Submitted by Jamile Barbosa da Cruz (jamile.cruz@ucsal.br) on 2016-09-14T19:38:21Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Costa JUNIOR, VLP-2016.pdf: 1582818 bytes, checksum: af8cccd25d84c206747e48883eb24a42 (MD5) / Rejected by Rosemary Magalhães (rosemary.magalhaes@ucsal.br), reason: PALAVRAS-CHAVE on 2016-09-21T22:01:20Z (GMT) / Submitted by Jamile Barbosa da Cruz (jamile.cruz@ucsal.br) on 2016-09-29T17:40:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Costa JUNIOR, VLP-2016.pdf: 1582818 bytes, checksum: af8cccd25d84c206747e48883eb24a42 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Maria Emília Carvalho Ribeiro (maria.ribeiro@ucsal.br) on 2016-11-22T20:57:40Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Costa JUNIOR, VLP-2016.pdf: 1582818 bytes, checksum: af8cccd25d84c206747e48883eb24a42 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-22T20:57:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Costa JUNIOR, VLP-2016.pdf: 1582818 bytes, checksum: af8cccd25d84c206747e48883eb24a42 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-31 / As modificações nas estruturas sociais, políticas, legais e, sobretudo, econômicas, no contexto da acumulação flexível resultaram em mudanças significativas na prestação de serviço da advocacia. A expansão do consumo em massa e padronizado, a desestatização de serviços essenciais, bem como a explosão de faculdades de Direito no Brasil, sobretudo a partir da década de 1990, marcada pelo avanço da agenda neoliberal, fizeram surgir um tipo de organização da advocacia denominada de contencioso de massa. Os escritórios deste setor de serviços jurídicos se dedicam ao patrocínio de acentuado volume de ações, em regra, simples, de matéria jurídica repetitiva, com valores de causa e honorários relativamente modestos, principalmente por tramitarem nos Juizados Especiais de Defesa do Consumidor. O objetivo do estudo consistiu em evidenciar a nova morfologia que abalou os pilares da profissão jurídica nos escritórios do contencioso de massa, suas causas e consequências. Em especial, mostra a indelével correlação entre este tipo de organização e a precariedade do trabalho, que atinge, principalmente, o jovem. O estudo considera jovem o advogado entre 20 e 30 anos, que tenha até 5 anos de inscrição na OAB, utilizando como marco temporal os anos de 2009 a 2014. Ademais, restringiu-se aos profissionais que trabalham para os escritórios que defendem empresas nos Juizados Especiais de Defesa do Consumidor, em Salvador, Bahia. Para conhecer o objeto, a pesquisa utilizou a revisão bibliográfica, análise documental e entrevistas semiestruturadas, feitas com advogados que se enquadram no perfil da análise. Os dados colhidos identificaram que a viabilidade operacional da advocacia massificada depende da automação do processo produtivo, do trabalho simples e repetitivo, mal remunerado, com jornadas extenuantes, vínculos flexíveis, terceirizados e inseguros, mazelas agravadas pela saturação de profissionais no mercado laboral, fenômenos que conduzem as variadas dimensões do trabalho precário. O panorama adverso atinge principalmente o jovem, que, encontra no contencioso de massa uma das poucas vias de acesso a mercado de trabalho. Nesta esteira, o enfrentamento do tema foi essencial para transpor a cortina de fumaça que concebe o advogado como profissional liberal, imune ao processo de precariedade, desvelando o inóspito cenário produtivo dos escritórios do contencioso de massa e íntima relação com a hostilidade laboral que subjuga o jovem advogado. / The modifications in the social, political, legal and above all economic structures in the context of flexible accumulation resulted in significant changes in the lawyers’ work. The expansion of standardized mass consumption, the privatization of essential services, as well as the boom of Law Schools in Brazil, mainly in the 1990’s, marked by the advance of the neoliberal agenda, made arise a new kind of lawyering organization called mass litigation. The offices of this sector of juridical services take on a large number of lawsuits. As a rule, they are simple, of a repetitive nature, with low values and relatively modest fees, mainly because they run in the Special Courts of Consumers’ Protection. The goal of this study was to evidence the new morphology that rocked the pillars of the juridical profession in the mass litigation offices, its causes and consequences. It especially shows the indelible correlation between these kinds of organization and the precariousness of the work, that strikes mainly the young. The study takes into consideration the lawyer who is from 20 to 30 years old and who has had a license to practice law for at most 5 years. The temporal mark was from 2009 to 2014. Furthermore, it was restricted to the ones who work for offices that represent companies in the Special Courts of Consumers’ Protection of Salvador, Bahia. To acknowledge the object, the research used literature review, document analysis and semi-structured interviews of the lawyers who fit the profile. The data identified that the operational feasibility of the mass litigation depends on the automation of the productive process. It also depends on the simple and repetitive work that is ill-paid and has exhaustive work hours. This kind of bond is flexible, uncertain and outsourced. All of those are aggravated by the saturation of professionals in the job market. These phenomena lead to various dimensions of precarious labor. The adverse overview strikes mainly the young, who find in the mass litigation one of the few ways to access the job market. Thus, facing this theme was essential to surpass the smoke curtain that sees the lawyer as a liberal professional who is immune to the precariousness process. It revealed the inhospitable productive scenery of the offices of mass litigation and the intimate relation with the labor hostility that subjugates the young lawyer.

La qualification pénale est classiquement considérée comme une sous-catégorie de la qualification juridique et partage avec elle la même définition et les mêmes caractéristiques. Elle est effectivement conçue comme une opération intellectuelle et, par voie de conséquence, elle est pensée dans sa dimension individuelle. L’opération de qualification apparaît ainsi comme une traduction des faits en droit par la mise en œuvre du langage juridique. Le chercheur qui entend faire de la qualification pénale son objet d’étude est nécessairement confronté à des disciplines qui lui sont peu familières telles que la linguistique ou la psychologie cognitive. Pour contourner les difficultés inhérentes à ces disciplines, il est possible d’opérer un changement de paradigme dans l’approche de la qualification pénale. Elle peut être envisagée sous l’angle du processus. Cette notion permet de rendre à la qualification pénale sa dimension institutionnelle et de l’envisager comme le produit des micros-décisions prises par des acteurs en réseau. Leurs actions respectives constituent les différentes phases de ce processus complexe qui aboutit in fine à la dénomination pénale d’une situation. La présente recherche se propose de mettre en œuvre la notion de processus de qualification pénale dans les contentieux de masse, domaines propices à l’observation des pratiques de qualification. L’analyse de ces pratiques, observées à partir des travaux empiriques, a permis de vérifier l’hypothèse selon laquelle la qualification pénale se construit en réseau. Elle apparaît alors comme le produit de la rencontre des divers acteurs aux prises avec des objectifs et des contraintes institutionnelles. De l’évènement à l’exacte qualification, la dénomination pénale est le fruit d’un processus multifactoriel. / Criminal qualification is conventionally considered as a sub-category of the legal qualification and shares with it the same definition and the same characteristics. It is actually conceived as an intellectual operation and, as a consequence, thought out in its own dimension. This qualifying operation appears as a translation of the facts in law by the use of legal language. The researcher who intends using this qualification process as his purpose of study is necessarily confronted with subjects that are unfamiliar to him such as linguistics and cognitive psychology. To circumvent the difficulties inherent to these subjects, it is possible to make a paradigm shift to the approach of the criminal qualification. It can be forseen in the terms of the process. This concept allows to give the criminal qualification its institutional dimension and to consider it as the product of micro-decisions of actors in a network. Their respective actions form different stages of this complex process which ultimately leads to the criminal definition of a situation. This research proposes to implement the concept of process of criminal qualification in mass litigation, areas that are favorable to the observation of qualification practices. The analysis of these practices observed from empirical work has permitted to verify the hypothesis that criminal qualification is formed through networking. It therefore appears as the product of various actors/participants dealing with objectives and institutional constraints. From the concept to the exact qualification, criminal designation is the result of a multifactorial process.

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-12-05T12:02:28Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Luis Fernando Nishi.pdf: 1135970 bytes, checksum: 574f9acfc5bec6aa454d3d9c22d19cf8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-05T12:02:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Luis Fernando Nishi.pdf: 1135970 bytes, checksum: 574f9acfc5bec6aa454d3d9c22d19cf8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-12-18 / In regard to fundamental rights based on “fraternity”, of essentially collective nature, using comparative and inductive methodology and overcoming the study of legislation, doctrine and jurisprudence, the following research analyses the current effectiveness degree of class actions in Brazil. Considering the New Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure, a parallel is drawn between the introduced trial technique system of so called “mass litigation procedures” and its effects on class actions. At first sight, it seems the prevailing “mass litigation procedures” system withdrawal the class actions legal system. However, the research concludes that “mass litigation procedures” system introduced by the New Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure, whether individual or not, doesn’t replace nor run against class actions legal system, but represents a modern technique to equate demands, strengthen precedents and improve the access and effectiveness of judicial remedies / Diante dos direitos fundamentais assentados na “fraternidade”, de índole essencialmente transindividual, empreende-se por metodologia comparativa e indutiva, com pesquisa à legislação, doutrina e jurisprudência, análise do atual grau de efetividade dos processos coletivos. Nesse contexto, com o advento do Código de Processo Civil de 2015, foi instituído o sistema de julgamento de casos repetitivos, cujos efeitos podem afetar o processamento das ações coletivas, dando a aparente ideia de esvaziamento do microssistema a estas relativo. Todavia, chega-se a conclusão de que os instrumentos introduzidos no sistema de julgamento de casos repetitivos, sejam eles individuais ou não, constituem técnica moderna de equacionamento de demandas, que não substituem ou concorrem com as ações coletivas, buscando em contrapartida o fortalecimento de precedentes, com caráter supletivo e complementar em prol do maior acesso e da efetividade da prestação jurisdicional

A presente dissertação tem por objetivo discutir o problema da litigiosidade de massa por meio da análise das técnicas processuais que conferem repercussão coletiva ao julgamento de demandas individuais. Serão objeto primordial de estudo os mecanismos de julgamento por amostragem, que serão examinados à luz dos princípios da isonomia e do contraditório, de maneira que se possa avaliar se mencionados mecanismos estão aptos a conferir tratamento adequado às demandas repetitivas. Para tanto, busca-se identificar o fenômeno da litigiosidade de massa e seus reflexos no Poder Judiciário, que tem se deparado com novas espécies de conflito, com características próprias e que merecem tratamento homogeneizado. Com base nestes elementos, pretende-se traçar diretrizes fundamentais para um modelo legítimo de julgamento por amostragem, que confira segurança, previsibilidade e legitimidade às decisões proferidas pelo Poder Judiciário. / This work aims to discuss the problem of mass litigation by analyzing the procedural techniques that give collective effect to the judgment of individual demands. Will be primary object of study the mechanisms trial sample, which will be examined in the light of the principles of equality and contradictory, so that it can assess whether those mechanisms are able to give proper treatment to repetitive demands. Therefore, we seek to identify the mass litigation phenomenon and its effects on the Judiciary, which has been facing new kinds of conflict, with its own characteristics and they deserve homogenized treatment. On this basis, we intend to draw basic guidelines for a legitimate model of judgment sample, which offers security, predictability and legitimacy to decisions made by the Judiciary.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:20:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Guilherme Gaspari Coelho.pdf: 1517217 bytes, checksum: b30a1a4f43f23880ba466079a765be3c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-05-15 / The objective of this paper is to analyze the tendency of adaptation of the judicial review to the phenomenon of repetition, typical of our contemporary society and, as consequence of such adaptation, the creation of the ruling based on test claims, which renders adequate treatment to repetitive lawsuits originated by mass litigation. The origins of the phenomenon of massing social relations will be analyzed, as well as the culture of repetition and the considerable increase in recurring to the courts in search of jurisdictional tutelage, which resulted in a historical crisis on the administration of justice in the Brazilian legal system. The shortfalls of traditional litigation procedures and collective litigation to solve the problem of adequate judicial review to repetitive lawsuits will also be analyzed. As a result of these issues, and considering, on the one hand, the influence of the tendency to solve collective issues by aggregation techniques of judicial review, and on the other, the raising appreciation of jurisprudence, it was necessary to develop adequate procedural techniques to deal with mass litigation, having its constitutional foundations on the reasonable duration of the lawsuit, predictability and isonomy. Finally, this paper will examine the peculiarities and polemic issues of the ruling based on sampling technique as applied by the Brazilian superior courts, as well as the new technique as presented on the Bill of the New Code of Procedural Law. The conclusion will support that the adoption of procedural techniques aimed at decisions on repetitive lawsuits is essential to an effective jurisdictional tutelage on such cases, especially when considering the results already obtained by existing techniques / O presente trabalho tem por objetivo analisar a tendência de adaptação da tutela jurisdicional ao fenômeno da repetição, característico da sociedade contemporânea e, como conseqüência desta adequação, a criação da técnica de julgamento por amostragem, apta a dar tratamento adequado aos processos repetitivos decorrentes da litigiosidade em massa. Serão analisadas as origens históricas do fenômeno da massificação das relações sociais, da cultura da repetição e do aumento substancial de procura dos jurisdicionados pela tutela jurisdicional, que acabou por gerar uma histórica crise de administração da justiça no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Também será demonstrada a incapacidade do processo civil tradicional e do processo coletivo para solucionar o problema da adequação da tutela jurisdicional aos processos repetitivos. Nesse sentido, e diante da influência das tendências de coletivização da tutela jurisdicional e valorização de precedentes judiciais, foi crescente a necessidade do desenvolvimento técnicas processuais adequadas às demandas de massa, cujos alicerces constitucionais são a duração razoável do processo, a segurança jurídica e isonomia. Por fim, serão esmiuçadas as peculiaridades e os pontos polêmicos da técnica do julgamento por amostragem nos tribunais superiores, bem como a nova técnica de amostragem sugerida pelo Projeto de Novo Código de Processo Civil. A conclusão será no sentido de que a adoção de técnicas processuais voltadas aos processos repetitivos é um caminho sem volta, já que essencial para a efetiva prestação da tutela jurisdicional, até pelos resultados já obtidos para técnicas já vigentes

Direito processual civil, Mediação e conciliação, Reforma judiciária / The proliferation of individual claims repeating factual and/or legal matters have inspired procedural reforms aimed at the standardization of judgments, the consolidation of precedents and the collectivization of individual claims and searching for effectiveness and legal certainty. Another important response to this repeated litigation is the promotion of consensual dispute resolution, especially conciliation and mediation in the courts. This research investigates how consensual mechanisms are used by courts to deal with repeated litigation and which are the practices and techniques specifically aimed at repeated disputes. The characteristic elements of these repeated disputes are the similarity of the factual and/or legal arguments, the representativeness of the volume of claims and the fact that one of the parties litigates in similar disputes more often, while the other in involved in such type of cases only occasionally. These repeat players are known as the great litigants of the Judiciary, and enjoy certain advantages in terms of bargaining power, resources and information in view of their size and the frequency with which they are involved with similar cases. An empirical research was carried out court programs in Brazil and the United States to study the perceptions of the actors involved in the design and operation these programas on the issues raised. It was found that repeated litigation is a crucial part of court conciliation and mediation programs, influencing the role of the main stakeholders (parties, lawyers and conciliators/mediators), screening and case management practices, access conditions, specific techniques and the role played the Judiciary, who shall also act as manager, designer and institutional mediator. It is concluded that the structure of these programs and the role of those involved can be key factors for an adequate treatment of repeated disputes in the judicial context.

A presente dissertação tem por objetivo discutir o problema da litigiosidade de massa por meio da análise das técnicas processuais que conferem repercussão coletiva ao julgamento de demandas individuais. Serão objeto primordial de estudo os mecanismos de julgamento por amostragem, que serão examinados à luz dos princípios da isonomia e do contraditório, de maneira que se possa avaliar se mencionados mecanismos estão aptos a conferir tratamento adequado às demandas repetitivas. Para tanto, busca-se identificar o fenômeno da litigiosidade de massa e seus reflexos no Poder Judiciário, que tem se deparado com novas espécies de conflito, com características próprias e que merecem tratamento homogeneizado. Com base nestes elementos, pretende-se traçar diretrizes fundamentais para um modelo legítimo de julgamento por amostragem, que confira segurança, previsibilidade e legitimidade às decisões proferidas pelo Poder Judiciário. / This work aims to discuss the problem of mass litigation by analyzing the procedural techniques that give collective effect to the judgment of individual demands. Will be primary object of study the mechanisms trial sample, which will be examined in the light of the principles of equality and contradictory, so that it can assess whether those mechanisms are able to give proper treatment to repetitive demands. Therefore, we seek to identify the mass litigation phenomenon and its effects on the Judiciary, which has been facing new kinds of conflict, with its own characteristics and they deserve homogenized treatment. On this basis, we intend to draw basic guidelines for a legitimate model of judgment sample, which offers security, predictability and legitimacy to decisions made by the Judiciary.

Direito processual civil, Mediação e conciliação, Reforma judiciária / The proliferation of individual claims repeating factual and/or legal matters have inspired procedural reforms aimed at the standardization of judgments, the consolidation of precedents and the collectivization of individual claims and searching for effectiveness and legal certainty. Another important response to this repeated litigation is the promotion of consensual dispute resolution, especially conciliation and mediation in the courts. This research investigates how consensual mechanisms are used by courts to deal with repeated litigation and which are the practices and techniques specifically aimed at repeated disputes. The characteristic elements of these repeated disputes are the similarity of the factual and/or legal arguments, the representativeness of the volume of claims and the fact that one of the parties litigates in similar disputes more often, while the other in involved in such type of cases only occasionally. These repeat players are known as the great litigants of the Judiciary, and enjoy certain advantages in terms of bargaining power, resources and information in view of their size and the frequency with which they are involved with similar cases. An empirical research was carried out court programs in Brazil and the United States to study the perceptions of the actors involved in the design and operation these programas on the issues raised. It was found that repeated litigation is a crucial part of court conciliation and mediation programs, influencing the role of the main stakeholders (parties, lawyers and conciliators/mediators), screening and case management practices, access conditions, specific techniques and the role played the Judiciary, who shall also act as manager, designer and institutional mediator. It is concluded that the structure of these programs and the role of those involved can be key factors for an adequate treatment of repeated disputes in the judicial context.

La régulation du contentieux international des actions de groupe constitue le prolongement dans l'ordre international des fonctions poursuivies par une action de groupe dans l'ordre interne -l'accès en justice, l'efficacité économique et la régulation des marchés - et vise à assurer la sécurité juridique, la prévisibilité et l 'harmonie internationale des solutions ; objectifs également partagés par le droit international privé. Cette régulation s'avère pourtant difficile et complexe, notamment en raison de la concurrence exercée par les ordres juridiques en matière de redressement des dommages de masse, et de l'inadéquation des méthodes et instruments de droit international privé à la résolution d'un contentieux complexe, impliquant une multitude de parties et présentant une forte dimension régulatoire. La globalisation du contentieux international des actions de groupe soulève donc des questions complexes de conflits de juridictions, de conflits de lois, de coordination de procédures ainsi que de reconnaissance et d'exécution des décisions.C'est à ces questions complexes que cette thèse propose de répondre. Les solutions proposées tiennent compte des intérêts enchevêtrés que revêt le contentieux de groupe international, et visent essentiellement à prévenir des hypothèses de sous-régulation et de sur-régulation susceptibles d'empoisonner aujourd'hui le contentieux de masse international. / The regulation of international disputes arising out of group actions consists of safeguarding the functions underlying a domestic group action procedure in the context of international litigation (i.e. access to justice, economic efficiency and market regulation). It also aims to ensure the legal certainty, the predictability and harmony of solutions; the latters are objectives also pursued by the rules of private international law. Such regulation reveals difficult to achieve, in light of the competition arising between the legal systems in relation to the redress of global mass damages and the failure of private international law methods and instruments to address complex disputes putting at stake large number of parties and having a strong regulatory dimension. Thus, the globalisation of group actions disputes raises complex questions of conflicts of jurisdictions, conflicts of laws, coordination of procedures and enforcement of decisions.This PhD dissertation aims at addressing all these complex questions. The suggested solutions take into account the intertwined interests underlying disputes arising out of international group actions and aim essentially to prevent the current intoxication of international mass litigation resulting from the occurrence of situations of under-regulation and overregulation.