No description available.

Orientador: Martha Rosa Pisani Destro / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-15T19:56:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LiraNeto_JoaquimFranciscode_M.pdf: 992288 bytes, checksum: c992eb47460d169ef0b8426a2b404819 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 / Resumo: O presente trrabalho constiu-se numa pesquisa que teve como objetivo investigar os meios através dos quais o futebol foi e ainda pode ser utilizado como uma forma de reforço às idéias e valores que legitimam as relações capitalistas de produção. ...Observação: O resumo, na íntegra, poderá ser visualizado no texto completo da tese digital / Abstract: This work is based on a survey that aimed to investigate the ways in which football was and can still be used as a way of reinforcing the ideas and values that legitimize the capitalist relations of production. There has been an investigation of how football has been addressed by current approaches to Physical Education. In addition, the research works of authors from the historical-critical pedagogy revealed elements that an approach to Physical Education must have to make it possible to learn football in a view contrary to the dominant ideology. First, we examined specific ideological uses of football. To this end, we chose the periods of dictatorship of the New State and 1964-1985, on the understanding that were historic moments in football that was often used ideologically to serve the interests of the state. Later on, we present the analysis of the ideological use of football on the ground works of authors who studied the football and that, somehow, defend ideas that contribute to the legitimacy of capitalist relations of production. In the analysis of how football is present in the approaches of Physical Education, was made a division between approaches non-critical and critical, so that, without ignoring the contributions of the first, it was emphasized the point: the perception of the objective conditions of culture body that the latter approached a systematization that provides space for the teacher aims to combat the dominant ideology. In the last chapter, corresponding to the analysis of works by artists from the historical-critical pedagogy, which were investigated fundamental aspects of this trend can support a pedagogical teaching the elements of body culture contrary to the dominant ideology, where the football is intercepted in its relations with the concrete material conditions of social existence, in which it is built, and at the same time, this is the prospect of overcoming these conditions. These fundamentals can be summarized as follows: 1) the perception of constraints and objectives of education in the case of Physical Education, the body culture; 2) directiveness; 3) an education that addresses the relationship between content and practice the broader social - which is insufficiently explored, even by critical approaches of Physical Education, which still have attached to the field of experience of the elements of body culture. It is a literature review, and the theoretical and methodological framework adopted here is the dialectical and historical materialism, which is based on historical-critical pedagogy, so named by Dermeval Saviani / Mestrado / Historia, Filosofia e Educação / Mestre em Educação

Orientador: João Carlos Kfouri Quartim de Moraes / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-20T20:22:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Alves_AntonioJoseLopes_D.pdf: 2053693 bytes, checksum: f5cbf814beedd4c397cf75abc3623103 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 / Resumo: A presente tese resulta de pesquisa de doutoramento a qual teve por objeto o padrão de cientificidade que orienta e estrutura a crítica marxiana da economia política em sua fase de maturidade. Nesse sentido, buscou-se apreender, compreender e explicitar o conjunto de elementos e determinações conceituais a partir dos quais se organizou o pensamento de Marx no enfrentamento da decifração do modo capitalista de produção da vida humana, bem como quando da tarefa de avaliação de pensadores e correntes da economia política que pretenderam explicar cientificamente o mundo da produção do excedente. A questão inicial a que se volta Marx é precisamente explicitar a natureza do mais-valor, a forma da riqueza como capital, superando as aporias e inconsistências que caracterizaram as aproximações teóricas dos economistas. O trabalho de investigação dos textos marxianos evidenciou a existência de uma teorização cuja base é a definição do estatuto das categorias como Daseinsformen, Existenzbestimmungenen, como formas sociais de ser do existente, seja este ente, processo ou relação. As relações sociais mesmas apareceram a partir desse horizonte como formas de existência historicamente determinada dos indivíduos sociais, de sua atividade e dos produtos desta. Essa determinação vai de encontro com o que a tradição das interpretações marxistas, majoritariamente, assumia como base da exercitação científica de Marx: a dialética hegeliana. Contrapondo-se a essa posição predominante, a pesquisa, e a tese que nela se arrima, intentou descortinar e revelar o caráter da teoria marxiana acerca do capital, como uma analítica categorial das formas de ser da produção capitalista. No âmbito do desenvolvimento da pesquisa, buscou-se então determinar o mais precisamente possível o que distingue essa analítica, a delimitação da differentia specifica do objeto da reflexão marxiana. Nesse contexto, o Forschungsweise marxiano, o seu modo de investigação, e não tanto o seu modo de apresentação constante de O Capital, foi prioritariamente considerado como o centro da própria atividade científica de Marx. Assim, o Darstellungsweise revelou-se como instância determinada, e não determinante do discurso marxiano, estando sempre subsumida à ordem da analítica da forma do existente em questão a cada momento, bem como das relações que aquele guarda com outras determinações dentro de um complexo particular. Resulta disso, que a determinação mesma do momento preponderante não é tributária da eleição a priori de uma categoria em particular tomada como princípio ou chave explicativa. Ao contrário, depende da marcha da analítica como tal, da articulação que preside o ser da coisa como concreto efetivamente existente, independentemente da teoria ou dos procedimentos. A esse respeito, a própria questão de método acabou por ser reposicionada em função disso, não sendo mais entendida como núcleo da cientificidade, mas como momento igualmente determinado pelo talhe do objeto. O que encaminhou a tese da existência de um antimétodo no pensamento marxiano / Abstract: This thesis results from doctoral research which had the object of scientific standard and structure that guides the Marxian critique of political economy at its stage of maturity. Accordingly, we sought to learn, understand and explain the range of conceptual and determinations from which was organized Marx's thought in coping with the unraveling of the capitalist mode of production of human life, and when the evaluation task of thinkers and currents of political economy that sought to explain scientifically the world's production surplus. The threshold issue that turns Marx is precisely explain the nature of surplus-value, the shape of wealth as capital, overcoming the aporia and inconsistencies that have characterized the theoretical approaches of economists. The research of the Marxist texts revealed the existence of a theory whose foundation is the definition of status categories as Daseinsformen, Existenzbestimmungen as social forms of being of the existent, is this entity, process or relationship. The same socials relations that emerged from the horizon as the existence of historically determined forms of social individuals, their activity and products thereof. That determination runs counter to the tradition of Marxist interpretations, mostly, assumed as the basis of scientific exercitation Marx: the Hegelian dialectic. Opposed to this dominant position, research, and the thesis that it is anchored, brought uncover and reveal the character of the Marxian theory of capital as an analytical categorical ways of being of capitalist production. In developing the survey, we sought then to determine as precisely as possible what distinguishes this analysis, the delimitation of the differentia specifica of the object of Marxist reflection. In this context, the Marxian Forschungsweise, its mode of inquiry, rather than its mode of presentation contained in the Capital, was primarily considered as the center of scientific activity itself of Marx. Thus, the Darstellungsweise proved to be instance specific, not a determinant of Marxian discourse, being always subsumed to the order of the analytical form of matter exists in every moment, as well as that of relations with other custody determinations within a particular complex. It follows that the same determination of the tax is not currently leading the election in advance of a particular category or taken as a key explanatory principle. Rather, it's the march of analytics as such, who chairs the joint is the real thing as actually existing, regardless of theory or procedures. In this respect, the very question of method turned out to be repositioned because of this, no longer seen as core scientific, but also time as determined by the intaglio of the object. What forwarded the theory that there was an antimetod in Marxian thought / Doutorado / Filosofia / Doutor em Filosofia

This study is intended to illustrate how the reformist and revolutionary directions in the labor movement are manifested and visualized in the empirical material with regard to angry culture, thus contributing to an understanding of the informative importance of the image. It is clear that the investigated material in the form of social democratic and communist 1 May posters from the period 1922-1948 reflects its time (the interwar period to the post-war era) with regard to angry culture.  It is not the aesthetic aspect that is central, but the historical and political perspective in terms of information transmission. This study focuses on how to understand a historical period through an image material. The study aims to answer the question of what kind of information is communicated built on an analysis based on a combination of semiotics and hegemony analysis of the empirical material. Using the semiotic concepts denotation and connotation, the posters are analyzed in detail in the image analysis in combination with Stuart Hall's three hypothetical positions (codes), Antonio Gramsci’s hegemony concept, primarily in the form of “war of position” and “historic blocs”, is used to understand the historical period investigated. This method triangulation increases the credibility of the results. As far as the study and its results are concerned, it can be noted that the social democratic 1 May posters before 1936 (Social Democrats’ power access) with regard to “sublimed wrath” mainly represent consensus across class boundaries. The communist 1 May posters from that period, however, primarily represent “class war” and stand for “open anger”. After the Social Democrats’ access to power, it is clear that they constitute a historic bloc and that the communists are forced to adopt a more defensive approach, pronounced in drained paroles with a vague content. The conclusion with regard to the visual transmission of political and historical information and messages regarding social democratic and communistic 1 May posters from 1922-1948, based on socialist angry cultures is that the period between the wars was characterized by class struggle versus consensus, World War ll reduced everything to “hold together” and post-war time represents the starting point for the welfare state, as a successful consequence of the social democratic “dignity project”.

Orientador: Alcides Hector Rodriguez Benoit / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-27T10:35:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Melo_RicardoPereirade_D.pdf: 1024908 bytes, checksum: 5d89d206291fd20278b5b86fe1b1f73f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 / Resumo: Este presente trabalho pretende analisar a estrutura lógica e histórica de O Capital de Karl Marx e entender suas relações categoriais com o desenvolvimento dialético do conceito de circulação simples ou monetária presente no Livro 1 de O Capital e a sua continuação necessária do conceito de circulação creditícia presente no Livro 3 da mesma obra. A hipótese levantada por esse trabalho é que a circulação creditícia não pode ser desenvolvida de maneira isolada. A circulação creditícia é parte do desenvolvimento progressivo da circulação simples e, por isso, ligados dialeticamente pela exposição conceitual. Em O Capital, existe uma ordem expositiva das categorias usadas por Marx e, por isso, entender a circulação como um todo é necessário antes desenvolver as categorias mais simples presentes na circulação simples para avançar as categorias mais complexas da circulação creditícia / Abstract: The purpose of this study is to analyze the logical and historical structure of Capital by Karl Marx, understanding their categorical relations with the dialectical development of the concept of simple or monetary circulation in Book 1 of Capital and the necessary continuation of the concept of credit circulation in Book 3 of the same work. The main hypothesis is that the credit circulation cannot be developed in isolation. The credit movement is part of the progressive development of simple circulation and, therefore, dialectically connected by a conceptual exposition. In Capital, there is an expository order of categories used by Marx and, to understand the movement as a whole, is necessary to develop the simplest categories present in the simple movement to advance to the most complex categories of credit circulation / Doutorado / Filosofia / Doutor em Filosofia

Le Cercle de la Russie neuve est couramment présenté comme le lieu d’origine du « marxisme à la française » ; à savoir, d’une pensée marxiste reconduite au matérialisme des Lumières, définie en 1939 comme « rationalisme moderne » et qui sera, à partir de l’après-guerre, l’une des références idéologiques majeures du PCF. Et pourtant, les premiers travaux de ce groupe –dont le rôle joué dans l’introduction du matérialisme dialectique dans le débat philosophique en France est méconnu – sont consacrés à la démonstration de l’hétérogénéité du marxisme à la tradition rationaliste et matérialiste française, en proposant en revanche une lecture hégélianisante de la philosophie de Marx. Pour décrire le procès qui a conduit à ce véritable renversement de sens, et identifier les instances qui en étaient à l’origine, il ne suffit pas de remonter aux écrits des auteurs se réclamant du marxisme, pour les rendre à nouveau lisibles : il s’agit plutôt d’en suivre les thèses au-delà de leur formulation, dans leurs effets ainsi que dans leur interaction avec le champ idéologique dans lequel elles interviennent et qui à son tour les surdétermine. A la lumière de cette double forme d’existence de la philosophie marxiste – en tant que théorie, dans son élaboration, et en tant qu’idéologie, dans son activation – il est possible de réinscrire l’histoire de son introduction en France dans sa problématique originaire, et par là de l’interroger au-delà de la marque du stalinisme qui lui a été imprimée et qui en recouvre comme une pierre tombale sa propre spécificité. / The Cercle de la Russie neuve is commonly described as the place of origin of the “marxisme à la français”, namely, a Marxist thought reduced to Enlightenment materialism, and defined in 1939 as “modern rationalism”. And yet, at first the work of this group was aimed to demonstrate the heterogeneity of Marxism to the French rationalist and materialist tradition, proposing instead a Hegelian reading of Marx's philosophy.