Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-10-05T17:55:31Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2005 - Renato Ferreira.pdf: 559799 bytes, checksum: ac850dc7d73a0336326f2d3c101b9488 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-05T17:55:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2005 - Renato Ferreira.pdf: 559799 bytes, checksum: ac850dc7d73a0336326f2d3c101b9488 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005-02-28 / The general objetive of this work consisted of analyzing as the micros and small entrepreneurs deal with the decisions process, aiming at to identify the main difficulties, inperfections and traps that can commit in this basic process to guarantee first the survival of his/her organization and to suply bases its growth. The data were collected through applies questionnaire to 60 (sixty) micro and small entrepreneurs of the segment of commerce of construction materials located in the city of Rio de Janeiro and Baixada Fluminense. It is important to stand out that this sample of entrepreneurs is requested to daily take innumerable decisions on the most varied aspects of its business and, usually, without the support of specialized consultants. It was observed that, the majority of the people, uses heuristical in the simplification of the decision process and, in many cases suffers the effect from the same vieses emanated of, generating decisions oblique. The collected material will be able to serve of base for the elaboration of deeper studies, with the purpose to help to the elaboration of materials for programs of managerial development for this important group of entrepreneurs, who are the generating greater of jobs of this country, allowing that they improve its power to decide processes and they can gain more efficiency and effectiveness, forming base for the growth of its companies. / O objetivo geral deste trabalho consiste em analisar como os micros e pequenos empres?rios lidam com o processo de tomada de decis?o, visando identificar as principais dificuldades, falhas e armadilhas que possam cometer neste processo fundamental para garantir primeiro a sobreviv?ncia de sua organiza??o e fornecer bases para o seu crescimento . Os dados foram coletados atrav?s de question?rio aplicado a 60 ( sessenta ) micro e pequenos empres?rios do segmento de com?rcio de materiais de constru??o localizados na cidade do Rio de Janeiro e Baixada Fluminense . ? importante ressaltar que esse universo de empreendedores ? solicitado a tomar diariamente in?meras decis?es sobre os mais variados aspectos de seu neg?cio e, via de regra, sem o apoio de assessorias especializadas. Constatamos que, como a maioria das pessoas utiliza heur?sticas na simplifica??o do processo decis?rio e, em muitos casos sofrem os efeitos dos vieses emanados das mesmas, gerando decis?es enviesadas. O material coletado poder? servir de base para a elabora??o de estudos mais profundos, com a finalidade de ajudar a elabora??o de materiais para programas de desenvolvimento gerencial para esse importante grupo de empres?rios, que s?o os maiores geradores de empregos deste pa?s, permitindo que melhorem seus processos decis?rios e possam ganhar mais efici?ncia e efic?cia, formando base para o crescimento de suas empresas.

Submitted by JOSIANE SANTOS DE OLIVEIRA (josianeso) on 2019-03-07T16:23:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Ery Clovis Petry Jardim Junior_.pdf: 2380676 bytes, checksum: 3228458de9103b7053a9136b5d67eb55 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2019-03-07T16:23:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ery Clovis Petry Jardim Junior_.pdf: 2380676 bytes, checksum: 3228458de9103b7053a9136b5d67eb55 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-28 / Nenhuma / Em diferentes subculturas de projeto, arquitetos, engenheiros e designers transitam entre dois caminhos para decidir quais serão os próximos passos a serem dados no design e projeto de produtos: o caminho do raciocínio e o caminho da intuição. Estes dois caminhos são fundamentados na teoria de Epstein (1999, 2003), denominada de teoria do processamento duplo de informações (CEST - Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory of Personality). O caminho do raciocínio ou da racionalidade é o caminho das decisões baseadas na lógica das metodologias, métodos, ferramentas e processos que o designer utiliza para avançar na projetação na medida em que as informações sobre os problemas de design vão se estruturando. O caminho da intuição ou da experiencialidade é o das decisões baseadas nas experiências ou nas vivências pessoais que o designer acumulou em processos heurísticos, nos quais as metodologias, métodos, ferramentas e processos utilizados para dar um certo próximo passo na projetação não são claras o suficiente, pois não se dispõe de todas as informações sobre o problema de design e necessita-se ‘preencher as lacunas’ para avançar na projetação. Estes dois caminhos trilhados pelos arquitetos, engenheiros e designers no design e projeto de produtos serão analisados nesta dissertação, tendo como base os estudos sobre racionalidade limitada (Simon, 1969, 1996) e intuição limitada (Kahneman 2003), contando com o Inventário Racional- Experiencial (Rational-Experiential - REI, Pacini e Epstein, 1999, 2003) como instrumento de pesquisa. O estudo foi realizado na modalidade online com 156 participantes, revelando que na análise sobre formação os Engenheiros tendem a pensar de forma mais racional e tem mais confiança ao agirem assim, e, arquitetos e designers tendem a pensar de forma mais experiencial com mais capacidade de pensar com sentimentos e intuições. Na análise sobre tempo de experiência em design e projeto de produtos os designers tendem a pensar de forma mais racional e tem mais capacidade e confiança para agirem assim. Na análise sobre nível de formação os designers tendem a pensar tanto de forma racional, como experiencial e tem mais confiança e capacidade para agirem assim. / In different project subcultures, architects, engineers, and designers move between two paths to decide what are the next steps to be taken in product design and design: the path of reasoning and the path of intuition. These two paths are grounded in Epstein's theory (1999, 2003), called the CEST (Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory of Personality). The path of reasoning or rationality is the path of decisions based on the logic of the methodologies, methods, tools and processes that the designer uses to advance the design as the information about design problems is structured. The path of intuition or experientiality is that of the decisions based on the experiences or personal experiences that the designer accumulated in heuristic processes, in which the methodologies, methods, tools and processes used to take a certain next step in the design are not clear enough, because all the information about the design problem is not available and it is necessary to 'fill in the gaps' to advance the design. These two paths, traced by architects, engineers and designers for the design and design of products, will be analyzed in this dissertation, based on studies of limited rationality (Simon, 1969, 1996) and limited intuition (Kahneman 2003) Rational- Experiential (Rational-Experiential - REI, Pacini and Epstein, 1999, 2003) as a research tool. The study was conducted online with 156 participants, revealing that in training analysis engineers tend to think more rationally and have more confidence in doing so, and, architects and designers tend to think in a more experiential way with more ability to think with feelings and intuition. In the analysis of experience time in product design and design the designers tend to think more rationally and have more ability and confidence to do so. In the analysis of the level of training, designers tend to think in a rational, experiential way and have more confidence and ability to act in this way.

In this thesis 14 gender pedagogues’ stories about power and control are described and analysed. Here the term gender pedagogue refers to educators who have participated in further training in gender and gender equality studies. The training programme was the result of an initiative taken by the former Social Democratic government. The intention of the government was that those who participated in the training programme would then work as resource persons in the work for gender equality in preschools and schools (Frånberg, 2010; Regeringen, 2001a, 2001b; Wahlgren, 2009). The purpose of this study is to describe and analyse the gender pedagogues’ access to power and control in work for change. The theoretical framework chosen for the study consists of Basil Bernsteins concepts classification and framing (Bernstein, 1977, 2000) and Hildur Ve’s (1999a, 1999b) use of the concepts technical limited rationality and care work rationality. The empirical evidence is based on observations in a seminar series on gender issues and semi-structured interviews. The results of the interviews are presented as stories which have been created in the interplay between the gender pedagogues and the interviewer. One conclusion that can be drawn from the stories is that power relations and gender patterns on many different levels influenced the possibilities of the gender pedagogues for power and control. Power and control in the relation between technical limited rationality and care work rationality is expressed in different ways. It is seen in the possibilities and descriptions of resistance and difficulties. Resistance and difficulties depended, according to the gender pedagogues, on the differences between their own view of knowledge and that of others. If gender and gender equality was not considered to be an important area of knowledge, possibilities for power and control decreased.