Texte remanié de: Dissertation--Fakultät für Orientalistik und Altertumswissenschaft--Heidelberg--Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, 1999. / Contient les textes grecs suivis de leur traduction allemande. Commentaire en allemand. Bibliogr. p. [XI]-XXIX.

Texte remanié de: Dissertation--Fakultät für Orientalistik und Altertumswissenschaft--Heidelberg--Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, 1994. / Contient les textes grecs suivis de leur traduction allemande. Commentaire en allemand. Bibliogr. p. [IX]-XV.

Univ., Diss.--Köln, 2001.

Doctorat en philosophie et lettres / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

This study investigates Mark’s involvement in the writing of 1 Peter in light of the practice of first century letter writing. Many scholars argue that 1 Peter originated from within a Petrine group in Rome that included Silvanus and Mark, ignoring the possibility that Peter might have employed an amanuensis while composing his epistle, a prominent practice of first century letter writers. By contrast, a considerable number of scholars contend that 1 Peter was penned by an amanuensis, appealing to the reference in 1 Pet 5:12, Dia. Silouanou/ u`mi/n tou/ pistou/ avdelfou/( w`j logi,zomai( diV ovli,gwn e;graya, and identifying Silvanus as its amanuensis. However, the Greco-Roman epistolary evidence shows that the formula gra, fw dia, tinoj identified only the letter-carrier. This work explores Mark’s involvement in composing 1 Peter from five angles by means of a historical and comparative approach. The five criteria are the dominant practice of using an amanuensis in first-century letter writing, the noteworthy employment of an amanuensis by Paul as a contemporary of Peter, historical connections, linguistic connections, and literary connections. Chapter 2 surveys the major proposals regarding the authorship of 1 Peter. Chapter 3 examines first century letter writing and presents the findings as a practical and supportive background for this work. The role of an amanuensis in Greco-Roman antiquity was classified as a transcriber, contributor, and composer. An amanuensis’ role as a contributor was the most common in Greco-Roman antiquity. Chapter 4 explores the process of Paul’s letter writing in light of first century letter writing, with regard to Peter’s employment of an amanuensis. It is most likely that Paul and Peter allowed an amanuensis to have a free hand if he was a gifted and a trusted colleague of them. This probability is supported by the instances that Cicero, Atticus, Quintus, and Alexander the Great employed their amanuenses as contributors. Chapter 5 investigates the close relationship between Peter and Mark through their ministry based on 1 Pet 5:13 and the references to Mark in the early church, including Papias’ note reported by Eusebius, and presents these as evidence of a historical connection between two individuals. Chapter 6 explores the syntactic correlation, the distinctive features of terminology, and the significant and frequent use of w`j for a simile between 1 Peter and Mark’s Gospel and presents them as possible evidence with the implication of linguistic connections between them. Chapter 7 examines the common Old Testament quotations (allusions) in 1 Peter and the Gospel of Mark and their conflated and integrated use of the OT and presents them as possible evidence implying a literary connection between them. 1 Peter and Mark’s Gospel outstandingly emphasize the suffering of Christ and apply the imagery of the rejected stone of Ps 118 (LXX 117):22 and that of the suffering servant of Isa 53 to His suffering. This work concludes that Mark was the contributive amanuensis for 1 Peter with Peter allowing more than a free hand in the composition. / Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2008. / New Testament Studies / PhD / unrestricted

It is the author's belief that middle school mathematics is greatly taught in isolation with little or no mention of its origin. Teaching mathematics from a historical perspective will lead to greater understanding, student inspiration, motivation, excitement, varying levels of learning, and appreciation for this subject. This thesis will develop four units that will incorporate original source documents and selected historical topics surrounding computation, numbers, and early calculating devices. Many of the units will center on the Rhind Papyrus and The Treviso Arithmetic. These units will be appropriate to middle school, with an emphasis on 6th grade.

Traditionally papyrus fragments are stored between glass panels in many museum collections. In most exhibits a white precipitation is formed on the inner surface of the glazing which complicates reading and digitalization. With the help of the present study the question of the origin and possibilities for avoiding these precipitations should be answered. It could be shown that the precipitations consist of the salts sodium chloride and sodium nitrate. The chloride and nitrate ions for the salt formation stem from the papyrus whereas the sodium ions are dissolved from the float glass. By the use of higher-quality glass such as borosilicate glass this process can be prevented or at least slowed down. Furthermore a storage of the exhibits at relative humidities below 70 % is recommended.

L’analyse de compromis d’un modèle système a pour but de minimiser ou de maximiser différents objectifs tels que le coût ou les performances. Les méthodes actuelles de type OOSEM avec SysML ou ARCADIA sont basées sur la classification ; il s’agit de définir les différentes variantes de l’architecture d’un système de base puis d’analyser ces variantes. Dans ces approches, les choix d’architecture sont contraints : la plateforme d’exécution et la topologie sont déjà figées. Nous proposons la notion de « points de décision » pour modéliser les différents choix du système, en utilisant de nouveaux stéréotypes. L’avantage est d’avoir une modélisation plus « compacte » des différentes variantes et de piloter l’exploration des variantes en utilisant des contraintes. Lorsque le concepteur définit l’architecture du système, des points de décisions sont insérés dans le modèle du système. Ils permettent de modéliser la redondance ou le choix d’une instance pour un composant, les variations des attributs d’un composant, ou l’allocation des activités sur les blocs. Les fonctions objectifs sont définies dans un contexte d’optimisation à l’aide du diagramme paramétrique de SysML. Nous proposons des transformations du modèle SysML vers un problème de satisfaction de contraintes pour l’optimisation (CSMOP) dont la résolution nous permet d’obtenir l’ensemble des architectures optimales. Cette transformation est implantée dans un démonstrateur (plug-in Eclipse) permettant une utilisation conjointe de l’outil Papyrus et de solveurs, disponibles sous forme de logiciels libres. La méthode est illustrée avec des cas d’étude constitués d’une caméra stéréoscopique puis d’un drone, l’ensemble étant modélisé avec Papyrus. / Finding the set of optimal architectures is an important challenge for the designer who uses the Model-Based System Engineering (MBSE). Design objectives such as cost, performance are often conflicting. Current methods (OOSEM with SysML or ARCADIA) are focused on the design and the analysis of a particular alternative of the system. In these methods, the topology and the execution platform are frozen before the optimization. To improve the optimization from MBSE, we propose a methodology combining SysML with the concept of “decision point”. An initial SysML model is complemented with “decisions points” to show up the different alternatives for component redundancy, instance selection and allocation. The constraints and objective functions are also added to the initial SysML model, with an optimiza-tion context and parametric diagram. Then a representation of a constraint satisfaction problem for optimization (CSMOP) is generated with an algorithm and solved with an existing solver. A demonstrator implements this transformation in an Eclipse plug-in, combining the Papyrus open-source tool and CSP solvers. Two case studies illustrate the methodology: a stereoscopic camera sensor module and a mission controller for an Unmanned Aerial Vehi-cle (UAV).

Dès sa découverte en 1962, le Papyrus de Derveni, le plus ancien manuscrit d'Europe, n'a pas cessé de soulever des interrogations majeures relatives à la transmission, à l'interprétation et à la fonction des textes orphiques. Le Papyrus de Derveni nous fournit aussi un témoignage de premier ordre quant à l'influence de la philosophie présocratique sur les doctrines orphiques. Cette thèse est la première édition critique française du Papyrus de Derveni. Celle-ci comprend un apparat critique complet ainsi que des notes au texte. Ce travail de recherche propose aussi une étude monographique du Papyrus de Derveni. Nous avons porté une attention toute particulière à l'analyse du poème orphique, aux techniques exégétiques employées et aux thématiques philosophiques de l'écrit contenu dans le Papyrus de Derveni. Nous avons, en outre, comparé les doctrines cosmologiques et philosophiques proposées par son auteur avec les théories d'Héraclite d’Éphèse, d'Anaxagore de Clazomènes, de Diogène d'Apollonie et Archélaos d’Athènes. / Since his discovery in 1962, the Derveni Papyrus, the most ancient manuscript of Europe, has rase full of major questions about the transmission, the interpretation and the function of the orphic texts. The Derveni Papyrus offers us an emblematic testimony about the influence of Presocratic Philosophy on the orphic doctrines. This thesis is the first french critical edition of the Derveni Papyrus with a critical apparatus and notes on the text. This research paper also provides a monographic study of this document. We especially focused our attention on the orphic poem quoted by the author of the Derveni Papyrus, on the exegetical technics he employed and on the philosophical doctrines he proposed. We particularly compared the cosmological and philosophical theories of the Derveni Papyrus author with that of Heraclitus of Ephesus, Anaxagoras of Clazomenae, Diogenes of Apollonia and Archelaus of Athens.

Cette thèse est une réédition semi-diplomatique de trois manuscrits copiés dans le dialecte sahidique du copte : Berlin, Papyrussammlung, P. Berol. 22220; Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire, Copte 4-7a; Aswan, Nubian Museum, Special Number 168, ff. 12v-17r. L’édition est accompagnée d’index complets des mots grecs et coptes, d’une introduction détaillée visant à faire la lumière sur le contexte littéraire et culturel dans lequel les textes ont été produits, et d’un commentaire. P. Berol. 22220 est un manuscrit de parchemin d’origine inconnue. Les données paléographiques suggèrent qu’il aurait pu être copié durant le 7e ou le 8e siècle de notre ère. Les fragments de Strasbourg, aussi d’origine inconnue, proviennent d’un codex de papyrus daté approximativement de 600 de notre ère. Enfin, le codex Aswan est un petit manuscrit de parchemin découvert en 1965 à Qasr el-Wizz, en Nubie. On date ce codex aux environs de l’an 1000 de notre ère. Les manuscrits de Berlin et de Strasbourg contiennent la version complète du texte édité ici, mais sont aujourd’hui très fragmentaires. En revanche, le manuscrit de Qasr el-Wizz contient seulement un extrait retravaillé d’une partie du texte. L’ouvrage est connu jusqu’à maintenant comme l’Évangile du Sauveur, l’Unbekanntes Berliner Evangelium ou Strasbourg Gospel Fragments. Toutefois, comme ces titres ne rendent justice ni au genre ni au contenu réel du texte, j’ai choisi de l’appeler l’Apocryphon Berolinense/Argentoratense. Le texte est un discours de révélation de Jésus à ses apôtres, écrit à la première personne du pluriel. Une partie importante du texte est dévolue à un hymne de la Croix. L’hymne est chanté par le Christ alors que les apôtres semblent danser autour de la Croix en répondant « Amen ». Cette section est semblable à l’hymne au Père des Actes de Jean 94-96. L’introduction et le commentaire explorent le cadre littéraire et culturel dans lequel l’Apocryphon Berolinense/Argentoratense fut rédigé. Je propose ici que le texte constitue un des nombreux mémoires pseudo-apostoliques probablement composés en copte au cours des 5e-6e siècles. Ma lecture du texte améliore enfin en plus d’un point les précédentes éditions des trois manuscrits. / The present dissertation is a semi-diplomatic reedition of three manuscripts written in the Sahidic dialect of Coptic: Berlin, Papyrussammlung, P. Berol. 22220; Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire, Copte 4-7a; Aswan, Nubian Museum, Special Number 168, ff. 12v-17r. The edition is accompanied by complete indices of the Greek and Coptic words, an extensive introductory study concerning the literary and cultural context in which the text was written, and commentaries. P. Berol. 22220 is a parchment manuscript of unknown provenance. Paleographical data suggests that it might have been copied during the 7th-8th century CE. The Strasbourg fragments, also of unknown provenance, came from a papyrus codex tentatively dated around 600 CE. Finally, the Aswan codex is a small parchment manuscript discovered in 1965 at Qasr el-Wizz, in Nubia. The codex is roughly datable around 1000 CE. The Berlin and the Strasbourg manuscripts contained the full version of the text edited here, but they have survived very fragmentarily. On the other hand, the Qasr el-Wizz manuscript contains only a reworked extract from a portion of the text. The work has been known until now as the Gospel of the Savior, the Unbekanntes Berliner Evangelium or the Strasbourg Gospel Fragments. However, as these titles fail to conform to the genre and the real content of the text, I have chosen to call it the Apocryphon Berolinense/Argentoratense. The text is a revelation discourse of Jesus to the apostles, written in the first person plural. An important part of the text is occupied by an extensive hymn of the Cross. The hymn is sung by Christ while to apostles are apparently dancing around the Cross answering “Amen.” This section is similar to the hymn to the Father from the Acts of John 94-96. The introductory study and the commentary explore the literary and the cultural setting in which the Apocryphon Berolinense/Argentoratense was written. Here I suggest that the text is one of the numerous pseudo-apostolic memoirs probably composed in Coptic during the 5th-6th century. Finally, my reading of the text contains several improvements to the previous editions of the three manuscripts.