Das hier vorliegende Handbuch ist im Rahmen des Projektes „Vernetztes Forschungsdatenmanagement an Hochschulen für angewandte Wissenschaften am Beispiel der HTW Dresden – FoDaMa-HTWD“ entstanden.1 Es stellt eine kurze und übersichtliche Zusammenfassung der wichtigsten Erkenntnisse dar, welche während der Projektlaufzeit an der Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden (HTWD) zum Forschungsdatenmanagement (FDM) gewonnen wurden. Die Autor/innen möchten mit diesem Handbuch andere Hochschulen für angewandte Wissenschaften (HAW) bei der Strategieentwicklung und dem notwendigen FDM-Strukturaufbau unterstützen. Es richtet sich demnach vorrangig an Personen, die sich an Hochschulen mit der strategischen Weiterentwicklung im Bereich Forschung beschäftigen und sich vielleicht die Frage stellen, welche unterstützenden FDM-Services und Maßnahmen ergriffen werden sollten, damit die Forschenden der eigenen Institution der zunehmenden Forderung nach offener und nachhaltiger Arbeitsweise im Umgang mit Forschungsdaten gerecht werden können. / This handbook was developed within the project ' Vernetztes Forschungsdatenmanagement an Hochschulen für angewandte Wissenschaften am Beispiel der HTW Dresden – FoDaMa-HTWD '. It is a short and clear summary of the most important findings, which were gained during the project at the University of Applied Sciences Dresden (HTWD) on research data management (FDM). With this handbook, the authors would like to support other Universities of Applied Sciences (HAW) in developing strategies and the necessary FDM structure. It is therefore primarily aimed at people who are involved in the strategic development of research at universities and who may ask themselves the question of which supporting FDM services and measures should be taken to ensure that the researchers of their own institution are able to meet the increasing demand for open and sustainable working methods in dealing with research data.

Introduction: The subject of research data management is highly topical and university libraries around the world are working hard to establish a well-functioning support as well as technical solutions to deal with sharing and storing research data. Swedish university libraries are no exception, and this study aims to give a clearer view on how these support functions have come to take the form they have today, what they look like now and what the plans are.  Method: For this study eight people working with research data support at six Swedish university libraries were interviewed about the work of the support groups they are part of. These interviews were recorded and transcribed, and then analysed thematically by colour coding themes in the text.  Analysis and results: The findings show that the persons working with data managing support at these six university libraries agree on many points of how the support needs to be developed to meet the students and researchers needs. One of the most important things of what the research data managing groups need to do are to supply more information sessions, workshops, and teaching to reach out with their knowledge and to make people more aware of their existence and competences. Another is making sure technical solutions are in place to store data throughout the different steps of the research data lifecycle. The training and development of the professionals working in the support groups is also a very important part, as this is a changing subject and the rules and regulations do change. Lastly the interviewees underline the importance of solid motivating factors for researchers to share their data. The data support groups can simplify the process of data sharing and make it easier and smoother for the researcher to do it, but if it is unclear why it should be done it will not happen.  Conclusions: The development of the research data support has been, and is, slow and still ongoing. There is still a fair amount of work to be done, especially when it comes to the technical solutions that will enable safe and FAIR data sharing and storing. But the work that needs to be done cannot come only from university libraries and other university support functions, it must come from publishers, funders and other organisations that have the power to change the norms of data sharing. One of the main blockers of open data today is the lack of motivation for researchers to share their data and to be able to reach the goal of open data 2026 the entire system of merits for researchers needs to change and somehow include data sharing as an important part.  This is a two-year master’s thesis in Library and Information Science.

The ‘Specialised Information Service Benelux / Low Countries Studies’ (FID Benelux) of Münster University and State Library (ULB Münster) is one of at present 41 ‘Specialised Information Services’ (FID) funded by the German Research Foundation. Founded in 2016, the FID Benelux is designed as a one-stop provider of specialised literature and research-specific information about the culture and society of the Benelux countries as well as research supportive services. This article illustrates by means of various examples that the FID Benelux not only deals with border regions and crossing boundaries in the territorial-spatial area, but that it also focuses on the socio-spatial boundary area between scholars and research infrastructures. In this context, aspects such as (cross-border) networking with scholars, research groups and research infrastructures play just as important a role as for instance boundary spanning and knowledge exchange across organisational boundaries in the field of research data management. Last but not least, the ‘Bibliography of Benelux Borderlands Histories’, a current FID-project also dedicated to the topic of borders and boundaries, is presented.

Die Informationsverhaltensforschung liefert zahlreiche Erkenntnisse darüber, wie Menschen Informationen suchen, abrufen und nutzen. Wir verfügen über Forschungsergebnisse zu Informationsverhaltensmustern in einem breiten Spektrum von Kontexten und Situationen, aber wir wissen nicht genug über die Informationsbedürfnisse und Ziele von Forschenden hinsichtlich der Nutzung von Forschungsdaten. Die Informationsverhaltensforschung gibt insbesondere Aufschluss über das literaturbezogene Informationsverhalten. Die vorliegende Studie basiert auf der Annahme, dass diese Erkenntnisse nicht ohne weiteres auf datenbezogenes Informationsverhalten übertragen werden können. Um diese Annahme zu untersuchen, wurde eine Studie zum Informationssuchverhalten von Datennutzenden durchgeführt. Übergeordnetes Ziel der Studie war es, Erkenntnisse über das Informationsverhalten der Nutzenden eines bestimmten Retrievalsystems für sozialwissenschaftliche Daten zu erlangen, um die Entwicklung von Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen zu unterstützen, die das Data Sharing erleichtern sollen. Das empirische Design dieser Studie folgt einem Mixed-Methods-Ansatz. Dieser umfasst eine qualitative Studie in Form von Experteninterviews und – darauf aufbauend – eine quantitative Studie in Form einer Online-Befragung von Sekundärnutzenden von Daten aus Bevölkerungs- und Meinungsumfragen (Umfragedaten). Im Kern hat die Untersuchung ergeben, dass die Einbindung in die Forschungscommunity bei der Datensuche eine zentrale Rolle spielt. Die Analysen zeigen, dass Communities eine wichtige Determinante für das Informationssuchverhalten sind. Die Einbindung in die Community hat das Potential, Probleme oder Barrieren bei der Datensuche zu reduzieren. Diese Studie trägt zur Theorieentwicklung in der Informationsverhaltensforschung durch die Modellierung des Datensuchverhaltens bei. In praktischer Hinsicht gibt die Studie Empfehlungen für das Design von Dateninfrastrukturen, basierend auf empirischen Anforderungsanalysen. / From information behaviour research we have a rich knowledge of how people are looking for, retrieving, and using information. We have scientific evidence for information behaviour patterns in a wide scope of contexts and situations, but we don’t know enough about researchers’ information needs and goals regarding the usage of research data. Having emerged from library user studies, information behaviour research especially provides insight into literature-related information behaviour. This thesis is based on the assumption that these insights cannot be easily transferred to data-related information behaviour. In order to explore this assumption, a study of secondary data users’ information-seeking behaviour was conducted. The study was designed and evaluated in comparison to existing theories and models of information-seeking behaviour. The overall goal of the study was to create evidence of actual information practices of users of one particular retrieval system for social science data in order to inform the development of research data infrastructures that facilitate data sharing. The empirical design of this study follows a mixed methods approach. This includes a qualitative study in the form of expert interviews and – building on the results found therein – a quantitative web survey of secondary survey data users. The core result of this study is that community involvement plays a pivotal role in survey data seeking. The analyses show that survey data communities are an important determinant in survey data users' information seeking behaviour and that community involvement facilitates data seeking and has the capacity of reducing problems or barriers. Community involvement increases with growing experience, seniority, and data literacy. This study advances information behaviour research by modelling the specifics of data seeking behaviour. In practical respect, the study specifies data-user oriented requirements for systems design.

Zwei Innovationen innerhalb von Open Science werden in dieser Dissertation untersucht: Open Access und der Umgang mit Forschungsdaten. Die Ergebnisse zeigen ein positives Meinungsbild gegenüber beiden Innovationen, was sich allerdings nicht in einer übergreifenden Umsetzung in der Wissenschaft niederschlägt. Die disziplinären Unterschiede sind markant. Es lassen sich aber übergeordnete Ebenen herausarbeiten: Soziologische, technische & infrastrukturelle, sowie strategische & monetäre Aspekte gehören hierzu, wobei starke Interdependenzen zu verorten sind. Traditionell werden Qualität und Prestige von veröffentlichten wissenschaftlichen Ergebnissen als Maßgabe für die Reputation eines Wissenschaftlers angesehen, was klar in den Resultaten dieser Arbeit reflektiert ist. Sie präferieren die Nutzung von Publikationsorganen und Arbeitsabläufen, die in der Fachgemeinschaft etabliert sind. Daraus folgt ein zögerlicher Umgang mit Innovationen, z.B. dem offenem Zugang zu Forschungsdaten, wo es nur wenige etablierte Abläufe gibt. In der Diskussion dieser Arbeit wird die Notwendigkeit einer Verbindung zu heutigen Anreizsystemen und damit den Evaluierungssystemen in der Wissenschaft herausgestellt. Neue Strategien diesbezüglich sind im Aufbau, z.B. mit “zählbaren” Publikationen und Zitationen für Forschungsdaten. Die Kernthemen wurden in der Fallstudie der Hochenergiephysik genauer untersucht. Eine digitale Bibliothek erlaubte dort die praktische Implementierung von Open Science Werkzeugen. Die Ergebnisse unterstreichen das Potential: mit gezielten Diensten und Anreizen können Wissenschaftler für Open Science gewonnen werden; in diesem Fall zur Teilnahme in einem Crowdsourcingprojekt der digitalen Bibliothek und zur Umsetzung von „data sharing“. Dem Informationsmanagement kommt dabei eine neue Rolle zu, insbesondere bei einer engen Betreuung von Wissenschaftlern im digitalen Forschungsumfeld. Das kann parallel für die Serviceentwicklung und –begleitung genutzt werden. / Two major Open Science innovations, Open Access and research data sharing, have been studied in detail in this thesis. A large-scale survey and personal interviews are used to gain detailed insights from a range of disciplines. In addition, a case study in the High Energy Physics (HEP) community was used to study the results in practice. The results show that a rather positive attitude towards both, Open Access and research data sharing is not reflected in the researchers’ practices. Disciplinary differences prevail and relate to the different publishing cultures and research workflows. The results indicate that quality and prestige of research output are perceived as very important in determining a researcher’s reputation. Researchers prefer community-approved publication outlets. They hesitate to explore new innovations, such as data sharing, for which only few established workflows exist in digital scholarly communication. Interviewees highlight the significance of a (missing) link between such approaches on the one hand and the current incentive system and the research assessment schemes on the other. The results indicate that barriers can be overcome. In the case study, a strong collaboration with the community facilitated enhanced feedback loops to develop tailored and targeted services for Open Science. Researchers in the case study were successfully engaged in new innovative workflows: a crowdsourcing tool and data sharing in a digital library. The results highlight that opportunities of Open Science are not yet explored widely. But with targeted support, it is possible to build on best practices and develop strategies that engage communities in new innovations. The results furthermore demand new strategies to establish links from Open Science services to the academic incentive system. It is needed to revisit the current research assessment scheme in regard to potential support mechanisms for Open Science.

Die zweite Sektion begann am 4. Oktober mit einem einführenden Vortrag von Klaus Mauersberger über die Entwicklung, die Bewahrung und die Spezifik der Sammlungen der TU Dresden. Mauersberger, langjähriger Mitarbeiter am Zentrum für Geschichte der Technikwissenschaften und seit 1993 Leiter der Kustodie der TU Dresden, gab einen Überblick über die Anfänge, die Aufgaben sowie den Umfang und die Diversität der Dresdner Universitätssammlungen. (...)

Für Wissenschaftler der Technischen Universitäten Dresden und Bergakademie Freiberg, die ihre Forschungsdaten archivieren und publizieren möchten, steht seit Anfang 2018 der Dienst OpARA (Open Access Repository and Archive) als institutionelles Repositorium zur Verfügung. Wissenschaftler haben hier die Möglichkeit, ohne zusätzliche Kosten die Anforderungen der Guten Wissenschaftlichen Praxis an die langfristige sichere Aufbewahrung von Forschungsdaten (Archivierung über mindestens zehn Jahre) unkompliziert zu erfüllen. Der Dienst OpARA wird von den Rechenzentren der beiden Universitäten gemeinsam betrieben, die Daten werden lokal archiviert und optional publiziert. Vor der Archivierung findet ein Begutachtungsprozess statt, um die fachliche und technische Qualität der Daten zu gewährleisten. Es wird dabei insbesondere die Dokumentation und Aufbereitung für Daten, die publiziert werden sollen, unter dem Aspekt einer guten Nachnutzbarkeit beurteilt und bei Bedarf unterstützt.

Bibliography: pages 192-195 / The avoidability, or unavoidability of patterns in words over finite alphabets has been studied extensively. The word α over a finite set A is said to be unavoidable for an infinite set B+ of nonempty words over a finite set B if, for all but finitely many elements w of B+, there exists a semigroup morphism φ ∶ A+ → B+ such that φ(α) is a factor of w. In this treatise, we start by presenting a historical background of results that are related to unavoidability. We present and discuss the most important theorems surrounding unavoidability in detail. We present various complexity-related properties of unavoidable words. For words that are unavoidable, we provide a constructive upper bound to the lengths of words that avoid them. In particular, for a pattern α of length n over an alphabet of size r, we give a concrete function N(n, r) such that no word of length N(n, r) over the alphabet of size r avoids α. A natural subsequent question is how many unavoidable words there are. We show that the fraction of words that are unavoidable drops exponentially fast in the length of the word. This allows us to calculate an upper bound on the number of unavoidable patterns for any given finite alphabet. Subsequently, we investigate computational aspects of unavoidable words. In particular, we exhibit concrete algorithms for determining whether a word is unavoidable. We also prove results on the computational complexity of the problem of determining whether a given word is unavoidable. Specifically, the NP-completeness of the aforementioned problem is established. / Decision Sciences / D. Phil. (Operations Research)

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / In systems biology study, biological networks were used to gain insights into biological systems. While the traditional approach to studying biological networks is based on the identification of interactions among genes or the identification of a gene set ranking according to differentially expressed gene lists, little is known about interactions between higher order biological systems, a network of gene sets. Several types of gene set network have been proposed including co-membership, linkage, and co-enrichment human gene set networks. However, to our knowledge, none of them contains directionality information. Therefore, in this study we proposed a method to construct a regulatory gene set network, a directed network, which reveals novel relationships among gene sets. A regulatory gene set network was constructed by using publicly available gene regulation data. A directed edge in regulatory gene set networks represents a regulatory relationship from one gene set to the other gene set. A regulatory gene set network was compared with another type of gene set network to show that the regulatory network provides additional information. In order to show that a regulatory gene set network is useful for understand the underlying mechanism of a disease, an Alzheimer's disease (AD) regulatory gene set network was constructed. In addition, we developed Pathway and Annotated Gene-set Electronic Repository (PAGER), an online systems biology tool for constructing and visualizing gene and gene set networks from multiple gene set collections. PAGER is available at http://discern.uits.iu.edu:8340/PAGER/. Global regulatory and global co-membership gene set networks were pre-computed. PAGER contains 166,489 gene sets, 92,108,741 co-membership edges, 697,221,810 regulatory edges, 44,188 genes, 651,586 unique gene regulations, and 650,160 unique gene interactions. PAGER provided several unique features including constructing regulatory gene set networks, generating expanded gene set networks, and constructing gene networks within a gene set. However, tissue specific or disease specific information was not considered in the disease specific network constructing process, so it might not have high accuracy of presenting the high level relationship among gene sets in the disease context. Therefore, our framework can be improved by collecting higher resolution data, such as tissue specific and disease specific gene regulations and gene sets. In addition, experimental gene expression data can be applied to add more information to the gene set network. For the current version of PAGER, the size of gene and gene set networks are limited to 100 nodes due to browser memory constraint. Our future plans is integrating internal gene or proteins interactions inside pathways in order to support future systems biology study.

Diploma thesis entitled "Application of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods into Marketing Strategy of Print Medias" discusses employment of output research data accumulated on eye-tracking, in-depth interviewing and CAWI method of research. These research outcomes are further analyzed and implemented in the development process of the EURO Business Weekly strategy in the Czech publishing market. The final evaluation is based on a mutual comparison of results which were recorded by the EURO Business Weekly in the years 2005 and 2006.