis, the contract of enterprise for industrial property rights is governed by the provisions of the Civil Code, which do not protect the author or creator. Thus, in this context, the inventor does not have a right to remuneration proportional because the economic aspect dominates all stages of the contractual relationship, obtaining creation to its exploitation. Nevertheless, the rules of the attribution of the right to creation industrial are not clear